Talk:Stormtrooper (Cybertronian) - Revision history

LV at 20:47, 10 December 2010

2010-12-10T20:47:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:47, 10 December 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::"''but I didn't think the term is entirely a generic military term. Maybe it is.''"		::"''but I didn't think the term is entirely a generic military term. Maybe it is.''"
	::It completley is. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 18:11, 5 February 2010 (EST)		::It completley is. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 18:11, 5 February 2010 (EST)

			This doesn't ever seem to have been settled, but to me the quote above makes it seem pretty clear that "Thunderjets" is the most appropriate subgroup name for these guys. -[[User:LV\|LV]] 15:47, 10 December 2010 (EST)

Interrobang: Talk:Stormtrooper (G2 Cybertronian) moved to Talk:Stormtrooper (Cybertronian): Use simplest disambig.

2010-07-30T07:00:37Z

Talk:Stormtrooper (G2 Cybertronian) moved to Talk:Stormtrooper (Cybertronian): Use simplest disambig.

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:00, 30 July 2010
(No difference)

M Sipher at 23:11, 5 February 2010

2010-02-05T23:11:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:11, 5 February 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:I thought about the use of "stormtroopers", but I didn't think the term is entirely a generic military term. Maybe it is. I also thought about putting the article at "Mindset's stormtroopers" but with other articles on stormtroopers I thought this title with a disambiguation was more appropriate. What are you thinking, it should be deleted? I liked the Cybertronain combiners and thought this would be a good place for them. Maybe a section of [[Cybertronian (faction)]] would be better. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 10:08, 5 February 2010 (EST)		:I thought about the use of "stormtroopers", but I didn't think the term is entirely a generic military term. Maybe it is. I also thought about putting the article at "Mindset's stormtroopers" but with other articles on stormtroopers I thought this title with a disambiguation was more appropriate. What are you thinking, it should be deleted? I liked the Cybertronain combiners and thought this would be a good place for them. Maybe a section of [[Cybertronian (faction)]] would be better. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 10:08, 5 February 2010 (EST)
			::"''but I didn't think the term is entirely a generic military term. Maybe it is.''"
			::It completley is. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 18:11, 5 February 2010 (EST)

Starfield at 15:08, 5 February 2010

2010-02-05T15:08:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:08, 5 February 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	If "stormtroopers" was meant to be a subgroup or proper noun, it would have been bolded like "Thunderjet" and "Swarm" were. ("Mindset" isn't bolded here because this wasn't the first mention of his name in this story.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 09:41, 5 February 2010 (EST)		If "stormtroopers" was meant to be a subgroup or proper noun, it would have been bolded like "Thunderjet" and "Swarm" were. ("Mindset" isn't bolded here because this wasn't the first mention of his name in this story.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 09:41, 5 February 2010 (EST)

			:I thought about the use of "stormtroopers", but I didn't think the term is entirely a generic military term. Maybe it is. I also thought about putting the article at "Mindset's stormtroopers" but with other articles on stormtroopers I thought this title with a disambiguation was more appropriate. What are you thinking, it should be deleted? I liked the Cybertronain combiners and thought this would be a good place for them. Maybe a section of [[Cybertronian (faction)]] would be better. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 10:08, 5 February 2010 (EST)

ItsWalky: New page: What is this? "Stormtroopers" is not a proper noun in this instance. It's not a subgroup. It's a description. The narration in the comic goes as such: {{quote|TO THEIR CREDIT, MINDSET...

2010-02-05T14:41:23Z

New page: What is this? "Stormtroopers" is not a proper noun in this instance. It's not a subgroup. It's a description. The narration in the comic goes as such: {{quote|TO THEIR CREDIT, MINDSET...

New page

What is this? "Stormtroopers" is not a proper noun in this instance. It's not a subgroup. It's a description. The narration in the comic goes as such:

{{quote|TO THEIR CREDIT, MINDSET'S STORMTROOPERS -- IN THEIR COMBINED AIRBORNE '''THUNDERJET''' MODES -- DO '''ENOUGH''' DAMAGE... TO GIVE THE '''SWARM''' MOMENTARY PAUSE.}}

If "stormtroopers" was meant to be a subgroup or proper noun, it would have been bolded like "Thunderjet" and "Swarm" were. ("Mindset" isn't bolded here because this wasn't the first mention of his name in this story.) --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 09:41, 5 February 2010 (EST)