Talk:Stumble Bee - Revision history

67.6.107.1: Presumably so he could plant hash in its place.

2012-09-28T05:52:32Z

Presumably so he could plant hash in its place.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:52, 28 September 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: That calls for a supposition on your part that isn't this wiki's job to make. Maybe a note that he MIGHT be fictional would make sense, but he still deserves a page and to be treated as a real character just as gods and such that might be fictional have one. If we don't know for sure. IMO at least.--[[Special:Contributions/76.28.76.206\|76.28.76.206]] 22:13, 27 September 2012 (EDT)		: That calls for a supposition on your part that isn't this wiki's job to make. Maybe a note that he MIGHT be fictional would make sense, but he still deserves a page and to be treated as a real character just as gods and such that might be fictional have one. If we don't know for sure. IMO at least.--[[Special:Contributions/76.28.76.206\|76.28.76.206]] 22:13, 27 September 2012 (EDT)
	::I don't think it takes much supposition to presume that the events depicted in something called ''Decepticon Storytime Theater'' didn't actually happen. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:24, 27 September 2012 (EDT)		::I don't think it takes much supposition to presume that the events depicted in something called ''Decepticon Storytime Theater'' didn't actually happen. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:24, 27 September 2012 (EDT)
			:::He could be a fictionalized version of a real character. Americans tell their children moral-stories about George Washington uprooting a blueberry bush. -[[Special:Contributions/67.6.107.1\|67.6.107.1]] 01:52, 28 September 2012 (EDT)
	Oh hush, you love to nitpick. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:53, 27 September 2012 (EDT)		Oh hush, you love to nitpick. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:53, 27 September 2012 (EDT)

ItsWalky at 02:53, 28 September 2012

2012-09-28T02:53:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:53, 28 September 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: That calls for a supposition on your part that isn't this wiki's job to make. Maybe a note that he MIGHT be fictional would make sense, but he still deserves a page and to be treated as a real character just as gods and such that might be fictional have one. If we don't know for sure. IMO at least.--[[Special:Contributions/76.28.76.206\|76.28.76.206]] 22:13, 27 September 2012 (EDT)		: That calls for a supposition on your part that isn't this wiki's job to make. Maybe a note that he MIGHT be fictional would make sense, but he still deserves a page and to be treated as a real character just as gods and such that might be fictional have one. If we don't know for sure. IMO at least.--[[Special:Contributions/76.28.76.206\|76.28.76.206]] 22:13, 27 September 2012 (EDT)
	::I don't think it takes much supposition to presume that the events depicted in something called ''Decepticon Storytime Theater'' didn't actually happen. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:24, 27 September 2012 (EDT)		::I don't think it takes much supposition to presume that the events depicted in something called ''Decepticon Storytime Theater'' didn't actually happen. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:24, 27 September 2012 (EDT)
			Oh hush, you love to nitpick. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:53, 27 September 2012 (EDT)

Starfield at 02:24, 28 September 2012

2012-09-28T02:24:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:24, 28 September 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	: That calls for a supposition on your part that isn't this wiki's job to make. Maybe a note that he MIGHT be fictional would make sense, but he still deserves a page and to be treated as a real character just as gods and such that might be fictional have one. If we don't know for sure. IMO at least.--[[Special:Contributions/76.28.76.206\|76.28.76.206]] 22:13, 27 September 2012 (EDT)		: That calls for a supposition on your part that isn't this wiki's job to make. Maybe a note that he MIGHT be fictional would make sense, but he still deserves a page and to be treated as a real character just as gods and such that might be fictional have one. If we don't know for sure. IMO at least.--[[Special:Contributions/76.28.76.206\|76.28.76.206]] 22:13, 27 September 2012 (EDT)
			::I don't think it takes much supposition to presume that the events depicted in something called ''Decepticon Storytime Theater'' didn't actually happen. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:24, 27 September 2012 (EDT)

76.28.76.206 at 02:13, 28 September 2012

2012-09-28T02:13:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 28 September 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I hate to nitpick a fine article like this one, but Stumble Bee is probably not an actual "Decepticon from the Aligned continuity family" or a "[[:Category:Prime Decepticons\|Prime Decepticon]]". He appears to be a fictional character from ''Decepticon Storytime Theater''. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:10, 27 September 2012 (EDT)		I hate to nitpick a fine article like this one, but Stumble Bee is probably not an actual "Decepticon from the Aligned continuity family" or a "[[:Category:Prime Decepticons\|Prime Decepticon]]". He appears to be a fictional character from ''Decepticon Storytime Theater''. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:10, 27 September 2012 (EDT)

			: That calls for a supposition on your part that isn't this wiki's job to make. Maybe a note that he MIGHT be fictional would make sense, but he still deserves a page and to be treated as a real character just as gods and such that might be fictional have one. If we don't know for sure. IMO at least.--[[Special:Contributions/76.28.76.206\|76.28.76.206]] 22:13, 27 September 2012 (EDT)

Starfield: New page: I hate to nitpick a fine article like this one, but Stumble Bee is probably not an actual "Decepticon from the Aligned continuity family" or a "[[:Category:Prime Decepticons|Prime Deceptic...

2012-09-28T02:10:15Z

New page: I hate to nitpick a fine article like this one, but Stumble Bee is probably not an actual "Decepticon from the Aligned continuity family" or a "[[:Category:Prime Decepticons|Prime Deceptic...

New page

I hate to nitpick a fine article like this one, but Stumble Bee is probably not an actual "Decepticon from the Aligned continuity family" or a "[[:Category:Prime Decepticons|Prime Decepticon]]". He appears to be a fictional character from ''Decepticon Storytime Theater''. - [[User:Starfield|Starfield]] 22:10, 27 September 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:52, 28 September 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: That calls for a supposition on your part that isn't this wiki's job to make. Maybe a note that he MIGHT be fictional would make sense, but he still deserves a page and to be treated as a real character just as gods and such that might be fictional have one. If we don't know for sure. IMO at least.--[[Special:Contributions/76.28.76.206\|76.28.76.206]] 22:13, 27 September 2012 (EDT)		: That calls for a supposition on your part that isn't this wiki's job to make. Maybe a note that he MIGHT be fictional would make sense, but he still deserves a page and to be treated as a real character just as gods and such that might be fictional have one. If we don't know for sure. IMO at least.--[[Special:Contributions/76.28.76.206\|76.28.76.206]] 22:13, 27 September 2012 (EDT)
	::I don't think it takes much supposition to presume that the events depicted in something called ''Decepticon Storytime Theater'' didn't actually happen. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:24, 27 September 2012 (EDT)		::I don't think it takes much supposition to presume that the events depicted in something called ''Decepticon Storytime Theater'' didn't actually happen. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:24, 27 September 2012 (EDT)
			:::He could be a fictionalized version of a real character. Americans tell their children moral-stories about George Washington uprooting a blueberry bush. -[[Special:Contributions/67.6.107.1\|67.6.107.1]] 01:52, 28 September 2012 (EDT)
	Oh hush, you love to nitpick. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:53, 27 September 2012 (EDT)		Oh hush, you love to nitpick. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:53, 27 September 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:53, 28 September 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: That calls for a supposition on your part that isn't this wiki's job to make. Maybe a note that he MIGHT be fictional would make sense, but he still deserves a page and to be treated as a real character just as gods and such that might be fictional have one. If we don't know for sure. IMO at least.--[[Special:Contributions/76.28.76.206\|76.28.76.206]] 22:13, 27 September 2012 (EDT)		: That calls for a supposition on your part that isn't this wiki's job to make. Maybe a note that he MIGHT be fictional would make sense, but he still deserves a page and to be treated as a real character just as gods and such that might be fictional have one. If we don't know for sure. IMO at least.--[[Special:Contributions/76.28.76.206\|76.28.76.206]] 22:13, 27 September 2012 (EDT)
	::I don't think it takes much supposition to presume that the events depicted in something called ''Decepticon Storytime Theater'' didn't actually happen. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:24, 27 September 2012 (EDT)		::I don't think it takes much supposition to presume that the events depicted in something called ''Decepticon Storytime Theater'' didn't actually happen. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:24, 27 September 2012 (EDT)
			Oh hush, you love to nitpick. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 22:53, 27 September 2012 (EDT)