Talk:Tailpipe (G1) - Revision history

Chris McFeely at 11:01, 30 June 2014

2014-06-30T11:01:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:01, 30 June 2014
Line 11:		Line 11:
	--[[User:TheSpartanD\|TheSpartanD]] ([[User talk:TheSpartanD\|talk]]) 06:53, 30 June 2014 (EDT)		--[[User:TheSpartanD\|TheSpartanD]] ([[User talk:TheSpartanD\|talk]]) 06:53, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
	:'Tailpipe' is being used there as a Transformer euphemism for 'ass', not in reference to a character's name. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 06:57, 30 June 2014 (EDT)		:'Tailpipe' is being used there as a Transformer euphemism for 'ass', not in reference to a character's name. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 06:57, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
			::"Mistake" then. But it was linked to Kup and everything... - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 07:01, 30 June 2014 (EDT)

Jalaguy at 10:57, 30 June 2014

2014-06-30T10:57:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:57, 30 June 2014
Line 10:		Line 10:
	http://s1064.photobucket.com/user/TheSpartanD/media/LSOTW3Tailpipe_zps6066a156.png.html?sort=3&o=0		http://s1064.photobucket.com/user/TheSpartanD/media/LSOTW3Tailpipe_zps6066a156.png.html?sort=3&o=0
	--[[User:TheSpartanD\|TheSpartanD]] ([[User talk:TheSpartanD\|talk]]) 06:53, 30 June 2014 (EDT)		--[[User:TheSpartanD\|TheSpartanD]] ([[User talk:TheSpartanD\|talk]]) 06:53, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
			:'Tailpipe' is being used there as a Transformer euphemism for 'ass', not in reference to a character's name. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 06:57, 30 June 2014 (EDT)

TheSpartanD: /* Last Stand of the Wreckers #3 */ new section

2014-06-30T10:53:00Z

Last Stand of the Wreckers #3: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:53, 30 June 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::: Yeah, more than the face is different. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 18:29, 11 October 2013 (EDT)		::: Yeah, more than the face is different. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 18:29, 11 October 2013 (EDT)
	::::Okay, but I still think the arms and parts of the chest are mostly the same. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 18:31, 11 October 2013 (EDT)		::::Okay, but I still think the arms and parts of the chest are mostly the same. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 18:31, 11 October 2013 (EDT)

			== Last Stand of the Wreckers #3 ==

			Here's that line that mentions Tailpipe in LSOTW #3:
			http://s1064.photobucket.com/user/TheSpartanD/media/LSOTW3Tailpipe_zps6066a156.png.html?sort=3&o=0
			--[[User:TheSpartanD\|TheSpartanD]] ([[User talk:TheSpartanD\|talk]]) 06:53, 30 June 2014 (EDT)

Escargon at 22:31, 11 October 2013

2013-10-11T22:31:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 11 October 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::[http://i.imgur.com/QD7GC9E.jpg Comparison time!] The art was clearly ''inspired'' by the toy, but it clearly and intentionally deviates on the specific details. It's not like, say, Milne's G1-isation of the ROTF Lockdown toy, which mostly just normalised the face and knees, and still has lots of areas which very specifically match the toy. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 18:27, 11 October 2013 (EDT)		::[http://i.imgur.com/QD7GC9E.jpg Comparison time!] The art was clearly ''inspired'' by the toy, but it clearly and intentionally deviates on the specific details. It's not like, say, Milne's G1-isation of the ROTF Lockdown toy, which mostly just normalised the face and knees, and still has lots of areas which very specifically match the toy. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 18:27, 11 October 2013 (EDT)
	::: Yeah, more than the face is different. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 18:29, 11 October 2013 (EDT)		::: Yeah, more than the face is different. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 18:29, 11 October 2013 (EDT)
			::::Okay, but I still think the arms and parts of the chest are mostly the same. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 18:31, 11 October 2013 (EDT)

ItsWalky at 22:29, 11 October 2013

2013-10-11T22:29:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 11 October 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I'd say it's close enough. The only thing I'd see that's really different is that they gave him a more humanoid, non-movie face. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 17:58, 11 October 2013 (EDT)		:I'd say it's close enough. The only thing I'd see that's really different is that they gave him a more humanoid, non-movie face. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 17:58, 11 October 2013 (EDT)
	::[http://i.imgur.com/QD7GC9E.jpg Comparison time!] The art was clearly ''inspired'' by the toy, but it clearly and intentionally deviates on the specific details. It's not like, say, Milne's G1-isation of the ROTF Lockdown toy, which mostly just normalised the face and knees, and still has lots of areas which very specifically match the toy. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 18:27, 11 October 2013 (EDT)		::[http://i.imgur.com/QD7GC9E.jpg Comparison time!] The art was clearly ''inspired'' by the toy, but it clearly and intentionally deviates on the specific details. It's not like, say, Milne's G1-isation of the ROTF Lockdown toy, which mostly just normalised the face and knees, and still has lots of areas which very specifically match the toy. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 18:27, 11 October 2013 (EDT)
			::: Yeah, more than the face is different. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 18:29, 11 October 2013 (EDT)

Jalaguy at 22:27, 11 October 2013

2013-10-11T22:27:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:27, 11 October 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can we ''really'' include the DOTM toy as a repurpose? The art doesn't match any specific details of the toy, just basic kibble placement and colour layouts. They've not really got any more in common than, say, the ''Universe'' Galvatron toy has with his IDW design... [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:55, 11 October 2013 (EDT)		Can we ''really'' include the DOTM toy as a repurpose? The art doesn't match any specific details of the toy, just basic kibble placement and colour layouts. They've not really got any more in common than, say, the ''Universe'' Galvatron toy has with his IDW design... [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:55, 11 October 2013 (EDT)
	:I'd say it's close enough. The only thing I'd see that's really different is that they gave him a more humanoid, non-movie face. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 17:58, 11 October 2013 (EDT)		:I'd say it's close enough. The only thing I'd see that's really different is that they gave him a more humanoid, non-movie face. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 17:58, 11 October 2013 (EDT)
			::[http://i.imgur.com/QD7GC9E.jpg Comparison time!] The art was clearly ''inspired'' by the toy, but it clearly and intentionally deviates on the specific details. It's not like, say, Milne's G1-isation of the ROTF Lockdown toy, which mostly just normalised the face and knees, and still has lots of areas which very specifically match the toy. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 18:27, 11 October 2013 (EDT)

Escargon at 21:58, 11 October 2013

2013-10-11T21:58:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 11 October 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can we ''really'' include the DOTM toy as a repurpose? The art doesn't match any specific details of the toy, just basic kibble placement and colour layouts. They've not really got any more in common than, say, the ''Universe'' Galvatron toy has with his IDW design... [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:55, 11 October 2013 (EDT)		Can we ''really'' include the DOTM toy as a repurpose? The art doesn't match any specific details of the toy, just basic kibble placement and colour layouts. They've not really got any more in common than, say, the ''Universe'' Galvatron toy has with his IDW design... [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:55, 11 October 2013 (EDT)
			:I'd say it's close enough. The only thing I'd see that's really different is that they gave him a more humanoid, non-movie face. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 17:58, 11 October 2013 (EDT)

Jalaguy: Created page with "Can we ''really'' include the DOTM toy as a repurpose? The art doesn't match any specific details of the toy, just basic kibble placement and colour layouts. They've not really g…"

2013-10-11T21:55:33Z

Created page with "Can we ''really'' include the DOTM toy as a repurpose? The art doesn't match any specific details of the toy, just basic kibble placement and colour layouts. They've not really g…"

New page

Can we ''really'' include the DOTM toy as a repurpose? The art doesn't match any specific details of the toy, just basic kibble placement and colour layouts. They've not really got any more in common than, say, the ''Universe'' Galvatron toy has with his IDW design... [[User:Jalaguy|Jalaguy]] 17:55, 11 October 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:01, 30 June 2014
Line 11:		Line 11:
	--[[User:TheSpartanD\|TheSpartanD]] ([[User talk:TheSpartanD\|talk]]) 06:53, 30 June 2014 (EDT)		--[[User:TheSpartanD\|TheSpartanD]] ([[User talk:TheSpartanD\|talk]]) 06:53, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
	:'Tailpipe' is being used there as a Transformer euphemism for 'ass', not in reference to a character's name. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 06:57, 30 June 2014 (EDT)		:'Tailpipe' is being used there as a Transformer euphemism for 'ass', not in reference to a character's name. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 06:57, 30 June 2014 (EDT)
			::"Mistake" then. But it was linked to Kup and everything... - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely\|talk]]) 07:01, 30 June 2014 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 11 October 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::[http://i.imgur.com/QD7GC9E.jpg Comparison time!] The art was clearly ''inspired'' by the toy, but it clearly and intentionally deviates on the specific details. It's not like, say, Milne's G1-isation of the ROTF Lockdown toy, which mostly just normalised the face and knees, and still has lots of areas which very specifically match the toy. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 18:27, 11 October 2013 (EDT)		::[http://i.imgur.com/QD7GC9E.jpg Comparison time!] The art was clearly ''inspired'' by the toy, but it clearly and intentionally deviates on the specific details. It's not like, say, Milne's G1-isation of the ROTF Lockdown toy, which mostly just normalised the face and knees, and still has lots of areas which very specifically match the toy. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 18:27, 11 October 2013 (EDT)
	::: Yeah, more than the face is different. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 18:29, 11 October 2013 (EDT)		::: Yeah, more than the face is different. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 18:29, 11 October 2013 (EDT)
			::::Okay, but I still think the arms and parts of the chest are mostly the same. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 18:31, 11 October 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 11 October 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I'd say it's close enough. The only thing I'd see that's really different is that they gave him a more humanoid, non-movie face. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 17:58, 11 October 2013 (EDT)		:I'd say it's close enough. The only thing I'd see that's really different is that they gave him a more humanoid, non-movie face. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] 17:58, 11 October 2013 (EDT)
	::[http://i.imgur.com/QD7GC9E.jpg Comparison time!] The art was clearly ''inspired'' by the toy, but it clearly and intentionally deviates on the specific details. It's not like, say, Milne's G1-isation of the ROTF Lockdown toy, which mostly just normalised the face and knees, and still has lots of areas which very specifically match the toy. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 18:27, 11 October 2013 (EDT)		::[http://i.imgur.com/QD7GC9E.jpg Comparison time!] The art was clearly ''inspired'' by the toy, but it clearly and intentionally deviates on the specific details. It's not like, say, Milne's G1-isation of the ROTF Lockdown toy, which mostly just normalised the face and knees, and still has lots of areas which very specifically match the toy. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 18:27, 11 October 2013 (EDT)
			::: Yeah, more than the face is different. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 18:29, 11 October 2013 (EDT)