Talk:Tankor (disambiguation) - Revision history

ItsWalky at 20:31, 2 November 2016

2016-11-02T20:31:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 2 November 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Agreed, but not on Octane being Tankor forever. His TR version is in store listings as "Octane." Which isn't ironclad, but if they can get Hot Rod and Trailbreaker back... --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (EDT)		::Agreed, but not on Octane being Tankor forever. His TR version is in store listings as "Octane." Which isn't ironclad, but if they can get Hot Rod and Trailbreaker back... --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
	:::<nowiki></nowiki>''shrugs'' We'll see how that plays out. I'm not vehement on either direction. I sorta feel like he's been "Tankor" long enough to belong on the page (especially given the popular comics' "Tall Tankor/Fat Tankor" thing), but ehn. I don't feel real strong about it either way.--[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:29, 2 November 2016 (EDT)		:::<nowiki></nowiki>''shrugs'' We'll see how that plays out. I'm not vehement on either direction. I sorta feel like he's been "Tankor" long enough to belong on the page (especially given the popular comics' "Tall Tankor/Fat Tankor" thing), but ehn. I don't feel real strong about it either way.--[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:29, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
			::::Oh, definitely put him on this page. I'm just being nitpicky about unimportant tangental things. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 16:31, 2 November 2016 (EDT)

M Sipher at 20:29, 2 November 2016

2016-11-02T20:29:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 2 November 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Agreed. See [[Lugnut]].--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 15:48, 2 November 2016 (EDT)		:Agreed. See [[Lugnut]].--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 15:48, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
	::Agreed, but not on Octane being Tankor forever. His TR version is in store listings as "Octane." Which isn't ironclad, but if they can get Hot Rod and Trailbreaker back... --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (EDT)		::Agreed, but not on Octane being Tankor forever. His TR version is in store listings as "Octane." Which isn't ironclad, but if they can get Hot Rod and Trailbreaker back... --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
			:::<nowiki></nowiki>''shrugs'' We'll see how that plays out. I'm not vehement on either direction. I sorta feel like he's been "Tankor" long enough to belong on the page (especially given the popular comics' "Tall Tankor/Fat Tankor" thing), but ehn. I don't feel real strong about it either way.--[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:29, 2 November 2016 (EDT)

ItsWalky at 20:24, 2 November 2016

2016-11-02T20:24:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 2 November 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I'd just like to say that, yeah, you actually ''can'' completely justify only having one "Major _____" up top. Sometimes there IS only one "major" character with a name used by a lot of schmucks. It happens. As it stands, I think we're probably looking at a long-term name change to "Tankor" for Octane, so sure, he should probably go up here... but even if he didn't, then BM Tankor totally deserves to be separated up top. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 14:39, 2 November 2016 (EDT)		I'd just like to say that, yeah, you actually ''can'' completely justify only having one "Major _____" up top. Sometimes there IS only one "major" character with a name used by a lot of schmucks. It happens. As it stands, I think we're probably looking at a long-term name change to "Tankor" for Octane, so sure, he should probably go up here... but even if he didn't, then BM Tankor totally deserves to be separated up top. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 14:39, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
	:Agreed. See [[Lugnut]].--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 15:48, 2 November 2016 (EDT)		:Agreed. See [[Lugnut]].--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 15:48, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
			::Agreed, but not on Octane being Tankor forever. His TR version is in store listings as "Octane." Which isn't ironclad, but if they can get Hot Rod and Trailbreaker back... --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (EDT)

Jimsorenson at 19:48, 2 November 2016

2016-11-02T19:48:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:48, 2 November 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I'd just like to say that, yeah, you actually ''can'' completely justify only having one "Major _____" up top. Sometimes there IS only one "major" character with a name used by a lot of schmucks. It happens. As it stands, I think we're probably looking at a long-term name change to "Tankor" for Octane, so sure, he should probably go up here... but even if he didn't, then BM Tankor totally deserves to be separated up top. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 14:39, 2 November 2016 (EDT)		I'd just like to say that, yeah, you actually ''can'' completely justify only having one "Major _____" up top. Sometimes there IS only one "major" character with a name used by a lot of schmucks. It happens. As it stands, I think we're probably looking at a long-term name change to "Tankor" for Octane, so sure, he should probably go up here... but even if he didn't, then BM Tankor totally deserves to be separated up top. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 14:39, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
			:Agreed. See [[Lugnut]].--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 15:48, 2 November 2016 (EDT)

M Sipher: Created page with "I'd just like to say that, yeah, you actually ''can'' completely justify only having one "Major _____" up top. Sometimes there IS only one "major" character with a name used b..."

2016-11-02T18:39:51Z

Created page with "I'd just like to say that, yeah, you actually ''can'' completely justify only having one "Major _____" up top. Sometimes there IS only one "major" character with a name used b..."

New page

I'd just like to say that, yeah, you actually ''can'' completely justify only having one "Major _____" up top. Sometimes there IS only one "major" character with a name used by a lot of schmucks. It happens. As it stands, I think we're probably looking at a long-term name change to "Tankor" for Octane, so sure, he should probably go up here... but even if he didn't, then BM Tankor totally deserves to be separated up top. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 14:39, 2 November 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 2 November 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Agreed, but not on Octane being Tankor forever. His TR version is in store listings as "Octane." Which isn't ironclad, but if they can get Hot Rod and Trailbreaker back... --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (EDT)		::Agreed, but not on Octane being Tankor forever. His TR version is in store listings as "Octane." Which isn't ironclad, but if they can get Hot Rod and Trailbreaker back... --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
	:::<nowiki></nowiki>''shrugs'' We'll see how that plays out. I'm not vehement on either direction. I sorta feel like he's been "Tankor" long enough to belong on the page (especially given the popular comics' "Tall Tankor/Fat Tankor" thing), but ehn. I don't feel real strong about it either way.--[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:29, 2 November 2016 (EDT)		:::<nowiki></nowiki>''shrugs'' We'll see how that plays out. I'm not vehement on either direction. I sorta feel like he's been "Tankor" long enough to belong on the page (especially given the popular comics' "Tall Tankor/Fat Tankor" thing), but ehn. I don't feel real strong about it either way.--[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:29, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
			::::Oh, definitely put him on this page. I'm just being nitpicky about unimportant tangental things. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 16:31, 2 November 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 2 November 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Agreed. See [[Lugnut]].--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 15:48, 2 November 2016 (EDT)		:Agreed. See [[Lugnut]].--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson\|talk]]) 15:48, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
	::Agreed, but not on Octane being Tankor forever. His TR version is in store listings as "Octane." Which isn't ironclad, but if they can get Hot Rod and Trailbreaker back... --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (EDT)		::Agreed, but not on Octane being Tankor forever. His TR version is in store listings as "Octane." Which isn't ironclad, but if they can get Hot Rod and Trailbreaker back... --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
			:::<nowiki></nowiki>''shrugs'' We'll see how that plays out. I'm not vehement on either direction. I sorta feel like he's been "Tankor" long enough to belong on the page (especially given the popular comics' "Tall Tankor/Fat Tankor" thing), but ehn. I don't feel real strong about it either way.--[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 16:29, 2 November 2016 (EDT)