Talk:The Ark series - Revision history

Interrobang: Talk:Ark series moved to Talk:The Ark series: Because.

2011-06-09T01:04:17Z

Talk:Ark series moved to Talk:The Ark series: Because.

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:04, 9 June 2011
(No difference)

Khajidha at 18:56, 22 December 2009

2009-12-22T18:56:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:56, 22 December 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::Plus on top of that, I'm not sure it's hugely different from, say, us having Animated Hot Shot's bio pic here, as it's also official content given to an unofficial source to display.		:::Plus on top of that, I'm not sure it's hugely different from, say, us having Animated Hot Shot's bio pic here, as it's also official content given to an unofficial source to display.
	:::I'd probably be willing to give a tentative Keep vote. At the worse, I think we'd at least want to keep a link to the main Blog section, even if we remove the individual links. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 13:22, 22 December 2009 (EST)		:::I'd probably be willing to give a tentative Keep vote. At the worse, I think we'd at least want to keep a link to the main Blog section, even if we remove the individual links. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 13:22, 22 December 2009 (EST)
			::::As you said, Jim, you're basically working for Hasbro. This isn't a case of someone leaking stolen information. I'd say this is something that is basically aboveboard and should be kept. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:56, 22 December 2009 (EST)

Jeysie at 18:22, 22 December 2009

2009-12-22T18:22:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:22, 22 December 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Hmmm... It sure looks official, using the Ark name and all. I wouldn't have guessed. It isn't sanctioned by IDW or Hasbro? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:50, 22 December 2009 (EST)		:Hmmm... It sure looks official, using the Ark name and all. I wouldn't have guessed. It isn't sanctioned by IDW or Hasbro? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:50, 22 December 2009 (EST)
	::'Sanctioned' is a funny word. Let's just say it's not officially licensed by Hasbro. I don't actually think it's 100% cut-and-dried, if we should torch it. The models ARE official Hasbro content, after all, presented by a Hasbro licensee (well, contractor to a Hasbro licensee, but then that's pretty much the same as anything by Furman or Wyatt or whatnot.) It's just presented in a context that's a bit different. I think it's worth a debate, anyway. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 13:10, 22 December 2009 (EST)		::'Sanctioned' is a funny word. Let's just say it's not officially licensed by Hasbro. I don't actually think it's 100% cut-and-dried, if we should torch it. The models ARE official Hasbro content, after all, presented by a Hasbro licensee (well, contractor to a Hasbro licensee, but then that's pretty much the same as anything by Furman or Wyatt or whatnot.) It's just presented in a context that's a bit different. I think it's worth a debate, anyway. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 13:10, 22 December 2009 (EST)
			:::It's sticky, to be sure. We're not entirely devoid of official-yet-never-officially-''published'' content--G1 Blades' main pic, for example. Nor are we even devoid of unofficial content by official creators, a la Alignment.
			:::Plus on top of that, I'm not sure it's hugely different from, say, us having Animated Hot Shot's bio pic here, as it's also official content given to an unofficial source to display.
			:::I'd probably be willing to give a tentative Keep vote. At the worse, I think we'd at least want to keep a link to the main Blog section, even if we remove the individual links. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 13:22, 22 December 2009 (EST)

Jimsorenson at 18:10, 22 December 2009

2009-12-22T18:10:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:10, 22 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So, this page is very flattering, but I'm not 100% sure The Ark Addendum should be covered in such detail. It is, after all, unofficial. I mean, the MODELS are official, of course, but The Ark Addendum branding I put around it is not.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 11:25, 22 December 2009 (EST)		So, this page is very flattering, but I'm not 100% sure The Ark Addendum should be covered in such detail. It is, after all, unofficial. I mean, the MODELS are official, of course, but The Ark Addendum branding I put around it is not.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 11:25, 22 December 2009 (EST)
	:Hmmm... It sure looks official, using the Ark name and all. I wouldn't have guessed. It isn't sanctioned by IDW or Hasbro? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:50, 22 December 2009 (EST)		:Hmmm... It sure looks official, using the Ark name and all. I wouldn't have guessed. It isn't sanctioned by IDW or Hasbro? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:50, 22 December 2009 (EST)
			::'Sanctioned' is a funny word. Let's just say it's not officially licensed by Hasbro. I don't actually think it's 100% cut-and-dried, if we should torch it. The models ARE official Hasbro content, after all, presented by a Hasbro licensee (well, contractor to a Hasbro licensee, but then that's pretty much the same as anything by Furman or Wyatt or whatnot.) It's just presented in a context that's a bit different. I think it's worth a debate, anyway. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 13:10, 22 December 2009 (EST)

Starfield at 17:50, 22 December 2009

2009-12-22T17:50:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:50, 22 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So, this page is very flattering, but I'm not 100% sure The Ark Addendum should be covered in such detail. It is, after all, unofficial. I mean, the MODELS are official, of course, but The Ark Addendum branding I put around it is not.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 11:25, 22 December 2009 (EST)		So, this page is very flattering, but I'm not 100% sure The Ark Addendum should be covered in such detail. It is, after all, unofficial. I mean, the MODELS are official, of course, but The Ark Addendum branding I put around it is not.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 11:25, 22 December 2009 (EST)
			:Hmmm... It sure looks official, using the Ark name and all. I wouldn't have guessed. It isn't sanctioned by IDW or Hasbro? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 12:50, 22 December 2009 (EST)

Jimsorenson: New page: So, this page is very flattering, but I'm not 100% sure The Ark Addendum should be covered in such detail. It is, after all, unofficial. I mean, the MODELS are official, of course, but T...

2009-12-22T16:25:01Z

New page: So, this page is very flattering, but I'm not 100% sure The Ark Addendum should be covered in such detail. It is, after all, unofficial. I mean, the MODELS are official, of course, but T...

New page

So, this page is very flattering, but I'm not 100% sure The Ark Addendum should be covered in such detail. It is, after all, unofficial. I mean, the MODELS are official, of course, but The Ark Addendum branding I put around it is not.--[[User:Jimsorenson|Jimsorenson]] 11:25, 22 December 2009 (EST)