Talk:The Arrival issue 3 - Revision history

Sharpfinger: discussion about guzzle/scorponok

2012-03-11T13:54:30Z

discussion about guzzle/scorponok

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:54, 11 March 2012
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Why we have this "Guzzle" and "Scorponok" entries? Do we have any official statement that those characters are Animated Guzzle and Animated Scorponok? If not, I think is better to remove them from Featured Character list. Maybe they can have a text in "Notes" (in the last scene we have a small G1 Optimus Prime, should we list him as "Optimus Prime" in Featured Characters?). What do you think? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 23:41, 10 March 2012 (EST)		Why we have this "Guzzle" and "Scorponok" entries? Do we have any official statement that those characters are Animated Guzzle and Animated Scorponok? If not, I think is better to remove them from Featured Character list. Maybe they can have a text in "Notes" (in the last scene we have a small G1 Optimus Prime, should we list him as "Optimus Prime" in Featured Characters?). What do you think? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 23:41, 10 March 2012 (EST)
	:When the homage is that blatant, we don't need an official statement. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:15, 11 March 2012 (EST)		:When the homage is that blatant, we don't need an official statement. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:15, 11 March 2012 (EST)
	:So, we need to include the G1 Optimus Prime showed in comic's last frame in the Featured Characters. The homage in those scenes didn't means that those generics are the Animated version of those characters. Didn't this information be better in Notes? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 00:30, 11 March 2012 (EST)		::So, we need to include the G1 Optimus Prime showed in comic's last frame in the Featured Characters. The homage in those scenes didn't means that those generics are the Animated version of those characters. Didn't this information be better in Notes? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 00:30, 11 March 2012 (EST)
	::No, because in that case there already exists an Optimus Prime. There's no other Animated Guzzle to contradict this one. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:36, 11 March 2012 (EST)		:::No, because in that case there already exists an Optimus Prime. There's no other Animated Guzzle to contradict this one. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:36, 11 March 2012 (EST)
			::::Ok got the idea. Thanks! --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 09:54, 11 March 2012 (EDT)

Detour at 05:36, 11 March 2012

2012-03-11T05:36:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:36, 11 March 2012
Line 24:		Line 24:
	:When the homage is that blatant, we don't need an official statement. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:15, 11 March 2012 (EST)		:When the homage is that blatant, we don't need an official statement. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:15, 11 March 2012 (EST)
	:So, we need to include the G1 Optimus Prime showed in comic's last frame in the Featured Characters. The homage in those scenes didn't means that those generics are the Animated version of those characters. Didn't this information be better in Notes? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 00:30, 11 March 2012 (EST)		:So, we need to include the G1 Optimus Prime showed in comic's last frame in the Featured Characters. The homage in those scenes didn't means that those generics are the Animated version of those characters. Didn't this information be better in Notes? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 00:30, 11 March 2012 (EST)
			::No, because in that case there already exists an Optimus Prime. There's no other Animated Guzzle to contradict this one. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:36, 11 March 2012 (EST)

Sharpfinger: discussion about guzzle/scorponok

2012-03-11T05:30:31Z

discussion about guzzle/scorponok

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:30, 11 March 2012
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Why we have this "Guzzle" and "Scorponok" entries? Do we have any official statement that those characters are Animated Guzzle and Animated Scorponok? If not, I think is better to remove them from Featured Character list. Maybe they can have a text in "Notes" (in the last scene we have a small G1 Optimus Prime, should we list him as "Optimus Prime" in Featured Characters?). What do you think? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 23:41, 10 March 2012 (EST)		Why we have this "Guzzle" and "Scorponok" entries? Do we have any official statement that those characters are Animated Guzzle and Animated Scorponok? If not, I think is better to remove them from Featured Character list. Maybe they can have a text in "Notes" (in the last scene we have a small G1 Optimus Prime, should we list him as "Optimus Prime" in Featured Characters?). What do you think? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 23:41, 10 March 2012 (EST)
	:When the homage is that blatant, we don't need an official statement. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:15, 11 March 2012 (EST)		:When the homage is that blatant, we don't need an official statement. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:15, 11 March 2012 (EST)
			:So, we need to include the G1 Optimus Prime showed in comic's last frame in the Featured Characters. The homage in those scenes didn't means that those generics are the Animated version of those characters. Didn't this information be better in Notes? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 00:30, 11 March 2012 (EST)

Detour: /* Not official characters */

2012-03-11T05:15:06Z

Not official characters

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 11 March 2012
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Why we have this "Guzzle" and "Scorponok" entries? Do we have any official statement that those characters are Animated Guzzle and Animated Scorponok? If not, I think is better to remove them from Featured Character list. Maybe they can have a text in "Notes" (in the last scene we have a small G1 Optimus Prime, should we list him as "Optimus Prime" in Featured Characters?). What do you think? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 23:41, 10 March 2012 (EST)		Why we have this "Guzzle" and "Scorponok" entries? Do we have any official statement that those characters are Animated Guzzle and Animated Scorponok? If not, I think is better to remove them from Featured Character list. Maybe they can have a text in "Notes" (in the last scene we have a small G1 Optimus Prime, should we list him as "Optimus Prime" in Featured Characters?). What do you think? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 23:41, 10 March 2012 (EST)
			:When the homage is that blatant, we don't need an official statement. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:15, 11 March 2012 (EST)

Sharpfinger: Ask about non-official characters listed in the article

2012-03-11T04:41:00Z

Ask about non-official characters listed in the article

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:41, 11 March 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:
	For the Bots of Science section, shouldn't most of these "cameos" get their own pages? It seems our general policy for animated is that, if a character can be identified as being based on a Transformer of a previous generation, they're not a generic. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 13:59, 29 January 2011 (EST)		For the Bots of Science section, shouldn't most of these "cameos" get their own pages? It seems our general policy for animated is that, if a character can be identified as being based on a Transformer of a previous generation, they're not a generic. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 13:59, 29 January 2011 (EST)
	:I think you want [[Bots of Science\|this page]]. There weren't any characters beyond those mentioned already in this version of the story. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:45, 29 January 2011 (EST)		:I think you want [[Bots of Science\|this page]]. There weren't any characters beyond those mentioned already in this version of the story. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:45, 29 January 2011 (EST)

			== Not official characters ==

			Why we have this "Guzzle" and "Scorponok" entries? Do we have any official statement that those characters are Animated Guzzle and Animated Scorponok? If not, I think is better to remove them from Featured Character list. Maybe they can have a text in "Notes" (in the last scene we have a small G1 Optimus Prime, should we list him as "Optimus Prime" in Featured Characters?). What do you think? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 23:41, 10 March 2012 (EST)

ItsWalky: /* Aren't they new characters? :\ */

2011-01-29T19:45:11Z

Aren't they new characters? :\

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 29 January 2011
Line 17:		Line 17:

	For the Bots of Science section, shouldn't most of these "cameos" get their own pages? It seems our general policy for animated is that, if a character can be identified as being based on a Transformer of a previous generation, they're not a generic. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 13:59, 29 January 2011 (EST)		For the Bots of Science section, shouldn't most of these "cameos" get their own pages? It seems our general policy for animated is that, if a character can be identified as being based on a Transformer of a previous generation, they're not a generic. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 13:59, 29 January 2011 (EST)
			:I think you want [[Bots of Science\|this page]]. There weren't any characters beyond those mentioned already in this version of the story. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 14:45, 29 January 2011 (EST)

Ascendron: /* Aren't they new characters? :\ */ new section

2011-01-29T18:59:19Z

Aren't they new characters? :\: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 29 January 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Should the standalone issue of Bots of Science be added to this page? It has some additional content not in the Arrival issue, notably a bunch of cameos in the first few pages. --[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 17:10, 18 October 2010 (EDT)		Should the standalone issue of Bots of Science be added to this page? It has some additional content not in the Arrival issue, notably a bunch of cameos in the first few pages. --[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 17:10, 18 October 2010 (EDT)

			== Aren't they new characters? :\ ==

			For the Bots of Science section, shouldn't most of these "cameos" get their own pages? It seems our general policy for animated is that, if a character can be identified as being based on a Transformer of a previous generation, they're not a generic. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] 13:59, 29 January 2011 (EST)

MistaTee: /* 'Bots of Science , the issue */ new section

2010-10-18T21:10:27Z

'Bots of Science , the issue: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:10, 18 October 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:

	It looks that the picture is repeated, can I delete the clone, even though it has a joke on it?-[[User:ACIDSTORM92\|ACIDSTORM92]] 21:45, 7 October 2010 (EDT)		It looks that the picture is repeated, can I delete the clone, even though it has a joke on it?-[[User:ACIDSTORM92\|ACIDSTORM92]] 21:45, 7 October 2010 (EDT)

			== 'Bots of Science , the issue ==

			Should the standalone issue of Bots of Science be added to this page? It has some additional content not in the Arrival issue, notably a bunch of cameos in the first few pages. --[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] 17:10, 18 October 2010 (EDT)

ACIDSTORM92: /* Can I remove the other picture? */ new section

2010-10-08T01:45:25Z

Can I remove the other picture?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:45, 8 October 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:

	So, he's got a character model, and the creator has given him a name. So does this technically make him an official character? [[User:Eire]] 22.15 Jan 16 2010 (UTC)		So, he's got a character model, and the creator has given him a name. So does this technically make him an official character? [[User:Eire]] 22.15 Jan 16 2010 (UTC)

			== Can I remove the other picture? ==

			It looks that the picture is repeated, can I delete the clone, even though it has a joke on it?-[[User:ACIDSTORM92\|ACIDSTORM92]] 21:45, 7 October 2010 (EDT)

Eire: New page: ==Orange Sentinel new character?== This was posted on DA today http://theboo.deviantart.com/art/TFA-Sentinel-Supreme-Design-150625604 So, he's got a character model, and the creator has ...

2010-01-16T22:17:18Z

New page: ==Orange Sentinel new character?== This was posted on DA today http://theboo.deviantart.com/art/TFA-Sentinel-Supreme-Design-150625604 So, he's got a character model, and the creator has ...

New page

==Orange Sentinel new character?==
This was posted on DA today

http://theboo.deviantart.com/art/TFA-Sentinel-Supreme-Design-150625604

So, he's got a character model, and the creator has given him a name. So does this technically make him an official character? [[User:Eire]] 22.15 Jan 16 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:54, 11 March 2012
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Why we have this "Guzzle" and "Scorponok" entries? Do we have any official statement that those characters are Animated Guzzle and Animated Scorponok? If not, I think is better to remove them from Featured Character list. Maybe they can have a text in "Notes" (in the last scene we have a small G1 Optimus Prime, should we list him as "Optimus Prime" in Featured Characters?). What do you think? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 23:41, 10 March 2012 (EST)		Why we have this "Guzzle" and "Scorponok" entries? Do we have any official statement that those characters are Animated Guzzle and Animated Scorponok? If not, I think is better to remove them from Featured Character list. Maybe they can have a text in "Notes" (in the last scene we have a small G1 Optimus Prime, should we list him as "Optimus Prime" in Featured Characters?). What do you think? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 23:41, 10 March 2012 (EST)
	:When the homage is that blatant, we don't need an official statement. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:15, 11 March 2012 (EST)		:When the homage is that blatant, we don't need an official statement. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:15, 11 March 2012 (EST)
	:So, we need to include the G1 Optimus Prime showed in comic's last frame in the Featured Characters. The homage in those scenes didn't means that those generics are the Animated version of those characters. Didn't this information be better in Notes? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 00:30, 11 March 2012 (EST)		::So, we need to include the G1 Optimus Prime showed in comic's last frame in the Featured Characters. The homage in those scenes didn't means that those generics are the Animated version of those characters. Didn't this information be better in Notes? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 00:30, 11 March 2012 (EST)
	::No, because in that case there already exists an Optimus Prime. There's no other Animated Guzzle to contradict this one. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:36, 11 March 2012 (EST)		:::No, because in that case there already exists an Optimus Prime. There's no other Animated Guzzle to contradict this one. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:36, 11 March 2012 (EST)
			::::Ok got the idea. Thanks! --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 09:54, 11 March 2012 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:36, 11 March 2012
Line 24:		Line 24:
	:When the homage is that blatant, we don't need an official statement. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:15, 11 March 2012 (EST)		:When the homage is that blatant, we don't need an official statement. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:15, 11 March 2012 (EST)
	:So, we need to include the G1 Optimus Prime showed in comic's last frame in the Featured Characters. The homage in those scenes didn't means that those generics are the Animated version of those characters. Didn't this information be better in Notes? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 00:30, 11 March 2012 (EST)		:So, we need to include the G1 Optimus Prime showed in comic's last frame in the Featured Characters. The homage in those scenes didn't means that those generics are the Animated version of those characters. Didn't this information be better in Notes? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 00:30, 11 March 2012 (EST)
			::No, because in that case there already exists an Optimus Prime. There's no other Animated Guzzle to contradict this one. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:36, 11 March 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:30, 11 March 2012
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Why we have this "Guzzle" and "Scorponok" entries? Do we have any official statement that those characters are Animated Guzzle and Animated Scorponok? If not, I think is better to remove them from Featured Character list. Maybe they can have a text in "Notes" (in the last scene we have a small G1 Optimus Prime, should we list him as "Optimus Prime" in Featured Characters?). What do you think? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 23:41, 10 March 2012 (EST)		Why we have this "Guzzle" and "Scorponok" entries? Do we have any official statement that those characters are Animated Guzzle and Animated Scorponok? If not, I think is better to remove them from Featured Character list. Maybe they can have a text in "Notes" (in the last scene we have a small G1 Optimus Prime, should we list him as "Optimus Prime" in Featured Characters?). What do you think? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 23:41, 10 March 2012 (EST)
	:When the homage is that blatant, we don't need an official statement. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:15, 11 March 2012 (EST)		:When the homage is that blatant, we don't need an official statement. --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 00:15, 11 March 2012 (EST)
			:So, we need to include the G1 Optimus Prime showed in comic's last frame in the Featured Characters. The homage in those scenes didn't means that those generics are the Animated version of those characters. Didn't this information be better in Notes? --[[User:Sharpfinger\|Sharpfinger]] 00:30, 11 March 2012 (EST)