Talk:The Immobilizer - Revision history

Starfield: /* What was damaged on Starscream? */ new section

2012-06-06T01:27:26Z

What was damaged on Starscream?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:27, 6 June 2012
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:Evidently, the disambiguation notice at the top of the page does not exist for you.		:Evidently, the disambiguation notice at the top of the page does not exist for you.
	:We've gone over this before. Disambiguation parentheses in the name of articles only exist because two different articles cannot occupy the same name. Their main purpose is not to convey information or alleviate the specter that is "confusion". [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:00, 1 June 2010 (EDT)		:We've gone over this before. Disambiguation parentheses in the name of articles only exist because two different articles cannot occupy the same name. Their main purpose is not to convey information or alleviate the specter that is "confusion". [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:00, 1 June 2010 (EDT)

			== What was damaged on Starscream? ==

			What does Starscream say he damaged? His telemeter? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 21:27, 5 June 2012 (EDT)

Interrobang at 20:19, 1 June 2010

2010-06-01T20:19:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 1 June 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:
	== Disambiguation ==		== Disambiguation ==

	I really don't like that the definite article is all that separates this page from [[Immobilizer]]. I mean, there was only one such device so TECHNICALLY it is "the" Immobilizer (as opposed to being "an" Immobilizer - one of many). Leaving these pages without disambig tags just seems like saying there is no chance the names could be confused and that's just wrong. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:35, 1 June 2010 (EDT)		I really don't like that the definite article is all that separates this page from [[Wheeljack Instant Immobilizer\|Immobilizer]]. I mean, there was only one such device so TECHNICALLY it is "the" Immobilizer (as opposed to being "an" Immobilizer - one of many). Leaving these pages without disambig tags just seems like saying there is no chance the names could be confused and that's just wrong. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:35, 1 June 2010 (EDT)
	:Evidently, the disambiguation notice at the top of the page does not exist for you.		:Evidently, the disambiguation notice at the top of the page does not exist for you.
	:We've gone over this before. Disambiguation parentheses in the name of articles only exist because two different articles cannot occupy the same name. Their main purpose is not to convey information or alleviate the specter that is "confusion". [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:00, 1 June 2010 (EDT)		:We've gone over this before. Disambiguation parentheses in the name of articles only exist because two different articles cannot occupy the same name. Their main purpose is not to convey information or alleviate the specter that is "confusion". [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:00, 1 June 2010 (EDT)

Interrobang: /* Disambiguation */

2010-06-01T20:00:05Z

Disambiguation

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 1 June 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:

	I really don't like that the definite article is all that separates this page from [[Immobilizer]]. I mean, there was only one such device so TECHNICALLY it is "the" Immobilizer (as opposed to being "an" Immobilizer - one of many). Leaving these pages without disambig tags just seems like saying there is no chance the names could be confused and that's just wrong. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:35, 1 June 2010 (EDT)		I really don't like that the definite article is all that separates this page from [[Immobilizer]]. I mean, there was only one such device so TECHNICALLY it is "the" Immobilizer (as opposed to being "an" Immobilizer - one of many). Leaving these pages without disambig tags just seems like saying there is no chance the names could be confused and that's just wrong. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:35, 1 June 2010 (EDT)
			:Evidently, the disambiguation notice at the top of the page does not exist for you.
			:We've gone over this before. Disambiguation parentheses in the name of articles only exist because two different articles cannot occupy the same name. Their main purpose is not to convey information or alleviate the specter that is "confusion". [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:00, 1 June 2010 (EDT)

Khajidha: /* Disambiguation */ new section

2010-06-01T18:35:07Z

Disambiguation: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:35, 1 June 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:Actually, no. I don't see what you are getting at. W.I.I.? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:16, 12 February 2010 (EST)		:Actually, no. I don't see what you are getting at. W.I.I.? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:16, 12 February 2010 (EST)
	::He's referring to the Nintendo wii. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:06, 12 February 2010 (EST)		::He's referring to the Nintendo wii. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:06, 12 February 2010 (EST)

			== Disambiguation ==

			I really don't like that the definite article is all that separates this page from [[Immobilizer]]. I mean, there was only one such device so TECHNICALLY it is "the" Immobilizer (as opposed to being "an" Immobilizer - one of many). Leaving these pages without disambig tags just seems like saying there is no chance the names could be confused and that's just wrong. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:35, 1 June 2010 (EDT)

Khajidha: /* Fun with Acronyms */

2010-02-12T22:06:35Z

Fun with Acronyms

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 12 February 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::Don't see how it is funny. If the two devices had some similarity to each other, maybe. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:50, 12 February 2010 (EST)		::::Don't see how it is funny. If the two devices had some similarity to each other, maybe. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:50, 12 February 2010 (EST)
	:Actually, no. I don't see what you are getting at. W.I.I.? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:16, 12 February 2010 (EST)		:Actually, no. I don't see what you are getting at. W.I.I.? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:16, 12 February 2010 (EST)
			::He's referring to the Nintendo wii. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:06, 12 February 2010 (EST)

Starfield: /* Fun with Acronyms */

2010-02-12T21:16:01Z

Fun with Acronyms

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:16, 12 February 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::: Well, duh. But it's a funny one. Go to TVtropes and look up Fun With Acronyms and Reverse Funny Aneurysm. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 13:43, 12 February 2010 (EST)		::: Well, duh. But it's a funny one. Go to TVtropes and look up Fun With Acronyms and Reverse Funny Aneurysm. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 13:43, 12 February 2010 (EST)
	::::Don't see how it is funny. If the two devices had some similarity to each other, maybe. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:50, 12 February 2010 (EST)		::::Don't see how it is funny. If the two devices had some similarity to each other, maybe. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:50, 12 February 2010 (EST)
			:Actually, no. I don't see what you are getting at. W.I.I.? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:16, 12 February 2010 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Fun with Acronyms */

2010-02-12T18:50:20Z

Fun with Acronyms

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 12 February 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::Unless time flows backwards in Japan, it's just a coincidence. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:23, 11 February 2010 (EST)		::Unless time flows backwards in Japan, it's just a coincidence. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:23, 11 February 2010 (EST)
	::: Well, duh. But it's a funny one. Go to TVtropes and look up Fun With Acronyms and Reverse Funny Aneurysm. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 13:43, 12 February 2010 (EST)		::: Well, duh. But it's a funny one. Go to TVtropes and look up Fun With Acronyms and Reverse Funny Aneurysm. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 13:43, 12 February 2010 (EST)
			::::Don't see how it is funny. If the two devices had some similarity to each other, maybe. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:50, 12 February 2010 (EST)

ZeldaTheSwordsman: /* Fun with Acronyms */

2010-02-12T18:43:36Z

Fun with Acronyms

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 12 February 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Wheeljack Instant Immobilizer. W.I.I. See what I'm getting at? [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 14:04, 11 February 2010 (EST)		Wheeljack Instant Immobilizer. W.I.I. See what I'm getting at? [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 14:04, 11 February 2010 (EST)
	::Unless time flows backwards in Japan, it's just a coincidence. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:23, 11 February 2010 (EST)		::Unless time flows backwards in Japan, it's just a coincidence. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:23, 11 February 2010 (EST)
			::: Well, duh. But it's a funny one. Go to TVtropes and look up Fun With Acronyms and Reverse Funny Aneurysm. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 13:43, 12 February 2010 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Fun with Acronyms */

2010-02-11T19:23:32Z

Fun with Acronyms

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:23, 11 February 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	* I'm pretty sure we should point this out somewhere.		* I'm pretty sure we should point this out somewhere.
	Wheeljack Instant Immobilizer. W.I.I. See what I'm getting at? [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 14:04, 11 February 2010 (EST)		Wheeljack Instant Immobilizer. W.I.I. See what I'm getting at? [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 14:04, 11 February 2010 (EST)
			::Unless time flows backwards in Japan, it's just a coincidence. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:23, 11 February 2010 (EST)

ZeldaTheSwordsman: /* Fun with Acronyms */ new section

2010-02-11T19:04:10Z

Fun with Acronyms: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 11 February 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Is it really necessary to list "Immobilizer" as the Japanese title? This doesn't seem like a truly different title, rather a stylistic choice of whether to include the article along with the noun. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 01:16, 26 June 2009 (EDT)		Is it really necessary to list "Immobilizer" as the Japanese title? This doesn't seem like a truly different title, rather a stylistic choice of whether to include the article along with the noun. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 01:16, 26 June 2009 (EDT)

			== Fun with Acronyms ==

			* I'm pretty sure we should point this out somewhere.
			Wheeljack Instant Immobilizer. W.I.I. See what I'm getting at? [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 14:04, 11 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 12 February 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::Don't see how it is funny. If the two devices had some similarity to each other, maybe. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:50, 12 February 2010 (EST)		::::Don't see how it is funny. If the two devices had some similarity to each other, maybe. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:50, 12 February 2010 (EST)
	:Actually, no. I don't see what you are getting at. W.I.I.? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:16, 12 February 2010 (EST)		:Actually, no. I don't see what you are getting at. W.I.I.? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:16, 12 February 2010 (EST)
			::He's referring to the Nintendo wii. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:06, 12 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:16, 12 February 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::: Well, duh. But it's a funny one. Go to TVtropes and look up Fun With Acronyms and Reverse Funny Aneurysm. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 13:43, 12 February 2010 (EST)		::: Well, duh. But it's a funny one. Go to TVtropes and look up Fun With Acronyms and Reverse Funny Aneurysm. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 13:43, 12 February 2010 (EST)
	::::Don't see how it is funny. If the two devices had some similarity to each other, maybe. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:50, 12 February 2010 (EST)		::::Don't see how it is funny. If the two devices had some similarity to each other, maybe. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:50, 12 February 2010 (EST)
			:Actually, no. I don't see what you are getting at. W.I.I.? - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 16:16, 12 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 12 February 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::Unless time flows backwards in Japan, it's just a coincidence. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:23, 11 February 2010 (EST)		::Unless time flows backwards in Japan, it's just a coincidence. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:23, 11 February 2010 (EST)
	::: Well, duh. But it's a funny one. Go to TVtropes and look up Fun With Acronyms and Reverse Funny Aneurysm. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 13:43, 12 February 2010 (EST)		::: Well, duh. But it's a funny one. Go to TVtropes and look up Fun With Acronyms and Reverse Funny Aneurysm. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 13:43, 12 February 2010 (EST)
			::::Don't see how it is funny. If the two devices had some similarity to each other, maybe. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 13:50, 12 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 12 February 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Wheeljack Instant Immobilizer. W.I.I. See what I'm getting at? [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 14:04, 11 February 2010 (EST)		Wheeljack Instant Immobilizer. W.I.I. See what I'm getting at? [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 14:04, 11 February 2010 (EST)
	::Unless time flows backwards in Japan, it's just a coincidence. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:23, 11 February 2010 (EST)		::Unless time flows backwards in Japan, it's just a coincidence. [[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 14:23, 11 February 2010 (EST)
			::: Well, duh. But it's a funny one. Go to TVtropes and look up Fun With Acronyms and Reverse Funny Aneurysm. [[User:ZeldaTheSwordsman\|ZeldaTheSwordsman]] 13:43, 12 February 2010 (EST)