Talk:The Misfits - Revision history

Saix: Saix moved page Talk:Misfits to Talk:The Misfits: Full name of band

2024-07-27T02:13:07Z

Saix moved page Talk:Misfits to Talk:The Misfits: Full name of band

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:13, 27 July 2024
(No difference)

Cyberlink420 at 04:05, 31 July 2019

2019-07-31T04:05:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:05, 31 July 2019
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::::Works for me. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 17:14, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		::::::Works for me. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 17:14, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
	So, should this be added to the Jem Properties category? [[User:RyuHane\|RyuHane]] ([[User talk:RyuHane\|talk]]) 22:52, 30 July 2019 (EDT)		So, should this be added to the Jem Properties category? [[User:RyuHane\|RyuHane]] ([[User talk:RyuHane\|talk]]) 22:52, 30 July 2019 (EDT)
			:Done. -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 00:05, 31 July 2019 (EDT)

RyuHane at 02:52, 31 July 2019

2019-07-31T02:52:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 31 July 2019
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::::Alright, how's the new wording then?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:53, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::Alright, how's the new wording then?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:53, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::::Works for me. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 17:14, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		::::::Works for me. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 17:14, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
			So, should this be added to the Jem Properties category? [[User:RyuHane\|RyuHane]] ([[User talk:RyuHane\|talk]]) 22:52, 30 July 2019 (EDT)

Jeysie at 21:14, 6 June 2010

2010-06-06T21:14:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 6 June 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::::Though I think Walky's got the counterargument I'm more inclined to agree with. It may not be a Classicsverse mirror... but I don't think saying it's a Sunbowverse mirror is really any more accurate. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:51, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		::::Though I think Walky's got the counterargument I'm more inclined to agree with. It may not be a Classicsverse mirror... but I don't think saying it's a Sunbowverse mirror is really any more accurate. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:51, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::::Alright, how's the new wording then?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:53, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::Alright, how's the new wording then?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:53, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
			::::::Works for me. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 17:14, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Rosicrucian at 20:53, 6 June 2010

2010-06-06T20:53:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 6 June 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::<nowiki></nowiki>shrug Just putting it out there.		::::<nowiki></nowiki>shrug Just putting it out there.
	::::Though I think Walky's got the counterargument I'm more inclined to agree with. It may not be a Classicsverse mirror... but I don't think saying it's a Sunbowverse mirror is really any more accurate. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:51, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		::::Though I think Walky's got the counterargument I'm more inclined to agree with. It may not be a Classicsverse mirror... but I don't think saying it's a Sunbowverse mirror is really any more accurate. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:51, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
			:::::Alright, how's the new wording then?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:53, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Jeysie: /* Notes */

2010-06-06T20:51:16Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, 6 June 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Given my well-known position towards authorial intent, it should come as no surprise that I side with the evidence presented in the story over Mr. Sinclair's statements.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 16:43, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		::Given my well-known position towards authorial intent, it should come as no surprise that I side with the evidence presented in the story over Mr. Sinclair's statements.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 16:43, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::Hell, Pete isn't even the author in this case.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:44, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		:::Hell, Pete isn't even the author in this case.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:44, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
			::::<nowiki></nowiki>shrug Just putting it out there.
			::::Though I think Walky's got the counterargument I'm more inclined to agree with. It may not be a Classicsverse mirror... but I don't think saying it's a Sunbowverse mirror is really any more accurate. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:51, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Rosicrucian at 20:44, 6 June 2010

2010-06-06T20:44:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 6 June 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I'm not sure if Pete's word overshadows how the universe is ordered within the fiction itself. There's a whole lotta stuff in the SG stories that are not solely Marvel US-based, like its evil Vector Sigma and its evil Alpha Trion and its Demolishor and its Fred and Billy and so forth. It really feels like a mirror of Transformers as a whole. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:42, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		:I'm not sure if Pete's word overshadows how the universe is ordered within the fiction itself. There's a whole lotta stuff in the SG stories that are not solely Marvel US-based, like its evil Vector Sigma and its evil Alpha Trion and its Demolishor and its Fred and Billy and so forth. It really feels like a mirror of Transformers as a whole. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:42, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
	::Given my well-known position towards authorial intent, it should come as no surprise that I side with the evidence presented in the story over Mr. Sinclair's statements.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 16:43, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		::Given my well-known position towards authorial intent, it should come as no surprise that I side with the evidence presented in the story over Mr. Sinclair's statements.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 16:43, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
			:::Hell, Pete isn't even the author in this case.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:44, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Jimsorenson at 20:43, 6 June 2010

2010-06-06T20:43:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 6 June 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Trouble is, it shares almost nothing with the Classicsverse, and Earth at least is drawing very heavily from Sunbow cartoons. It's pretty referencelicious.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:41, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		:Trouble is, it shares almost nothing with the Classicsverse, and Earth at least is drawing very heavily from Sunbow cartoons. It's pretty referencelicious.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:41, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
	:I'm not sure if Pete's word overshadows how the universe is ordered within the fiction itself. There's a whole lotta stuff in the SG stories that are not solely Marvel US-based, like its evil Vector Sigma and its evil Alpha Trion and its Demolishor and its Fred and Billy and so forth. It really feels like a mirror of Transformers as a whole. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:42, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		:I'm not sure if Pete's word overshadows how the universe is ordered within the fiction itself. There's a whole lotta stuff in the SG stories that are not solely Marvel US-based, like its evil Vector Sigma and its evil Alpha Trion and its Demolishor and its Fred and Billy and so forth. It really feels like a mirror of Transformers as a whole. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:42, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
			::Given my well-known position towards authorial intent, it should come as no surprise that I side with the evidence presented in the story over Mr. Sinclair's statements.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 16:43, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

ItsWalky at 20:42, 6 June 2010

2010-06-06T20:42:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:42, 6 June 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Actually... considering Sinclair's said that the main SG universe is meant to be a mirror of the Classicsverse (with additions) I'm not sure the note is entirely worded correctly. I'm just not sure what the correct wording ''would'' be. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:09, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		Actually... considering Sinclair's said that the main SG universe is meant to be a mirror of the Classicsverse (with additions) I'm not sure the note is entirely worded correctly. I'm just not sure what the correct wording ''would'' be. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:09, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
	:Trouble is, it shares almost nothing with the Classicsverse, and Earth at least is drawing very heavily from Sunbow cartoons. It's pretty referencelicious.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:41, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		:Trouble is, it shares almost nothing with the Classicsverse, and Earth at least is drawing very heavily from Sunbow cartoons. It's pretty referencelicious.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:41, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
			:I'm not sure if Pete's word overshadows how the universe is ordered within the fiction itself. There's a whole lotta stuff in the SG stories that are not solely Marvel US-based, like its evil Vector Sigma and its evil Alpha Trion and its Demolishor and its Fred and Billy and so forth. It really feels like a mirror of Transformers as a whole. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:42, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Rosicrucian: /* Notes */

2010-06-06T20:41:15Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 6 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Notes==		==Notes==
	Actually... considering Sinclair's said that the main SG universe is meant to be a mirror of the Classicsverse (with additions) I'm not sure the note is entirely worded correctly. I'm just not sure what the correct wording ''would'' be. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:09, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		Actually... considering Sinclair's said that the main SG universe is meant to be a mirror of the Classicsverse (with additions) I'm not sure the note is entirely worded correctly. I'm just not sure what the correct wording ''would'' be. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:09, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
			:Trouble is, it shares almost nothing with the Classicsverse, and Earth at least is drawing very heavily from Sunbow cartoons. It's pretty referencelicious.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:41, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:05, 31 July 2019
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::::Works for me. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 17:14, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		::::::Works for me. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 17:14, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
	So, should this be added to the Jem Properties category? [[User:RyuHane\|RyuHane]] ([[User talk:RyuHane\|talk]]) 22:52, 30 July 2019 (EDT)		So, should this be added to the Jem Properties category? [[User:RyuHane\|RyuHane]] ([[User talk:RyuHane\|talk]]) 22:52, 30 July 2019 (EDT)
			:Done. -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 00:05, 31 July 2019 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 31 July 2019
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::::Alright, how's the new wording then?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:53, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::Alright, how's the new wording then?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:53, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
	::::::Works for me. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 17:14, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		::::::Works for me. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 17:14, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
			So, should this be added to the Jem Properties category? [[User:RyuHane\|RyuHane]] ([[User talk:RyuHane\|talk]]) 22:52, 30 July 2019 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 6 June 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::::Though I think Walky's got the counterargument I'm more inclined to agree with. It may not be a Classicsverse mirror... but I don't think saying it's a Sunbowverse mirror is really any more accurate. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:51, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		::::Though I think Walky's got the counterargument I'm more inclined to agree with. It may not be a Classicsverse mirror... but I don't think saying it's a Sunbowverse mirror is really any more accurate. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:51, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::::Alright, how's the new wording then?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:53, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		:::::Alright, how's the new wording then?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:53, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
			::::::Works for me. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 17:14, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 6 June 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::<nowiki></nowiki>shrug Just putting it out there.		::::<nowiki></nowiki>shrug Just putting it out there.
	::::Though I think Walky's got the counterargument I'm more inclined to agree with. It may not be a Classicsverse mirror... but I don't think saying it's a Sunbowverse mirror is really any more accurate. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:51, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		::::Though I think Walky's got the counterargument I'm more inclined to agree with. It may not be a Classicsverse mirror... but I don't think saying it's a Sunbowverse mirror is really any more accurate. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:51, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
			:::::Alright, how's the new wording then?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:53, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, 6 June 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Given my well-known position towards authorial intent, it should come as no surprise that I side with the evidence presented in the story over Mr. Sinclair's statements.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 16:43, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		::Given my well-known position towards authorial intent, it should come as no surprise that I side with the evidence presented in the story over Mr. Sinclair's statements.--[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 16:43, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
	:::Hell, Pete isn't even the author in this case.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:44, 6 June 2010 (EDT)		:::Hell, Pete isn't even the author in this case.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:44, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
			::::<nowiki></nowiki>shrug Just putting it out there.
			::::Though I think Walky's got the counterargument I'm more inclined to agree with. It may not be a Classicsverse mirror... but I don't think saying it's a Sunbowverse mirror is really any more accurate. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 16:51, 6 June 2010 (EDT)