Talk:Thundercracker (G1)/toys - Revision history

MistaTee: /* MP-52+ release date */ new section

2021-12-31T22:47:10Z

MP-52+ release date: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:47, 31 December 2021
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::::Hypothetically speaking: If the original plan of including both bios in the package had been followed, the toy would have officially been BOTH G1 and SG without either being a repurpose, right? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:12, 6 March 2012 (EST)		::::Hypothetically speaking: If the original plan of including both bios in the package had been followed, the toy would have officially been BOTH G1 and SG without either being a repurpose, right? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:12, 6 March 2012 (EST)
	:::::Frankly, "more than five" I think is the tipping point for whether the "only a few characters have received multiple BotCon exclusive toys" remains true. As is, that note's still kind of pushing it. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:15, 6 March 2012 (EST)		:::::Frankly, "more than five" I think is the tipping point for whether the "only a few characters have received multiple BotCon exclusive toys" remains true. As is, that note's still kind of pushing it. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:15, 6 March 2012 (EST)

			== MP-52+ release date ==

			The Masterpiece page lists 9/27 as the release date of MP-52+ Thundercracker. Anyone know if this is correct? That's a Monday, but doesn't Takara release on Fri or Sat? --[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] ([[User talk:MistaTee\|talk]]) 17:47, 31 December 2021 (EST)

ItsWalky: /* Toy Note */

2012-03-06T22:15:40Z

Toy Note

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 6 March 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::: That is a repurposing. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:56, 6 March 2012 (EST)		::: That is a repurposing. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:56, 6 March 2012 (EST)
	::::Hypothetically speaking: If the original plan of including both bios in the package had been followed, the toy would have officially been BOTH G1 and SG without either being a repurpose, right? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:12, 6 March 2012 (EST)		::::Hypothetically speaking: If the original plan of including both bios in the package had been followed, the toy would have officially been BOTH G1 and SG without either being a repurpose, right? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:12, 6 March 2012 (EST)
			:::::Frankly, "more than five" I think is the tipping point for whether the "only a few characters have received multiple BotCon exclusive toys" remains true. As is, that note's still kind of pushing it. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:15, 6 March 2012 (EST)

Khajidha at 22:12, 6 March 2012

2012-03-06T22:12:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 6 March 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:
	All of these characters have similar notes. Should Thundercracker be included in the list? He technically has two exclusives?[[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 14:32, 6 March 2012 (EST)		All of these characters have similar notes. Should Thundercracker be included in the list? He technically has two exclusives?[[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 14:32, 6 March 2012 (EST)
	: No, one of them was Shattered Glass, who's a different guy. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:06, 6 March 2012 (EST)		: No, one of them was Shattered Glass, who's a different guy. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:06, 6 March 2012 (EST)
	: But I thought that toy was intended to stand in for both G1 and SG. He has the second bio in the TFCC Magazine and is included on G1 Thundercracker's toy page. Or is that just a repurposing? [[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 15:53, 6 March 2012 (EST)		:: But I thought that toy was intended to stand in for both G1 and SG. He has the second bio in the TFCC Magazine and is included on G1 Thundercracker's toy page. Or is that just a repurposing? [[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 15:53, 6 March 2012 (EST)
	:: That is a repurposing. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:56, 6 March 2012 (EST)		::: That is a repurposing. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:56, 6 March 2012 (EST)
			::::Hypothetically speaking: If the original plan of including both bios in the package had been followed, the toy would have officially been BOTH G1 and SG without either being a repurpose, right? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:12, 6 March 2012 (EST)

ItsWalky at 20:56, 6 March 2012

2012-03-06T20:56:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:56, 6 March 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	: No, one of them was Shattered Glass, who's a different guy. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:06, 6 March 2012 (EST)		: No, one of them was Shattered Glass, who's a different guy. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:06, 6 March 2012 (EST)
	: But I thought that toy was intended to stand in for both G1 and SG. He has the second bio in the TFCC Magazine and is included on G1 Thundercracker's toy page. Or is that just a repurposing? [[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 15:53, 6 March 2012 (EST)		: But I thought that toy was intended to stand in for both G1 and SG. He has the second bio in the TFCC Magazine and is included on G1 Thundercracker's toy page. Or is that just a repurposing? [[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 15:53, 6 March 2012 (EST)
			:: That is a repurposing. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:56, 6 March 2012 (EST)

Riddlerj: /* Toy Note */

2012-03-06T20:53:41Z

Toy Note

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 6 March 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:
	All of these characters have similar notes. Should Thundercracker be included in the list? He technically has two exclusives?[[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 14:32, 6 March 2012 (EST)		All of these characters have similar notes. Should Thundercracker be included in the list? He technically has two exclusives?[[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 14:32, 6 March 2012 (EST)
	: No, one of them was Shattered Glass, who's a different guy. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:06, 6 March 2012 (EST)		: No, one of them was Shattered Glass, who's a different guy. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:06, 6 March 2012 (EST)
			: But I thought that toy was intended to stand in for both G1 and SG. He has the second bio in the TFCC Magazine and is included on G1 Thundercracker's toy page. Or is that just a repurposing? [[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 15:53, 6 March 2012 (EST)

ItsWalky: /* Toy Note */

2012-03-06T20:06:34Z

Toy Note

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:06, 6 March 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:

	All of these characters have similar notes. Should Thundercracker be included in the list? He technically has two exclusives?[[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 14:32, 6 March 2012 (EST)		All of these characters have similar notes. Should Thundercracker be included in the list? He technically has two exclusives?[[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 14:32, 6 March 2012 (EST)
			: No, one of them was Shattered Glass, who's a different guy. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:06, 6 March 2012 (EST)

Riddlerj: New page: == Toy Note == ''Megatron/Galvatron is one of only a few characters to receive multiple BotCon exclusive toys, sharing the distinction with Breakdown, Double Punch, Apelinq, and Tigatron.'...

2012-03-06T19:32:12Z

New page: == Toy Note == ''Megatron/Galvatron is one of only a few characters to receive multiple BotCon exclusive toys, sharing the distinction with Breakdown, Double Punch, Apelinq, and Tigatron.'...

New page

== Toy Note ==
''Megatron/Galvatron is one of only a few characters to receive multiple BotCon exclusive toys, sharing the distinction with Breakdown, Double Punch, Apelinq, and Tigatron.''

All of these characters have similar notes. Should Thundercracker be included in the list? He technically has two exclusives?[[User:Riddlerj|Riddlerj]] 14:32, 6 March 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 6 March 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::: That is a repurposing. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:56, 6 March 2012 (EST)		::: That is a repurposing. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:56, 6 March 2012 (EST)
	::::Hypothetically speaking: If the original plan of including both bios in the package had been followed, the toy would have officially been BOTH G1 and SG without either being a repurpose, right? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:12, 6 March 2012 (EST)		::::Hypothetically speaking: If the original plan of including both bios in the package had been followed, the toy would have officially been BOTH G1 and SG without either being a repurpose, right? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:12, 6 March 2012 (EST)
			:::::Frankly, "more than five" I think is the tipping point for whether the "only a few characters have received multiple BotCon exclusive toys" remains true. As is, that note's still kind of pushing it. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 17:15, 6 March 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 6 March 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:
	All of these characters have similar notes. Should Thundercracker be included in the list? He technically has two exclusives?[[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 14:32, 6 March 2012 (EST)		All of these characters have similar notes. Should Thundercracker be included in the list? He technically has two exclusives?[[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 14:32, 6 March 2012 (EST)
	: No, one of them was Shattered Glass, who's a different guy. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:06, 6 March 2012 (EST)		: No, one of them was Shattered Glass, who's a different guy. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:06, 6 March 2012 (EST)
	: But I thought that toy was intended to stand in for both G1 and SG. He has the second bio in the TFCC Magazine and is included on G1 Thundercracker's toy page. Or is that just a repurposing? [[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 15:53, 6 March 2012 (EST)		:: But I thought that toy was intended to stand in for both G1 and SG. He has the second bio in the TFCC Magazine and is included on G1 Thundercracker's toy page. Or is that just a repurposing? [[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 15:53, 6 March 2012 (EST)
	:: That is a repurposing. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:56, 6 March 2012 (EST)		::: That is a repurposing. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:56, 6 March 2012 (EST)
			::::Hypothetically speaking: If the original plan of including both bios in the package had been followed, the toy would have officially been BOTH G1 and SG without either being a repurpose, right? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 17:12, 6 March 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:56, 6 March 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	: No, one of them was Shattered Glass, who's a different guy. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:06, 6 March 2012 (EST)		: No, one of them was Shattered Glass, who's a different guy. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:06, 6 March 2012 (EST)
	: But I thought that toy was intended to stand in for both G1 and SG. He has the second bio in the TFCC Magazine and is included on G1 Thundercracker's toy page. Or is that just a repurposing? [[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 15:53, 6 March 2012 (EST)		: But I thought that toy was intended to stand in for both G1 and SG. He has the second bio in the TFCC Magazine and is included on G1 Thundercracker's toy page. Or is that just a repurposing? [[User:Riddlerj\|Riddlerj]] 15:53, 6 March 2012 (EST)
			:: That is a repurposing. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 15:56, 6 March 2012 (EST)