Talk:Toy Fair 1986 - Revision history

Timrollpickering: /* Differences */

2024-08-25T16:17:57Z

Differences

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 25 August 2024
Line 73:		Line 73:
	::I'm amending things now that I've got access to the super hi-res scans. I'd like to have it complete before adding it here. I've also chosen to ignore to ignore the mistransformations, since they don't really pertain to what I'm trying to document.--[[User:MCRG\|MCRG]] 00:05, 2 March 2010 (EST)		::I'm amending things now that I've got access to the super hi-res scans. I'd like to have it complete before adding it here. I've also chosen to ignore to ignore the mistransformations, since they don't really pertain to what I'm trying to document.--[[User:MCRG\|MCRG]] 00:05, 2 March 2010 (EST)
	:And yes, that picture with Cyclonus (actually the whole picture of all five toys) were used in the 1986 Euro catalog (I live in Denmark, so that's probably why you thought about Denmark/Sweden). Also, I think (need to check that) that the group shots of the combiner limbs were used in the same catalog as well. Big kudos to all for those killer pics! --[[User:Fighbird\|Fighbird]] 03:15, 2 March 2010 (EST)		:And yes, that picture with Cyclonus (actually the whole picture of all five toys) were used in the 1986 Euro catalog (I live in Denmark, so that's probably why you thought about Denmark/Sweden). Also, I think (need to check that) that the group shots of the combiner limbs were used in the same catalog as well. Big kudos to all for those killer pics! --[[User:Fighbird\|Fighbird]] 03:15, 2 March 2010 (EST)
			::The UK catalogue for 1986 also uses that Decepticon Planes picture and some of the other photos such as the Triple Changers appear to use the same backdrop, suggesting the same photo shoot. [[User:Timrollpickering\|Timrollpickering]] ([[User talk:Timrollpickering\|talk]]) 12:17, 25 August 2024 (EDT)

	== Galvatron's cannon ==		== Galvatron's cannon ==

66.227.214.206 at 13:37, 18 July 2011

2011-07-18T13:37:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 18 July 2011
Line 22:		Line 22:

	HEY GUESS WHO'S HOTLINKING OUR IMAGES		HEY GUESS WHO'S HOTLINKING OUR IMAGES
	~~{{spoiler\|when=April 1, 2010}}~~
	It's Seibertron. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:30, 2 March 2010 (EST)		It's Seibertron. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:30, 2 March 2010 (EST)
	:Is there any way we could replace some of the images they're hotlinking with, like, a big sweaty dick or something? That'll learn 'em. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 16:07, 2 March 2010 (EST)		:Is there any way we could replace some of the images they're hotlinking with, like, a big sweaty dick or something? That'll learn 'em. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 16:07, 2 March 2010 (EST)

Khajidha: actually this expired spoiler needs to stay, it ruins the point of Walky's post to lose it

2011-07-02T20:59:14Z

actually this expired spoiler needs to stay, it ruins the point of Walky's post to lose it

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:59, 2 July 2011
Line 22:		Line 22:

	HEY GUESS WHO'S HOTLINKING OUR IMAGES		HEY GUESS WHO'S HOTLINKING OUR IMAGES
			{{spoiler\|when=April 1, 2010}}
	It's Seibertron. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:30, 2 March 2010 (EST)		It's Seibertron. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:30, 2 March 2010 (EST)
	:Is there any way we could replace some of the images they're hotlinking with, like, a big sweaty dick or something? That'll learn 'em. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 16:07, 2 March 2010 (EST)		:Is there any way we could replace some of the images they're hotlinking with, like, a big sweaty dick or something? That'll learn 'em. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 16:07, 2 March 2010 (EST)

72.223.81.196: /* Scans Discussion */

2011-07-02T20:43:24Z

Scans Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 2 July 2011
Line 22:		Line 22:

	HEY GUESS WHO'S HOTLINKING OUR IMAGES		HEY GUESS WHO'S HOTLINKING OUR IMAGES
	~~{{spoiler\|when=April 1, 2010}}~~
	It's Seibertron. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:30, 2 March 2010 (EST)		It's Seibertron. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:30, 2 March 2010 (EST)
	:Is there any way we could replace some of the images they're hotlinking with, like, a big sweaty dick or something? That'll learn 'em. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 16:07, 2 March 2010 (EST)		:Is there any way we could replace some of the images they're hotlinking with, like, a big sweaty dick or something? That'll learn 'em. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 16:07, 2 March 2010 (EST)

Starfield: /* Scans Discussion */ spoiler expiration date

2011-07-01T15:34:02Z

Scans Discussion: spoiler expiration date

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 1 July 2011
Line 22:		Line 22:

	HEY GUESS WHO'S HOTLINKING OUR IMAGES		HEY GUESS WHO'S HOTLINKING OUR IMAGES
	{{spoiler}}		{{spoiler\|when=April 1, 2010}}
	It's Seibertron. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:30, 2 March 2010 (EST)		It's Seibertron. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:30, 2 March 2010 (EST)
	:Is there any way we could replace some of the images they're hotlinking with, like, a big sweaty dick or something? That'll learn 'em. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 16:07, 2 March 2010 (EST)		:Is there any way we could replace some of the images they're hotlinking with, like, a big sweaty dick or something? That'll learn 'em. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 16:07, 2 March 2010 (EST)

Semysane: /* Galvatron's cannon */

2011-02-04T00:07:28Z

Galvatron's cannon

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 4 February 2011
Line 78:		Line 78:

	Just thinking... at what point was it decided that the best way to stop kids getting confused when they shot at each other with pretend guns was to make the barrels orange? I'm wondering if that was the reason for the particle cannon colour change. Either that, or maybe they thought that the black cannon made him look too much like Megatron? [[User:LiamK\|LiamK]] 17:31, 3 February 2011 (EST)		Just thinking... at what point was it decided that the best way to stop kids getting confused when they shot at each other with pretend guns was to make the barrels orange? I'm wondering if that was the reason for the particle cannon colour change. Either that, or maybe they thought that the black cannon made him look too much like Megatron? [[User:LiamK\|LiamK]] 17:31, 3 February 2011 (EST)
			:I'm fairly certain that the orange barrels are so cops don't think some kid is pointing a real gun at them and shoot them. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 19:07, 3 February 2011 (EST)

LiamK: /* Galvatron's cannon */ new section

2011-02-03T22:31:32Z

Galvatron's cannon: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 3 February 2011
Line 74:		Line 74:
	::I'm amending things now that I've got access to the super hi-res scans. I'd like to have it complete before adding it here. I've also chosen to ignore to ignore the mistransformations, since they don't really pertain to what I'm trying to document.--[[User:MCRG\|MCRG]] 00:05, 2 March 2010 (EST)		::I'm amending things now that I've got access to the super hi-res scans. I'd like to have it complete before adding it here. I've also chosen to ignore to ignore the mistransformations, since they don't really pertain to what I'm trying to document.--[[User:MCRG\|MCRG]] 00:05, 2 March 2010 (EST)
	:And yes, that picture with Cyclonus (actually the whole picture of all five toys) were used in the 1986 Euro catalog (I live in Denmark, so that's probably why you thought about Denmark/Sweden). Also, I think (need to check that) that the group shots of the combiner limbs were used in the same catalog as well. Big kudos to all for those killer pics! --[[User:Fighbird\|Fighbird]] 03:15, 2 March 2010 (EST)		:And yes, that picture with Cyclonus (actually the whole picture of all five toys) were used in the 1986 Euro catalog (I live in Denmark, so that's probably why you thought about Denmark/Sweden). Also, I think (need to check that) that the group shots of the combiner limbs were used in the same catalog as well. Big kudos to all for those killer pics! --[[User:Fighbird\|Fighbird]] 03:15, 2 March 2010 (EST)

			== Galvatron's cannon ==

			Just thinking... at what point was it decided that the best way to stop kids getting confused when they shot at each other with pretend guns was to make the barrels orange? I'm wondering if that was the reason for the particle cannon colour change. Either that, or maybe they thought that the black cannon made him look too much like Megatron? [[User:LiamK\|LiamK]] 17:31, 3 February 2011 (EST)

95.148.9.152: /* Scans Discussion */

2010-03-10T21:25:02Z

Scans Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 10 March 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	It's Seibertron. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:30, 2 March 2010 (EST)		It's Seibertron. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:30, 2 March 2010 (EST)
	:Is there any way we could replace some of the images they're hotlinking with, like, a big sweaty dick or something? That'll learn 'em. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 16:07, 2 March 2010 (EST)		:Is there any way we could replace some of the images they're hotlinking with, like, a big sweaty dick or something? That'll learn 'em. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 16:07, 2 March 2010 (EST)
			::But who would we get to take a picture of themselves?

	==MyLittlePony==		==MyLittlePony==

Lonegamer78: /* Differences */

2010-03-05T05:10:57Z

Differences

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:10, 5 March 2010
Line 72:		Line 72:
	:::Like I said, I could only ascertain so much from the scans on here at the time. You had the super hi-res ones to work from, so that has since been amended now that I have them too.--[[User:MCRG\|MCRG]] 00:10, 2 March 2010 (EST)		:::Like I said, I could only ascertain so much from the scans on here at the time. You had the super hi-res ones to work from, so that has since been amended now that I have them too.--[[User:MCRG\|MCRG]] 00:10, 2 March 2010 (EST)
	::I'm amending things now that I've got access to the super hi-res scans. I'd like to have it complete before adding it here. I've also chosen to ignore to ignore the mistransformations, since they don't really pertain to what I'm trying to document.--[[User:MCRG\|MCRG]] 00:05, 2 March 2010 (EST)		::I'm amending things now that I've got access to the super hi-res scans. I'd like to have it complete before adding it here. I've also chosen to ignore to ignore the mistransformations, since they don't really pertain to what I'm trying to document.--[[User:MCRG\|MCRG]] 00:05, 2 March 2010 (EST)
	:And yes, that picture with Cyclonus (actually the whole picture of all five toys) were used in the 1986 Euro catalog (I live in Denmark, so that's probably why you thought about Denmark/Sweden). Also, I think (need to check that) that the group shots of the combiner limbs were used in the same catalog as well. Big kudos to all for those killer pics!		:And yes, that picture with Cyclonus (actually the whole picture of all five toys) were used in the 1986 Euro catalog (I live in Denmark, so that's probably why you thought about Denmark/Sweden). Also, I think (need to check that) that the group shots of the combiner limbs were used in the same catalog as well. Big kudos to all for those killer pics! --[[User:Fighbird\|Fighbird]] 03:15, 2 March 2010 (EST)

GrantB: /* Scans Discussion */

2010-03-05T04:43:13Z

Scans Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:43, 5 March 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	:::If there's Voltron stuff in there, I know some places that would like to see/host it. (I didn't donate as I didn't know of it until today, but I'll gladly throw some money at the charity in return.) --[[User:GrantB\|GrantB]] 09:25, 2 March 2010 (EST)		:::If there's Voltron stuff in there, I know some places that would like to see/host it. (I didn't donate as I didn't know of it until today, but I'll gladly throw some money at the charity in return.) --[[User:GrantB\|GrantB]] 09:25, 2 March 2010 (EST)
	::::Uh, Voltron wasn't Hasbro, dude. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:29, 2 March 2010 (EST)		::::Uh, Voltron wasn't Hasbro, dude. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:29, 2 March 2010 (EST)
			:::::Doh, my mistake. I thought it was a general non-company-specific Toy Fair catalog. Should have read closer. --[[User:GrantB\|GrantB]] 23:43, 4 March 2010 (EST)

	HEY GUESS WHO'S HOTLINKING OUR IMAGES		HEY GUESS WHO'S HOTLINKING OUR IMAGES

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:10, 5 March 2010
Line 72:		Line 72:
	:::Like I said, I could only ascertain so much from the scans on here at the time. You had the super hi-res ones to work from, so that has since been amended now that I have them too.--[[User:MCRG\|MCRG]] 00:10, 2 March 2010 (EST)		:::Like I said, I could only ascertain so much from the scans on here at the time. You had the super hi-res ones to work from, so that has since been amended now that I have them too.--[[User:MCRG\|MCRG]] 00:10, 2 March 2010 (EST)
	::I'm amending things now that I've got access to the super hi-res scans. I'd like to have it complete before adding it here. I've also chosen to ignore to ignore the mistransformations, since they don't really pertain to what I'm trying to document.--[[User:MCRG\|MCRG]] 00:05, 2 March 2010 (EST)		::I'm amending things now that I've got access to the super hi-res scans. I'd like to have it complete before adding it here. I've also chosen to ignore to ignore the mistransformations, since they don't really pertain to what I'm trying to document.--[[User:MCRG\|MCRG]] 00:05, 2 March 2010 (EST)
	:And yes, that picture with Cyclonus (actually the whole picture of all five toys) were used in the 1986 Euro catalog (I live in Denmark, so that's probably why you thought about Denmark/Sweden). Also, I think (need to check that) that the group shots of the combiner limbs were used in the same catalog as well. Big kudos to all for those killer pics!		:And yes, that picture with Cyclonus (actually the whole picture of all five toys) were used in the 1986 Euro catalog (I live in Denmark, so that's probably why you thought about Denmark/Sweden). Also, I think (need to check that) that the group shots of the combiner limbs were used in the same catalog as well. Big kudos to all for those killer pics! --[[User:Fighbird\|Fighbird]] 03:15, 2 March 2010 (EST)