Talk:Toy swapping - Revision history

Boingus: Undo revision 1232957 by Arren1234 (talk) not a chat room

2018-01-01T19:11:19Z

Undo revision 1232957 by Arren1234 (talk) not a chat room

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 1 January 2018
Line 86:		Line 86:
	Unless you know you can get loss prevention on your side, there's no point in ever turning down a return. It shouldn't go back to the shelf, but if you aren't noticing (because it doesn't matter if you did, or you don't know the item), it's pretty easy to return it back to stock. [[User:Cosmos1\|Cosmos1]] ([[User talk:Cosmos1\|talk]]) 20:04, 23 October 2017 (EDT)		Unless you know you can get loss prevention on your side, there's no point in ever turning down a return. It shouldn't go back to the shelf, but if you aren't noticing (because it doesn't matter if you did, or you don't know the item), it's pretty easy to return it back to stock. [[User:Cosmos1\|Cosmos1]] ([[User talk:Cosmos1\|talk]]) 20:04, 23 October 2017 (EDT)
	:So add it on the page under notes. I think it would worthy addition. [[User:West james\|west james/notirishman]] ([[User talk:West james\|talk]]) 21:01, 23 October 2017 (EDT)		:So add it on the page under notes. I think it would worthy addition. [[User:West james\|west james/notirishman]] ([[User talk:West james\|talk]]) 21:01, 23 October 2017 (EDT)

	~~== CAT. ==~~

	~~BE in the cat. does not exist?\~~

Arren1234: /* CAT. */ new section

2018-01-01T19:07:54Z

CAT.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:07, 1 January 2018
Line 86:		Line 86:
	Unless you know you can get loss prevention on your side, there's no point in ever turning down a return. It shouldn't go back to the shelf, but if you aren't noticing (because it doesn't matter if you did, or you don't know the item), it's pretty easy to return it back to stock. [[User:Cosmos1\|Cosmos1]] ([[User talk:Cosmos1\|talk]]) 20:04, 23 October 2017 (EDT)		Unless you know you can get loss prevention on your side, there's no point in ever turning down a return. It shouldn't go back to the shelf, but if you aren't noticing (because it doesn't matter if you did, or you don't know the item), it's pretty easy to return it back to stock. [[User:Cosmos1\|Cosmos1]] ([[User talk:Cosmos1\|talk]]) 20:04, 23 October 2017 (EDT)
	:So add it on the page under notes. I think it would worthy addition. [[User:West james\|west james/notirishman]] ([[User talk:West james\|talk]]) 21:01, 23 October 2017 (EDT)		:So add it on the page under notes. I think it would worthy addition. [[User:West james\|west james/notirishman]] ([[User talk:West james\|talk]]) 21:01, 23 October 2017 (EDT)

			== CAT. ==

			BE in the cat. does not exist?\

Boingus: /* Having worked retail returns */

2017-10-24T01:01:57Z

Having worked retail returns

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:01, 24 October 2017
Line 85:		Line 85:

	Unless you know you can get loss prevention on your side, there's no point in ever turning down a return. It shouldn't go back to the shelf, but if you aren't noticing (because it doesn't matter if you did, or you don't know the item), it's pretty easy to return it back to stock. [[User:Cosmos1\|Cosmos1]] ([[User talk:Cosmos1\|talk]]) 20:04, 23 October 2017 (EDT)		Unless you know you can get loss prevention on your side, there's no point in ever turning down a return. It shouldn't go back to the shelf, but if you aren't noticing (because it doesn't matter if you did, or you don't know the item), it's pretty easy to return it back to stock. [[User:Cosmos1\|Cosmos1]] ([[User talk:Cosmos1\|talk]]) 20:04, 23 October 2017 (EDT)
			:So add it on the page under notes. I think it would worthy addition. [[User:West james\|west james/notirishman]] ([[User talk:West james\|talk]]) 21:01, 23 October 2017 (EDT)

Waverod: /* Having worked retail returns */ new section

2017-10-24T00:04:38Z

Having worked retail returns: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:04, 24 October 2017
Line 74:		Line 74:
	:No. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 22:28, 4 February 2015 (EST)		:No. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 22:28, 4 February 2015 (EST)
	::I thought there is a rule that says we may not use the **** word in captions, is it okay if it's censored?{{unsigned\|Pat}}		::I thought there is a rule that says we may not use the **** word in captions, is it okay if it's censored?{{unsigned\|Pat}}

			== Having worked retail returns ==

			I can tell you that the reason stuff like this happens is that it's not worth the hassle for the returns cashier. Example:
			Cashier: I'm sorry, this isn't the toy that came in the box.
			Swapper: That's how it came.
			Cashier: I'm sorry, I can't return it.
			Swapper: I want to speak to your manager
			Manager: Go ahead and return it.

			Unless you know you can get loss prevention on your side, there's no point in ever turning down a return. It shouldn't go back to the shelf, but if you aren't noticing (because it doesn't matter if you did, or you don't know the item), it's pretty easy to return it back to stock. [[User:Cosmos1\|Cosmos1]] ([[User talk:Cosmos1\|talk]]) 20:04, 23 October 2017 (EDT)

Foffy the Sheep at 04:54, 20 December 2015

2015-12-20T04:54:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:54, 20 December 2015
Line 71:		Line 71:
	== Inappropriate caption ==		== Inappropriate caption ==

	I think the caption that says "What the ****" should be replaced, it's sensored but i think it's still inapropriate.		I think the caption that says "What the ****" should be replaced, it's sensored but i think it's still inapropriate.{{unsigned\|Pat}}
	:No. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 22:28, 4 February 2015 (EST)		:No. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 22:28, 4 February 2015 (EST)
	::I thought there is a rule that says we may not use the **** word in captions, is it okay if it's censored?		::I thought there is a rule that says we may not use the **** word in captions, is it okay if it's censored?{{unsigned\|Pat}}

Pat: /* Inappropriate caption */

2015-02-07T13:32:11Z

Inappropriate caption

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:32, 7 February 2015
Line 73:		Line 73:
	I think the caption that says "What the ****" should be replaced, it's sensored but i think it's still inapropriate.		I think the caption that says "What the ****" should be replaced, it's sensored but i think it's still inapropriate.
	:No. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 22:28, 4 February 2015 (EST)		:No. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 22:28, 4 February 2015 (EST)
			::I thought there is a rule that says we may not use the **** word in captions, is it okay if it's censored?

M Sipher: /* Inappropriate caption */

2015-02-05T03:28:50Z

Inappropriate caption

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:28, 5 February 2015
Line 72:		Line 72:

	I think the caption that says "What the ****" should be replaced, it's sensored but i think it's still inapropriate.		I think the caption that says "What the ****" should be replaced, it's sensored but i think it's still inapropriate.
			:No. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 22:28, 4 February 2015 (EST)

Pat: /* Inappropriate caption */ new section

2015-02-04T10:57:33Z

Inappropriate caption: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:57, 4 February 2015
Line 68:		Line 68:
	:http://shortpacked.livejournal.com/614371.html - from the comments, it seems like it was just on eBay maybe? --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:54, 10 July 2013 (EDT)		:http://shortpacked.livejournal.com/614371.html - from the comments, it seems like it was just on eBay maybe? --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:54, 10 July 2013 (EDT)
	:: Aaaah. That explains why it wasn't on here. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] 10:25, 11 July 2013 (EDT)		:: Aaaah. That explains why it wasn't on here. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] 10:25, 11 July 2013 (EDT)

			== Inappropriate caption ==

			I think the caption that says "What the ****" should be replaced, it's sensored but i think it's still inapropriate.

King Starscream: /* Toy swaps i found */

2013-07-11T14:26:30Z

Toy swaps i found

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 11 July 2013
Line 60:		Line 60:
	Here, three tomatos in a transformers packaging.		Here, three tomatos in a transformers packaging.
	AND, a cat in a Blitzwing packaging! OMG! --[[User:Karenjean5409\|Karenjean5409]] 20:45, 25 July 2012 (EDT)		AND, a cat in a Blitzwing packaging! OMG! --[[User:Karenjean5409\|Karenjean5409]] 20:45, 25 July 2012 (EDT)

			:Please tell me you mean a TOY cat. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] 10:26, 11 July 2013 (EDT)

	== Hornet's nest swap? ==		== Hornet's nest swap? ==

King Starscream: /* Hornet's nest swap? */

2013-07-11T14:25:43Z

Hornet's nest swap?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 11 July 2013
Line 65:		Line 65:
	I think Walky originally had this on his LiveJournal or something a long time ago, but does anyone have any info on that figure that got swapped for a slagging ''hornet's nest?'' If so, I think that's definitely worth adding due to its sheer outrageousness. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] 16:22, 10 July 2013 (EDT)		I think Walky originally had this on his LiveJournal or something a long time ago, but does anyone have any info on that figure that got swapped for a slagging ''hornet's nest?'' If so, I think that's definitely worth adding due to its sheer outrageousness. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] 16:22, 10 July 2013 (EDT)
	:http://shortpacked.livejournal.com/614371.html - from the comments, it seems like it was just on eBay maybe? --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:54, 10 July 2013 (EDT)		:http://shortpacked.livejournal.com/614371.html - from the comments, it seems like it was just on eBay maybe? --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:54, 10 July 2013 (EDT)
			:: Aaaah. That explains why it wasn't on here. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] 10:25, 11 July 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 11 July 2013
Line 65:		Line 65:
	I think Walky originally had this on his LiveJournal or something a long time ago, but does anyone have any info on that figure that got swapped for a slagging ''hornet's nest?'' If so, I think that's definitely worth adding due to its sheer outrageousness. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] 16:22, 10 July 2013 (EDT)		I think Walky originally had this on his LiveJournal or something a long time ago, but does anyone have any info on that figure that got swapped for a slagging ''hornet's nest?'' If so, I think that's definitely worth adding due to its sheer outrageousness. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] 16:22, 10 July 2013 (EDT)
	:http://shortpacked.livejournal.com/614371.html - from the comments, it seems like it was just on eBay maybe? --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:54, 10 July 2013 (EDT)		:http://shortpacked.livejournal.com/614371.html - from the comments, it seems like it was just on eBay maybe? --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:54, 10 July 2013 (EDT)
			:: Aaaah. That explains why it wasn't on here. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] 10:25, 11 July 2013 (EDT)