Talk:Transformers: Best of the Rarities - Revision history

Smasher at 19:29, 19 March 2024

2024-03-19T19:29:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 19 March 2024
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::I agree that now that they've been approved and published, they are "real". The last one is actually kinda good, considering how short it is. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 14:03, 7 September 2022 (EDT)		:::I agree that now that they've been approved and published, they are "real". The last one is actually kinda good, considering how short it is. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 14:03, 7 September 2022 (EDT)
	:::: Those are pretty good, actually.•[[User:ChristalIsMe\|ChristalIsMe]] ([[User talk:ChristalIsMe\|talk]]) 14:45, 7 September 2022 (EDT)		:::: Those are pretty good, actually.•[[User:ChristalIsMe\|ChristalIsMe]] ([[User talk:ChristalIsMe\|talk]]) 14:45, 7 September 2022 (EDT)

			==About the Sunday Times strips==
			Willing to make some pages for these, but a couple questions just for clarity; Who'd be listed as the publisher? Marvel, IDW, or what? Would publication date be when they were written or when ''Rarities'' was released? And should there be a page covering the strips and their history as a whole? [[User:Smasher\|Smasher]] ([[User talk:Smasher\|talk]]) 15:29, 19 March 2024 (EDT)

ChristalIsMe at 18:45, 7 September 2022

2022-09-07T18:45:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:45, 7 September 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Yeah, fully-written, completed—the link at the bottom of the article has all five, you can read them for yourself! Each deserves its own wiki page in my opinion, just nobody's gotten around to it yet. There's no info in Roberts' endnotes on why they never materialised at the time, i.e. what if anything Hasbro thought about them, but even if they weren't approved at the time, I think this publication renders them non-apocryphal in the technical sense of the term. —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 12:43, 7 September 2022 (EDT)		::Yeah, fully-written, completed—the link at the bottom of the article has all five, you can read them for yourself! Each deserves its own wiki page in my opinion, just nobody's gotten around to it yet. There's no info in Roberts' endnotes on why they never materialised at the time, i.e. what if anything Hasbro thought about them, but even if they weren't approved at the time, I think this publication renders them non-apocryphal in the technical sense of the term. —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 12:43, 7 September 2022 (EDT)
	:::I agree that now that they've been approved and published, they are "real". The last one is actually kinda good, considering how short it is. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 14:03, 7 September 2022 (EDT)		:::I agree that now that they've been approved and published, they are "real". The last one is actually kinda good, considering how short it is. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 14:03, 7 September 2022 (EDT)
			:::: Those are pretty good, actually.•[[User:ChristalIsMe\|ChristalIsMe]] ([[User talk:ChristalIsMe\|talk]]) 14:45, 7 September 2022 (EDT)

Thylacine 2000 at 18:03, 7 September 2022

2022-09-07T18:03:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:03, 7 September 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: If also like clarification on that. •[[User:ChristalIsMe\|ChristalIsMe]] ([[User talk:ChristalIsMe\|talk]]) 12:11, 7 September 2022 (EDT)		: If also like clarification on that. •[[User:ChristalIsMe\|ChristalIsMe]] ([[User talk:ChristalIsMe\|talk]]) 12:11, 7 September 2022 (EDT)
	::Yeah, fully-written, completed—the link at the bottom of the article has all five, you can read them for yourself! Each deserves its own wiki page in my opinion, just nobody's gotten around to it yet. There's no info in Roberts' endnotes on why they never materialised at the time, i.e. what if anything Hasbro thought about them, but even if they weren't approved at the time, I think this publication renders them non-apocryphal in the technical sense of the term. —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 12:43, 7 September 2022 (EDT)		::Yeah, fully-written, completed—the link at the bottom of the article has all five, you can read them for yourself! Each deserves its own wiki page in my opinion, just nobody's gotten around to it yet. There's no info in Roberts' endnotes on why they never materialised at the time, i.e. what if anything Hasbro thought about them, but even if they weren't approved at the time, I think this publication renders them non-apocryphal in the technical sense of the term. —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 12:43, 7 September 2022 (EDT)
			:::I agree that now that they've been approved and published, they are "real". The last one is actually kinda good, considering how short it is. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 14:03, 7 September 2022 (EDT)

The Wadapan at 16:43, 7 September 2022

2022-09-07T16:43:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 7 September 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Can we get more coverage on these, please? Are these fully-written, completed stories? Were they approved and licensed by Hasbro, then not published? --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 12:01, 7 September 2022 (EDT)		Can we get more coverage on these, please? Are these fully-written, completed stories? Were they approved and licensed by Hasbro, then not published? --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 12:01, 7 September 2022 (EDT)
	: If also like clarification on that. •[[User:ChristalIsMe\|ChristalIsMe]] ([[User talk:ChristalIsMe\|talk]]) 12:11, 7 September 2022 (EDT)		: If also like clarification on that. •[[User:ChristalIsMe\|ChristalIsMe]] ([[User talk:ChristalIsMe\|talk]]) 12:11, 7 September 2022 (EDT)
			::Yeah, fully-written, completed—the link at the bottom of the article has all five, you can read them for yourself! Each deserves its own wiki page in my opinion, just nobody's gotten around to it yet. There's no info in Roberts' endnotes on why they never materialised at the time, i.e. what if anything Hasbro thought about them, but even if they weren't approved at the time, I think this publication renders them non-apocryphal in the technical sense of the term. —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 12:43, 7 September 2022 (EDT)

ChristalIsMe at 16:11, 7 September 2022

2022-09-07T16:11:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 7 September 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=="Never-before-seen one-page strips"==		=="Never-before-seen one-page strips"==
	Can we get more coverage on these, please? Are these fully-written, completed stories? Were they approved and licensed by Hasbro, then not published? --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 12:01, 7 September 2022 (EDT)		Can we get more coverage on these, please? Are these fully-written, completed stories? Were they approved and licensed by Hasbro, then not published? --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 12:01, 7 September 2022 (EDT)
			: If also like clarification on that. •[[User:ChristalIsMe\|ChristalIsMe]] ([[User talk:ChristalIsMe\|talk]]) 12:11, 7 September 2022 (EDT)

Thylacine 2000: Created page with "=="Never-before-seen one-page strips"== Can we get more coverage on these, please? Are these fully-written, completed stories? Were they approved and licensed by Hasbro, the..."

2022-09-07T16:01:47Z

Created page with "=="Never-before-seen one-page strips"== Can we get more coverage on these, please? Are these fully-written, completed stories? Were they approved and licensed by Hasbro, the..."

New page

=="Never-before-seen one-page strips"==
Can we get more coverage on these, please? Are these fully-written, completed stories? Were they approved and licensed by Hasbro, then not published? --[[User:Thylacine 2000|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000|talk]]) 12:01, 7 September 2022 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:45, 7 September 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Yeah, fully-written, completed—the link at the bottom of the article has all five, you can read them for yourself! Each deserves its own wiki page in my opinion, just nobody's gotten around to it yet. There's no info in Roberts' endnotes on why they never materialised at the time, i.e. what if anything Hasbro thought about them, but even if they weren't approved at the time, I think this publication renders them non-apocryphal in the technical sense of the term. —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 12:43, 7 September 2022 (EDT)		::Yeah, fully-written, completed—the link at the bottom of the article has all five, you can read them for yourself! Each deserves its own wiki page in my opinion, just nobody's gotten around to it yet. There's no info in Roberts' endnotes on why they never materialised at the time, i.e. what if anything Hasbro thought about them, but even if they weren't approved at the time, I think this publication renders them non-apocryphal in the technical sense of the term. —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 12:43, 7 September 2022 (EDT)
	:::I agree that now that they've been approved and published, they are "real". The last one is actually kinda good, considering how short it is. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 14:03, 7 September 2022 (EDT)		:::I agree that now that they've been approved and published, they are "real". The last one is actually kinda good, considering how short it is. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 14:03, 7 September 2022 (EDT)
			:::: Those are pretty good, actually.•[[User:ChristalIsMe\|ChristalIsMe]] ([[User talk:ChristalIsMe\|talk]]) 14:45, 7 September 2022 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:03, 7 September 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: If also like clarification on that. •[[User:ChristalIsMe\|ChristalIsMe]] ([[User talk:ChristalIsMe\|talk]]) 12:11, 7 September 2022 (EDT)		: If also like clarification on that. •[[User:ChristalIsMe\|ChristalIsMe]] ([[User talk:ChristalIsMe\|talk]]) 12:11, 7 September 2022 (EDT)
	::Yeah, fully-written, completed—the link at the bottom of the article has all five, you can read them for yourself! Each deserves its own wiki page in my opinion, just nobody's gotten around to it yet. There's no info in Roberts' endnotes on why they never materialised at the time, i.e. what if anything Hasbro thought about them, but even if they weren't approved at the time, I think this publication renders them non-apocryphal in the technical sense of the term. —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 12:43, 7 September 2022 (EDT)		::Yeah, fully-written, completed—the link at the bottom of the article has all five, you can read them for yourself! Each deserves its own wiki page in my opinion, just nobody's gotten around to it yet. There's no info in Roberts' endnotes on why they never materialised at the time, i.e. what if anything Hasbro thought about them, but even if they weren't approved at the time, I think this publication renders them non-apocryphal in the technical sense of the term. —[[User:The Wadapan\|The Wadapan]] ([[User talk:The Wadapan\|talk]]) 12:43, 7 September 2022 (EDT)
			:::I agree that now that they've been approved and published, they are "real". The last one is actually kinda good, considering how short it is. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] ([[User talk:Thylacine 2000\|talk]]) 14:03, 7 September 2022 (EDT)