Talk:Transformers: Dark of the Moon (novel) - Revision history

Interrobang: Talk:Dark of the Moon (novel) moved to Talk:Transformers: Dark of the Moon (novel)

2011-09-16T00:17:51Z

Talk:Dark of the Moon (novel) moved to Talk:Transformers: Dark of the Moon (novel)

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:17, 16 September 2011
(No difference)

FFN: /* This article should probably unlocked now */ new section

2011-07-09T17:38:42Z

This article should probably unlocked now: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 9 July 2011
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:::::::We should just add the info. If people don't want to be spoiled, why would they want to read the summary of the novel? Anyone who doesn't want to be spoiled wouldn't even bother reading the page.--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:50, 19 June 2011 (EDT)		:::::::We should just add the info. If people don't want to be spoiled, why would they want to read the summary of the novel? Anyone who doesn't want to be spoiled wouldn't even bother reading the page.--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:50, 19 June 2011 (EDT)
	::::::::Which means that if the page is horribly formatted, full of typos or perhaps even outright lies, only few contributors will be willing to bring or capable of bringing the page up to standards. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 16:58, 19 June 2011 (EDT)		::::::::Which means that if the page is horribly formatted, full of typos or perhaps even outright lies, only few contributors will be willing to bring or capable of bringing the page up to standards. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 16:58, 19 June 2011 (EDT)

			== This article should probably unlocked now ==

			Yeah. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 13:38, 9 July 2011 (EDT)

Geewunling: /* A synopsis already? Why? */

2011-06-19T20:58:25Z

A synopsis already? Why?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:58, 19 June 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:
	::::::You are reading too much into "not all of us care about spoilers" in relation to this one article. I have nothing in particular against deleting any untrustworthy edits that people don't feel like editing for various reasons or keeping information out of character pages. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:34, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		::::::You are reading too much into "not all of us care about spoilers" in relation to this one article. I have nothing in particular against deleting any untrustworthy edits that people don't feel like editing for various reasons or keeping information out of character pages. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:34, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
	:::::::We should just add the info. If people don't want to be spoiled, why would they want to read the summary of the novel? Anyone who doesn't want to be spoiled wouldn't even bother reading the page.--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:50, 19 June 2011 (EDT)		:::::::We should just add the info. If people don't want to be spoiled, why would they want to read the summary of the novel? Anyone who doesn't want to be spoiled wouldn't even bother reading the page.--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:50, 19 June 2011 (EDT)
			::::::::Which means that if the page is horribly formatted, full of typos or perhaps even outright lies, only few contributors will be willing to bring or capable of bringing the page up to standards. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 16:58, 19 June 2011 (EDT)

Primo at 20:50, 19 June 2011

2011-06-19T20:50:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 19 June 2011
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:::::And if you want a justification, I think this talk page serves as a good example. Who, exactly, among us is willing to be the guy who checks, for example, Eagc7's spoiler edits on pages to make sure they're readable and correct? And who's going to check THAT guy's edits to make sure his fix of Eagc7's material is correct? If most of our editors would rather avoid spoilers, then we shouldn't leave pages to those who are less dependable/consistent editors. Then we just have pages and pages and pages of crap that's going to remain rotting out in the open for the weeks duration until we can fix them. The wiki is collaborative. And when people don't want to collaborate because of sensitive material, that material should be put off limits until it can be collaborative. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:13, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		:::::And if you want a justification, I think this talk page serves as a good example. Who, exactly, among us is willing to be the guy who checks, for example, Eagc7's spoiler edits on pages to make sure they're readable and correct? And who's going to check THAT guy's edits to make sure his fix of Eagc7's material is correct? If most of our editors would rather avoid spoilers, then we shouldn't leave pages to those who are less dependable/consistent editors. Then we just have pages and pages and pages of crap that's going to remain rotting out in the open for the weeks duration until we can fix them. The wiki is collaborative. And when people don't want to collaborate because of sensitive material, that material should be put off limits until it can be collaborative. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:13, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
	::::::You are reading too much into "not all of us care about spoilers" in relation to this one article. I have nothing in particular against deleting any untrustworthy edits that people don't feel like editing for various reasons or keeping information out of character pages. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:34, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		::::::You are reading too much into "not all of us care about spoilers" in relation to this one article. I have nothing in particular against deleting any untrustworthy edits that people don't feel like editing for various reasons or keeping information out of character pages. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:34, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
			:::::::We should just add the info. If people don't want to be spoiled, why would they want to read the summary of the novel? Anyone who doesn't want to be spoiled wouldn't even bother reading the page.--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:50, 19 June 2011 (EDT)

Interrobang at 05:34, 31 May 2011

2011-05-31T05:34:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:34, 31 May 2011
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:::::Oh good, Interrobang's here to tell us all what we want. Thanks, Interrobang. (We kept the novel synopsis off the wiki for the other two movies, too.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:33, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		:::::Oh good, Interrobang's here to tell us all what we want. Thanks, Interrobang. (We kept the novel synopsis off the wiki for the other two movies, too.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:33, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
	:::::And if you want a justification, I think this talk page serves as a good example. Who, exactly, among us is willing to be the guy who checks, for example, Eagc7's spoiler edits on pages to make sure they're readable and correct? And who's going to check THAT guy's edits to make sure his fix of Eagc7's material is correct? If most of our editors would rather avoid spoilers, then we shouldn't leave pages to those who are less dependable/consistent editors. Then we just have pages and pages and pages of crap that's going to remain rotting out in the open for the weeks duration until we can fix them. The wiki is collaborative. And when people don't want to collaborate because of sensitive material, that material should be put off limits until it can be collaborative. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:13, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		:::::And if you want a justification, I think this talk page serves as a good example. Who, exactly, among us is willing to be the guy who checks, for example, Eagc7's spoiler edits on pages to make sure they're readable and correct? And who's going to check THAT guy's edits to make sure his fix of Eagc7's material is correct? If most of our editors would rather avoid spoilers, then we shouldn't leave pages to those who are less dependable/consistent editors. Then we just have pages and pages and pages of crap that's going to remain rotting out in the open for the weeks duration until we can fix them. The wiki is collaborative. And when people don't want to collaborate because of sensitive material, that material should be put off limits until it can be collaborative. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:13, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
			::::::You are reading too much into "not all of us care about spoilers" in relation to this one article. I have nothing in particular against deleting any untrustworthy edits that people don't feel like editing for various reasons or keeping information out of character pages. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:34, 31 May 2011 (EDT)

ItsWalky at 05:13, 31 May 2011

2011-05-31T05:13:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:13, 31 May 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	::::Because we do tend to care about spoilers and inadvertently spoiling the movies for ourselves and our readership. Keep it off the wiki for another month, I say. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 00:24, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		::::Because we do tend to care about spoilers and inadvertently spoiling the movies for ourselves and our readership. Keep it off the wiki for another month, I say. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 00:24, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
	:::::Oh good, Interrobang's here to tell us all what we want. Thanks, Interrobang. (We kept the novel synopsis off the wiki for the other two movies, too.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:33, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		:::::Oh good, Interrobang's here to tell us all what we want. Thanks, Interrobang. (We kept the novel synopsis off the wiki for the other two movies, too.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:33, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
			:::::And if you want a justification, I think this talk page serves as a good example. Who, exactly, among us is willing to be the guy who checks, for example, Eagc7's spoiler edits on pages to make sure they're readable and correct? And who's going to check THAT guy's edits to make sure his fix of Eagc7's material is correct? If most of our editors would rather avoid spoilers, then we shouldn't leave pages to those who are less dependable/consistent editors. Then we just have pages and pages and pages of crap that's going to remain rotting out in the open for the weeks duration until we can fix them. The wiki is collaborative. And when people don't want to collaborate because of sensitive material, that material should be put off limits until it can be collaborative. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:13, 31 May 2011 (EDT)

ItsWalky: /* A synopsis already? Why? */

2011-05-31T04:33:24Z

A synopsis already? Why?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:33, 31 May 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::::oops sorry mate, didn't relise. [[User:DOTM123\|DOTM123]] 27 May 2011		::::::oops sorry mate, didn't relise. [[User:DOTM123\|DOTM123]] 27 May 2011
	::::Because we do tend to care about spoilers and inadvertently spoiling the movies for ourselves and our readership. Keep it off the wiki for another month, I say. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 00:24, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		::::Because we do tend to care about spoilers and inadvertently spoiling the movies for ourselves and our readership. Keep it off the wiki for another month, I say. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 00:24, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
			:::::Oh good, Interrobang's here to tell us all what we want. Thanks, Interrobang. (We kept the novel synopsis off the wiki for the other two movies, too.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:33, 31 May 2011 (EDT)

FFN: /* A synopsis already? Why? */

2011-05-31T04:24:16Z

A synopsis already? Why?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:24, 31 May 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:::::I was not talking to you, dude. Unless your name is FFN. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 11:41, 27 May 2011 (EDT)		:::::I was not talking to you, dude. Unless your name is FFN. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 11:41, 27 May 2011 (EDT)
	::::::oops sorry mate, didn't relise. [[User:DOTM123\|DOTM123]] 27 May 2011		::::::oops sorry mate, didn't relise. [[User:DOTM123\|DOTM123]] 27 May 2011
			::::Because we do tend to care about spoilers and inadvertently spoiling the movies for ourselves and our readership. Keep it off the wiki for another month, I say. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 00:24, 31 May 2011 (EDT)

DOTM123: /* A synopsis already? Why? */

2011-05-27T16:00:14Z

A synopsis already? Why?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 27 May 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::It was just a simple question, asking if the story was true, which obviously it is due to you all been so disappointed you know the ending. [[User:DOTM123\|DOTM123]] 27 May 2011		::::It was just a simple question, asking if the story was true, which obviously it is due to you all been so disappointed you know the ending. [[User:DOTM123\|DOTM123]] 27 May 2011
	:::::I was not talking to you, dude. Unless your name is FFN. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 11:41, 27 May 2011 (EDT)		:::::I was not talking to you, dude. Unless your name is FFN. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 11:41, 27 May 2011 (EDT)
			::::::oops sorry mate, didn't relise. [[User:DOTM123\|DOTM123]] 27 May 2011

Interrobang at 15:41, 27 May 2011

2011-05-27T15:41:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:41, 27 May 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:I just checked (because I don't care about spoilers), and yeah, definitely not Eacg7's work and definitely taken from comicbookmovies.com (with some minor adjustments). I removed the synopsis and put the coming soon template back up. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 03:09, 27 May 2011 (EDT)		:I just checked (because I don't care about spoilers), and yeah, definitely not Eacg7's work and definitely taken from comicbookmovies.com (with some minor adjustments). I removed the synopsis and put the coming soon template back up. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 03:09, 27 May 2011 (EDT)

	:So the Synopsis that was written, is it the true story from the novel. [[User:DOTM123\|DOTM123]] 16:28, 27 May 2011		::So the Synopsis that was written, is it the true story from the novel. [[User:DOTM123\|DOTM123]] 16:28, 27 May 2011
	::Why are you assuming all of us care about spoilers, FFN? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 11:37, 27 May 2011 (EDT)		:::Why are you assuming all of us care about spoilers, FFN? [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 11:37, 27 May 2011 (EDT)
	:It was just a simple question, asking if the story was true, which obviously it is due to you all been so disappointed you know the ending. [[User:DOTM123\|DOTM123]] 27 May 2011		::::It was just a simple question, asking if the story was true, which obviously it is due to you all been so disappointed you know the ending. [[User:DOTM123\|DOTM123]] 27 May 2011
			:::::I was not talking to you, dude. Unless your name is FFN. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 11:41, 27 May 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:58, 19 June 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:
	::::::You are reading too much into "not all of us care about spoilers" in relation to this one article. I have nothing in particular against deleting any untrustworthy edits that people don't feel like editing for various reasons or keeping information out of character pages. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:34, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		::::::You are reading too much into "not all of us care about spoilers" in relation to this one article. I have nothing in particular against deleting any untrustworthy edits that people don't feel like editing for various reasons or keeping information out of character pages. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:34, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
	:::::::We should just add the info. If people don't want to be spoiled, why would they want to read the summary of the novel? Anyone who doesn't want to be spoiled wouldn't even bother reading the page.--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:50, 19 June 2011 (EDT)		:::::::We should just add the info. If people don't want to be spoiled, why would they want to read the summary of the novel? Anyone who doesn't want to be spoiled wouldn't even bother reading the page.--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:50, 19 June 2011 (EDT)
			::::::::Which means that if the page is horribly formatted, full of typos or perhaps even outright lies, only few contributors will be willing to bring or capable of bringing the page up to standards. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 16:58, 19 June 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 19 June 2011
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:::::And if you want a justification, I think this talk page serves as a good example. Who, exactly, among us is willing to be the guy who checks, for example, Eagc7's spoiler edits on pages to make sure they're readable and correct? And who's going to check THAT guy's edits to make sure his fix of Eagc7's material is correct? If most of our editors would rather avoid spoilers, then we shouldn't leave pages to those who are less dependable/consistent editors. Then we just have pages and pages and pages of crap that's going to remain rotting out in the open for the weeks duration until we can fix them. The wiki is collaborative. And when people don't want to collaborate because of sensitive material, that material should be put off limits until it can be collaborative. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:13, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		:::::And if you want a justification, I think this talk page serves as a good example. Who, exactly, among us is willing to be the guy who checks, for example, Eagc7's spoiler edits on pages to make sure they're readable and correct? And who's going to check THAT guy's edits to make sure his fix of Eagc7's material is correct? If most of our editors would rather avoid spoilers, then we shouldn't leave pages to those who are less dependable/consistent editors. Then we just have pages and pages and pages of crap that's going to remain rotting out in the open for the weeks duration until we can fix them. The wiki is collaborative. And when people don't want to collaborate because of sensitive material, that material should be put off limits until it can be collaborative. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:13, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
	::::::You are reading too much into "not all of us care about spoilers" in relation to this one article. I have nothing in particular against deleting any untrustworthy edits that people don't feel like editing for various reasons or keeping information out of character pages. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:34, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		::::::You are reading too much into "not all of us care about spoilers" in relation to this one article. I have nothing in particular against deleting any untrustworthy edits that people don't feel like editing for various reasons or keeping information out of character pages. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:34, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
			:::::::We should just add the info. If people don't want to be spoiled, why would they want to read the summary of the novel? Anyone who doesn't want to be spoiled wouldn't even bother reading the page.--[[User:Primo\|Primo]] 16:50, 19 June 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:34, 31 May 2011
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:::::Oh good, Interrobang's here to tell us all what we want. Thanks, Interrobang. (We kept the novel synopsis off the wiki for the other two movies, too.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:33, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		:::::Oh good, Interrobang's here to tell us all what we want. Thanks, Interrobang. (We kept the novel synopsis off the wiki for the other two movies, too.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:33, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
	:::::And if you want a justification, I think this talk page serves as a good example. Who, exactly, among us is willing to be the guy who checks, for example, Eagc7's spoiler edits on pages to make sure they're readable and correct? And who's going to check THAT guy's edits to make sure his fix of Eagc7's material is correct? If most of our editors would rather avoid spoilers, then we shouldn't leave pages to those who are less dependable/consistent editors. Then we just have pages and pages and pages of crap that's going to remain rotting out in the open for the weeks duration until we can fix them. The wiki is collaborative. And when people don't want to collaborate because of sensitive material, that material should be put off limits until it can be collaborative. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:13, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		:::::And if you want a justification, I think this talk page serves as a good example. Who, exactly, among us is willing to be the guy who checks, for example, Eagc7's spoiler edits on pages to make sure they're readable and correct? And who's going to check THAT guy's edits to make sure his fix of Eagc7's material is correct? If most of our editors would rather avoid spoilers, then we shouldn't leave pages to those who are less dependable/consistent editors. Then we just have pages and pages and pages of crap that's going to remain rotting out in the open for the weeks duration until we can fix them. The wiki is collaborative. And when people don't want to collaborate because of sensitive material, that material should be put off limits until it can be collaborative. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:13, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
			::::::You are reading too much into "not all of us care about spoilers" in relation to this one article. I have nothing in particular against deleting any untrustworthy edits that people don't feel like editing for various reasons or keeping information out of character pages. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:34, 31 May 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:13, 31 May 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	::::Because we do tend to care about spoilers and inadvertently spoiling the movies for ourselves and our readership. Keep it off the wiki for another month, I say. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 00:24, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		::::Because we do tend to care about spoilers and inadvertently spoiling the movies for ourselves and our readership. Keep it off the wiki for another month, I say. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 00:24, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
	:::::Oh good, Interrobang's here to tell us all what we want. Thanks, Interrobang. (We kept the novel synopsis off the wiki for the other two movies, too.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:33, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		:::::Oh good, Interrobang's here to tell us all what we want. Thanks, Interrobang. (We kept the novel synopsis off the wiki for the other two movies, too.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:33, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
			:::::And if you want a justification, I think this talk page serves as a good example. Who, exactly, among us is willing to be the guy who checks, for example, Eagc7's spoiler edits on pages to make sure they're readable and correct? And who's going to check THAT guy's edits to make sure his fix of Eagc7's material is correct? If most of our editors would rather avoid spoilers, then we shouldn't leave pages to those who are less dependable/consistent editors. Then we just have pages and pages and pages of crap that's going to remain rotting out in the open for the weeks duration until we can fix them. The wiki is collaborative. And when people don't want to collaborate because of sensitive material, that material should be put off limits until it can be collaborative. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 01:13, 31 May 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:33, 31 May 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::::oops sorry mate, didn't relise. [[User:DOTM123\|DOTM123]] 27 May 2011		::::::oops sorry mate, didn't relise. [[User:DOTM123\|DOTM123]] 27 May 2011
	::::Because we do tend to care about spoilers and inadvertently spoiling the movies for ourselves and our readership. Keep it off the wiki for another month, I say. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 00:24, 31 May 2011 (EDT)		::::Because we do tend to care about spoilers and inadvertently spoiling the movies for ourselves and our readership. Keep it off the wiki for another month, I say. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 00:24, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
			:::::Oh good, Interrobang's here to tell us all what we want. Thanks, Interrobang. (We kept the novel synopsis off the wiki for the other two movies, too.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 00:33, 31 May 2011 (EDT)