Talk:Transformers: Robots in Disguise (2015 toyline) - Revision history

Nevermore: /* Wave numbering */ new section

2017-10-30T10:52:30Z

Wave numbering: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:52, 30 October 2017
Line 19:		Line 19:

	: The combiner sets are out now. I don't have the details on the release schedule, what sets there will be, or anything technical, but I got the Optimus/Strongarm two-pack. There was a Bumblebee/Sideswipe set at the store as well. The sets have two Legion sized characters that plug together and autotransform into a combined robot. One robot is the legs and the other is the torso and arms. Again, I don't know anything beyond what I've seen in stores so I'm not really qualified to update the page on the matter. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] ([[User talk:King Starscream\|talk]]) 12:31, 3 January 2017 (EST)		: The combiner sets are out now. I don't have the details on the release schedule, what sets there will be, or anything technical, but I got the Optimus/Strongarm two-pack. There was a Bumblebee/Sideswipe set at the store as well. The sets have two Legion sized characters that plug together and autotransform into a combined robot. One robot is the legs and the other is the torso and arms. Again, I don't know anything beyond what I've seen in stores so I'm not really qualified to update the page on the matter. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] ([[User talk:King Starscream\|talk]]) 12:31, 3 January 2017 (EST)

			== Wave numbering ==

			Another case of stupid annoying "how do we do this" minutiae: The last RID Warriors.

			Multiple international markets got a wave that includes Twinferno, Bludgeon and Thermidor from the get-go before any of these ever became available in the US.

			Then Twinferno was found all by himself, and Entertainment Earth is labeling this "[https://www.entertainmentearth.com/prodinfo.asp?number=HTB0070M wave 12]". This wave appears to be exclusive to the US.

			The wave that was released internationally is now listed as "[https://www.entertainmentearth.com/prodinfo.asp?number=HTB0070N wave 13]".

			What takes precedent? The wave that was available pretty much everywhere (Asia, Canada, Australia, Europe) ''except'' for the US for months or the official US wave order?--[[User:Nevermore\|Nevermore]] ([[User talk:Nevermore\|talk]]) 06:52, 30 October 2017 (EDT)

King Starscream: /* Combiner Force */

2017-01-03T17:31:26Z

Combiner Force

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 3 January 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Do we have any info at all on the Combiner Force sub-line imprint? I saw Optimus and Starscream Legion figures with the new packaging today. I bought Starscream, but the instructions and packaging don't really say anything about combining either as a feature or even a concept. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] ([[User talk:King Starscream\|talk]]) 13:11, 15 December 2016 (EST)		Do we have any info at all on the Combiner Force sub-line imprint? I saw Optimus and Starscream Legion figures with the new packaging today. I bought Starscream, but the instructions and packaging don't really say anything about combining either as a feature or even a concept. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] ([[User talk:King Starscream\|talk]]) 13:11, 15 December 2016 (EST)

			: The combiner sets are out now. I don't have the details on the release schedule, what sets there will be, or anything technical, but I got the Optimus/Strongarm two-pack. There was a Bumblebee/Sideswipe set at the store as well. The sets have two Legion sized characters that plug together and autotransform into a combined robot. One robot is the legs and the other is the torso and arms. Again, I don't know anything beyond what I've seen in stores so I'm not really qualified to update the page on the matter. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] ([[User talk:King Starscream\|talk]]) 12:31, 3 January 2017 (EST)

King Starscream: /* Combiner Force */ new section

2016-12-15T18:11:51Z

Combiner Force: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 15 December 2016
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::(That being said, I kiiiiiinda doubt it'll be ''that'' Override regardless.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 14:51, 24 April 2015 (EDT)		:::(That being said, I kiiiiiinda doubt it'll be ''that'' Override regardless.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 14:51, 24 April 2015 (EDT)
	::::Yeah, I changed them all to Aligned once the Insecticons were confirmed. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 19:05, 24 April 2015 (EDT)		::::Yeah, I changed them all to Aligned once the Insecticons were confirmed. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 19:05, 24 April 2015 (EDT)

			== Combiner Force ==

			Do we have any info at all on the Combiner Force sub-line imprint? I saw Optimus and Starscream Legion figures with the new packaging today. I bought Starscream, but the instructions and packaging don't really say anything about combining either as a feature or even a concept. --[[User:King Starscream\|King Starscream]] ([[User talk:King Starscream\|talk]]) 13:11, 15 December 2016 (EST)

Saix: /* TAV26 Override */

2015-04-24T23:05:52Z

TAV26 Override

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:05, 24 April 2015
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molds all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given Adventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])		::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molds all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given Adventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])
	:::(That being said, I kiiiiiinda doubt it'll be ''that'' Override regardless.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 14:51, 24 April 2015 (EDT)		:::(That being said, I kiiiiiinda doubt it'll be ''that'' Override regardless.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 14:51, 24 April 2015 (EDT)
	::::Yeah, I changed them all to ~~Adventure~~ once the Insecticons were confirmed. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 19:05, 24 April 2015 (EDT)		::::Yeah, I changed them all to Aligned once the Insecticons were confirmed. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 19:05, 24 April 2015 (EDT)

Saix: /* TAV26 Override */

2015-04-24T23:05:38Z

TAV26 Override

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:05, 24 April 2015
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molds all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given Adventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])		::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molds all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given Adventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])
	:::(That being said, I kiiiiiinda doubt it'll be ''that'' Override regardless.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 14:51, 24 April 2015 (EDT)		:::(That being said, I kiiiiiinda doubt it'll be ''that'' Override regardless.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 14:51, 24 April 2015 (EDT)
			::::Yeah, I changed them all to Adventure once the Insecticons were confirmed. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 19:05, 24 April 2015 (EDT)

LV at 18:51, 24 April 2015

2015-04-24T18:51:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:51, 24 April 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)		:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)
	::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molds all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given Adventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])		::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molds all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given Adventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])
			:::(That being said, I kiiiiiinda doubt it'll be ''that'' Override regardless.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 14:51, 24 April 2015 (EDT)

LV: ugh

2015-04-24T18:50:30Z

ugh

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 24 April 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Should this be linked to [[Override (Prime)]]? Or is this a new character? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 11:57, 19 April 2015 (EDT)		Should this be linked to [[Override (Prime)]]? Or is this a new character? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 11:57, 19 April 2015 (EDT)
	:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)		:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)
	::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style ~~molsd~~ all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given ~~QAdventure~~ toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])		::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molds all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given Adventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])

LV at 18:50, 24 April 2015

2015-04-24T18:50:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 24 April 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Should this be linked to [[Override (Prime)]]? Or is this a new character? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 11:57, 19 April 2015 (EDT)		Should this be linked to [[Override (Prime)]]? Or is this a new character? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 11:57, 19 April 2015 (EDT)
	:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)		:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)
			::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molsd all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given QAdventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])

Saix: Not a chatroom

2015-04-24T14:15:30Z

Not a chatroom

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 24 April 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Should this be linked to [[Override (Prime)]]? Or is this a new character? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 11:57, 19 April 2015 (EDT)		Should this be linked to [[Override (Prime)]]? Or is this a new character? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 11:57, 19 April 2015 (EDT)
	:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)		:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)
	:This is just speculation, but I believe that the reason Takara didn't announce this figure as Groove is because they have a Deluxe class Groove coming down the line! Speculation, but awesome speculation. [[User:Autoboty\|Autoboty]] ([[User talk:Autoboty\|talk]]) 05:28, 24 April 2015 (EDT)

Autoboty: /* TAV26 Override */

2015-04-24T09:28:07Z

TAV26 Override

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 24 April 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Should this be linked to [[Override (Prime)]]? Or is this a new character? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 11:57, 19 April 2015 (EDT)		Should this be linked to [[Override (Prime)]]? Or is this a new character? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 11:57, 19 April 2015 (EDT)
	:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)		:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)
			:This is just speculation, but I believe that the reason Takara didn't announce this figure as Groove is because they have a Deluxe class Groove coming down the line! Speculation, but awesome speculation. [[User:Autoboty\|Autoboty]] ([[User talk:Autoboty\|talk]]) 05:28, 24 April 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:05, 24 April 2015
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molds all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given Adventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])		::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molds all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given Adventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])
	:::(That being said, I kiiiiiinda doubt it'll be ''that'' Override regardless.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 14:51, 24 April 2015 (EDT)		:::(That being said, I kiiiiiinda doubt it'll be ''that'' Override regardless.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 14:51, 24 April 2015 (EDT)
	::::Yeah, I changed them all to ~~Adventure~~ once the Insecticons were confirmed. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 19:05, 24 April 2015 (EDT)		::::Yeah, I changed them all to Aligned once the Insecticons were confirmed. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 19:05, 24 April 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:05, 24 April 2015
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molds all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given Adventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])		::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molds all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given Adventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])
	:::(That being said, I kiiiiiinda doubt it'll be ''that'' Override regardless.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 14:51, 24 April 2015 (EDT)		:::(That being said, I kiiiiiinda doubt it'll be ''that'' Override regardless.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 14:51, 24 April 2015 (EDT)
			::::Yeah, I changed them all to Adventure once the Insecticons were confirmed. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 19:05, 24 April 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:51, 24 April 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)		:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)
	::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molds all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given Adventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])		::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molds all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given Adventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])
			:::(That being said, I kiiiiiinda doubt it'll be ''that'' Override regardless.) -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]]) 14:51, 24 April 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 24 April 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Should this be linked to [[Override (Prime)]]? Or is this a new character? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 11:57, 19 April 2015 (EDT)		Should this be linked to [[Override (Prime)]]? Or is this a new character? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 11:57, 19 April 2015 (EDT)
	:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)		:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)
	::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style ~~molsd~~ all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given ~~QAdventure~~ toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])		::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molds all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given Adventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 24 April 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Should this be linked to [[Override (Prime)]]? Or is this a new character? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 11:57, 19 April 2015 (EDT)		Should this be linked to [[Override (Prime)]]? Or is this a new character? --[[User:Flicky1991\|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991\|1991]] 11:57, 19 April 2015 (EDT)
	:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)		:We don't know what the deal is with the Legends toys being released in Adventure. If the character is Aligned, then it'd be a new character based on G1 Override. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 12:13, 19 April 2015 (EDT)
			::Well, the Insecticons seem to be RIDiverse characters, assuming Lockdown is, and at this point, with RID, Animated, BH, AOE and G1-style molsd all in Adventure, Id say the preponderance of evidence is probably on showing a given QAdventure toy is ''not'' Aligned, whether they look like they should be or not. -[[User:LV\|LV]] ([[User talk:LV\|talk]])