Talk:Transformers: The Ultimate Guide - Revision history

85.210.51.187: /* Italics */

2011-10-21T16:20:13Z

Italics

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 21 October 2011
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::I see.... three instances of it in the entire article. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 11:47, 21 October 2011 (EDT)		::I see.... three instances of it in the entire article. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 11:47, 21 October 2011 (EDT)
	:::I found four, three of them in the "Editorial priorities" section. The single word one in the third paragraph of that section is hard to see. While 4 is still a small number, having 3 instances that close together is kind of much. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:54, 21 October 2011 (EDT)		:::I found four, three of them in the "Editorial priorities" section. The single word one in the third paragraph of that section is hard to see. While 4 is still a small number, having 3 instances that close together is kind of much. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:54, 21 October 2011 (EDT)

			::::''No'', it's not ''enough''. Everyone,'' but'' everyone, ''reading'' this ''Wiki'' is a ''complete'' moron totally ''unable'' to work out '''if''' something is stupid'' from'' mere text.

			"This approach goes so far as to claim that the cartoon's Quintesson-creation origin for the Transformers is entirely conjectural—when talking solely about the cartoon!" is completely meaningless. I have no ''idea'' how strange and ''bizarre'' that situation is from just ''the'' words used and my ''own'' brain. "This approach goes so far as to claim that the cartoon's Quintesson-creation origin for the Transformers is entirely conjectural — ''when talking solely about the cartoon''!" ''lets'' me know exactly ''what'' the score ''is''.

Khajidha: /* Italics */ misremembered section title

2011-10-21T16:00:10Z

Italics: misremembered section title

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 21 October 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Hey, can we have ''more'' italics for ''emphasis''? It's difficult to ''work out'' what's meant to be funny/amazingly astounding and gobsmacking ''without'' italics ''hammering'' every single instance home like a pneumatic ''drill''.		Hey, can we have ''more'' italics for ''emphasis''? It's difficult to ''work out'' what's meant to be funny/amazingly astounding and gobsmacking ''without'' italics ''hammering'' every single instance home like a pneumatic ''drill''.
	::I see.... three instances of it in the entire article. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 11:47, 21 October 2011 (EDT)		::I see.... three instances of it in the entire article. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 11:47, 21 October 2011 (EDT)
	:::I found four, three of them in the "Editorial ~~policies~~" section. The single word one in the third paragraph of that section is hard to see. While 4 is still a small number, having 3 instances that close together is kind of much. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:54, 21 October 2011 (EDT)		:::I found four, three of them in the "Editorial priorities" section. The single word one in the third paragraph of that section is hard to see. While 4 is still a small number, having 3 instances that close together is kind of much. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:54, 21 October 2011 (EDT)

Khajidha: /* Italics */

2011-10-21T15:54:37Z

Italics

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, 21 October 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Hey, can we have ''more'' italics for ''emphasis''? It's difficult to ''work out'' what's meant to be funny/amazingly astounding and gobsmacking ''without'' italics ''hammering'' every single instance home like a pneumatic ''drill''.		Hey, can we have ''more'' italics for ''emphasis''? It's difficult to ''work out'' what's meant to be funny/amazingly astounding and gobsmacking ''without'' italics ''hammering'' every single instance home like a pneumatic ''drill''.
	::I see.... three instances of it in the entire article. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 11:47, 21 October 2011 (EDT)		::I see.... three instances of it in the entire article. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 11:47, 21 October 2011 (EDT)
			:::I found four, three of them in the "Editorial policies" section. The single word one in the third paragraph of that section is hard to see. While 4 is still a small number, having 3 instances that close together is kind of much. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:54, 21 October 2011 (EDT)

Chris McFeely: /* Italics */

2011-10-21T15:47:04Z

Italics

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 21 October 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Hey, can we have ''more'' italics for ''emphasis''? It's difficult to ''work out'' what's meant to be funny/amazingly astounding and gobsmacking ''without'' italics ''hammering'' every single instance home like a pneumatic ''drill''.		Hey, can we have ''more'' italics for ''emphasis''? It's difficult to ''work out'' what's meant to be funny/amazingly astounding and gobsmacking ''without'' italics ''hammering'' every single instance home like a pneumatic ''drill''.
			::I see.... three instances of it in the entire article. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 11:47, 21 October 2011 (EDT)

85.210.51.187: /* Italics */ new section

2011-10-21T15:38:06Z

Italics: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 21 October 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:

	:The Dreamwave section became "Dreamwave and IDW," and two double-page spreads were added - one for IDW's G1 universe, and one for their other projects. After that, without any kind of setion header to separate them out, just tacking them on at the end of the book, were a double-page on Alternators, and a double-page on Classics. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 19:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		:The Dreamwave section became "Dreamwave and IDW," and two double-page spreads were added - one for IDW's G1 universe, and one for their other projects. After that, without any kind of setion header to separate them out, just tacking them on at the end of the book, were a double-page on Alternators, and a double-page on Classics. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 19:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

			== Italics ==

			Hey, can we have ''more'' italics for ''emphasis''? It's difficult to ''work out'' what's meant to be funny/amazingly astounding and gobsmacking ''without'' italics ''hammering'' every single instance home like a pneumatic ''drill''.

Deceptitran: /* Deceptitran import fixes v1.0 */

2009-03-23T11:53:51Z

Deceptitran import fixes v1.0

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:53, 23 March 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	What, exactly, was added for the updated edition? -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		What, exactly, was added for the updated edition? -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

	:The Dreamwave section became "Dreamwave and IDW," and two double-page spreads were added - one for IDW's G1 universe, and one for their other projects. After that, without any kind of setion header to separate them out, just tacking them on at the end of the book, were a double-page on Alternators, and a double-page on Classics. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 19:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)~~<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>~~		:The Dreamwave section became "Dreamwave and IDW," and two double-page spreads were added - one for IDW's G1 universe, and one for their other projects. After that, without any kind of setion header to separate them out, just tacking them on at the end of the book, were a double-page on Alternators, and a double-page on Classics. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 19:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Chris McFeely at 19:50, 21 August 2007

2007-08-21T19:50:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 21 August 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== 2nd Edition ==		== 2nd Edition ==

	What, exactly, was added for the updated edition? -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		What, exactly, was added for the updated edition? -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

			:The Dreamwave section became "Dreamwave and IDW," and two double-page spreads were added - one for IDW's G1 universe, and one for their other projects. After that, without any kind of setion header to separate them out, just tacking them on at the end of the book, were a double-page on Alternators, and a double-page on Classics. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 19:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Derik: 2nd Edition

2007-08-21T19:40:24Z

2nd Edition

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 21 August 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::"We realized it would look bad by the time the book came out not to have an Energon section. So we had to scale back a few sections. Robots in Disguise lost its TV section which is a shame because it would have been nice just to have that for completists sake, you know we've got a TV section on pretty much everything."		::"We realized it would look bad by the time the book came out not to have an Energon section. So we had to scale back a few sections. Robots in Disguise lost its TV section which is a shame because it would have been nice just to have that for completists sake, you know we've got a TV section on pretty much everything."
	:Bah. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		:Bah. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
	:::Thank you. That burns, but I was asking for it. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] 18:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		:::Thank you. That burns, but I was asking for it. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] 18:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

			== 2nd Edition ==

			What, exactly, was added for the updated edition? -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 19:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Thylacine 2000 at 18:52, 21 August 2007

2007-08-21T18:52:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, 21 August 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Bit o' digging dug [http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.toys.transformers/msg/5ce0bb3b94e7f91f?&hl=en&q=furman+auto+assembly+book+panel this up]. And I quote:		:Bit o' digging dug [http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.toys.transformers/msg/5ce0bb3b94e7f91f?&hl=en&q=furman+auto+assembly+book+panel this up]. And I quote:
	::"We realized it would look bad by the time the book came out not to have an Energon section. So we had to scale back a few sections. Robots in Disguise lost its TV section which is a shame because it would have been nice just to have that for completists sake, you know we've got a TV section on pretty much everything."		::"We realized it would look bad by the time the book came out not to have an Energon section. So we had to scale back a few sections. Robots in Disguise lost its TV section which is a shame because it would have been nice just to have that for completists sake, you know we've got a TV section on pretty much everything."
	:Bah. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		:Bah. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
			:::Thank you. That burns, but I was asking for it. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] 18:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Chris McFeely at 18:30, 21 August 2007

2007-08-21T18:30:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 21 August 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	The info about Saban and Disney is all correct. However, I recall that convention reports from Auto Assembly, posted to ATT and Allspark, reported Furman saying he would have cut RID anyway--either because he didn't like it, or because assorted short stuff had to be pruned to allow more room for the then-upcoming Energon, or both. Can anyone clear that up?--[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] 18:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		The info about Saban and Disney is all correct. However, I recall that convention reports from Auto Assembly, posted to ATT and Allspark, reported Furman saying he would have cut RID anyway--either because he didn't like it, or because assorted short stuff had to be pruned to allow more room for the then-upcoming Energon, or both. Can anyone clear that up?--[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] 18:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
	:Bit o' digging dug [http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.toys.transformers/msg/5ce0bb3b94e7f91f?&hl=en&q=furman+auto+assembly+book+panel this up]. And I quote:		:Bit o' digging dug [http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.toys.transformers/msg/5ce0bb3b94e7f91f?&hl=en&q=furman+auto+assembly+book+panel this up]. And I quote:
	:"We realized it would look bad by the time the book came out not to have an Energon section. So we had to scale back a few sections. Robots in Disguise lost its TV section which is a shame because it would have been nice just to have that for completists sake, you know we've got a TV section on pretty much everything."		::"We realized it would look bad by the time the book came out not to have an Energon section. So we had to scale back a few sections. Robots in Disguise lost its TV section which is a shame because it would have been nice just to have that for completists sake, you know we've got a TV section on pretty much everything."
	Bah. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>		:Bah. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 18:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>