Talk:Transformers: Wings Universe - Revision history

AzimuthAcolyte: Alpha Trion (G1) -> Alpha Trion update

2025-05-25T16:02:04Z

Alpha Trion (G1) -> Alpha Trion update

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:02, 25 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Female Autobots==		==Female Autobots==
	{{quote\|The historical tales feature a young [[Kup (G1)\|Kup]] alongside mostly characters who never appeared in the cartoon. So far, this has allowed the writers to avoid problems of relative age, since Kup is supposed to be significantly older than almost everyone in the present day. And the only familiar characters in that early timeframe are either [[Alpha Trion ~~(G1)~~\|also old]] or [[renegade Decepticon\|have an excuse]].}}		{{quote\|The historical tales feature a young [[Kup (G1)\|Kup]] alongside mostly characters who never appeared in the cartoon. So far, this has allowed the writers to avoid problems of relative age, since Kup is supposed to be significantly older than almost everyone in the present day. And the only familiar characters in that early timeframe are either [[Alpha Trion\|also old]] or [[renegade Decepticon\|have an excuse]].}}
	What about the [[Female Autobots]]? "Flames of Yesterday" features the orange/purple and green elf ladies, and also Moonracer, the youngest-seeming Female Autobot, is also out and about. (Moonracer's bio tries to deal with this by saying that there was an accident during an upgrade so she acts like a teenager.) I am not sure how to rewrite this paragraph to accommodate them, since there are so many exceptions presented already to the "rule" given in it. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:35, 31 May 2010 (EDT)		What about the [[Female Autobots]]? "Flames of Yesterday" features the orange/purple and green elf ladies, and also Moonracer, the youngest-seeming Female Autobot, is also out and about. (Moonracer's bio tries to deal with this by saying that there was an accident during an upgrade so she acts like a teenager.) I am not sure how to rewrite this paragraph to accommodate them, since there are so many exceptions presented already to the "rule" given in it. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:35, 31 May 2010 (EDT)
	:It also makes zero mention of the fact that (so far, anyway) this is a very Elite Guard-centric set of stories, not just pre-war stories in general.		:It also makes zero mention of the fact that (so far, anyway) this is a very Elite Guard-centric set of stories, not just pre-war stories in general.

Escargon: /* How loosely based is this to the cartoon? */

2023-05-10T01:06:15Z

How loosely based is this to the cartoon?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:06, 10 May 2023
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:::::::I am not sure if a decision was reached, but if Wings stuff started getting moved to cartoon sections with the appropriate note-age, I wouldn't stop anyone. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:36, 16 November 2012 (EST)		:::::::I am not sure if a decision was reached, but if Wings stuff started getting moved to cartoon sections with the appropriate note-age, I wouldn't stop anyone. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:36, 16 November 2012 (EST)
	::::::::Why hasn't this been done yet? It's been over ten years and everybody seems to have thought moving Wings info into cartoon sections made sense, yet it still hasn't happened. Honestly, categorizing fiction that is explicitly intended to be a part of the cartoon continuity as being completely seperate just because of unimportant design differences is petty and doesn't make a lot of sense.--[[User:Volnar The Unforgiving\|Volnar The Unforgiving]] ([[User talk:Volnar The Unforgiving\|talk]]) 20:58, 9 May 2023 (EDT)		::::::::Why hasn't this been done yet? It's been over ten years and everybody seems to have thought moving Wings info into cartoon sections made sense, yet it still hasn't happened. Honestly, categorizing fiction that is explicitly intended to be a part of the cartoon continuity as being completely seperate just because of unimportant design differences is petty and doesn't make a lot of sense.--[[User:Volnar The Unforgiving\|Volnar The Unforgiving]] ([[User talk:Volnar The Unforgiving\|talk]]) 20:58, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
	:::::::::The thing being discussed here is putting the Wings fiction sections in the section of the articles about the various cartoon-based appearances, including related media, not actually putting it in the cartoon section. We aren't doing that because that's now how it was released. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 21:05, 9 May 2023 (EDT)		:::::::::The thing being discussed here is putting the Wings fiction sections in the section of the articles about the various cartoon-based appearances, including related media, not actually putting it in the cartoon section. We aren't doing that because that's now how it was released, and it contradicts other material. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 21:05, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
	::Different bodies with no explanation based on modern toys seems to be the new normal, like [[Rodimus vs. Cyclonus]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:00, 24 December 2011 (EST)		::Different bodies with no explanation based on modern toys seems to be the new normal, like [[Rodimus vs. Cyclonus]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:00, 24 December 2011 (EST)

Escargon: /* How loosely based is this to the cartoon? */

2023-05-10T01:05:55Z

How loosely based is this to the cartoon?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:05, 10 May 2023
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:::::::I am not sure if a decision was reached, but if Wings stuff started getting moved to cartoon sections with the appropriate note-age, I wouldn't stop anyone. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:36, 16 November 2012 (EST)		:::::::I am not sure if a decision was reached, but if Wings stuff started getting moved to cartoon sections with the appropriate note-age, I wouldn't stop anyone. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:36, 16 November 2012 (EST)
	::::::::Why hasn't this been done yet? It's been over ten years and everybody seems to have thought moving Wings info into cartoon sections made sense, yet it still hasn't happened. Honestly, categorizing fiction that is explicitly intended to be a part of the cartoon continuity as being completely seperate just because of unimportant design differences is petty and doesn't make a lot of sense.--[[User:Volnar The Unforgiving\|Volnar The Unforgiving]] ([[User talk:Volnar The Unforgiving\|talk]]) 20:58, 9 May 2023 (EDT)		::::::::Why hasn't this been done yet? It's been over ten years and everybody seems to have thought moving Wings info into cartoon sections made sense, yet it still hasn't happened. Honestly, categorizing fiction that is explicitly intended to be a part of the cartoon continuity as being completely seperate just because of unimportant design differences is petty and doesn't make a lot of sense.--[[User:Volnar The Unforgiving\|Volnar The Unforgiving]] ([[User talk:Volnar The Unforgiving\|talk]]) 20:58, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
			:::::::::The thing being discussed here is putting the Wings fiction sections in the section of the articles about the various cartoon-based appearances, including related media, not actually putting it in the cartoon section. We aren't doing that because that's now how it was released. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 21:05, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
	::Different bodies with no explanation based on modern toys seems to be the new normal, like [[Rodimus vs. Cyclonus]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:00, 24 December 2011 (EST)		::Different bodies with no explanation based on modern toys seems to be the new normal, like [[Rodimus vs. Cyclonus]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:00, 24 December 2011 (EST)

Volnar The Unforgiving: /* How loosely based is this to the cartoon? */

2023-05-10T00:58:57Z

How loosely based is this to the cartoon?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 10 May 2023
Line 21:		Line 21:
	::::::Did we ever come to a decision on this? It does seem like it'd be better suited in the G1 cartoon continuity sections. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 20:23, 16 November 2012 (EST)		::::::Did we ever come to a decision on this? It does seem like it'd be better suited in the G1 cartoon continuity sections. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 20:23, 16 November 2012 (EST)
	:::::::I am not sure if a decision was reached, but if Wings stuff started getting moved to cartoon sections with the appropriate note-age, I wouldn't stop anyone. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:36, 16 November 2012 (EST)		:::::::I am not sure if a decision was reached, but if Wings stuff started getting moved to cartoon sections with the appropriate note-age, I wouldn't stop anyone. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:36, 16 November 2012 (EST)
			::::::::Why hasn't this been done yet? It's been over ten years and everybody seems to have thought moving Wings info into cartoon sections made sense, yet it still hasn't happened. Honestly, categorizing fiction that is explicitly intended to be a part of the cartoon continuity as being completely seperate just because of unimportant design differences is petty and doesn't make a lot of sense.--[[User:Volnar The Unforgiving\|Volnar The Unforgiving]] ([[User talk:Volnar The Unforgiving\|talk]]) 20:58, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
	::Different bodies with no explanation based on modern toys seems to be the new normal, like [[Rodimus vs. Cyclonus]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:00, 24 December 2011 (EST)		::Different bodies with no explanation based on modern toys seems to be the new normal, like [[Rodimus vs. Cyclonus]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:00, 24 December 2011 (EST)

Mimi: And Pete further clarifies. Never mind.

2014-09-25T23:27:12Z

And Pete further clarifies. Never mind.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 25 September 2014
Line 40:		Line 40:
	:::::Glancing over 3H stuff, the Hunter was described as being from a Cybertron where BW Megatron and the Predacons ruled, and that he winds up crash-landing on the desolate future-Earth before finding the Dark Essence. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:18, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		:::::Glancing over 3H stuff, the Hunter was described as being from a Cybertron where BW Megatron and the Predacons ruled, and that he winds up crash-landing on the desolate future-Earth before finding the Dark Essence. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:18, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	::::::Yeah, that'd do it. You could probably bend over backwards to explain that away, but that ain't what WE'RE for. Distinct continuity integrity is preserved! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		::::::Yeah, that'd do it. You could probably bend over backwards to explain that away, but that ain't what WE'RE for. Distinct continuity integrity is preserved! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

	~~== DoFP ==~~

	I suppose Pete used some ambiguous phrasing to leave options open, but I dunno if it's really helpful to exclude DoFP from Wingsverse stuff. They're both FunPub stories that will likely only be used by FunPub, and any post-Beast Machines Wings Universe stories going forward will include DoFP in its continuity. I don't think any continuity is going to arise and include DoFP but not Wings. [[User:Mimi\|Mimi]] ([[User talk:Mimi\|talk]]) 19:18, 25 September 2014 (EDT)

Mimi: /* DoFP */

2014-09-25T23:19:10Z

DoFP

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 25 September 2014
Line 43:		Line 43:
	== DoFP ==		== DoFP ==

	I suppose Pete used some ambiguous phrasing to leave options open, but I dunno if it's really helpful to exclude DoFP from Wingsverse stuff. They're both FunPub stories that will likely only be used by FunPub, and any post-Beast Machines Wings Universe stories going forward will include DoFP in its continuity. I don't think any continuity is going to ~~develop that includes~~ DoFP but not Wings. [[User:Mimi\|Mimi]] ([[User talk:Mimi\|talk]]) 19:18, 25 September 2014 (EDT)		I suppose Pete used some ambiguous phrasing to leave options open, but I dunno if it's really helpful to exclude DoFP from Wingsverse stuff. They're both FunPub stories that will likely only be used by FunPub, and any post-Beast Machines Wings Universe stories going forward will include DoFP in its continuity. I don't think any continuity is going to arise and include DoFP but not Wings. [[User:Mimi\|Mimi]] ([[User talk:Mimi\|talk]]) 19:18, 25 September 2014 (EDT)

Mimi: /* DoFP */ new section

2014-09-25T23:18:04Z

DoFP: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, 25 September 2014
Line 40:		Line 40:
	:::::Glancing over 3H stuff, the Hunter was described as being from a Cybertron where BW Megatron and the Predacons ruled, and that he winds up crash-landing on the desolate future-Earth before finding the Dark Essence. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:18, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		:::::Glancing over 3H stuff, the Hunter was described as being from a Cybertron where BW Megatron and the Predacons ruled, and that he winds up crash-landing on the desolate future-Earth before finding the Dark Essence. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:18, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	::::::Yeah, that'd do it. You could probably bend over backwards to explain that away, but that ain't what WE'RE for. Distinct continuity integrity is preserved! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		::::::Yeah, that'd do it. You could probably bend over backwards to explain that away, but that ain't what WE'RE for. Distinct continuity integrity is preserved! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

			== DoFP ==

			I suppose Pete used some ambiguous phrasing to leave options open, but I dunno if it's really helpful to exclude DoFP from Wingsverse stuff. They're both FunPub stories that will likely only be used by FunPub, and any post-Beast Machines Wings Universe stories going forward will include DoFP in its continuity. I don't think any continuity is going to develop that includes DoFP but not Wings. [[User:Mimi\|Mimi]] ([[User talk:Mimi\|talk]]) 19:18, 25 September 2014 (EDT)

Jalaguy: /* BotCon 2014 stuff */ Correcting myself.

2014-06-25T10:13:04Z

BotCon 2014 stuff: Correcting myself.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:13, 25 June 2014
Line 38:		Line 38:
	::::Oh, and I wouldn't say Shokaract's origin is different, at least going by my memory. By all appeareances, Hunter steps through the space bridge that Cannonball stole to Earth, where he finds the Dark Essence. That's just putting him in the right place for his original origin to happen. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:32, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		::::Oh, and I wouldn't say Shokaract's origin is different, at least going by my memory. By all appeareances, Hunter steps through the space bridge that Cannonball stole to Earth, where he finds the Dark Essence. That's just putting him in the right place for his original origin to happen. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:32, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	::::And Tap-Out coulda been Wrecker second-in-command during any point in time in the past 150 years. Same with Devcon's defection, since he joins up again with them in Wreckers Finale II. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:33, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		::::And Tap-Out coulda been Wrecker second-in-command during any point in time in the past 150 years. Same with Devcon's defection, since he joins up again with them in Wreckers Finale II. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:33, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	:::::Glancing over 3H stuff, the Hunter was described as being from a Cybertron where BW Megatron and the Predacons ruled, and that he winds up crash-landing on ~~prehistoric~~ Earth before finding the Dark Essence. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:18, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		:::::Glancing over 3H stuff, the Hunter was described as being from a Cybertron where BW Megatron and the Predacons ruled, and that he winds up crash-landing on the desolate future-Earth before finding the Dark Essence. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:18, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	::::::Yeah, that'd do it. You could probably bend over backwards to explain that away, but that ain't what WE'RE for. Distinct continuity integrity is preserved! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		::::::Yeah, that'd do it. You could probably bend over backwards to explain that away, but that ain't what WE'RE for. Distinct continuity integrity is preserved! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

ItsWalky: /* BotCon 2014 stuff */

2014-06-25T01:54:56Z

BotCon 2014 stuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 25 June 2014
Line 39:		Line 39:
	::::And Tap-Out coulda been Wrecker second-in-command during any point in time in the past 150 years. Same with Devcon's defection, since he joins up again with them in Wreckers Finale II. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:33, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		::::And Tap-Out coulda been Wrecker second-in-command during any point in time in the past 150 years. Same with Devcon's defection, since he joins up again with them in Wreckers Finale II. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:33, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	:::::Glancing over 3H stuff, the Hunter was described as being from a Cybertron where BW Megatron and the Predacons ruled, and that he winds up crash-landing on prehistoric Earth before finding the Dark Essence. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:18, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		:::::Glancing over 3H stuff, the Hunter was described as being from a Cybertron where BW Megatron and the Predacons ruled, and that he winds up crash-landing on prehistoric Earth before finding the Dark Essence. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:18, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
			::::::Yeah, that'd do it. You could probably bend over backwards to explain that away, but that ain't what WE'RE for. Distinct continuity integrity is preserved! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

Jalaguy: /* BotCon 2014 stuff */

2014-06-24T16:18:48Z

BotCon 2014 stuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 24 June 2014
Line 38:		Line 38:
	::::Oh, and I wouldn't say Shokaract's origin is different, at least going by my memory. By all appeareances, Hunter steps through the space bridge that Cannonball stole to Earth, where he finds the Dark Essence. That's just putting him in the right place for his original origin to happen. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:32, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		::::Oh, and I wouldn't say Shokaract's origin is different, at least going by my memory. By all appeareances, Hunter steps through the space bridge that Cannonball stole to Earth, where he finds the Dark Essence. That's just putting him in the right place for his original origin to happen. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:32, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	::::And Tap-Out coulda been Wrecker second-in-command during any point in time in the past 150 years. Same with Devcon's defection, since he joins up again with them in Wreckers Finale II. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:33, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		::::And Tap-Out coulda been Wrecker second-in-command during any point in time in the past 150 years. Same with Devcon's defection, since he joins up again with them in Wreckers Finale II. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:33, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
			:::::Glancing over 3H stuff, the Hunter was described as being from a Cybertron where BW Megatron and the Predacons ruled, and that he winds up crash-landing on prehistoric Earth before finding the Dark Essence. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:18, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:06, 10 May 2023
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:::::::I am not sure if a decision was reached, but if Wings stuff started getting moved to cartoon sections with the appropriate note-age, I wouldn't stop anyone. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:36, 16 November 2012 (EST)		:::::::I am not sure if a decision was reached, but if Wings stuff started getting moved to cartoon sections with the appropriate note-age, I wouldn't stop anyone. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:36, 16 November 2012 (EST)
	::::::::Why hasn't this been done yet? It's been over ten years and everybody seems to have thought moving Wings info into cartoon sections made sense, yet it still hasn't happened. Honestly, categorizing fiction that is explicitly intended to be a part of the cartoon continuity as being completely seperate just because of unimportant design differences is petty and doesn't make a lot of sense.--[[User:Volnar The Unforgiving\|Volnar The Unforgiving]] ([[User talk:Volnar The Unforgiving\|talk]]) 20:58, 9 May 2023 (EDT)		::::::::Why hasn't this been done yet? It's been over ten years and everybody seems to have thought moving Wings info into cartoon sections made sense, yet it still hasn't happened. Honestly, categorizing fiction that is explicitly intended to be a part of the cartoon continuity as being completely seperate just because of unimportant design differences is petty and doesn't make a lot of sense.--[[User:Volnar The Unforgiving\|Volnar The Unforgiving]] ([[User talk:Volnar The Unforgiving\|talk]]) 20:58, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
	:::::::::The thing being discussed here is putting the Wings fiction sections in the section of the articles about the various cartoon-based appearances, including related media, not actually putting it in the cartoon section. We aren't doing that because that's now how it was released. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 21:05, 9 May 2023 (EDT)		:::::::::The thing being discussed here is putting the Wings fiction sections in the section of the articles about the various cartoon-based appearances, including related media, not actually putting it in the cartoon section. We aren't doing that because that's now how it was released, and it contradicts other material. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 21:05, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
	::Different bodies with no explanation based on modern toys seems to be the new normal, like [[Rodimus vs. Cyclonus]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:00, 24 December 2011 (EST)		::Different bodies with no explanation based on modern toys seems to be the new normal, like [[Rodimus vs. Cyclonus]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:00, 24 December 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:05, 10 May 2023
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:::::::I am not sure if a decision was reached, but if Wings stuff started getting moved to cartoon sections with the appropriate note-age, I wouldn't stop anyone. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:36, 16 November 2012 (EST)		:::::::I am not sure if a decision was reached, but if Wings stuff started getting moved to cartoon sections with the appropriate note-age, I wouldn't stop anyone. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:36, 16 November 2012 (EST)
	::::::::Why hasn't this been done yet? It's been over ten years and everybody seems to have thought moving Wings info into cartoon sections made sense, yet it still hasn't happened. Honestly, categorizing fiction that is explicitly intended to be a part of the cartoon continuity as being completely seperate just because of unimportant design differences is petty and doesn't make a lot of sense.--[[User:Volnar The Unforgiving\|Volnar The Unforgiving]] ([[User talk:Volnar The Unforgiving\|talk]]) 20:58, 9 May 2023 (EDT)		::::::::Why hasn't this been done yet? It's been over ten years and everybody seems to have thought moving Wings info into cartoon sections made sense, yet it still hasn't happened. Honestly, categorizing fiction that is explicitly intended to be a part of the cartoon continuity as being completely seperate just because of unimportant design differences is petty and doesn't make a lot of sense.--[[User:Volnar The Unforgiving\|Volnar The Unforgiving]] ([[User talk:Volnar The Unforgiving\|talk]]) 20:58, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
			:::::::::The thing being discussed here is putting the Wings fiction sections in the section of the articles about the various cartoon-based appearances, including related media, not actually putting it in the cartoon section. We aren't doing that because that's now how it was released. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 21:05, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
	::Different bodies with no explanation based on modern toys seems to be the new normal, like [[Rodimus vs. Cyclonus]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:00, 24 December 2011 (EST)		::Different bodies with no explanation based on modern toys seems to be the new normal, like [[Rodimus vs. Cyclonus]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:00, 24 December 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 10 May 2023
Line 21:		Line 21:
	::::::Did we ever come to a decision on this? It does seem like it'd be better suited in the G1 cartoon continuity sections. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 20:23, 16 November 2012 (EST)		::::::Did we ever come to a decision on this? It does seem like it'd be better suited in the G1 cartoon continuity sections. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 20:23, 16 November 2012 (EST)
	:::::::I am not sure if a decision was reached, but if Wings stuff started getting moved to cartoon sections with the appropriate note-age, I wouldn't stop anyone. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:36, 16 November 2012 (EST)		:::::::I am not sure if a decision was reached, but if Wings stuff started getting moved to cartoon sections with the appropriate note-age, I wouldn't stop anyone. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:36, 16 November 2012 (EST)
			::::::::Why hasn't this been done yet? It's been over ten years and everybody seems to have thought moving Wings info into cartoon sections made sense, yet it still hasn't happened. Honestly, categorizing fiction that is explicitly intended to be a part of the cartoon continuity as being completely seperate just because of unimportant design differences is petty and doesn't make a lot of sense.--[[User:Volnar The Unforgiving\|Volnar The Unforgiving]] ([[User talk:Volnar The Unforgiving\|talk]]) 20:58, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
	::Different bodies with no explanation based on modern toys seems to be the new normal, like [[Rodimus vs. Cyclonus]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:00, 24 December 2011 (EST)		::Different bodies with no explanation based on modern toys seems to be the new normal, like [[Rodimus vs. Cyclonus]]. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 09:00, 24 December 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:13, 25 June 2014
Line 38:		Line 38:
	::::Oh, and I wouldn't say Shokaract's origin is different, at least going by my memory. By all appeareances, Hunter steps through the space bridge that Cannonball stole to Earth, where he finds the Dark Essence. That's just putting him in the right place for his original origin to happen. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:32, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		::::Oh, and I wouldn't say Shokaract's origin is different, at least going by my memory. By all appeareances, Hunter steps through the space bridge that Cannonball stole to Earth, where he finds the Dark Essence. That's just putting him in the right place for his original origin to happen. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:32, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	::::And Tap-Out coulda been Wrecker second-in-command during any point in time in the past 150 years. Same with Devcon's defection, since he joins up again with them in Wreckers Finale II. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:33, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		::::And Tap-Out coulda been Wrecker second-in-command during any point in time in the past 150 years. Same with Devcon's defection, since he joins up again with them in Wreckers Finale II. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:33, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	:::::Glancing over 3H stuff, the Hunter was described as being from a Cybertron where BW Megatron and the Predacons ruled, and that he winds up crash-landing on ~~prehistoric~~ Earth before finding the Dark Essence. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:18, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		:::::Glancing over 3H stuff, the Hunter was described as being from a Cybertron where BW Megatron and the Predacons ruled, and that he winds up crash-landing on the desolate future-Earth before finding the Dark Essence. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:18, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	::::::Yeah, that'd do it. You could probably bend over backwards to explain that away, but that ain't what WE'RE for. Distinct continuity integrity is preserved! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		::::::Yeah, that'd do it. You could probably bend over backwards to explain that away, but that ain't what WE'RE for. Distinct continuity integrity is preserved! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 25 June 2014
Line 39:		Line 39:
	::::And Tap-Out coulda been Wrecker second-in-command during any point in time in the past 150 years. Same with Devcon's defection, since he joins up again with them in Wreckers Finale II. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:33, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		::::And Tap-Out coulda been Wrecker second-in-command during any point in time in the past 150 years. Same with Devcon's defection, since he joins up again with them in Wreckers Finale II. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 11:33, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
	:::::Glancing over 3H stuff, the Hunter was described as being from a Cybertron where BW Megatron and the Predacons ruled, and that he winds up crash-landing on prehistoric Earth before finding the Dark Essence. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:18, 24 June 2014 (EDT)		:::::Glancing over 3H stuff, the Hunter was described as being from a Cybertron where BW Megatron and the Predacons ruled, and that he winds up crash-landing on prehistoric Earth before finding the Dark Essence. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 12:18, 24 June 2014 (EDT)
			::::::Yeah, that'd do it. You could probably bend over backwards to explain that away, but that ain't what WE'RE for. Distinct continuity integrity is preserved! --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] ([[User talk:ItsWalky\|talk]]) 21:54, 24 June 2014 (EDT)