Talk:Tremorcon - Revision history

Semysane at 06:41, 24 September 2010

2010-09-24T06:41:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:41, 24 September 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	==Random==		==Random==
	I wonder if Seizor is meant to be [[Seizer]]. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 02:08, 24 September 2010 (EDT)		I wonder if Seizor is meant to be [[Seizer]]. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 02:08, 24 September 2010 (EDT)
			:Unlikely. Seizer is (presumably) supposed to be pronounced like Ceaser, while Seizor is likely supposed to be pronounced like seismic. From what I can tell, it's just a coincidence. -- [[User:Semysane\|Semysane]] 02:41, 24 September 2010 (EDT)

Monzo at 06:08, 24 September 2010

2010-09-24T06:08:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:08, 24 September 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I agree. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 22:22, 23 September 2010 (EDT)		:I agree. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 22:22, 23 September 2010 (EDT)
	::So readers are too fucking retarded to pick the only other option from the drop-down menu or just enter "fracture" into the search box and press "go". Gotcha. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 22:29, 23 September 2010 (EDT)		::So readers are too fucking retarded to pick the only other option from the drop-down menu or just enter "fracture" into the search box and press "go". Gotcha. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 22:29, 23 September 2010 (EDT)

			==Random==
			I wonder if Seizor is meant to be [[Seizer]]. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 02:08, 24 September 2010 (EDT)

Interrobang: /* Disambigr removals. */

2010-09-24T02:29:11Z

Disambigr removals.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:29, 24 September 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	So, why were the disambigrs removed? "Fracture (G1)" redirects here. If someone remembers that there was a Fracture toy and types it into the search engine and picks "Fracture (G1)" selection and ends up here. It isn't the page he wanted. We give him no help finding the page he wanted. I think the disambigrs should stay. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:12, 23 September 2010 (EDT)		So, why were the disambigrs removed? "Fracture (G1)" redirects here. If someone remembers that there was a Fracture toy and types it into the search engine and picks "Fracture (G1)" selection and ends up here. It isn't the page he wanted. We give him no help finding the page he wanted. I think the disambigrs should stay. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:12, 23 September 2010 (EDT)
	:I agree. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 22:22, 23 September 2010 (EDT)		:I agree. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 22:22, 23 September 2010 (EDT)
			::So readers are too fucking retarded to pick the only other option from the drop-down menu or just enter "fracture" into the search box and press "go". Gotcha. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 22:29, 23 September 2010 (EDT)

NCZ: /* Disambigr removals. */

2010-09-24T02:22:01Z

Disambigr removals.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:22, 24 September 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:

	So, why were the disambigrs removed? "Fracture (G1)" redirects here. If someone remembers that there was a Fracture toy and types it into the search engine and picks "Fracture (G1)" selection and ends up here. It isn't the page he wanted. We give him no help finding the page he wanted. I think the disambigrs should stay. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:12, 23 September 2010 (EDT)		So, why were the disambigrs removed? "Fracture (G1)" redirects here. If someone remembers that there was a Fracture toy and types it into the search engine and picks "Fracture (G1)" selection and ends up here. It isn't the page he wanted. We give him no help finding the page he wanted. I think the disambigrs should stay. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:12, 23 September 2010 (EDT)
			:I agree. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 22:22, 23 September 2010 (EDT)

Starfield: /* Disambigr removals. */ new section

2010-09-24T02:12:41Z

Disambigr removals.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:12, 24 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think we can still let those character pages keep red because it is possible that those characters have their own actions someday. (Not sure if I've make my opinion clear.) --'''[[User:TX55\|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55\|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 11:16, 23 September 2010 (EDT)		I think we can still let those character pages keep red because it is possible that those characters have their own actions someday. (Not sure if I've make my opinion clear.) --'''[[User:TX55\|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55\|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 11:16, 23 September 2010 (EDT)
	:I don't think it is necessary. Leaving the names as redirects holds their place in namespace. Making the names links without pages makes it seem like there is work to be done on those pages, but there really isn't unless and until other stories use the characters. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:32, 23 September 2010 (EDT)		:I don't think it is necessary. Leaving the names as redirects holds their place in namespace. Making the names links without pages makes it seem like there is work to be done on those pages, but there really isn't unless and until other stories use the characters. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:32, 23 September 2010 (EDT)

			== Disambigr removals. ==

			So, why were the disambigrs removed? "Fracture (G1)" redirects here. If someone remembers that there was a Fracture toy and types it into the search engine and picks "Fracture (G1)" selection and ends up here. It isn't the page he wanted. We give him no help finding the page he wanted. I think the disambigrs should stay. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:12, 23 September 2010 (EDT)

Khajidha at 15:32, 23 September 2010

2010-09-23T15:32:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 23 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think we can still let those character pages keep red because it is possible that those characters have their own actions someday. (Not sure if I've make my opinion clear.) --'''[[User:TX55\|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55\|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 11:16, 23 September 2010 (EDT)		I think we can still let those character pages keep red because it is possible that those characters have their own actions someday. (Not sure if I've make my opinion clear.) --'''[[User:TX55\|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55\|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 11:16, 23 September 2010 (EDT)
			:I don't think it is necessary. Leaving the names as redirects holds their place in namespace. Making the names links without pages makes it seem like there is work to be done on those pages, but there really isn't unless and until other stories use the characters. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 11:32, 23 September 2010 (EDT)

TX55: New page: I think we can still let those character pages keep red because it is possible that those characters have their own actions someday. (Not sure if I've make my opinion clear.) --~~~~

2010-09-23T15:16:25Z

New page: I think we can still let those character pages keep red because it is possible that those characters have their own actions someday. (Not sure if I've make my opinion clear.) --~~~~

New page

I think we can still let those character pages keep red because it is possible that those characters have their own actions someday. (Not sure if I've make my opinion clear.) --'''[[User:TX55|TX55]]'''''[[User talk:TX55|TALK]]'' 11:16, 23 September 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:29, 24 September 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	So, why were the disambigrs removed? "Fracture (G1)" redirects here. If someone remembers that there was a Fracture toy and types it into the search engine and picks "Fracture (G1)" selection and ends up here. It isn't the page he wanted. We give him no help finding the page he wanted. I think the disambigrs should stay. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:12, 23 September 2010 (EDT)		So, why were the disambigrs removed? "Fracture (G1)" redirects here. If someone remembers that there was a Fracture toy and types it into the search engine and picks "Fracture (G1)" selection and ends up here. It isn't the page he wanted. We give him no help finding the page he wanted. I think the disambigrs should stay. - [[User:Starfield\|Starfield]] 22:12, 23 September 2010 (EDT)
	:I agree. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 22:22, 23 September 2010 (EDT)		:I agree. --[[User:NCZ\|NCZ]] 22:22, 23 September 2010 (EDT)
			::So readers are too fucking retarded to pick the only other option from the drop-down menu or just enter "fracture" into the search box and press "go". Gotcha. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 22:29, 23 September 2010 (EDT)