Talk:Unite Warriors Offshot - Revision history

Apoc: /* "20-30 years after the first two seasons"? */

2016-01-17T12:35:48Z

"20-30 years after the first two seasons"?

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:35, 17 January 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:

	That would put these all within the era of The Movie, season 3 and The Headmasters, between 2005-2015, yet Metroplex is very much in his upgraded body from "Metrowars", which is set post-Operation Combination. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 06:36, 17 January 2016 (EST)		That would put these all within the era of The Movie, season 3 and The Headmasters, between 2005-2015, yet Metroplex is very much in his upgraded body from "Metrowars", which is set post-Operation Combination. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 06:36, 17 January 2016 (EST)

			:True enough... I wasn't paying attention to Metroplex's design when I wrote that, but was making assumptions based on the apparent age of the human characters (Auggie looks pretty young assuming he was born shortly after the cartoon, etc). You might be onto something closer. --[[User:Apoc\|Apoc]] ([[User talk:Apoc\|talk]]) 07:35, 17 January 2016 (EST)

Sabrblade: /* "20-30 years after the first two seasons"? */

2016-01-17T11:36:46Z

"20-30 years after the first two seasons"?

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:36, 17 January 2016
Line 9:		Line 9:
	== "20-30 years after the first two seasons"? ==		== "20-30 years after the first two seasons"? ==

	That would put these all within the era of season 3 and The Headmasters, between 2005-2015, yet Metroplex is very much in his upgraded body from "Metrowars", which is set post-Operation Combination. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 06:36, 17 January 2016 (EST)		That would put these all within the era of The Movie, season 3 and The Headmasters, between 2005-2015, yet Metroplex is very much in his upgraded body from "Metrowars", which is set post-Operation Combination. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 06:36, 17 January 2016 (EST)

Sabrblade: /* "20-30 years after the first two seasons"? */ new section

2016-01-17T11:36:22Z

"20-30 years after the first two seasons"?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:36, 17 January 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::Yeah sure, I just based the format on our story page articles to start with and it could use some work. But while this series probably won't have that many chapters, I worry how this solution would look on series with lots of installments, like Recordicons, since the templates themselves would be bigger than the synopsises and really bloat the height of the article. --[[User:Apoc\|Apoc]] ([[User talk:Apoc\|talk]]) 18:19, 13 September 2015 (EDT)		:::Yeah sure, I just based the format on our story page articles to start with and it could use some work. But while this series probably won't have that many chapters, I worry how this solution would look on series with lots of installments, like Recordicons, since the templates themselves would be bigger than the synopsises and really bloat the height of the article. --[[User:Apoc\|Apoc]] ([[User talk:Apoc\|talk]]) 18:19, 13 September 2015 (EDT)
	::::If that becomes an issue, we could use the format used by the [[Transformers Legends (comic)]] article. I still don't think it's ideal, but it's better than no "featured characters" section whatsoever. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 18:29, 13 September 2015 (EDT)		::::If that becomes an issue, we could use the format used by the [[Transformers Legends (comic)]] article. I still don't think it's ideal, but it's better than no "featured characters" section whatsoever. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 18:29, 13 September 2015 (EDT)

			== "20-30 years after the first two seasons"? ==

			That would put these all within the era of season 3 and The Headmasters, between 2005-2015, yet Metroplex is very much in his upgraded body from "Metrowars", which is set post-Operation Combination. --[[User:Sabrblade\|Sabrblade]] ([[User talk:Sabrblade\|talk]]) 06:36, 17 January 2016 (EST)

Ascendron at 22:29, 13 September 2015

2015-09-13T22:29:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 13 September 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::It would also go a long way in ensuring that every character has the appropriate storylinks listed in their articles. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 17:01, 13 September 2015 (EDT)		::It would also go a long way in ensuring that every character has the appropriate storylinks listed in their articles. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 17:01, 13 September 2015 (EDT)
	:::Yeah sure, I just based the format on our story page articles to start with and it could use some work. But while this series probably won't have that many chapters, I worry how this solution would look on series with lots of installments, like Recordicons, since the templates themselves would be bigger than the synopsises and really bloat the height of the article. --[[User:Apoc\|Apoc]] ([[User talk:Apoc\|talk]]) 18:19, 13 September 2015 (EDT)		:::Yeah sure, I just based the format on our story page articles to start with and it could use some work. But while this series probably won't have that many chapters, I worry how this solution would look on series with lots of installments, like Recordicons, since the templates themselves would be bigger than the synopsises and really bloat the height of the article. --[[User:Apoc\|Apoc]] ([[User talk:Apoc\|talk]]) 18:19, 13 September 2015 (EDT)
			::::If that becomes an issue, we could use the format used by the [[Transformers Legends (comic)]] article. I still don't think it's ideal, but it's better than no "featured characters" section whatsoever. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 18:29, 13 September 2015 (EDT)

Apoc at 22:19, 13 September 2015

2015-09-13T22:19:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 13 September 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I feel like that would be useful for a lot of articles. The Legends online comics, Recordicons, the Around Cybertron strips could probably all use them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 16:55, 13 September 2015 (EDT)		:I feel like that would be useful for a lot of articles. The Legends online comics, Recordicons, the Around Cybertron strips could probably all use them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 16:55, 13 September 2015 (EDT)
	::It would also go a long way in ensuring that every character has the appropriate storylinks listed in their articles. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 17:01, 13 September 2015 (EDT)		::It would also go a long way in ensuring that every character has the appropriate storylinks listed in their articles. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 17:01, 13 September 2015 (EDT)
			:::Yeah sure, I just based the format on our story page articles to start with and it could use some work. But while this series probably won't have that many chapters, I worry how this solution would look on series with lots of installments, like Recordicons, since the templates themselves would be bigger than the synopsises and really bloat the height of the article. --[[User:Apoc\|Apoc]] ([[User talk:Apoc\|talk]]) 18:19, 13 September 2015 (EDT)

Ascendron: /* Dislike of this format... */

2015-09-13T21:01:38Z

Dislike of this format...

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 13 September 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I'd just like to point out that I dislike that this article format excludes the "featured characters" template. Anyone opposed to adding the template to this article, and similar articles, for each entry included within them? -- [[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:53, 13 September 2015 (EDT)		I'd just like to point out that I dislike that this article format excludes the "featured characters" template. Anyone opposed to adding the template to this article, and similar articles, for each entry included within them? -- [[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:53, 13 September 2015 (EDT)
	:I feel like that would be useful for a lot of articles. The Legends online comics, Recordicons, the Around Cybertron strips could probably all use them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 16:55, 13 September 2015 (EDT)		:I feel like that would be useful for a lot of articles. The Legends online comics, Recordicons, the Around Cybertron strips could probably all use them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 16:55, 13 September 2015 (EDT)
			::It would also go a long way in ensuring that every character has the appropriate storylinks listed in their articles. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 17:01, 13 September 2015 (EDT)

Escargon: /* Dislike of this format... */

2015-09-13T20:55:45Z

Dislike of this format...

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 13 September 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I'd just like to point out that I dislike that this article format excludes the "featured characters" template. Anyone opposed to adding the template to this article, and similar articles, for each entry included within them? -- [[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:53, 13 September 2015 (EDT)		I'd just like to point out that I dislike that this article format excludes the "featured characters" template. Anyone opposed to adding the template to this article, and similar articles, for each entry included within them? -- [[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 16:53, 13 September 2015 (EDT)
			:I feel like that would be useful for a lot of articles. The Legends online comics, Recordicons, the Around Cybertron strips could probably all use them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 16:55, 13 September 2015 (EDT)

Ascendron: /* Dislike of this format... */ new section

2015-09-13T20:53:15Z

Dislike of this format...: new section

New page

== Dislike of this format... ==

I'd just like to point out that I dislike that this article format excludes the "featured characters" template. Anyone opposed to adding the template to this article, and similar articles, for each entry included within them? -- [[User:Ascendron|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron|talk]]) 16:53, 13 September 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 13 September 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::It would also go a long way in ensuring that every character has the appropriate storylinks listed in their articles. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 17:01, 13 September 2015 (EDT)		::It would also go a long way in ensuring that every character has the appropriate storylinks listed in their articles. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 17:01, 13 September 2015 (EDT)
	:::Yeah sure, I just based the format on our story page articles to start with and it could use some work. But while this series probably won't have that many chapters, I worry how this solution would look on series with lots of installments, like Recordicons, since the templates themselves would be bigger than the synopsises and really bloat the height of the article. --[[User:Apoc\|Apoc]] ([[User talk:Apoc\|talk]]) 18:19, 13 September 2015 (EDT)		:::Yeah sure, I just based the format on our story page articles to start with and it could use some work. But while this series probably won't have that many chapters, I worry how this solution would look on series with lots of installments, like Recordicons, since the templates themselves would be bigger than the synopsises and really bloat the height of the article. --[[User:Apoc\|Apoc]] ([[User talk:Apoc\|talk]]) 18:19, 13 September 2015 (EDT)
			::::If that becomes an issue, we could use the format used by the [[Transformers Legends (comic)]] article. I still don't think it's ideal, but it's better than no "featured characters" section whatsoever. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 18:29, 13 September 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 13 September 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I feel like that would be useful for a lot of articles. The Legends online comics, Recordicons, the Around Cybertron strips could probably all use them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 16:55, 13 September 2015 (EDT)		:I feel like that would be useful for a lot of articles. The Legends online comics, Recordicons, the Around Cybertron strips could probably all use them. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 16:55, 13 September 2015 (EDT)
	::It would also go a long way in ensuring that every character has the appropriate storylinks listed in their articles. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 17:01, 13 September 2015 (EDT)		::It would also go a long way in ensuring that every character has the appropriate storylinks listed in their articles. --[[User:Ascendron\|Ascendron]] ([[User talk:Ascendron\|talk]]) 17:01, 13 September 2015 (EDT)
			:::Yeah sure, I just based the format on our story page articles to start with and it could use some work. But while this series probably won't have that many chapters, I worry how this solution would look on series with lots of installments, like Recordicons, since the templates themselves would be bigger than the synopsises and really bloat the height of the article. --[[User:Apoc\|Apoc]] ([[User talk:Apoc\|talk]]) 18:19, 13 September 2015 (EDT)