Talk:Unpaintable plastic - Revision history

M Sipher at 20:20, 29 August 2009

2009-08-29T20:20:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, 29 August 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	: Well then, apparently everybody at Hasbro is just retarded, then. Thanks, sir! Move to delete, based on this anonymous guy's unsupported contradiction? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:57, 29 August 2009 (EDT)		: Well then, apparently everybody at Hasbro is just retarded, then. Thanks, sir! Move to delete, based on this anonymous guy's unsupported contradiction? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:57, 29 August 2009 (EDT)
	::There's "unpaintable with the paints Hasbro use" and there's "unpaintable with ANY paint". No doubt, if budget and inventiveness (and safety regs - lead-based paints, for example, are out for obvious reasons) weren't an issue, Hasbro COULD find a /paint/s that would adhere to these plastics. Before Sipher's edit of an hour or so ago, the article suggested the latter rather than the former. Which would need some serious citing to support. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 14:43, 29 August 2009 (EDT)		::There's "unpaintable with the paints Hasbro use" and there's "unpaintable with ANY paint". No doubt, if budget and inventiveness (and safety regs - lead-based paints, for example, are out for obvious reasons) weren't an issue, Hasbro COULD find a /paint/s that would adhere to these plastics. Before Sipher's edit of an hour or so ago, the article suggested the latter rather than the former. Which would need some serious citing to support. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 14:43, 29 August 2009 (EDT)
			:::The article made the grievous mistake of assuming the reader wasn't a complete idiot and was capable of the simple extrapolation "if Has/Tak COULD paint the damn plastic, they would have years ago". That's been corrected. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 16:20, 29 August 2009 (EDT)

SanityOrMadness at 18:43, 29 August 2009

2009-08-29T18:43:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 29 August 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	-www.frenzyrumble.com {{unsigned\|24.228.45.37\|10:47, August 29, 2009 (EDT)}}		-www.frenzyrumble.com {{unsigned\|24.228.45.37\|10:47, August 29, 2009 (EDT)}}
	: Well then, apparently everybody at Hasbro is just retarded, then. Thanks, sir! Move to delete, based on this anonymous guy's unsupported contradiction? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:57, 29 August 2009 (EDT)		: Well then, apparently everybody at Hasbro is just retarded, then. Thanks, sir! Move to delete, based on this anonymous guy's unsupported contradiction? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:57, 29 August 2009 (EDT)
			::There's "unpaintable with the paints Hasbro use" and there's "unpaintable with ANY paint". No doubt, if budget and inventiveness (and safety regs - lead-based paints, for example, are out for obvious reasons) weren't an issue, Hasbro COULD find a /paint/s that would adhere to these plastics. Before Sipher's edit of an hour or so ago, the article suggested the latter rather than the former. Which would need some serious citing to support. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 14:43, 29 August 2009 (EDT)

ItsWalky at 14:57, 29 August 2009

2009-08-29T14:57:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 29 August 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	-www.frenzyrumble.com {{unsigned\|24.228.45.37\|10:47, August 29, 2009 (EDT)}}		-www.frenzyrumble.com {{unsigned\|24.228.45.37\|10:47, August 29, 2009 (EDT)}}
			: Well then, apparently everybody at Hasbro is just retarded, then. Thanks, sir! Move to delete, based on this anonymous guy's unsupported contradiction? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:57, 29 August 2009 (EDT)

Starfield at 14:52, 29 August 2009

2009-08-29T14:52:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 29 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	There's no such thing as "unpaintable plastic"		There's no such thing as "unpaintable plastic"

	-www.frenzyrumble.com		-www.frenzyrumble.com {{unsigned\|24.228.45.37\|10:47, August 29, 2009 (EDT)}}

24.228.45.37: New page: There's no such thing as "unpaintable plastic" -www.frenzyrumble.com

2009-08-29T14:47:23Z

New page: There's no such thing as "unpaintable plastic" -www.frenzyrumble.com

New page

There's no such thing as "unpaintable plastic"

-www.frenzyrumble.com

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, 29 August 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	: Well then, apparently everybody at Hasbro is just retarded, then. Thanks, sir! Move to delete, based on this anonymous guy's unsupported contradiction? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:57, 29 August 2009 (EDT)		: Well then, apparently everybody at Hasbro is just retarded, then. Thanks, sir! Move to delete, based on this anonymous guy's unsupported contradiction? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:57, 29 August 2009 (EDT)
	::There's "unpaintable with the paints Hasbro use" and there's "unpaintable with ANY paint". No doubt, if budget and inventiveness (and safety regs - lead-based paints, for example, are out for obvious reasons) weren't an issue, Hasbro COULD find a /paint/s that would adhere to these plastics. Before Sipher's edit of an hour or so ago, the article suggested the latter rather than the former. Which would need some serious citing to support. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 14:43, 29 August 2009 (EDT)		::There's "unpaintable with the paints Hasbro use" and there's "unpaintable with ANY paint". No doubt, if budget and inventiveness (and safety regs - lead-based paints, for example, are out for obvious reasons) weren't an issue, Hasbro COULD find a /paint/s that would adhere to these plastics. Before Sipher's edit of an hour or so ago, the article suggested the latter rather than the former. Which would need some serious citing to support. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 14:43, 29 August 2009 (EDT)
			:::The article made the grievous mistake of assuming the reader wasn't a complete idiot and was capable of the simple extrapolation "if Has/Tak COULD paint the damn plastic, they would have years ago". That's been corrected. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 16:20, 29 August 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 29 August 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	-www.frenzyrumble.com {{unsigned\|24.228.45.37\|10:47, August 29, 2009 (EDT)}}		-www.frenzyrumble.com {{unsigned\|24.228.45.37\|10:47, August 29, 2009 (EDT)}}
	: Well then, apparently everybody at Hasbro is just retarded, then. Thanks, sir! Move to delete, based on this anonymous guy's unsupported contradiction? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:57, 29 August 2009 (EDT)		: Well then, apparently everybody at Hasbro is just retarded, then. Thanks, sir! Move to delete, based on this anonymous guy's unsupported contradiction? --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 10:57, 29 August 2009 (EDT)
			::There's "unpaintable with the paints Hasbro use" and there's "unpaintable with ANY paint". No doubt, if budget and inventiveness (and safety regs - lead-based paints, for example, are out for obvious reasons) weren't an issue, Hasbro COULD find a /paint/s that would adhere to these plastics. Before Sipher's edit of an hour or so ago, the article suggested the latter rather than the former. Which would need some serious citing to support. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] 14:43, 29 August 2009 (EDT)