Talk:Wayne C. Lewis - Revision history

BlackStarscream at 05:37, 31 July 2023

2023-07-31T05:37:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:37, 31 July 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::Website certainly seems legit. Perhaps finding Christ made Wankus lose all sense of self-parody? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 17:25, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		::::Website certainly seems legit. Perhaps finding Christ made Wankus lose all sense of self-parody? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 17:25, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
	:::::We could do both, while both respecting the guy and straddling (heh) the line between parody and non-parody. "Filmography": Pre (whatever date): porn name, porn name, porn name. Post (whatever date; hotlinked to Porn To Pure): none. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] 22:28, 22 June 2011 (EDT)		:::::We could do both, while both respecting the guy and straddling (heh) the line between parody and non-parody. "Filmography": Pre (whatever date): porn name, porn name, porn name. Post (whatever date; hotlinked to Porn To Pure): none. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] 22:28, 22 June 2011 (EDT)

			==TF CON LA 2023==
			Should've dropped this before but I made some notes at the RID panel at the con where all three of the Car Bros VAs were including Wayne C. Lewis.

			Wayne originally read every part except Prowl when auditioning after which he was called back to do Prowl.
			Was hyped to do Transformers as was wally.
			Prowl voice came from him trying to Optimus’s voice as that was the first part he read.
			Favorite episode is the one where Prowl wore a disguise and still laughs about it to this day. Also according to him they voiced 5 or 6 minor 1 liner characters that nobody realizes in RID

			Last two points are in the article but I'm just leaving em up here anyway. His Prowl voice and auditioning for all the other parts though I think should go in though as I'm not a regular editor IDK if that would go in notes/trivia or the main article. --[[User:BlackStarscream\|BlackStarscream]] ([[User talk:BlackStarscream\|talk]]) 01:37, 31 July 2023 (EDT)

Cyberlink420: Cyberlink420 moved page Talk:Wankus to Talk:Wayne C. Lewis: Current name

2021-03-29T20:53:00Z

Cyberlink420 moved page Talk:Wankus to Talk:Wayne C. Lewis: Current name

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:53, 29 March 2021
(No difference)

Thylacine 2000 at 02:28, 23 June 2011

2011-06-23T02:28:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:28, 23 June 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::So, should we leave it as-is, since I trust that info about his new lifestyle and broadcast history is all legit (sounds way too detailed to be fake)? Should we reinsert the titles to the porn flicks he directed? They were kinda gross, yeah. FUNNY... but gross. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:59, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		:::So, should we leave it as-is, since I trust that info about his new lifestyle and broadcast history is all legit (sounds way too detailed to be fake)? Should we reinsert the titles to the porn flicks he directed? They were kinda gross, yeah. FUNNY... but gross. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:59, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
	::::Website certainly seems legit. Perhaps finding Christ made Wankus lose all sense of self-parody? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 17:25, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		::::Website certainly seems legit. Perhaps finding Christ made Wankus lose all sense of self-parody? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 17:25, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
			:::::We could do both, while both respecting the guy and straddling (heh) the line between parody and non-parody. "Filmography": Pre (whatever date): porn name, porn name, porn name. Post (whatever date; hotlinked to Porn To Pure): none. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] 22:28, 22 June 2011 (EDT)

Detour at 21:25, 21 June 2011

2011-06-21T21:25:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 21 June 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:: Wankus is all self-parody. (I wonder what happened to Daisy.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:57, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		:: Wankus is all self-parody. (I wonder what happened to Daisy.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:57, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
	:::So, should we leave it as-is, since I trust that info about his new lifestyle and broadcast history is all legit (sounds way too detailed to be fake)? Should we reinsert the titles to the porn flicks he directed? They were kinda gross, yeah. FUNNY... but gross. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:59, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		:::So, should we leave it as-is, since I trust that info about his new lifestyle and broadcast history is all legit (sounds way too detailed to be fake)? Should we reinsert the titles to the porn flicks he directed? They were kinda gross, yeah. FUNNY... but gross. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:59, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
			::::Website certainly seems legit. Perhaps finding Christ made Wankus lose all sense of self-parody? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 17:25, 21 June 2011 (EDT)

DrSpengler at 20:59, 21 June 2011

2011-06-21T20:59:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:59, 21 June 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I can never tell with this kind of thing, since this sort of person usually has no sense of self-parody. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:50, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		:I can never tell with this kind of thing, since this sort of person usually has no sense of self-parody. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:50, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
	:: Wankus is all self-parody. (I wonder what happened to Daisy.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:57, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		:: Wankus is all self-parody. (I wonder what happened to Daisy.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:57, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
			:::So, should we leave it as-is, since I trust that info about his new lifestyle and broadcast history is all legit (sounds way too detailed to be fake)? Should we reinsert the titles to the porn flicks he directed? They were kinda gross, yeah. FUNNY... but gross. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:59, 21 June 2011 (EDT)

ItsWalky at 20:57, 21 June 2011

2011-06-21T20:57:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 21 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Wow. That has GOT to be Wankus-himself who just overhauled the intro to this article. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:34, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		Wow. That has GOT to be Wankus-himself who just overhauled the intro to this article. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:34, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
	:I can never tell with this kind of thing, since this sort of person usually has no sense of self-parody. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:50, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		:I can never tell with this kind of thing, since this sort of person usually has no sense of self-parody. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:50, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
			:: Wankus is all self-parody. (I wonder what happened to Daisy.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:57, 21 June 2011 (EDT)

Interrobang at 20:50, 21 June 2011

2011-06-21T20:50:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 21 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Wow. That has GOT to be Wankus-himself who just overhauled the intro to this article. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:34, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		Wow. That has GOT to be Wankus-himself who just overhauled the intro to this article. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:34, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
	:I can never tell with this kind of thing, since this ~~kind~~ of person usually has no sense of self-parody. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:50, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		:I can never tell with this kind of thing, since this sort of person usually has no sense of self-parody. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:50, 21 June 2011 (EDT)

Interrobang at 20:50, 21 June 2011

2011-06-21T20:50:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 21 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Wow. That has GOT to be Wankus-himself who just overhauled the intro to this article. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:34, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		Wow. That has GOT to be Wankus-himself who just overhauled the intro to this article. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:34, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
			:I can never tell with this kind of thing, since this kind of person usually has no sense of self-parody. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:50, 21 June 2011 (EDT)

DrSpengler: Wankus sooooooo made that last edit that overhauled his intro

2011-06-21T20:34:29Z

Wankus sooooooo made that last edit that overhauled his intro

New page

Wow. That has GOT to be Wankus-himself who just overhauled the intro to this article. --[[User:DrSpengler|DrSpengler]] 16:34, 21 June 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:28, 23 June 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::So, should we leave it as-is, since I trust that info about his new lifestyle and broadcast history is all legit (sounds way too detailed to be fake)? Should we reinsert the titles to the porn flicks he directed? They were kinda gross, yeah. FUNNY... but gross. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:59, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		:::So, should we leave it as-is, since I trust that info about his new lifestyle and broadcast history is all legit (sounds way too detailed to be fake)? Should we reinsert the titles to the porn flicks he directed? They were kinda gross, yeah. FUNNY... but gross. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:59, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
	::::Website certainly seems legit. Perhaps finding Christ made Wankus lose all sense of self-parody? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 17:25, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		::::Website certainly seems legit. Perhaps finding Christ made Wankus lose all sense of self-parody? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 17:25, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
			:::::We could do both, while both respecting the guy and straddling (heh) the line between parody and non-parody. "Filmography": Pre (whatever date): porn name, porn name, porn name. Post (whatever date; hotlinked to Porn To Pure): none. --[[User:Thylacine 2000\|Thylacine 2000]] 22:28, 22 June 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 21 June 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:: Wankus is all self-parody. (I wonder what happened to Daisy.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:57, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		:: Wankus is all self-parody. (I wonder what happened to Daisy.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:57, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
	:::So, should we leave it as-is, since I trust that info about his new lifestyle and broadcast history is all legit (sounds way too detailed to be fake)? Should we reinsert the titles to the porn flicks he directed? They were kinda gross, yeah. FUNNY... but gross. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:59, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		:::So, should we leave it as-is, since I trust that info about his new lifestyle and broadcast history is all legit (sounds way too detailed to be fake)? Should we reinsert the titles to the porn flicks he directed? They were kinda gross, yeah. FUNNY... but gross. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:59, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
			::::Website certainly seems legit. Perhaps finding Christ made Wankus lose all sense of self-parody? --[[User:Detour\|Detour]] 17:25, 21 June 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:59, 21 June 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I can never tell with this kind of thing, since this sort of person usually has no sense of self-parody. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:50, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		:I can never tell with this kind of thing, since this sort of person usually has no sense of self-parody. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 16:50, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
	:: Wankus is all self-parody. (I wonder what happened to Daisy.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:57, 21 June 2011 (EDT)		:: Wankus is all self-parody. (I wonder what happened to Daisy.) --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 16:57, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
			:::So, should we leave it as-is, since I trust that info about his new lifestyle and broadcast history is all legit (sounds way too detailed to be fake)? Should we reinsert the titles to the porn flicks he directed? They were kinda gross, yeah. FUNNY... but gross. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] 16:59, 21 June 2011 (EDT)