Template talk:Disambig3.5 - Revision history

Derik at 16:33, 16 July 2009

2009-07-16T16:33:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, 16 July 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I kind of wish I knew how to do "for loops" in wikicode so you could repeat the "disambig2" part of this as necessary (just to further help eliminate some cases of disambig stacking), but this ought to be good enough for now. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 11:32, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		:I kind of wish I knew how to do "for loops" in wikicode so you could repeat the "disambig2" part of this as necessary (just to further help eliminate some cases of disambig stacking), but this ought to be good enough for now. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 11:32, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
	::While I can appreciate the utility of making it more expandable, we really probably shouldn't be disambiguating further than <most prominent example X> and <disambiguation page Y>. Otherwise it just gets cluttered. This seems pretty much ideal as-is.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:34, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		::While I can appreciate the utility of making it more expandable, we really probably shouldn't be disambiguating further than <most prominent example X> and <disambiguation page Y>. Otherwise it just gets cluttered. This seems pretty much ideal as-is.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:34, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

			::Thanks Jeysie! I know there was a couple places I'd run into where I needed a template like this, but I could never figure out how to format it. (Turns out I was over thinking it.) This is perfect. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 12:33, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

Derik: User talk:Jeysie/Disambig3.5 moved to Template talk:Disambig3.5: Yes, it's a stupid name for a template... but it's also consistent w/ disambig, sisambig2, disambig3 etc.

2009-07-16T16:21:26Z

User talk:Jeysie/Disambig3.5 moved to Template talk:Disambig3.5: Yes, it's a stupid name for a template... but it's also consistent w/ disambig, sisambig2, disambig3 etc.

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:21, 16 July 2009
(No difference)

Rosicrucian at 15:34, 16 July 2009

2009-07-16T15:34:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 16 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Could come in handy for those rare exceptions, though, now that I think about it. [[Nightstick (disambiguation)\|Nightstick]], I'm looking at you.		:Could come in handy for those rare exceptions, though, now that I think about it. [[Nightstick (disambiguation)\|Nightstick]], I'm looking at you.
	:I kind of wish I knew how to do "for loops" in wikicode so you could repeat the "disambig2" part of this as necessary (just to further help eliminate some cases of disambig stacking), but this ought to be good enough for now. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 11:32, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		:I kind of wish I knew how to do "for loops" in wikicode so you could repeat the "disambig2" part of this as necessary (just to further help eliminate some cases of disambig stacking), but this ought to be good enough for now. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 11:32, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
			::While I can appreciate the utility of making it more expandable, we really probably shouldn't be disambiguating further than <most prominent example X> and <disambiguation page Y>. Otherwise it just gets cluttered. This seems pretty much ideal as-is.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:34, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

Jeysie at 15:32, 16 July 2009

2009-07-16T15:32:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 16 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Personally, I'm surprised we didn't implement this sooner. Wikipedia has had an analogue for years.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:17, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		Personally, I'm surprised we didn't implement this sooner. Wikipedia has had an analogue for years.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:17, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
			:I guess until Shattered Glass and Movie/ROTF, it never seemed that important, as opposed to just linking to the disambig3? Most of the time, even if we have characters or concepts with the same name in the same continuity family, they're still from separate continuities (or otherwise not that confusingly connected), and exceptions are rare.
			:Could come in handy for those rare exceptions, though, now that I think about it. [[Nightstick (disambiguation)\|Nightstick]], I'm looking at you.
			:I kind of wish I knew how to do "for loops" in wikicode so you could repeat the "disambig2" part of this as necessary (just to further help eliminate some cases of disambig stacking), but this ought to be good enough for now. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 11:32, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

Rosicrucian: New page: Personally, I'm surprised we didn't implement this sooner. Wikipedia has had an analogue for years.--~~~~

2009-07-16T15:17:34Z

New page: Personally, I'm surprised we didn't implement this sooner. Wikipedia has had an analogue for years.--~~~~

New page

Personally, I'm surprised we didn't implement this sooner. Wikipedia has had an analogue for years.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:17, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, 16 July 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I kind of wish I knew how to do "for loops" in wikicode so you could repeat the "disambig2" part of this as necessary (just to further help eliminate some cases of disambig stacking), but this ought to be good enough for now. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 11:32, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		:I kind of wish I knew how to do "for loops" in wikicode so you could repeat the "disambig2" part of this as necessary (just to further help eliminate some cases of disambig stacking), but this ought to be good enough for now. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 11:32, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
	::While I can appreciate the utility of making it more expandable, we really probably shouldn't be disambiguating further than <most prominent example X> and <disambiguation page Y>. Otherwise it just gets cluttered. This seems pretty much ideal as-is.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:34, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		::While I can appreciate the utility of making it more expandable, we really probably shouldn't be disambiguating further than <most prominent example X> and <disambiguation page Y>. Otherwise it just gets cluttered. This seems pretty much ideal as-is.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:34, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

			::Thanks Jeysie! I know there was a couple places I'd run into where I needed a template like this, but I could never figure out how to format it. (Turns out I was over thinking it.) This is perfect. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 12:33, 16 July 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 16 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Could come in handy for those rare exceptions, though, now that I think about it. [[Nightstick (disambiguation)\|Nightstick]], I'm looking at you.		:Could come in handy for those rare exceptions, though, now that I think about it. [[Nightstick (disambiguation)\|Nightstick]], I'm looking at you.
	:I kind of wish I knew how to do "for loops" in wikicode so you could repeat the "disambig2" part of this as necessary (just to further help eliminate some cases of disambig stacking), but this ought to be good enough for now. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 11:32, 16 July 2009 (EDT)		:I kind of wish I knew how to do "for loops" in wikicode so you could repeat the "disambig2" part of this as necessary (just to further help eliminate some cases of disambig stacking), but this ought to be good enough for now. --[[User:Jeysie\|Jeysie]] 11:32, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
			::While I can appreciate the utility of making it more expandable, we really probably shouldn't be disambiguating further than <most prominent example X> and <disambiguation page Y>. Otherwise it just gets cluttered. This seems pretty much ideal as-is.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:34, 16 July 2009 (EDT)