User talk:184.56.148.244 - Revision history

Khajidha: /* Come on, I worked all day on that */

2010-11-24T13:45:34Z

Come on, I worked all day on that

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:45, 24 November 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::Yes, before spending a day on changing an established format to one you just made up, you should really discuss it to avoid people reverting your changes. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:52, 20 November 2010 (EST)		::Yes, before spending a day on changing an established format to one you just made up, you should really discuss it to avoid people reverting your changes. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:52, 20 November 2010 (EST)

	discuss with who, and isn't it free to everyone		:::discuss with who, and isn't it free to everyone

			::::Discuss with the community. Anyone can edit, but not all edits are useful. As abates mentioned, this format was established some time ago and is used consistently on all fiction pages. Even if your changes were considered useful, were you planning on changing every fiction page to incorporate them? --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 08:45, 24 November 2010 (EST)

184.56.148.244: /* Come on, I worked all day on that */

2010-11-24T03:11:48Z

Come on, I worked all day on that

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:11, 24 November 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:

	::Yes, before spending a day on changing an established format to one you just made up, you should really discuss it to avoid people reverting your changes. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:52, 20 November 2010 (EST)		::Yes, before spending a day on changing an established format to one you just made up, you should really discuss it to avoid people reverting your changes. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:52, 20 November 2010 (EST)

			discuss with who, and isn't it free to everyone

Abates: /* Come on, I worked all day on that */

2010-11-20T21:52:47Z

Come on, I worked all day on that

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 20 November 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Thanks a lot.):		Thanks a lot.):
	:Could we have discussed this before you changed everything in the first place? The featured characters box lists characters in order of appearance, with the characters split by faction. The number should increase as you go down each column. The order of appearance is the reason such a box exists. The community here is agreed on that. If you want to change it, it is up to you to convince us first. Also, "Dinobot", "Insecticon", etc. aren't factions. They are subgroups. I don't see how they are any more relevant than "Autobot Cars" would be. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 20 November 2010 (EST)		:Could we have discussed this before you changed everything in the first place? The featured characters box lists characters in order of appearance, with the characters split by faction. The number should increase as you go down each column. The order of appearance is the reason such a box exists. The community here is agreed on that. If you want to change it, it is up to you to convince us first. Also, "Dinobot", "Insecticon", etc. aren't factions. They are subgroups. I don't see how they are any more relevant than "Autobot Cars" would be. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 20 November 2010 (EST)

			::Yes, before spending a day on changing an established format to one you just made up, you should really discuss it to avoid people reverting your changes. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] 16:52, 20 November 2010 (EST)

Khajidha: /* Come on, I worked all day on that */

2010-11-20T21:49:48Z

Come on, I worked all day on that

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 20 November 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	I think factions are more important, besides they still have numbers.		I think factions are more important, besides they still have numbers.
	Thanks a lot.):		Thanks a lot.):
			:Could we have discussed this before you changed everything in the first place? The featured characters box lists characters in order of appearance, with the characters split by faction. The number should increase as you go down each column. The order of appearance is the reason such a box exists. The community here is agreed on that. If you want to change it, it is up to you to convince us first. Also, "Dinobot", "Insecticon", etc. aren't factions. They are subgroups. I don't see how they are any more relevant than "Autobot Cars" would be. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:49, 20 November 2010 (EST)

184.56.148.244: /* Please stop */

2010-11-20T21:45:20Z

Please stop

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 20 November 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	We organize the characters by order of appearance, split by faction. Your grouping of subgroups messes up the format. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:21, 20 November 2010 (EST)		We organize the characters by order of appearance, split by faction. Your grouping of subgroups messes up the format. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:21, 20 November 2010 (EST)


	~~Could we have consulted this before you changed everything back.~~
	~~All of the numbers were still there, and I think faction is more important that order.~~

	== Come on, I worked all day on that ==		== Come on, I worked all day on that ==

184.56.148.244: /* Come on, I worked all day on that */ new section

2010-11-20T21:44:50Z

Come on, I worked all day on that: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:44, 20 November 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Could we have consulted this before you changed everything back.		Could we have consulted this before you changed everything back.
	All of the numbers were still there, and I think faction is more important that order.		All of the numbers were still there, and I think faction is more important that order.

			== Come on, I worked all day on that ==

			I think factions are more important, besides they still have numbers.
			Thanks a lot.):

184.56.148.244: /* Please stop */

2010-11-20T21:42:11Z

Please stop

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 20 November 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	We organize the characters by order of appearance, split by faction. Your grouping of subgroups messes up the format. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:21, 20 November 2010 (EST)		We organize the characters by order of appearance, split by faction. Your grouping of subgroups messes up the format. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 16:21, 20 November 2010 (EST)


			Could we have consulted this before you changed everything back.
			All of the numbers were still there, and I think faction is more important that order.

Khajidha: Please stop

2010-11-20T21:21:37Z

Please stop

New page

== Please stop ==

We organize the characters by order of appearance, split by faction. Your grouping of subgroups messes up the format. --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 16:21, 20 November 2010 (EST)