User talk:65.93.116.207 - Revision history

65.93.116.207 at 15:00, 19 June 2011

2011-06-19T15:00:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:00, 19 June 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	so if i write about what she did in a episode it would have to be all the events that she was included in the whole episode, every time she was shown would have to be mentioned		so if i write about what she did in a episode it would have to be all the events that she was included in the whole episode, every time she was shown would have to be mentioned
	:Not necessarily. If the character was present at an event, it should be mentioned, but if all the character did was stand around while ''others'' did things, you don't have to elaborate on the events themselves or keep repeating the character kept being present while doing nothing. Basically, when writing about a character, you should ask yourself if you think the readers will get a good feeling for what the character is about, if all (worthwhile) details are included and if the text is pleasant to read. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 10:51, 19 June 2011 (EDT)		:Not necessarily. If the character was present at an event, it should be mentioned, but if all the character did was stand around while ''others'' did things, you don't have to elaborate on the events themselves or keep repeating the character kept being present while doing nothing. Basically, when writing about a character, you should ask yourself if you think the readers will get a good feeling for what the character is about, if all (worthwhile) details are included and if the text is pleasant to read. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 10:51, 19 June 2011 (EDT)
			ok, that helps me, i think i will try again eventually but this time i will explain the characters role completely, not just in a summary

Geewunling at 14:52, 19 June 2011

2011-06-19T14:52:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 19 June 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:That article is of a different kind. Essentially, the Kiss page is a joke in the form of a list of instances of kissing throughout the TF continuities with some (humorous) observations added. The Artemis page is a character article, which requires a serious approach in the form of a coherent, in-universe report on what the character did/thought/said within the fiction. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 10:38, 19 June 2011 (EDT)		:That article is of a different kind. Essentially, the Kiss page is a joke in the form of a list of instances of kissing throughout the TF continuities with some (humorous) observations added. The Artemis page is a character article, which requires a serious approach in the form of a coherent, in-universe report on what the character did/thought/said within the fiction. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 10:38, 19 June 2011 (EDT)
	so if i write about what she did in a episode it would have to be all the events that she was included in the whole episode, every time she was shown would have to be mentioned		so if i write about what she did in a episode it would have to be all the events that she was included in the whole episode, every time she was shown would have to be mentioned
	:Not necessarily. If the character was present at an event, it should be mentioned, but if all the character did was stand around while ''others'' did things, you don't have to elaborate on the events themselves or keep repeating the character kept being present while doing nothing. Basically, when writing about a character, you should ask yourself if you think the readers will get a good feeling for what the character is about, if all (worthwhile) details are included and if the text is ~~plesant~~ to read. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 10:51, 19 June 2011 (EDT)		:Not necessarily. If the character was present at an event, it should be mentioned, but if all the character did was stand around while ''others'' did things, you don't have to elaborate on the events themselves or keep repeating the character kept being present while doing nothing. Basically, when writing about a character, you should ask yourself if you think the readers will get a good feeling for what the character is about, if all (worthwhile) details are included and if the text is pleasant to read. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 10:51, 19 June 2011 (EDT)

Geewunling at 14:51, 19 June 2011

2011-06-19T14:51:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 19 June 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:That article is of a different kind. Essentially, the Kiss page is a joke in the form of a list of instances of kissing throughout the TF continuities with some (humorous) observations added. The Artemis page is a character article, which requires a serious approach in the form of a coherent, in-universe report on what the character did/thought/said within the fiction. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 10:38, 19 June 2011 (EDT)		:That article is of a different kind. Essentially, the Kiss page is a joke in the form of a list of instances of kissing throughout the TF continuities with some (humorous) observations added. The Artemis page is a character article, which requires a serious approach in the form of a coherent, in-universe report on what the character did/thought/said within the fiction. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 10:38, 19 June 2011 (EDT)
	so if i write about what she did in a episode it would have to be all the events that she was included in the whole episode, every time she was shown would have to be mentioned		so if i write about what she did in a episode it would have to be all the events that she was included in the whole episode, every time she was shown would have to be mentioned
			:Not necessarily. If the character was present at an event, it should be mentioned, but if all the character did was stand around while ''others'' did things, you don't have to elaborate on the events themselves or keep repeating the character kept being present while doing nothing. Basically, when writing about a character, you should ask yourself if you think the readers will get a good feeling for what the character is about, if all (worthwhile) details are included and if the text is plesant to read. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 10:51, 19 June 2011 (EDT)

65.93.116.207 at 14:42, 19 June 2011

2011-06-19T14:42:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:42, 19 June 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	why is this aloud then????"Let's not even get into Rattrap and Botanica." Spark of Darkness this is in the kiss section.		why is this aloud then????"Let's not even get into Rattrap and Botanica." Spark of Darkness this is in the kiss section.
	:That article is of a different kind. Essentially, the Kiss page is a joke in the form of a list of instances of kissing throughout the TF continuities with some (humorous) observations added. The Artemis page is a character article, which requires a serious approach in the form of a coherent, in-universe report on what the character did/thought/said within the fiction. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 10:38, 19 June 2011 (EDT)		:That article is of a different kind. Essentially, the Kiss page is a joke in the form of a list of instances of kissing throughout the TF continuities with some (humorous) observations added. The Artemis page is a character article, which requires a serious approach in the form of a coherent, in-universe report on what the character did/thought/said within the fiction. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 10:38, 19 June 2011 (EDT)
			so if i write about what she did in a episode it would have to be all the events that she was included in the whole episode, every time she was shown would have to be mentioned

Geewunling at 14:38, 19 June 2011

2011-06-19T14:38:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:38, 19 June 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I would have reverted it even if it wasn't breaking the fourth wall. It was ridiculously vague and really came off as somebody who didn't understand Japanese. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 21:04, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		:I would have reverted it even if it wasn't breaking the fourth wall. It was ridiculously vague and really came off as somebody who didn't understand Japanese. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 21:04, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
	why is this aloud then????"Let's not even get into Rattrap and Botanica." Spark of Darkness this is in the kiss section.		why is this aloud then????"Let's not even get into Rattrap and Botanica." Spark of Darkness this is in the kiss section.
			:That article is of a different kind. Essentially, the Kiss page is a joke in the form of a list of instances of kissing throughout the TF continuities with some (humorous) observations added. The Artemis page is a character article, which requires a serious approach in the form of a coherent, in-universe report on what the character did/thought/said within the fiction. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 10:38, 19 June 2011 (EDT)

65.93.116.207 at 14:26, 19 June 2011

2011-06-19T14:26:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 19 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	We require our fiction sections to be written "in-universe." This means no writing stuff like "in the next episode" and "in episode 8, blankity does blah blah blah." I tried to rewrite what you wrote, since it was a lot of material, but it would require me to know what actually happens in the episode, so I kept the revert intact. "Let's not talk about episode 10!" is not helpful to others. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:26, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		We require our fiction sections to be written "in-universe." This means no writing stuff like "in the next episode" and "in episode 8, blankity does blah blah blah." I tried to rewrite what you wrote, since it was a lot of material, but it would require me to know what actually happens in the episode, so I kept the revert intact. "Let's not talk about episode 10!" is not helpful to others. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:26, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
	:I would have reverted it even if it wasn't breaking the fourth wall. It was ridiculously vague and really came off as somebody who didn't understand Japanese. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 21:04, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		:I would have reverted it even if it wasn't breaking the fourth wall. It was ridiculously vague and really came off as somebody who didn't understand Japanese. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 21:04, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
			why is this aloud then????"Let's not even get into Rattrap and Botanica." Spark of Darkness this is in the kiss section.

Interrobang at 01:04, 17 June 2011

2011-06-17T01:04:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:04, 17 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	We require our fiction sections to be written "in-universe." This means no writing stuff like "in the next episode" and "in episode 8, blankity does blah blah blah." I tried to rewrite what you wrote, since it was a lot of material, but it would require me to know what actually happens in the episode, so I kept the revert intact. "Let's not talk about episode 10!" is not helpful to others. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:26, 16 June 2011 (EDT)		We require our fiction sections to be written "in-universe." This means no writing stuff like "in the next episode" and "in episode 8, blankity does blah blah blah." I tried to rewrite what you wrote, since it was a lot of material, but it would require me to know what actually happens in the episode, so I kept the revert intact. "Let's not talk about episode 10!" is not helpful to others. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:26, 16 June 2011 (EDT)
			:I would have reverted it even if it wasn't breaking the fourth wall. It was ridiculously vague and really came off as somebody who didn't understand Japanese. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 21:04, 16 June 2011 (EDT)

ItsWalky: New page: We require our fiction sections to be written "in-universe." This means no writing stuff like "in the next episode" and "in episode 8, blankity does blah blah blah." I tried to rewrite w...

2011-06-17T00:26:52Z

New page: We require our fiction sections to be written "in-universe." This means no writing stuff like "in the next episode" and "in episode 8, blankity does blah blah blah." I tried to rewrite w...

New page

We require our fiction sections to be written "in-universe." This means no writing stuff like "in the next episode" and "in episode 8, blankity does blah blah blah." I tried to rewrite what you wrote, since it was a lot of material, but it would require me to know what actually happens in the episode, so I kept the revert intact. "Let's not talk about episode 10!" is not helpful to others. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 20:26, 16 June 2011 (EDT)