User talk:86.144.113.206 - Revision history

Chris McFeely at 18:37, 23 June 2009

2009-06-23T18:37:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:37, 23 June 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	It is Blackout. The design is identical and it can be surmised that he was repaired by the Constructicons. Not too much of a leap of logic, given Megatron's resurrection.		It is Blackout. The design is identical and it can be surmised that he was repaired by the Constructicons. Not too much of a leap of logic, given Megatron's resurrection.
			:[[Grindor (ROTF)\|Ahem.]] - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 14:37, 23 June 2009 (EDT)

86.144.113.206 at 18:34, 23 June 2009

2009-06-23T18:34:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 23 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Erm, the recent additions you have made do not conform to our style guide. You've sort of done a wikipedia-like descriptions of what happens in the film, but you've neglected to present the information as if it were part of the character's history, and in the ''past'' tense. And that wasn't even Blackout. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 13:34, 23 June 2009 (EDT)		Erm, the recent additions you have made do not conform to our style guide. You've sort of done a wikipedia-like descriptions of what happens in the film, but you've neglected to present the information as if it were part of the character's history, and in the ''past'' tense. And that wasn't even Blackout. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 13:34, 23 June 2009 (EDT)

			It is Blackout. The design is identical and it can be surmised that he was repaired by the Constructicons. Not too much of a leap of logic, given Megatron's resurrection.

FFN at 17:38, 23 June 2009

2009-06-23T17:38:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 23 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Erm, the recent additions you have made do not conform to our style guide. You've sort of done a wikipedia-like descriptions of what happens in the film, but you've neglected to present the information as if it were part of the character's history. And that wasn't even Blackout. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 13:34, 23 June 2009 (EDT)		Erm, the recent additions you have made do not conform to our style guide. You've sort of done a wikipedia-like descriptions of what happens in the film, but you've neglected to present the information as if it were part of the character's history, and in the ''past'' tense. And that wasn't even Blackout. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 13:34, 23 June 2009 (EDT)

FFN: New page: Erm, the recent additions you have made do not conform to our style guide. You've sort of done a wikipedia-like descriptions of what happens in the film, but you've neglected to present th...

2009-06-23T17:34:19Z

New page: Erm, the recent additions you have made do not conform to our style guide. You've sort of done a wikipedia-like descriptions of what happens in the film, but you've neglected to present th...

New page

Erm, the recent additions you have made do not conform to our style guide. You've sort of done a wikipedia-like descriptions of what happens in the film, but you've neglected to present the information as if it were part of the character's history. And that wasn't even Blackout. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 13:34, 23 June 2009 (EDT)