User talk:Derik/Sexytime - DRAFT - Revision history

Andrusi at 12:57, 13 June 2011

2011-06-13T12:57:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 13 June 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::::::Really? I'm pretty sure I've been '''extra''' assholish to you in the past... probably when disagreeing about disambiguation schemas.		:::::::Really? I'm pretty sure I've been '''extra''' assholish to you in the past... probably when disagreeing about disambiguation schemas.
	:::::::I feel kinda bad about that. I had a transformative spiritual experience a year ago and I am attempting to live my life by an Aquarian ideal of peaceful co-existence with my fellow man, not depriving another of their dignity in the heat of an argument. It is impossible to enter the Age of Aquarius by the sword. Can't we all just sit down on a couch and get piss-drunk while talking out our disagreements until we realize whatever it was we were talking about couldn't ''possibly'' have been that important and go join the rest of the people at the party? -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:46, 13 June 2011 (EDT)		:::::::I feel kinda bad about that. I had a transformative spiritual experience a year ago and I am attempting to live my life by an Aquarian ideal of peaceful co-existence with my fellow man, not depriving another of their dignity in the heat of an argument. It is impossible to enter the Age of Aquarius by the sword. Can't we all just sit down on a couch and get piss-drunk while talking out our disagreements until we realize whatever it was we were talking about couldn't ''possibly'' have been that important and go join the rest of the people at the party? -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:46, 13 June 2011 (EDT)

			This has nothing to do with any opinions I may hold regarding the article as a whole, but I want to state my approval of the three-way "race" conflation. --[[User:Andrusi\|Andrusi]] 08:57, 13 June 2011 (EDT)

Derik at 06:46, 13 June 2011

2011-06-13T06:46:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:46, 13 June 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::::(Seriously, I expected you to just say that I have been an asshole to people in the past, which makes you less tolerant of my occasionally quixotic edits. I mean... that's a fairly legitimate basis for complaint.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:24, 13 June 2011 (EDT)		:::::(Seriously, I expected you to just say that I have been an asshole to people in the past, which makes you less tolerant of my occasionally quixotic edits. I mean... that's a fairly legitimate basis for complaint.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:24, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
	::::::We're all assholes. I'm not sure why I would single you out for it. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 02:29, 13 June 2011 (EDT)		::::::We're all assholes. I'm not sure why I would single you out for it. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 02:29, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
			:::::::Really? I'm pretty sure I've been '''extra''' assholish to you in the past... probably when disagreeing about disambiguation schemas.
			:::::::I feel kinda bad about that. I had a transformative spiritual experience a year ago and I am attempting to live my life by an Aquarian ideal of peaceful co-existence with my fellow man, not depriving another of their dignity in the heat of an argument. It is impossible to enter the Age of Aquarius by the sword. Can't we all just sit down on a couch and get piss-drunk while talking out our disagreements until we realize whatever it was we were talking about couldn't ''possibly'' have been that important and go join the rest of the people at the party? -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:46, 13 June 2011 (EDT)

Interrobang at 06:29, 13 June 2011

2011-06-13T06:29:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:29, 13 June 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::::I can't have views on the canon which others disagree with? I (mostly) believe articles you're citing were legitimate... but I admit, I '''do''' tend to rely on the 'wikiness' of this site when I work on articles like that. ''"This seems to make sense to me, but it '''is''' pretty slim... oh well, if the other guys think it's bullshit I'm sure they'll tell me and delete the article."'' I'm fairly sure no excessively 'Deriky' article has darkened the wiki's doorstep for more than 45 minutes.		:::::I can't have views on the canon which others disagree with? I (mostly) believe articles you're citing were legitimate... but I admit, I '''do''' tend to rely on the 'wikiness' of this site when I work on articles like that. ''"This seems to make sense to me, but it '''is''' pretty slim... oh well, if the other guys think it's bullshit I'm sure they'll tell me and delete the article."'' I'm fairly sure no excessively 'Deriky' article has darkened the wiki's doorstep for more than 45 minutes.
	:::::(Seriously, I expected you to just say that I have been an asshole to people in the past, which makes you less tolerant of my occasionally quixotic edits. I mean... that's a fairly legitimate basis for complaint.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:24, 13 June 2011 (EDT)		:::::(Seriously, I expected you to just say that I have been an asshole to people in the past, which makes you less tolerant of my occasionally quixotic edits. I mean... that's a fairly legitimate basis for complaint.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:24, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
			::::::We're all assholes. I'm not sure why I would single you out for it. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 02:29, 13 June 2011 (EDT)

Derik at 06:25, 13 June 2011

2011-06-13T06:25:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:25, 13 June 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::For the record I think the Q&A panel 'glitch' gaffe was ''probably'' reaching for a sort of "and one day God sneezed" harmless deflection about the day someone is born (can't remember off the top of me how that joke goes...) but innocently stumbled into a mildly pejorative term as the guys giving the answers searched for an appropriate response. It doesn't bother me-- I feel sorry for the guy who made the answer because he probably feels bad about it. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 01:16, 13 June 2011 (EDT)		:::For the record I think the Q&A panel 'glitch' gaffe was ''probably'' reaching for a sort of "and one day God sneezed" harmless deflection about the day someone is born (can't remember off the top of me how that joke goes...) but innocently stumbled into a mildly pejorative term as the guys giving the answers searched for an appropriate response. It doesn't bother me-- I feel sorry for the guy who made the answer because he probably feels bad about it. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 01:16, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
	::::It's more the fact that pulling shit out of your ass on specious evidence ("Trinity of Chaos", "The One", etc., etc.) and pushing stuff for your amusement ("Bob the friendly Insecticon") are your forte here. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 02:08, 13 June 2011 (EDT)		::::It's more the fact that pulling shit out of your ass on specious evidence ("Trinity of Chaos", "The One", etc., etc.) and pushing stuff for your amusement ("Bob the friendly Insecticon") are your forte here. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 02:08, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
	:::::I can't have views on the canon which others disagree with? I ~~tend to~~ believe articles you're citing were legitimate... but I admit, I '''do''' tend to ~~lean~~ on the 'wikiness' of this ~~side~~ when I work on articles like that. ''"This seems to make sense to me, but it '''is''' pretty slim... oh well, if the other guys think it's bullshit I'm sure they'll tell me and delete the article."'' I'm fairly sure no excessively 'Deriky' article has darkened the wiki's doorstep for more than 45 minutes.		:::::I can't have views on the canon which others disagree with? I (mostly) believe articles you're citing were legitimate... but I admit, I '''do''' tend to rely on the 'wikiness' of this site when I work on articles like that. ''"This seems to make sense to me, but it '''is''' pretty slim... oh well, if the other guys think it's bullshit I'm sure they'll tell me and delete the article."'' I'm fairly sure no excessively 'Deriky' article has darkened the wiki's doorstep for more than 45 minutes.
	:::::(Seriously, I ~~thought~~ you'd just say I~~'ve~~ been an asshole to people in the past, which makes you less tolerant of my occasionally quixotic edits.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:24, 13 June 2011 (EDT)		:::::(Seriously, I expected you to just say that I have been an asshole to people in the past, which makes you less tolerant of my occasionally quixotic edits. I mean... that's a fairly legitimate basis for complaint.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:24, 13 June 2011 (EDT)

Derik: I still think "Bob the friendly Insecticon" is a better name for the article. And (IDW) is a shit disambiguation.

2011-06-13T06:24:06Z

I still think "Bob the friendly Insecticon" is a better name for the article. And (IDW) is a shit disambiguation.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:24, 13 June 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::For the record I think the Q&A panel 'glitch' gaffe was ''probably'' reaching for a sort of "and one day God sneezed" harmless deflection about the day someone is born (can't remember off the top of me how that joke goes...) but innocently stumbled into a mildly pejorative term as the guys giving the answers searched for an appropriate response. It doesn't bother me-- I feel sorry for the guy who made the answer because he probably feels bad about it. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 01:16, 13 June 2011 (EDT)		:::For the record I think the Q&A panel 'glitch' gaffe was ''probably'' reaching for a sort of "and one day God sneezed" harmless deflection about the day someone is born (can't remember off the top of me how that joke goes...) but innocently stumbled into a mildly pejorative term as the guys giving the answers searched for an appropriate response. It doesn't bother me-- I feel sorry for the guy who made the answer because he probably feels bad about it. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 01:16, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
	::::It's more the fact that pulling shit out of your ass on specious evidence ("Trinity of Chaos", "The One", etc., etc.) and pushing stuff for your amusement ("Bob the friendly Insecticon") are your forte here. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 02:08, 13 June 2011 (EDT)		::::It's more the fact that pulling shit out of your ass on specious evidence ("Trinity of Chaos", "The One", etc., etc.) and pushing stuff for your amusement ("Bob the friendly Insecticon") are your forte here. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 02:08, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
			:::::I can't have views on the canon which others disagree with? I tend to believe articles you're citing were legitimate... but I admit, I '''do''' tend to lean on the 'wikiness' of this side when I work on articles like that. ''"This seems to make sense to me, but it '''is''' pretty slim... oh well, if the other guys think it's bullshit I'm sure they'll tell me and delete the article."'' I'm fairly sure no excessively 'Deriky' article has darkened the wiki's doorstep for more than 45 minutes.
			:::::(Seriously, I thought you'd just say I've been an asshole to people in the past, which makes you less tolerant of my occasionally quixotic edits.) -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 02:24, 13 June 2011 (EDT)

Interrobang at 06:08, 13 June 2011

2011-06-13T06:08:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:08, 13 June 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::You know, I think you have a very warped picture of me, and it kinda bothers me. Do you ''want'' me to do my "gay doesn't mean..." speech where I slam the radicals that pass for LBGT "leadership," Gay Pride parades and the minstrel show that's been embraced for gays on television? Because I can.		:::You know, I think you have a very warped picture of me, and it kinda bothers me. Do you ''want'' me to do my "gay doesn't mean..." speech where I slam the radicals that pass for LBGT "leadership," Gay Pride parades and the minstrel show that's been embraced for gays on television? Because I can.
	:::For the record I think the Q&A panel 'glitch' gaffe was ''probably'' reaching for a sort of "and one day God sneezed" harmless deflection about the day someone is born (can't remember off the top of me how that joke goes...) but innocently stumbled into a mildly pejorative term as the guys giving the answers searched for an appropriate response. It doesn't bother me-- I feel sorry for the guy who made the answer because he probably feels bad about it. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 01:16, 13 June 2011 (EDT)		:::For the record I think the Q&A panel 'glitch' gaffe was ''probably'' reaching for a sort of "and one day God sneezed" harmless deflection about the day someone is born (can't remember off the top of me how that joke goes...) but innocently stumbled into a mildly pejorative term as the guys giving the answers searched for an appropriate response. It doesn't bother me-- I feel sorry for the guy who made the answer because he probably feels bad about it. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 01:16, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
			::::It's more the fact that pulling shit out of your ass on specious evidence ("Trinity of Chaos", "The One", etc., etc.) and pushing stuff for your amusement ("Bob the friendly Insecticon") are your forte here. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 02:08, 13 June 2011 (EDT)

Derik at 05:16, 13 June 2011

2011-06-13T05:16:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:16, 13 June 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	: I really, ''really'' don't want the wiki to have a "list of gay transformers" in the [[Reproduction#Familial_relationships\|familial/relationships]] section. It would attract the wrong sort of tittering purient interest I don't think the wiki should encourage in relation to the brand. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 01:03, 13 June 2011 (EDT)		: I really, ''really'' don't want the wiki to have a "list of gay transformers" in the [[Reproduction#Familial_relationships\|familial/relationships]] section. It would attract the wrong sort of tittering purient interest I don't think the wiki should encourage in relation to the brand. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 01:03, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
	::I'm not sure if this is sarcasm or not. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:07, 13 June 2011 (EDT)		::I'm not sure if this is sarcasm or not. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:07, 13 June 2011 (EDT)

			:::You know, I think you have a very warped picture of me, and it kinda bothers me. Do you ''want'' me to do my "gay doesn't mean..." speech where I slam the radicals that pass for LBGT "leadership," Gay Pride parades and the minstrel show that's been embraced for gays on television? Because I can.
			:::For the record I think the Q&A panel 'glitch' gaffe was ''probably'' reaching for a sort of "and one day God sneezed" harmless deflection about the day someone is born (can't remember off the top of me how that joke goes...) but innocently stumbled into a mildly pejorative term as the guys giving the answers searched for an appropriate response. It doesn't bother me-- I feel sorry for the guy who made the answer because he probably feels bad about it. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 01:16, 13 June 2011 (EDT)

Interrobang at 05:07, 13 June 2011

2011-06-13T05:07:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:07, 13 June 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:mmm. It's supposed to sidestep the issue of Transformers homosexuality by hard-lining canonicity on this subject and implicitly pushing Sunstreaker and Knock-Out into [[Authorial intent]] territory. (Until there's something canon on the subject, we say nothing.)		:mmm. It's supposed to sidestep the issue of Transformers homosexuality by hard-lining canonicity on this subject and implicitly pushing Sunstreaker and Knock-Out into [[Authorial intent]] territory. (Until there's something canon on the subject, we say nothing.)
	: I really, ''really'' don't want the wiki to have a "list of gay transformers" in the [[Reproduction#Familial_relationships\|familial/relationships]] section. It would attract the wrong sort of tittering purient interest I don't think the wiki should encourage in relation to the brand. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 01:03, 13 June 2011 (EDT)		: I really, ''really'' don't want the wiki to have a "list of gay transformers" in the [[Reproduction#Familial_relationships\|familial/relationships]] section. It would attract the wrong sort of tittering purient interest I don't think the wiki should encourage in relation to the brand. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 01:03, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
			::I'm not sure if this is sarcasm or not. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 01:07, 13 June 2011 (EDT)

Derik at 05:03, 13 June 2011

2011-06-13T05:03:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 13 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I can't decide if this is awful or brilliant. Which I suppose ''does'' put it squarely in the company of Derik articles I've seen in the past.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:36, 13 June 2011 (EDT)		I can't decide if this is awful or brilliant. Which I suppose ''does'' put it squarely in the company of Derik articles I've seen in the past.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:36, 13 June 2011 (EDT)

			:mmm. It's supposed to sidestep the issue of Transformers homosexuality by hard-lining canonicity on this subject and implicitly pushing Sunstreaker and Knock-Out into [[Authorial intent]] territory. (Until there's something canon on the subject, we say nothing.)
			: I really, ''really'' don't want the wiki to have a "list of gay transformers" in the [[Reproduction#Familial_relationships\|familial/relationships]] section. It would attract the wrong sort of tittering purient interest I don't think the wiki should encourage in relation to the brand. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 01:03, 13 June 2011 (EDT)

Rosicrucian: New page: I can't decide if this is awful or brilliant. Which I suppose ''does'' put it squarely in the company of Derik articles I've seen in the past.--~~~~

2011-06-13T04:36:56Z

New page: I can't decide if this is awful or brilliant. Which I suppose ''does'' put it squarely in the company of Derik articles I've seen in the past.--~~~~

New page

I can't decide if this is awful or brilliant. Which I suppose ''does'' put it squarely in the company of Derik articles I've seen in the past.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:36, 13 June 2011 (EDT)