User talk:FFN/Archive1 - Revision history

Teletraan-X: Teletraan-X Text Replacement The Transformers (PS2) => The Transformers (G1 PS2)

2023-12-29T06:53:14Z

Teletraan-X Text Replacement The Transformers (PS2) => The Transformers (G1 PS2)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:53, 29 December 2023
Line 275:		Line 275:
	:1) He never really appeared again the American cartoon continuity to my knowledge. Just like all those other characters who have dissapeared into oblivion during Season 3.		:1) He never really appeared again the American cartoon continuity to my knowledge. Just like all those other characters who have dissapeared into oblivion during Season 3.

	:2) He possibly appeared in [[The Transformers (PS2)\|that horrible Japanese G1 game]].		:2) He possibly appeared in [[The Transformers (G1 PS2)\|that horrible Japanese G1 game]].

	:3) I have no idea. He's kind of goofy by today's standards.		:3) I have no idea. He's kind of goofy by today's standards.

Saix: /* Image Editing */clean up, replaced: Grandus (ROC) → Grandus (G1)

2021-10-20T15:52:32Z

Image Editing: clean up, replaced: Grandus (ROC) → Grandus (G1)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:52, 20 October 2021
Line 169:		Line 169:

	: Who do we need out of that image? Grandus, I assume? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 13:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)		: Who do we need out of that image? Grandus, I assume? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 13:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
	::I uploaded the Grandus image on his [[Grandus (~~ROC~~)\|page]]. Can you fill out the image's details? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 14:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)		::I uploaded the Grandus image on his [[Grandus (G1)\|page]]. Can you fill out the image's details? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 14:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

	:Thanks! Grandus was one of them, yeah, but also Sixliner... hm. Do you think we could use that painted Grandus In Base Mode art as his main pic, with the one you edited in the main body, or vice versa? We'd drop the three-Battlestar picture from his article, which would still be in the main Battlestar article. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 23:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)		:Thanks! Grandus was one of them, yeah, but also Sixliner... hm. Do you think we could use that painted Grandus In Base Mode art as his main pic, with the one you edited in the main body, or vice versa? We'd drop the three-Battlestar picture from his article, which would still be in the main Battlestar article. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 23:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Detour at 20:07, 3 December 2010

2010-12-03T20:07:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 3 December 2010
Line 275:		Line 275:
	:1) He never really appeared again the American cartoon continuity to my knowledge. Just like all those other characters who have dissapeared into oblivion during Season 3.		:1) He never really appeared again the American cartoon continuity to my knowledge. Just like all those other characters who have dissapeared into oblivion during Season 3.

	:2) He possibly appeared in [[Transformers~~: Call of the Future~~\|that horrible Japanese G1 game]].		:2) He possibly appeared in [[The Transformers (PS2)\|that horrible Japanese G1 game]].

	:3) I have no idea. He's kind of goofy by today's standards.		:3) I have no idea. He's kind of goofy by today's standards.

Khajidha: /* Suggestions */ removing link to unneeded page

2009-12-16T20:15:10Z

Suggestions: removing link to unneeded page

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 16 December 2009
Line 139:		Line 139:
	== Suggestions ==		== Suggestions ==

	Why don't I suggest on creating a page about [[Popular Cybertronian vehicle alternate modes]]? If the Earth and Beast gets a popular vehicle alternate modes page so does Cybertron.([[User:Soldier 79\|Soldier 79]] 10:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC))		Why don't I suggest on creating a page about Popular Cybertronian vehicle alternate modes? If the Earth and Beast gets a popular vehicle alternate modes page so does Cybertron.([[User:Soldier 79\|Soldier 79]] 10:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC))
	:Because with Earth vehicles there are identifiable models and designs that are recognisable. With Cybertronian vehicles they are 'generic futuristic car/truck/plane/spaceship'. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 10:38, 20 October 2007 (UTC)		:Because with Earth vehicles there are identifiable models and designs that are recognisable. With Cybertronian vehicles they are 'generic futuristic car/truck/plane/spaceship'. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 10:38, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
	More reasons why to create it. You are an awesome person, Megatron often turns into mostly a Cybertronian vehicle, Earth Vehicle modes page has a rule like 3 toy models and finally it is better that way. Plus Transformers Animated will have one heck of alot of Autobots and Decepticons that turn into Cybertronian vehicles.([[User:Soldier 79\|Soldier 79]] 10:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC))		More reasons why to create it. You are an awesome person, Megatron often turns into mostly a Cybertronian vehicle, Earth Vehicle modes page has a rule like 3 toy models and finally it is better that way. Plus Transformers Animated will have one heck of alot of Autobots and Decepticons that turn into Cybertronian vehicles.([[User:Soldier 79\|Soldier 79]] 10:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC))

Geewunling at 12:09, 5 July 2009

2009-07-05T12:09:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:09, 5 July 2009
Line 42:		Line 42:
	And there I thought someone would complain about bashing, or something. :) - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)		And there I thought someone would complain about bashing, or something. :) - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
	: I'm pretty sure Energon is fair game. You know, like NAMbLA. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)		: I'm pretty sure Energon is fair game. You know, like NAMbLA. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
	:: Yeah, when you ruin [[Demolishor\|a perfectly good, interesting character]] by resurrecting him as a gorilla-like dump truck who serves only as slapstick comic relief (and not even good comic relief), you deserve everything you get, stupid Takara Marketing and WE'VE! shakes fist of fanboy fury --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 20:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)		:: Yeah, when you ruin [[Demolishor (Armada)\|a perfectly good, interesting character]] by resurrecting him as a gorilla-like dump truck who serves only as slapstick comic relief (and not even good comic relief), you deserve everything you get, stupid Takara Marketing and WE'VE! shakes fist of fanboy fury --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 20:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
	::: Man. Demolishor's article needs, like, made not crap. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)		::: Man. Demolishor's article needs, like, made not crap. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
	:::: Feel free to do so. I get too fanboyish for this wiki whenever I write about stuff I like (like Armada Starscream). --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 20:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)		:::: Feel free to do so. I get too fanboyish for this wiki whenever I write about stuff I like (like Armada Starscream). --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 20:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Line 169:		Line 169:

	: Who do we need out of that image? Grandus, I assume? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 13:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)		: Who do we need out of that image? Grandus, I assume? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 13:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
	::I uploaded the Grandus image on his [[Grandus\|page]]. Can you fill out the image's details? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 14:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)		::I uploaded the Grandus image on his [[Grandus (ROC)\|page]]. Can you fill out the image's details? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 14:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

	:Thanks! Grandus was one of them, yeah, but also Sixliner... hm. Do you think we could use that painted Grandus In Base Mode art as his main pic, with the one you edited in the main body, or vice versa? We'd drop the three-Battlestar picture from his article, which would still be in the main Battlestar article. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 23:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)		:Thanks! Grandus was one of them, yeah, but also Sixliner... hm. Do you think we could use that painted Grandus In Base Mode art as his main pic, with the one you edited in the main body, or vice versa? We'd drop the three-Battlestar picture from his article, which would still be in the main Battlestar article. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 23:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Geewunling: /* Safeword debate */

2009-06-27T09:27:37Z

Safeword debate

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:27, 27 June 2009
Line 70:		Line 70:
	Cheers, [[User:PacifistPrime\|PacifistPrime]]		Cheers, [[User:PacifistPrime\|PacifistPrime]]
	:: Yeah, you're probably right about that; if it goes over their heads, let it. I'll change it back without the link. Cheers, [[User:PacifistPrime\|PacifistPrime]].		:: Yeah, you're probably right about that; if it goes over their heads, let it. I'll change it back without the link. Cheers, [[User:PacifistPrime\|PacifistPrime]].
	:::FFN, you mentioned that you changed the caption back to the clean joke because nobody refuted your point... The thing is, I haven't been able to find where you made your argument for its change in the first place. Not on Starscream's talk page, and not here... How can we refute your point if no one knows where it is? That being said, I personally agree with Pacifist Prime. It's no more offensive or risque than some of the other stuff on here (i.e. [[Transformers Collectors' Club]] or anything relating to [[Kiss Players]]), and without the link it's no longer harmful in the slightest. Besides, the new caption is pretty lame and practically screams, "I couldn't think of anything better than this." - [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] 06:55, 22 April 2007 (UTC)		:::FFN, you mentioned that you changed the caption back to the clean joke because nobody refuted your point... The thing is, I haven't been able to find where you made your argument for its change in the first place. Not on Starscream's talk page, and not here... How can we refute your point if no one knows where it is? That being said, I personally agree with Pacifist Prime. It's no more offensive or risque than some of the other stuff on here (i.e. [[Transformers Collectors' Club]] or anything relating to [[Kiss Players (franchise)\|Kiss Players]]), and without the link it's no longer harmful in the slightest. Besides, the new caption is pretty lame and practically screams, "I couldn't think of anything better than this." - [[User:Dark T Zeratul\|Dark T Zeratul]] 06:55, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
	::::I was referring to my discussion with Walky over MP Starscream's incorrect F-15E colours, and I sorta reverted Walky's edit back to the original with modifications (with hooperx's Titanium 3" caption) to my original MP Starscream paragraph, with added notes about Starscream's other glaring inaccuracies. That's what I meant by 'nobody refuted my point'.		::::I was referring to my discussion with Walky over MP Starscream's incorrect F-15E colours, and I sorta reverted Walky's edit back to the original with modifications (with hooperx's Titanium 3" caption) to my original MP Starscream paragraph, with added notes about Starscream's other glaring inaccuracies. That's what I meant by 'nobody refuted my point'.
	:::: At no point did I change the safeword caption, given that Pacifist Prime and I already resolved that, like, weeks ago, and I advised that to make the joke work, he didn't need to link the meaning for people, because '''A.''' The link to the meaning is abit inappropriate given our wiki's topic, and '''B.''' Its hitting people over the head with the joke. If the joke flies over people's heads, let it.		:::: At no point did I change the safeword caption, given that Pacifist Prime and I already resolved that, like, weeks ago, and I advised that to make the joke work, he didn't need to link the meaning for people, because '''A.''' The link to the meaning is abit inappropriate given our wiki's topic, and '''B.''' Its hitting people over the head with the joke. If the joke flies over people's heads, let it.

Geewunling: /* Comic arrangement */

2009-04-11T19:41:01Z

Comic arrangement

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:41, 11 April 2009
Line 214:		Line 214:
	:I'm mostly concerned about the fact we seem to agree on a format or standard..... then somebody changes their mind, so the wiki ends up looking really disorganised. One only needs to look at the episode articles and you'll see what I mean. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 00:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)		:I'm mostly concerned about the fact we seem to agree on a format or standard..... then somebody changes their mind, so the wiki ends up looking really disorganised. One only needs to look at the episode articles and you'll see what I mean. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 00:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
	::Perhaps style guide pages for both would would help consistency. I'll... go and make them, suppose. So discussion can be centralized. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 00:40, 13 January 2008 (UTC)		::Perhaps style guide pages for both would would help consistency. I'll... go and make them, suppose. So discussion can be centralized. [[User:Interrobang\|—Interrobang]] 00:40, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
	:::We've already decided on the cartoon article style, and the help page lists [[More ~~Than~~ Meets the Eye, Part 1]] as the example. However, the comic example is one of the older Marvel G1 styles, which is perfectly servicable, but just lacks the character box. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:00, 13 January 2008 (UTC)		:::We've already decided on the cartoon article style, and the help page lists [[More than Meets the Eye, Part 1]] as the example. However, the comic example is one of the older Marvel G1 styles, which is perfectly servicable, but just lacks the character box. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:00, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

	==Image formats==		==Image formats==

Geewunling at 20:07, 4 April 2009

2009-04-04T20:07:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 4 April 2009
Line 128:		Line 128:

	==Vector Sigma==		==Vector Sigma==
	[[User:Lordhighannoyingstarscream\|Lordhighannoyingstarscream]] 21:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC) I am a new user here and I am also sorry for the caption thing, but i just discovered that someone took away all the humourous captions and sarcasm in [[Vector Sigma]]'s info page. he is a somwhat important character so I think somebody should look into that. I also had an idea for the [[Unicron ~~trilogy~~]] so if yoyu wanna fix anything i put a basic theme there as well as some content and images.		[[User:Lordhighannoyingstarscream\|Lordhighannoyingstarscream]] 21:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC) I am a new user here and I am also sorry for the caption thing, but i just discovered that someone took away all the humourous captions and sarcasm in [[Vector Sigma]]'s info page. he is a somwhat important character so I think somebody should look into that. I also had an idea for the [[Unicron Trilogy]] so if yoyu wanna fix anything i put a basic theme there as well as some content and images.
	:As you may or may not (probably not, I'm guessing) have read, we ''do'' use serious captions on occasion, when there's a need to convey information that isn't obvious from the text. Vector Sigma's article is one such instance. Please go to [[Transformers_Wiki:Caption\|this page]] and read carefully. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 21:21, 16 January 2008 (UTC)		:As you may or may not (probably not, I'm guessing) have read, we ''do'' use serious captions on occasion, when there's a need to convey information that isn't obvious from the text. Vector Sigma's article is one such instance. Please go to [[Transformers_Wiki:Caption\|this page]] and read carefully. -- [[User:Repowers\|Repowers]] 21:21, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Line 275:		Line 275:
	:1) He never really appeared again the American cartoon continuity to my knowledge. Just like all those other characters who have dissapeared into oblivion during Season 3.		:1) He never really appeared again the American cartoon continuity to my knowledge. Just like all those other characters who have dissapeared into oblivion during Season 3.

	:2) He possibly appeared in [[Transformers ~~(Atlus)~~\|that horrible Japanese G1 game]].		:2) He possibly appeared in [[Transformers: Call of the Future\|that horrible Japanese G1 game]].

	:3) I have no idea. He's kind of goofy by today's standards.		:3) I have no idea. He's kind of goofy by today's standards.

FFN: New page: ==Captions== Not to try and start a fight or anything, but who made you the arbiter of what makes a "good" caption or not? If you don't have a better caption to put there, then do you rea...

2009-03-21T14:33:09Z

New page: ==Captions== Not to try and start a fight or anything, but who made you the arbiter of what makes a "good" caption or not? If you don't have a better caption to put there, then do you rea...

Show changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:52, 20 October 2021
Line 169:		Line 169:

	: Who do we need out of that image? Grandus, I assume? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 13:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)		: Who do we need out of that image? Grandus, I assume? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 13:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
	::I uploaded the Grandus image on his [[Grandus (~~ROC~~)\|page]]. Can you fill out the image's details? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 14:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)		::I uploaded the Grandus image on his [[Grandus (G1)\|page]]. Can you fill out the image's details? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 14:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

	:Thanks! Grandus was one of them, yeah, but also Sixliner... hm. Do you think we could use that painted Grandus In Base Mode art as his main pic, with the one you edited in the main body, or vice versa? We'd drop the three-Battlestar picture from his article, which would still be in the main Battlestar article. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 23:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)		:Thanks! Grandus was one of them, yeah, but also Sixliner... hm. Do you think we could use that painted Grandus In Base Mode art as his main pic, with the one you edited in the main body, or vice versa? We'd drop the three-Battlestar picture from his article, which would still be in the main Battlestar article. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 23:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:09, 5 July 2009
Line 42:		Line 42:
	And there I thought someone would complain about bashing, or something. :) - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)		And there I thought someone would complain about bashing, or something. :) - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
	: I'm pretty sure Energon is fair game. You know, like NAMbLA. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)		: I'm pretty sure Energon is fair game. You know, like NAMbLA. --[[User:ItsWalky\|ItsWalky]] 20:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
	:: Yeah, when you ruin [[Demolishor\|a perfectly good, interesting character]] by resurrecting him as a gorilla-like dump truck who serves only as slapstick comic relief (and not even good comic relief), you deserve everything you get, stupid Takara Marketing and WE'VE! shakes fist of fanboy fury --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 20:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)		:: Yeah, when you ruin [[Demolishor (Armada)\|a perfectly good, interesting character]] by resurrecting him as a gorilla-like dump truck who serves only as slapstick comic relief (and not even good comic relief), you deserve everything you get, stupid Takara Marketing and WE'VE! shakes fist of fanboy fury --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 20:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
	::: Man. Demolishor's article needs, like, made not crap. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)		::: Man. Demolishor's article needs, like, made not crap. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 20:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
	:::: Feel free to do so. I get too fanboyish for this wiki whenever I write about stuff I like (like Armada Starscream). --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 20:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)		:::: Feel free to do so. I get too fanboyish for this wiki whenever I write about stuff I like (like Armada Starscream). --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 20:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Line 169:		Line 169:

	: Who do we need out of that image? Grandus, I assume? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 13:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)		: Who do we need out of that image? Grandus, I assume? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 13:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
	::I uploaded the Grandus image on his [[Grandus\|page]]. Can you fill out the image's details? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 14:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)		::I uploaded the Grandus image on his [[Grandus (ROC)\|page]]. Can you fill out the image's details? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 14:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

	:Thanks! Grandus was one of them, yeah, but also Sixliner... hm. Do you think we could use that painted Grandus In Base Mode art as his main pic, with the one you edited in the main body, or vice versa? We'd drop the three-Battlestar picture from his article, which would still be in the main Battlestar article. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 23:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)		:Thanks! Grandus was one of them, yeah, but also Sixliner... hm. Do you think we could use that painted Grandus In Base Mode art as his main pic, with the one you edited in the main body, or vice versa? We'd drop the three-Battlestar picture from his article, which would still be in the main Battlestar article. --[[User:Monzo\|Monzo]] 23:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)