User talk:Giggidy/Sandbox - Revision history

Giggidy at 22:19, 11 September 2016

2016-09-11T22:19:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 11 September 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I dunno, I think the fact that it ''has'' been acknowledged twice - with actual logos, to boot! - makes it more reasonable. Buuuut I get that joke pages have to be particularly good to be viable, so yeah, maybe not a great idea. (A trimmed down version of this as a subsection of the BW franchise page would be a reasonable compromise, perhaps?) --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 17:37, 11 September 2016 (EDT)		:I dunno, I think the fact that it ''has'' been acknowledged twice - with actual logos, to boot! - makes it more reasonable. Buuuut I get that joke pages have to be particularly good to be viable, so yeah, maybe not a great idea. (A trimmed down version of this as a subsection of the BW franchise page would be a reasonable compromise, perhaps?) --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 17:37, 11 September 2016 (EDT)
	::A "20th Anniversary" subsection, with snark about the underwhelming amount of product (and noting the competing, more "mass-marketable" concurrent anniversary) would be acceptable, yes. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:52, 11 September 2016 (EDT)		::A "20th Anniversary" subsection, with snark about the underwhelming amount of product (and noting the competing, more "mass-marketable" concurrent anniversary) would be acceptable, yes. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:52, 11 September 2016 (EDT)
			:::I think Riptide articulated my thinking about it. The presence of actual logos points out that parts of Hasbro and its licensees are aware of the situation, and are the seed around which the pages germinate. But you're right, I think the joke could work well as a sub-section on the franchise page. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 18:19, 11 September 2016 (EDT)

M Sipher at 21:52, 11 September 2016

2016-09-11T21:52:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 11 September 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Okay, sorry, but neither of these are viable for actual pages. There's any number of arbitrary anniversaries that don't get officially recognized in ways to satisfy certain subgroups of fans. This is, at BEST, a trivia note on the BW franchise page, '''''if''''' that. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (EDT)		Okay, sorry, but neither of these are viable for actual pages. There's any number of arbitrary anniversaries that don't get officially recognized in ways to satisfy certain subgroups of fans. This is, at BEST, a trivia note on the BW franchise page, '''''if''''' that. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (EDT)
	:I dunno, I think the fact that it ''has'' been acknowledged twice - with actual logos, to boot! - makes it more reasonable. Buuuut I get that joke pages have to be particularly good to be viable, so yeah, maybe not a great idea. (A trimmed down version of this as a subsection of the BW franchise page would be a reasonable compromise, perhaps?) --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 17:37, 11 September 2016 (EDT)		:I dunno, I think the fact that it ''has'' been acknowledged twice - with actual logos, to boot! - makes it more reasonable. Buuuut I get that joke pages have to be particularly good to be viable, so yeah, maybe not a great idea. (A trimmed down version of this as a subsection of the BW franchise page would be a reasonable compromise, perhaps?) --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 17:37, 11 September 2016 (EDT)
			::A "20th Anniversary" subsection, with snark about the underwhelming amount of product (and noting the competing, more "mass-marketable" concurrent anniversary) would be acceptable, yes. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:52, 11 September 2016 (EDT)

Broadside at 21:38, 11 September 2016

2016-09-11T21:38:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 11 September 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Okay, sorry, but neither of these are viable for actual pages. There's any number of arbitrary anniversaries that don't get officially recognized in ways to satisfy certain subgroups of fans. This is, at BEST, a trivia note on the BW franchise page, '''''if''''' that. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (EDT)		Okay, sorry, but neither of these are viable for actual pages. There's any number of arbitrary anniversaries that don't get officially recognized in ways to satisfy certain subgroups of fans. This is, at BEST, a trivia note on the BW franchise page, '''''if''''' that. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (EDT)
	:I dunno, I think the fact that it has been acknowledged twice - with actual logos, to boot! - makes it more reasonable. Buuuut I get that joke pages have to be particularly good to be viable, so... --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 17:37, 11 September 2016 (EDT)		:I dunno, I think the fact that it ''has'' been acknowledged twice - with actual logos, to boot! - makes it more reasonable. Buuuut I get that joke pages have to be particularly good to be viable, so yeah, maybe not a great idea. (A trimmed down version of this as a subsection of the BW franchise page would be a reasonable compromise, perhaps?) --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 17:37, 11 September 2016 (EDT)

Broadside at 21:37, 11 September 2016

2016-09-11T21:37:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 11 September 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Okay, sorry, but neither of these are viable for actual pages. There's any number of arbitrary anniversaries that don't get officially recognized in ways to satisfy certain subgroups of fans. This is, at BEST, a trivia note on the BW franchise page, '''''if''''' that. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (EDT)		Okay, sorry, but neither of these are viable for actual pages. There's any number of arbitrary anniversaries that don't get officially recognized in ways to satisfy certain subgroups of fans. This is, at BEST, a trivia note on the BW franchise page, '''''if''''' that. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (EDT)
			:I dunno, I think the fact that it has been acknowledged twice - with actual logos, to boot! - makes it more reasonable. Buuuut I get that joke pages have to be particularly good to be viable, so... --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 17:37, 11 September 2016 (EDT)

M Sipher at 21:25, 11 September 2016

2016-09-11T21:25:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 11 September 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	[[User:Jalaguy/BW20\|Snap!]] [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 20:13, 10 September 2016 (EDT)		[[User:Jalaguy/BW20\|Snap!]] [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 20:13, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
	:Lol! That's funny. Great minds I guess.--[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 12:42, 11 September 2016 (EDT)		:Lol! That's funny. Great minds I guess.--[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 12:42, 11 September 2016 (EDT)

			Okay, sorry, but neither of these are viable for actual pages. There's any number of arbitrary anniversaries that don't get officially recognized in ways to satisfy certain subgroups of fans. This is, at BEST, a trivia note on the BW franchise page, '''''if''''' that. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (EDT)

Giggidy at 16:42, 11 September 2016

2016-09-11T16:42:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 11 September 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:We-ell, Year of the Monkey Optimus Primal did have a BW20 logo on... --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 20:05, 10 September 2016 (EDT)		:We-ell, Year of the Monkey Optimus Primal did have a BW20 logo on... --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 20:05, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
	[[User:Jalaguy/BW20\|Snap!]] [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 20:13, 10 September 2016 (EDT)		[[User:Jalaguy/BW20\|Snap!]] [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 20:13, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
			:Lol! That's funny. Great minds I guess.--[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 12:42, 11 September 2016 (EDT)

Jalaguy at 00:13, 11 September 2016

2016-09-11T00:13:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:13, 11 September 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is this too much? I never know. Comments, edits, whatever, all welcome.--[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 20:00, 10 September 2016 (EDT)		Is this too much? I never know. Comments, edits, whatever, all welcome.--[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 20:00, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
	:We-ell, Year of the Monkey Optimus Primal did have a BW20 logo on... --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 20:05, 10 September 2016 (EDT)		:We-ell, Year of the Monkey Optimus Primal did have a BW20 logo on... --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 20:05, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
			[[User:Jalaguy/BW20\|Snap!]] [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 20:13, 10 September 2016 (EDT)

Broadside at 00:05, 11 September 2016

2016-09-11T00:05:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 11 September 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is this too much? I never know. Comments, edits, whatever, all welcome.--[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 20:00, 10 September 2016 (EDT)		Is this too much? I never know. Comments, edits, whatever, all welcome.--[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 20:00, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
			:We-ell, Year of the Monkey Optimus Primal did have a BW20 logo on... --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 20:05, 10 September 2016 (EDT)

Giggidy: Created page with "Is this too much? I never know. Comments, edits, whatever, all welcome.--~~~~"

2016-09-11T00:00:22Z

Created page with "Is this too much? I never know. Comments, edits, whatever, all welcome.--~~~~"

New page

Is this too much? I never know. Comments, edits, whatever, all welcome.--[[User:Giggidy|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy|talk]]) 20:00, 10 September 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 11 September 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I dunno, I think the fact that it ''has'' been acknowledged twice - with actual logos, to boot! - makes it more reasonable. Buuuut I get that joke pages have to be particularly good to be viable, so yeah, maybe not a great idea. (A trimmed down version of this as a subsection of the BW franchise page would be a reasonable compromise, perhaps?) --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 17:37, 11 September 2016 (EDT)		:I dunno, I think the fact that it ''has'' been acknowledged twice - with actual logos, to boot! - makes it more reasonable. Buuuut I get that joke pages have to be particularly good to be viable, so yeah, maybe not a great idea. (A trimmed down version of this as a subsection of the BW franchise page would be a reasonable compromise, perhaps?) --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 17:37, 11 September 2016 (EDT)
	::A "20th Anniversary" subsection, with snark about the underwhelming amount of product (and noting the competing, more "mass-marketable" concurrent anniversary) would be acceptable, yes. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:52, 11 September 2016 (EDT)		::A "20th Anniversary" subsection, with snark about the underwhelming amount of product (and noting the competing, more "mass-marketable" concurrent anniversary) would be acceptable, yes. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:52, 11 September 2016 (EDT)
			:::I think Riptide articulated my thinking about it. The presence of actual logos points out that parts of Hasbro and its licensees are aware of the situation, and are the seed around which the pages germinate. But you're right, I think the joke could work well as a sub-section on the franchise page. --[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 18:19, 11 September 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 11 September 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Okay, sorry, but neither of these are viable for actual pages. There's any number of arbitrary anniversaries that don't get officially recognized in ways to satisfy certain subgroups of fans. This is, at BEST, a trivia note on the BW franchise page, '''''if''''' that. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (EDT)		Okay, sorry, but neither of these are viable for actual pages. There's any number of arbitrary anniversaries that don't get officially recognized in ways to satisfy certain subgroups of fans. This is, at BEST, a trivia note on the BW franchise page, '''''if''''' that. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (EDT)
	:I dunno, I think the fact that it ''has'' been acknowledged twice - with actual logos, to boot! - makes it more reasonable. Buuuut I get that joke pages have to be particularly good to be viable, so yeah, maybe not a great idea. (A trimmed down version of this as a subsection of the BW franchise page would be a reasonable compromise, perhaps?) --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 17:37, 11 September 2016 (EDT)		:I dunno, I think the fact that it ''has'' been acknowledged twice - with actual logos, to boot! - makes it more reasonable. Buuuut I get that joke pages have to be particularly good to be viable, so yeah, maybe not a great idea. (A trimmed down version of this as a subsection of the BW franchise page would be a reasonable compromise, perhaps?) --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 17:37, 11 September 2016 (EDT)
			::A "20th Anniversary" subsection, with snark about the underwhelming amount of product (and noting the competing, more "mass-marketable" concurrent anniversary) would be acceptable, yes. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:52, 11 September 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 11 September 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	[[User:Jalaguy/BW20\|Snap!]] [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 20:13, 10 September 2016 (EDT)		[[User:Jalaguy/BW20\|Snap!]] [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 20:13, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
	:Lol! That's funny. Great minds I guess.--[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 12:42, 11 September 2016 (EDT)		:Lol! That's funny. Great minds I guess.--[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 12:42, 11 September 2016 (EDT)

			Okay, sorry, but neither of these are viable for actual pages. There's any number of arbitrary anniversaries that don't get officially recognized in ways to satisfy certain subgroups of fans. This is, at BEST, a trivia note on the BW franchise page, '''''if''''' that. --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher\|talk]]) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 11 September 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:We-ell, Year of the Monkey Optimus Primal did have a BW20 logo on... --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 20:05, 10 September 2016 (EDT)		:We-ell, Year of the Monkey Optimus Primal did have a BW20 logo on... --[[User:Riptide\|Riptide]] ([[User talk:Riptide\|talk]]) 20:05, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
	[[User:Jalaguy/BW20\|Snap!]] [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 20:13, 10 September 2016 (EDT)		[[User:Jalaguy/BW20\|Snap!]] [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 20:13, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
			:Lol! That's funny. Great minds I guess.--[[User:Giggidy\|Giggidy]] ([[User talk:Giggidy\|talk]]) 12:42, 11 September 2016 (EDT)