User talk:Jackpot/Sandbox/Sections - Revision history

Saix: replaced: [[Hot Rod (G1) → [[Hot Rod

2016-02-27T06:17:39Z

replaced: [[Hot Rod (G1) → [[Hot Rod

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:17, 27 February 2016
Line 153:		Line 153:
	::::Victory		::::Victory

	::::It ''works'' here because they dont appear ''anywhere else'', so we don't have to try and work it into the timeline ahead of something that's already happened, or to try and figure out how to loop it back around to Zone-and-beyond. It's eaiser to relate the information than this complicated discussion is making it sound, but ultimately, we might have to use a case-by-case method to just figure out how to do it in the easiest way. Take what I did with [[Hot Rod ~~(G1)~~\|Rodimus Prime]] a while back - I just made one section "Headmasters anime and manga," because his appearance in the manga follows on ''directly'' from what he does in the anime (we haven't really talked about it here, for everyone's benefit, but HM is a ''strange'' animal, in that it IS concurrent with its anime, using it as its basis, rather than being an "alternate" to it, but at the same time, some things happen in it the manga can't possibly occur within the cartoon). Case-by-case. Someone give me an example till I test out how easy it is to make it work... - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 21:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)		::::It ''works'' here because they dont appear ''anywhere else'', so we don't have to try and work it into the timeline ahead of something that's already happened, or to try and figure out how to loop it back around to Zone-and-beyond. It's eaiser to relate the information than this complicated discussion is making it sound, but ultimately, we might have to use a case-by-case method to just figure out how to do it in the easiest way. Take what I did with [[Hot Rod\|Rodimus Prime]] a while back - I just made one section "Headmasters anime and manga," because his appearance in the manga follows on ''directly'' from what he does in the anime (we haven't really talked about it here, for everyone's benefit, but HM is a ''strange'' animal, in that it IS concurrent with its anime, using it as its basis, rather than being an "alternate" to it, but at the same time, some things happen in it the manga can't possibly occur within the cartoon). Case-by-case. Someone give me an example till I test out how easy it is to make it work... - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 21:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

	:::::I totally get your "continuity roundabout" drawing (and, yeah, we Americans have them - just not many). I don't understand how you redid the list, though. The revision ''I'' suggested is the linear depiction of your roundabout. Look at the master list, and see how there's Marvel G1 first, going all the way up to the present with ''Classics.'' Then the G1 cartoon, with all of its spawn. Then BW, which stems from both. Likewise, I suggested we run the pre-Zone anime together in its subsection, as it's one cohesive unit, then the pre-Zone manga in another cohesive unit, then Zone and beyond which stems from both. I could see maybe splitting "Zone anime" and "Zone manga" apart and putting them at the ends of their respective sections, based the point you made about them not ''drawing from,'' but rather ''belonging to'' both worlds. But making the mangas subsections of their animes doesn't make sense to me, since you said the mangas are NOT in continuity with their animes. The exception, apparently, is the HM manga? But if even THAT still can't fully mesh with the anime, then I say for the purposes of the master we just treat it like it's another "alternate" and let all the mangas live together separately. But equally. - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 18:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		:::::I totally get your "continuity roundabout" drawing (and, yeah, we Americans have them - just not many). I don't understand how you redid the list, though. The revision ''I'' suggested is the linear depiction of your roundabout. Look at the master list, and see how there's Marvel G1 first, going all the way up to the present with ''Classics.'' Then the G1 cartoon, with all of its spawn. Then BW, which stems from both. Likewise, I suggested we run the pre-Zone anime together in its subsection, as it's one cohesive unit, then the pre-Zone manga in another cohesive unit, then Zone and beyond which stems from both. I could see maybe splitting "Zone anime" and "Zone manga" apart and putting them at the ends of their respective sections, based the point you made about them not ''drawing from,'' but rather ''belonging to'' both worlds. But making the mangas subsections of their animes doesn't make sense to me, since you said the mangas are NOT in continuity with their animes. The exception, apparently, is the HM manga? But if even THAT still can't fully mesh with the anime, then I say for the purposes of the master we just treat it like it's another "alternate" and let all the mangas live together separately. But equally. - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 18:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Line 181:		Line 181:
	:Also, I wonder how often we really ''need'' subsections at all. For instance, we don't make a new section every time IDW starts a new "-ation" title. For the J-G1 stuff, can we combine the ''Headmasters''-through-''Zone'' anime into one bottom-level "Anime continuity" section (and likewise with the manga)? The reader would then have to click on storylinks to find out which series is being referenced, but is that a big deal?		:Also, I wonder how often we really ''need'' subsections at all. For instance, we don't make a new section every time IDW starts a new "-ation" title. For the J-G1 stuff, can we combine the ''Headmasters''-through-''Zone'' anime into one bottom-level "Anime continuity" section (and likewise with the manga)? The reader would then have to click on storylinks to find out which series is being referenced, but is that a big deal?
	:- [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 18:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		:- [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 18:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
	::You know, I ''have'' occasionally mulled over why we have things like~~<br>~~		::You know, I ''have'' occasionally mulled over why we have things like
	::<nowiki>===Cartoon continuity===</nowiki~~><br~~>		::<nowiki>===Cartoon continuity===</nowiki>
	::<nowiki>====Armada====</nowiki~~><br~~>		::<nowiki>====Armada====</nowiki>
	::...for characters who ''only ever appeared in the Armada cartoon''. The "Armada" seems unneccessary. Why not only use "<nowiki>===Armada cartoon continuity===</nowiki>", instead of adding a pointless sub-divide? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 18:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		::...for characters who ''only ever appeared in the Armada cartoon''. The "Armada" seems unneccessary. Why not only use "<nowiki>===Armada cartoon continuity===</nowiki>", instead of adding a pointless sub-divide? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 18:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

LOMI: /* Updates */ new section

2014-11-11T21:41:13Z

Updates: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:41, 11 November 2014
Line 185:		Line 185:
	::<nowiki>====Armada====</nowiki><br>		::<nowiki>====Armada====</nowiki><br>
	::...for characters who ''only ever appeared in the Armada cartoon''. The "Armada" seems unneccessary. Why not only use "<nowiki>===Armada cartoon continuity===</nowiki>", instead of adding a pointless sub-divide? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 18:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		::...for characters who ''only ever appeared in the Armada cartoon''. The "Armada" seems unneccessary. Why not only use "<nowiki>===Armada cartoon continuity===</nowiki>", instead of adding a pointless sub-divide? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 18:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

			== Updates ==

			So, I stumbled upon this article... any chance we could see it updated with some of the new stuff? I'd really love to see something successfully keep track of all the various continuities we have. --[[User:LOMI\|LOMI]] ([[User talk:LOMI\|talk]]) 16:41, 11 November 2014 (EST)

Abates: Undo revision 511811 by 205.200.78.142 (Talk)

2010-10-22T01:25:23Z

Undo revision 511811 by 205.200.78.142 (Talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:25, 22 October 2010
Line 185:		Line 185:
	::<nowiki>====Armada====</nowiki><br>		::<nowiki>====Armada====</nowiki><br>
	::...for characters who ''only ever appeared in the Armada cartoon''. The "Armada" seems unneccessary. Why not only use "<nowiki>===Armada cartoon continuity===</nowiki>", instead of adding a pointless sub-divide? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 18:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		::...for characters who ''only ever appeared in the Armada cartoon''. The "Armada" seems unneccessary. Why not only use "<nowiki>===Armada cartoon continuity===</nowiki>", instead of adding a pointless sub-divide? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 18:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

	~~== 5 Diabetes Diet ==~~

	~~sibcxaznk, <http>//newhealthchoice.com diabetes diet] frEQdkehsbmelo~~

205.200.78.142: /* 5 Diabetes Diet */ new section

2010-10-22T01:24:41Z

5 Diabetes Diet: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:24, 22 October 2010
Line 185:		Line 185:
	::<nowiki>====Armada====</nowiki><br>		::<nowiki>====Armada====</nowiki><br>
	::...for characters who ''only ever appeared in the Armada cartoon''. The "Armada" seems unneccessary. Why not only use "<nowiki>===Armada cartoon continuity===</nowiki>", instead of adding a pointless sub-divide? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 18:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		::...for characters who ''only ever appeared in the Armada cartoon''. The "Armada" seems unneccessary. Why not only use "<nowiki>===Armada cartoon continuity===</nowiki>", instead of adding a pointless sub-divide? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 18:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

			== 5 Diabetes Diet ==

			sibcxaznk, <http>//newhealthchoice.com diabetes diet] frEQdkehsbmelo

FortMax: Undo revision 436776 by Interrobang (Talk)

2010-03-17T05:07:31Z

Undo revision 436776 by Interrobang (Talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:07, 17 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{delete}}~~
	==Organizing principles==		==Organizing principles==
	I've organized all the various series and such on these principles:		I've organized all the various series and such on these principles:

Interrobang at 08:13, 16 March 2010

2010-03-16T08:13:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:13, 16 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{delete}}
	==Organizing principles==		==Organizing principles==
	I've organized all the various series and such on these principles:		I've organized all the various series and such on these principles:

Geewunling at 19:26, 11 July 2009

2009-07-11T19:26:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 11 July 2009
Line 153:		Line 153:
	::::Victory		::::Victory

	::::It ''works'' here because they dont appear ''anywhere else'', so we don't have to try and work it into the timeline ahead of something that's already happened, or to try and figure out how to loop it back around to Zone-and-beyond. It's eaiser to relate the information than this complicated discussion is making it sound, but ultimately, we might have to use a case-by-case method to just figure out how to do it in the easiest way. Take what I did with [[Rodimus Prime]] a while back - I just made one section "Headmasters anime and manga," because his appearance in the manga follows on ''directly'' from what he does in the anime (we haven't really talked about it here, for everyone's benefit, but HM is a ''strange'' animal, in that it IS concurrent with its anime, using it as its basis, rather than being an "alternate" to it, but at the same time, some things happen in it the manga can't possibly occur within the cartoon). Case-by-case. Someone give me an example till I test out how easy it is to make it work... - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 21:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)		::::It ''works'' here because they dont appear ''anywhere else'', so we don't have to try and work it into the timeline ahead of something that's already happened, or to try and figure out how to loop it back around to Zone-and-beyond. It's eaiser to relate the information than this complicated discussion is making it sound, but ultimately, we might have to use a case-by-case method to just figure out how to do it in the easiest way. Take what I did with [[Hot Rod (G1)\|Rodimus Prime]] a while back - I just made one section "Headmasters anime and manga," because his appearance in the manga follows on ''directly'' from what he does in the anime (we haven't really talked about it here, for everyone's benefit, but HM is a ''strange'' animal, in that it IS concurrent with its anime, using it as its basis, rather than being an "alternate" to it, but at the same time, some things happen in it the manga can't possibly occur within the cartoon). Case-by-case. Someone give me an example till I test out how easy it is to make it work... - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 21:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

	:::::I totally get your "continuity roundabout" drawing (and, yeah, we Americans have them - just not many). I don't understand how you redid the list, though. The revision ''I'' suggested is the linear depiction of your roundabout. Look at the master list, and see how there's Marvel G1 first, going all the way up to the present with ''Classics.'' Then the G1 cartoon, with all of its spawn. Then BW, which stems from both. Likewise, I suggested we run the pre-Zone anime together in its subsection, as it's one cohesive unit, then the pre-Zone manga in another cohesive unit, then Zone and beyond which stems from both. I could see maybe splitting "Zone anime" and "Zone manga" apart and putting them at the ends of their respective sections, based the point you made about them not ''drawing from,'' but rather ''belonging to'' both worlds. But making the mangas subsections of their animes doesn't make sense to me, since you said the mangas are NOT in continuity with their animes. The exception, apparently, is the HM manga? But if even THAT still can't fully mesh with the anime, then I say for the purposes of the master we just treat it like it's another "alternate" and let all the mangas live together separately. But equally. - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 18:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		:::::I totally get your "continuity roundabout" drawing (and, yeah, we Americans have them - just not many). I don't understand how you redid the list, though. The revision ''I'' suggested is the linear depiction of your roundabout. Look at the master list, and see how there's Marvel G1 first, going all the way up to the present with ''Classics.'' Then the G1 cartoon, with all of its spawn. Then BW, which stems from both. Likewise, I suggested we run the pre-Zone anime together in its subsection, as it's one cohesive unit, then the pre-Zone manga in another cohesive unit, then Zone and beyond which stems from both. I could see maybe splitting "Zone anime" and "Zone manga" apart and putting them at the ends of their respective sections, based the point you made about them not ''drawing from,'' but rather ''belonging to'' both worlds. But making the mangas subsections of their animes doesn't make sense to me, since you said the mangas are NOT in continuity with their animes. The exception, apparently, is the HM manga? But if even THAT still can't fully mesh with the anime, then I say for the purposes of the master we just treat it like it's another "alternate" and let all the mangas live together separately. But equally. - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 18:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Jackpot: Removing Wikia-link.

2009-03-20T09:48:15Z

Removing Wikia-link.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:48, 20 March 2009
Line 184:		Line 184:
	::<nowiki>===Cartoon continuity===</nowiki><br>		::<nowiki>===Cartoon continuity===</nowiki><br>
	::<nowiki>====Armada====</nowiki><br>		::<nowiki>====Armada====</nowiki><br>
	::...for characters who ''only ever appeared in the Armada cartoon''. The "Armada" seems unneccessary. Why not only use "<nowiki>===Armada cartoon continuity===</nowiki>", instead of adding a pointless sub-divide? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 18:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)~~<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>~~		::...for characters who ''only ever appeared in the Armada cartoon''. The "Armada" seems unneccessary. Why not only use "<nowiki>===Armada cartoon continuity===</nowiki>", instead of adding a pointless sub-divide? --[[User:M Sipher\|M Sipher]] 18:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Jackpot: /* J-G1 continuity / Also, separated the header-size discussion into / Header-size issues */. Well, the first paragraph of it, anyway.

2008-02-03T20:31:38Z

J-G1 continuity: Also, separated the header-size discussion into Header-size issues: . Well, the first paragraph of it, anyway.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 3 February 2008
Line 157:		Line 157:
	:::::I totally get your "continuity roundabout" drawing (and, yeah, we Americans have them - just not many). I don't understand how you redid the list, though. The revision ''I'' suggested is the linear depiction of your roundabout. Look at the master list, and see how there's Marvel G1 first, going all the way up to the present with ''Classics.'' Then the G1 cartoon, with all of its spawn. Then BW, which stems from both. Likewise, I suggested we run the pre-Zone anime together in its subsection, as it's one cohesive unit, then the pre-Zone manga in another cohesive unit, then Zone and beyond which stems from both. I could see maybe splitting "Zone anime" and "Zone manga" apart and putting them at the ends of their respective sections, based the point you made about them not ''drawing from,'' but rather ''belonging to'' both worlds. But making the mangas subsections of their animes doesn't make sense to me, since you said the mangas are NOT in continuity with their animes. The exception, apparently, is the HM manga? But if even THAT still can't fully mesh with the anime, then I say for the purposes of the master we just treat it like it's another "alternate" and let all the mangas live together separately. But equally. - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 18:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		:::::I totally get your "continuity roundabout" drawing (and, yeah, we Americans have them - just not many). I don't understand how you redid the list, though. The revision ''I'' suggested is the linear depiction of your roundabout. Look at the master list, and see how there's Marvel G1 first, going all the way up to the present with ''Classics.'' Then the G1 cartoon, with all of its spawn. Then BW, which stems from both. Likewise, I suggested we run the pre-Zone anime together in its subsection, as it's one cohesive unit, then the pre-Zone manga in another cohesive unit, then Zone and beyond which stems from both. I could see maybe splitting "Zone anime" and "Zone manga" apart and putting them at the ends of their respective sections, based the point you made about them not ''drawing from,'' but rather ''belonging to'' both worlds. But making the mangas subsections of their animes doesn't make sense to me, since you said the mangas are NOT in continuity with their animes. The exception, apparently, is the HM manga? But if even THAT still can't fully mesh with the anime, then I say for the purposes of the master we just treat it like it's another "alternate" and let all the mangas live together separately. But equally. - [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 18:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

	:::::::Yeah, y'know, looking back on that after a day, I honestly don't know what I was talkin' about. I'm looking at your list now, and I'm thinking, "That makes more sense." I think it was the use of the term "Zone continuity" that sort of threw me, and it being it's own separate header, when it's all part of the same line. All of the fault of these bloody mangas, honestly, it is. The silly thing is, I don't think this will ever really be an issue in the actual creation of an article... it's just awkward to try and fit into a cover-everything explanation. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 00:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 00:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)		::::::Yeah, y'know, looking back on that after a day, I honestly don't know what I was talkin' about. I'm looking at your list now, and I'm thinking, "That makes more sense." I think it was the use of the term "Zone continuity" that sort of threw me, and it being it's own separate header, when it's all part of the same line. All of the fault of these bloody mangas, honestly, it is. The silly thing is, I don't think this will ever really be an issue in the actual creation of an article... it's just awkward to try and fit into a cover-everything explanation. - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 00:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 00:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

	::::::::Okay, I've updated the master to reflect this discussion. I decided to separate the two Zones, since context will always decide one over the other in an article anyway. I also lumped ''Battlestars'' and ''Operation Combination'' into the manga continuity, since I don't know any better. If they don't belong there, let me know.		:::::::Okay, I've updated the master to reflect this discussion. I decided to separate the two Zones, since context will always decide one over the other in an article anyway. I also lumped ''Battlestars'' and ''Operation Combination'' into the manga continuity, since I don't know any better. If they don't belong there, let me know.
	::::::::All the J-fiction from ''Binaltech'' onwards, I kept outside of the G1 'toon-verse proper because of the Beast elements in them. (Ravage, at the very least.) And it's my limited understanding that ''Binaltech's'' temporal wackiness ends up taking it outside the 'toon-verse proper anyway. But if anyone can give a more informed analysis, I'd love to hear it.		:::::::All the J-fiction from ''Binaltech'' onwards, I kept outside of the G1 'toon-verse proper because of the Beast elements in them. (Ravage, at the very least.) And it's my limited understanding that ''Binaltech's'' temporal wackiness ends up taking it outside the 'toon-verse proper anyway. But if anyone can give a more informed analysis, I'd love to hear it.
	::::::::- [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 04:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)		:::::::- [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 04:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::::See, I just plain don't agree with the keeping of Binaltech, KP, RM and all that other stuff out of there. I know ''why'' you're doing it, but it's purely my personal preference not to. Like Siph and Walky are saying, I want to write a character's fictional history in chronological story order, not the way the fiction came out. I also realized what part of the problem I had with the list was - it was putting the SRLF, 2010 and Big War mangs in the "manga continuity," when they're very definitely part of the anime continuity. Regarding Binaltech - essentially, yeah, but again, it's no different from how Classics branches out from the Marvel continuity. Takes the cartoon as its starting point, and then branches off and tells a new story that's not in-line with the other existing fiction (it just so happens that in the case of Binaltech, the divergence is a story point). - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 11:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)		::::::::See, I just plain don't agree with the keeping of Binaltech, KP, RM and all that other stuff out of there. I know ''why'' you're doing it, but it's purely my personal preference not to. Like Siph and Walky are saying, I want to write a character's fictional history in chronological story order, not the way the fiction came out. I also realized what part of the problem I had with the list was - it was putting the SRLF, 2010 and Big War mangs in the "manga continuity," when they're very definitely part of the anime continuity. Regarding Binaltech - essentially, yeah, but again, it's no different from how Classics branches out from the Marvel continuity. Takes the cartoon as its starting point, and then branches off and tells a new story that's not in-line with the other existing fiction (it just so happens that in the case of Binaltech, the divergence is a story point). - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 11:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
			:::::::::Okay, I've moved the first set of mangas into the "Anime continuity" section. Also, I'd been thinking about Binaltech et al., and I realized that if a series is ''set'' in a pre-existing continuity, it should go there... and if it uses time/dimension travel to draw from multiple continuities, well, it should go into ''all ''of them then. So, for instance, I put three ''Robot Masters'' headers into the Anime, Beast, and UT continuities. The placement used in an actual article will depend on the subject.
			:::::::::As for the chronological order, see my discussion with Siph above. I'm still putting series in real-world order for sake of having an absolute reference with no subject, but I'm fine saying that anyone using the master can feel free to rearrange sub-continuity headers as suits the fiction-chronology of a particular topic.
			:::::::::- [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 20:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

			==Header-size issues==

	Humm. I'll tell you what's just occurred to me. Creating a master "G1 cartoon continuity" heading, then sub-headings for the US and Japanese continuities, with ''more'' sub-headings below the latter for the individual aspects... would work if it was on it's own, but it is in turn all under a larger "fiction" heading, which will result in nasty, ugly little sub-headers that will be pretty much useless, on account of being ordnary sized bold text that will		Humm. I'll tell you what's just occurred to me. Creating a master "G1 cartoon continuity" heading, then sub-headings for the US and Japanese continuities, with ''more'' sub-headings below the latter for the individual aspects... would work if it was on it's own, but it is in turn all under a larger "fiction" heading, which will result in nasty, ugly little sub-headers that will be pretty much useless, on account of being ordnary sized bold text that will

Chris McFeely: /* J-G1 continuity */

2008-02-02T11:29:40Z

J-G1 continuity

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:29, 2 February 2008
Line 162:		Line 162:
	::::::::All the J-fiction from ''Binaltech'' onwards, I kept outside of the G1 'toon-verse proper because of the Beast elements in them. (Ravage, at the very least.) And it's my limited understanding that ''Binaltech's'' temporal wackiness ends up taking it outside the 'toon-verse proper anyway. But if anyone can give a more informed analysis, I'd love to hear it.		::::::::All the J-fiction from ''Binaltech'' onwards, I kept outside of the G1 'toon-verse proper because of the Beast elements in them. (Ravage, at the very least.) And it's my limited understanding that ''Binaltech's'' temporal wackiness ends up taking it outside the 'toon-verse proper anyway. But if anyone can give a more informed analysis, I'd love to hear it.
	::::::::- [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 04:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)		::::::::- [[User:Jackpot\|Jackpot]] 04:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
			:::::::::See, I just plain don't agree with the keeping of Binaltech, KP, RM and all that other stuff out of there. I know ''why'' you're doing it, but it's purely my personal preference not to. Like Siph and Walky are saying, I want to write a character's fictional history in chronological story order, not the way the fiction came out. I also realized what part of the problem I had with the list was - it was putting the SRLF, 2010 and Big War mangs in the "manga continuity," when they're very definitely part of the anime continuity. Regarding Binaltech - essentially, yeah, but again, it's no different from how Classics branches out from the Marvel continuity. Takes the cartoon as its starting point, and then branches off and tells a new story that's not in-line with the other existing fiction (it just so happens that in the case of Binaltech, the divergence is a story point). - [[User:Chris McFeely\|Chris McFeely]] 11:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

	Humm. I'll tell you what's just occurred to me. Creating a master "G1 cartoon continuity" heading, then sub-headings for the US and Japanese continuities, with ''more'' sub-headings below the latter for the individual aspects... would work if it was on it's own, but it is in turn all under a larger "fiction" heading, which will result in nasty, ugly little sub-headers that will be pretty much useless, on account of being ordnary sized bold text that will		Humm. I'll tell you what's just occurred to me. Creating a master "G1 cartoon continuity" heading, then sub-headings for the US and Japanese continuities, with ''more'' sub-headings below the latter for the individual aspects... would work if it was on it's own, but it is in turn all under a larger "fiction" heading, which will result in nasty, ugly little sub-headers that will be pretty much useless, on account of being ordnary sized bold text that will