User talk:Khajidha - Revision history

Khajidha: /* Generous Question */

2024-01-05T16:05:38Z

Generous Question

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 5 January 2024
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Your userpic and caption is friggin amazing [[User:Avalanche\|Avalanche]] ([[User talk:Avalanche\|talk]]) 02:21, 29 January 2017 (EST)		Your userpic and caption is friggin amazing [[User:Avalanche\|Avalanche]] ([[User talk:Avalanche\|talk]]) 02:21, 29 January 2017 (EST)

	~~===Generous Question===~~
	Hello! I noticed you took down my edit on the shelfwarmer article. That's totally okay; but I was curious on where that bit of trivia would belong instead, if anywhere. I personally think something being on a shelf for over a decade is notable enough to be on the wiki, so where could I put it? Thanks! [[User:Gigirassy\|Gigirassy]] ([[User talk:Gigirassy\|talk]]) 09:38, 4 October 2023 (EDT)

	===Archives===		===Archives===

Gigirassy at 17:42, 4 October 2023

2023-10-04T17:42:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 4 October 2023
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Hello! I noticed you took down my edit on the shelfwarmer article. That's totally okay; but I was curious on where that bit of trivia would belong instead, if anywhere. I personally think something being on a shelf for over a decade is notable enough to be on the wiki, so where could I put it? Thanks! [[User:Gigirassy\|Gigirassy]] ([[User talk:Gigirassy\|talk]]) 09:38, 4 October 2023 (EDT)		Hello! I noticed you took down my edit on the shelfwarmer article. That's totally okay; but I was curious on where that bit of trivia would belong instead, if anywhere. I personally think something being on a shelf for over a decade is notable enough to be on the wiki, so where could I put it? Thanks! [[User:Gigirassy\|Gigirassy]] ([[User talk:Gigirassy\|talk]]) 09:38, 4 October 2023 (EDT)
	:Minor toy markets like Rite-Aid often have product on the shelves for such long times, so I don't see it as worth noting. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 10:51, 4 October 2023 (EDT)		:Minor toy markets like Rite-Aid often have product on the shelves for such long times, so I don't see it as worth noting. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 10:51, 4 October 2023 (EDT)
			:That's fair. I appreciate you informing me, and I hope you have a nice day! [[User:Gigirassy\|Gigirassy]] ([[User talk:Gigirassy\|talk]]) 13:42, 4 October 2023 (EDT)

Khajidha at 14:51, 4 October 2023

2023-10-04T14:51:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 4 October 2023
Line 25:		Line 25:

	==New messages==		==New messages==
			===Generous Question===
			Hello! I noticed you took down my edit on the shelfwarmer article. That's totally okay; but I was curious on where that bit of trivia would belong instead, if anywhere. I personally think something being on a shelf for over a decade is notable enough to be on the wiki, so where could I put it? Thanks! [[User:Gigirassy\|Gigirassy]] ([[User talk:Gigirassy\|talk]]) 09:38, 4 October 2023 (EDT)
			:Minor toy markets like Rite-Aid often have product on the shelves for such long times, so I don't see it as worth noting. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 10:51, 4 October 2023 (EDT)

Gigirassy at 13:38, 4 October 2023

2023-10-04T13:38:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:38, 4 October 2023
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Your userpic and caption is friggin amazing [[User:Avalanche\|Avalanche]] ([[User talk:Avalanche\|talk]]) 02:21, 29 January 2017 (EST)		Your userpic and caption is friggin amazing [[User:Avalanche\|Avalanche]] ([[User talk:Avalanche\|talk]]) 02:21, 29 January 2017 (EST)

			===Generous Question===
			Hello! I noticed you took down my edit on the shelfwarmer article. That's totally okay; but I was curious on where that bit of trivia would belong instead, if anywhere. I personally think something being on a shelf for over a decade is notable enough to be on the wiki, so where could I put it? Thanks! [[User:Gigirassy\|Gigirassy]] ([[User talk:Gigirassy\|talk]]) 09:38, 4 October 2023 (EDT)

	===Archives===		===Archives===

Khajidha: archiving

2022-07-12T00:40:12Z

archiving

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:40, 12 July 2022
Line 23:		Line 23:

	==New messages==		==New messages==
	~~===Abuse from User:KS7564===~~
	~~U FUKING IDIOT !!! ([[User talk:KS7564\|talk]])~~

	~~== Yes, that exists ==~~

	~~https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/theme~~

	~~https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/theme~~

	"Theme" can be a verb. Would you like to dramatically question my sanity again? [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47\|talk]]) 07:13, 10 June 2019 (EDT)
	:1) I wasn't questioning its use as a verb, just the specific construction "themed on". I had never seen that particular construction and it sounded extremely odd to me. Checking around since you posted here, I have found it in use. 2) I wasn't questioning your sanity, I was questioning the grammar. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 12:15, 10 June 2019 (EDT)


	~~===Thanks===~~
	Thanks for helping me with my user page. I've been frequenting the wiki for a while, but I'm not good with that type of thing. Just appreciate it. I still don't get your logic on how Bumblebee's not it's own continuity, but whatever. --[[User:ChangingFate\|ChangingFate]] 12:26, 17 October 2019 (EDT)

	Hello Khajidha, just wanted to thank you for correcting my phrases in the pages I create! I am doing my best in English but it is very nice from you to take time to correct me. I should try to remember these corrections, I noticed that I often do the same mistakes! :) --[[User:SoundSky\|SoundSky]] ([[User talk:SoundSky\|talk]]) 16:03, 10 June 2020 (EDT)

	~~== I'M GETTING TIRED OF IT ==~~
	1st, i'am not making any "SUPPOSITION" that there is a connection, because i'm not a speculation, fanfiction and supposition creator, since i only like to pass official information about everything that exists about transformers, and i would edit only if i found a piece of information that it's not in the article, or if i found something that's not correct about it to fix-it, and 2nd, sure Hasbro and Takara may had never said that these figures are the same characters as the yellow bulldozer and dump truck in the movie, but if the figures have the same vehicle mode as the yellow bulldozer and yellow dump truck, than it's indeed an official media that Skipjack and Payload are the bulldozer and dump truck in the movie, now three questions, 1st, why didn't you read the entire "I'm back" part from the discussion section to understand my situation?, 2nd why did you wrote something like this to offend me? and 3rd, why are you talking to me instead of Riptide talking to me in first place? anyways go ahead, continue your offense againts me, because i want you all to know that Hasbro and Takara Tomy are releasing an Studio Series Skipjack, meaning that Skipjack is the yellow bulldozer that forms the left foot, and if Hasbro and Takara Tomy release an Studio Series Payload in the future, than it means that Payload is the yellow dump truck that forms the left leg, and if this happens, it means that everything i'm saying about Skipjack and Payload being the yellow bulldozer and dump truck is true!, and one final thing, if what saying turn out to be true, DON'T TELL ME I DIN'T WARNED YOU!. so Khadija, I HATE YOU BECAUSE OF WHAT YOU SAID TO ME, AND PLEASE DON'T ANSWER THE QUESTIONS ABOVE, BECAUSE NOW I'M VERY VERY VERY ANNOYED! bye. --Transformersbrasil (talk) 20:36, 20 February 2020 (EST)
	:"Hasbro and Takara may had never said that these figures are the same characters as the yellow bulldozer and dump truck in the movie". Again, this is the relevant point. They never said that this toy represents this character in the movie. You are assuming that they are. 1) I did read it. I pointed out to you how your understanding was flawed. 2) I did not write to offend you. I wrote to try to explain the problem you were having. 3) I thought that you might listen to someone else, since you did not seem to pay attention to Riptide. As your dispute is with the general policies of this site, discussion is not limited to you and Riptide. Notice that Escargon, M Sipher, and Grum had also pointed out to you that your edits were not following policy. Finally, your anger and refusal to listen is not helping you. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 20:49, 20 February 2020 (EST)

	~~==Reversion==~~
	Hey, I noticed you reverted my quote edit on Cosmic Rust? I don't mind; I'd just like to know the reasoning behind it so I can avoid making similar mistakes in the future :D [[User:Hellzapoppin\|Hellzapoppin]] ([[User talk:Hellzapoppin\|talk]]) 23:34, 14 July 2020 (EDT)
	:It simply isn't memorable on its own. Qotations from episodes should be as short as possible and still be effective. They should need little or no scene description. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 11:36, 15 July 2020 (EDT)
	::I disagree on its memorability as my friends and I refer to it sometimes, but I will respect your wishes as someone who's been here longer than I have and duly note your criticism. [[User:Hellzapoppin\|Hellzapoppin]] ([[User talk:Hellzapoppin\|talk]]) 13:52, 15 July 2020 (EDT)

	~~== Your input is requested ==~~

	~~[[Talk:Decepticon Super Scramble#Recommended buy 4 out of 5 combiners]]~~

	~~Thanks.~~

	~~[[User:Rhymus\|Rhymus]] ([[User talk:Rhymus\|talk]]) 00:19, 30 January 2021 (EST)~~

	~~== Mainframe reversion ==~~

	Can I ask the reason for reverting my note under Mainframe? I think it's very much worth noting that his appearance on the cover of FHE FFoD VHS is oddly less bizarre in retrospect as a result of the Kingdom toy.[[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 16:56, 12 May 2021 (EDT)

	:In the second reversion, after I edited my original note, you state there's no evidence that the Kingdom toy is meant to retcon previous fiction. I don't intend to get into a reversion war or anything, and I want this to be an actual discussion about the merits of the note, so here's the way I see it:

	:1) The statement that there is "no evidence" that the Kingdom toy is meant to retcon previous fiction is inaccurate. The Kingdom toy is listed on both G1 Mainframe's and Teletraan I's pages and is clearly meant to represent both of those characters/computers/concepts. I.e., it is a toy of Teletraan I as it appeared in the cartoon, and the very fact that Mainframe and Teletraan I are now the same toy is evidence. I'm a lawyer by trade, and it more or less follows the test for relevance that the Federal (and most state) Rules of Evidence espouses "Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action." In other words, the fact that Mainframe and Teletraan I are ever the same makes it more probable that they are at other times the same.

	:2) Obviously, Mainframe and Teletraan I are not the same in every continuity, as there are times Mainframe appears in stories that follow the G1 cartoon in which he is clearly a separate individual (barring specific retcons). That said, I purposely qualified the note with "arguably" for that reason. Additionally, it's merely a note rather than an extreme measure like proposing the pages be merged or something. It's meant to point out something interesting, and it does not in anyway detract from the article, nor is it inaccurate information.

	:3) Retcons are not always explicit, anyway, and can even be unintended consequences of introducing new information. I'm not sure lack of intent (or, rather, lack of evidence of intent) is enough to say a retcon hasn't occurred.

	:Now, I feel that's a pretty well-reasoned justification for a short note. Can you explain what is wrong with my reasoning?[[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 12:07, 13 May 2021 (EDT)
	:: Just cause Mainframe is linked to Teletraan I now doesn't somehow justify a bizarre VHS cover with multiple characters who didn't appear in any of the episodes containe within. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 12:11, 13 May 2021 (EDT)

	:::It's not justifying the VHS cover, it's noting the coincidental irony of it. The note I proposed is accurate information and is of some interest. I don't see how it's contrary to any policy of the Wiki. [[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 13:06, 13 May 2021 (EDT)
	::::You note was not "accurate information", as it insinuated that a toy released in 2021 had a retroactive influence on a '80s cartoon's continuity, which is nonsensical. We're not assuming that the ''Ark'' in the cartoon transforms into a gigantic robot just because the toy does. Art of Mainframe appearing on the cover of a concurrently released VHS, the cartoon's continuity, and a Mainframe toy transforming into a computer three decades later under the precepts of a new story are not related concepts. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 14:23, 13 May 2021 (EDT)

	::::: My note pointed out that Hasbro saying that Mainframe is Teletraan I COULD serve as a retcon. Heck, with all the continuities and micro-continuities, there could be an official story showing Mainframe transforming into Teletraan I right before the Ark launches in MTMTE, and it STILL wouldn't be true in every iteration. My note was not a definitive statement, and, again, it was a note for the sake of interest. And the Ark having a toy with a robot mode doesn't suddenly mean it did in the G1 cartoon, but it suggests the possibility. The note didn't say "The VHS cover is now accurate." It was saying, "Hey, look at this. Funnily enough, since Teletraan I was there, you could say Mainframe was there if you were so inclined. Weird, huh?"

	::::: What you seem to be saying is that it is impossible for Hasbro to retcon things in the G1 cartoon, which is truly nonsensical. Especially since one of the Ark's destinies in the cards released with the figures is to reactivate in 1984 and impliedly start the G1 cartoon continuity.

	::::: I've spent way too much time arguing over this, but the deletion of an innocuous note for such a point of interest is just baffling to me. Since the Wiki's purpose is to provide information with a secondary goal of being funny, I thought "funny information" fit within that purview.[[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 14:57, 13 May 2021 (EDT)

Tjfosko: /* Mainframe reversion */

2021-05-13T18:57:10Z

Mainframe reversion

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:57, 13 May 2021
Line 75:		Line 75:
	:::It's not justifying the VHS cover, it's noting the coincidental irony of it. The note I proposed is accurate information and is of some interest. I don't see how it's contrary to any policy of the Wiki. [[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 13:06, 13 May 2021 (EDT)		:::It's not justifying the VHS cover, it's noting the coincidental irony of it. The note I proposed is accurate information and is of some interest. I don't see how it's contrary to any policy of the Wiki. [[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 13:06, 13 May 2021 (EDT)
	::::You note was not "accurate information", as it insinuated that a toy released in 2021 had a retroactive influence on a '80s cartoon's continuity, which is nonsensical. We're not assuming that the ''Ark'' in the cartoon transforms into a gigantic robot just because the toy does. Art of Mainframe appearing on the cover of a concurrently released VHS, the cartoon's continuity, and a Mainframe toy transforming into a computer three decades later under the precepts of a new story are not related concepts. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 14:23, 13 May 2021 (EDT)		::::You note was not "accurate information", as it insinuated that a toy released in 2021 had a retroactive influence on a '80s cartoon's continuity, which is nonsensical. We're not assuming that the ''Ark'' in the cartoon transforms into a gigantic robot just because the toy does. Art of Mainframe appearing on the cover of a concurrently released VHS, the cartoon's continuity, and a Mainframe toy transforming into a computer three decades later under the precepts of a new story are not related concepts. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 14:23, 13 May 2021 (EDT)

			::::: My note pointed out that Hasbro saying that Mainframe is Teletraan I COULD serve as a retcon. Heck, with all the continuities and micro-continuities, there could be an official story showing Mainframe transforming into Teletraan I right before the Ark launches in MTMTE, and it STILL wouldn't be true in every iteration. My note was not a definitive statement, and, again, it was a note for the sake of interest. And the Ark having a toy with a robot mode doesn't suddenly mean it did in the G1 cartoon, but it suggests the possibility. The note didn't say "The VHS cover is now accurate." It was saying, "Hey, look at this. Funnily enough, since Teletraan I was there, you could say Mainframe was there if you were so inclined. Weird, huh?"

			::::: What you seem to be saying is that it is impossible for Hasbro to retcon things in the G1 cartoon, which is truly nonsensical. Especially since one of the Ark's destinies in the cards released with the figures is to reactivate in 1984 and impliedly start the G1 cartoon continuity.

			::::: I've spent way too much time arguing over this, but the deletion of an innocuous note for such a point of interest is just baffling to me. Since the Wiki's purpose is to provide information with a secondary goal of being funny, I thought "funny information" fit within that purview.[[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 14:57, 13 May 2021 (EDT)

Saix: /* Mainframe reversion */

2021-05-13T18:23:45Z

Mainframe reversion

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 13 May 2021
Line 74:		Line 74:

	:::It's not justifying the VHS cover, it's noting the coincidental irony of it. The note I proposed is accurate information and is of some interest. I don't see how it's contrary to any policy of the Wiki. [[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 13:06, 13 May 2021 (EDT)		:::It's not justifying the VHS cover, it's noting the coincidental irony of it. The note I proposed is accurate information and is of some interest. I don't see how it's contrary to any policy of the Wiki. [[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 13:06, 13 May 2021 (EDT)
			::::You note was not "accurate information", as it insinuated that a toy released in 2021 had a retroactive influence on a '80s cartoon's continuity, which is nonsensical. We're not assuming that the ''Ark'' in the cartoon transforms into a gigantic robot just because the toy does. Art of Mainframe appearing on the cover of a concurrently released VHS, the cartoon's continuity, and a Mainframe toy transforming into a computer three decades later under the precepts of a new story are not related concepts. [[User:Saix\|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix\|talk]]) 14:23, 13 May 2021 (EDT)

Tjfosko: /* Mainframe reversion */

2021-05-13T17:06:24Z

Mainframe reversion

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:06, 13 May 2021
Line 72:		Line 72:
	:Now, I feel that's a pretty well-reasoned justification for a short note. Can you explain what is wrong with my reasoning?[[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 12:07, 13 May 2021 (EDT)		:Now, I feel that's a pretty well-reasoned justification for a short note. Can you explain what is wrong with my reasoning?[[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 12:07, 13 May 2021 (EDT)
	:: Just cause Mainframe is linked to Teletraan I now doesn't somehow justify a bizarre VHS cover with multiple characters who didn't appear in any of the episodes containe within. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 12:11, 13 May 2021 (EDT)		:: Just cause Mainframe is linked to Teletraan I now doesn't somehow justify a bizarre VHS cover with multiple characters who didn't appear in any of the episodes containe within. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 12:11, 13 May 2021 (EDT)

			:::It's not justifying the VHS cover, it's noting the coincidental irony of it. The note I proposed is accurate information and is of some interest. I don't see how it's contrary to any policy of the Wiki. [[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 13:06, 13 May 2021 (EDT)

Escargon: /* Mainframe reversion */

2021-05-13T16:11:42Z

Mainframe reversion

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 13 May 2021
Line 71:		Line 71:

	:Now, I feel that's a pretty well-reasoned justification for a short note. Can you explain what is wrong with my reasoning?[[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 12:07, 13 May 2021 (EDT)		:Now, I feel that's a pretty well-reasoned justification for a short note. Can you explain what is wrong with my reasoning?[[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 12:07, 13 May 2021 (EDT)
			:: Just cause Mainframe is linked to Teletraan I now doesn't somehow justify a bizarre VHS cover with multiple characters who didn't appear in any of the episodes containe within. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 12:11, 13 May 2021 (EDT)

Tjfosko: /* Mainframe reversion */

2021-05-13T16:08:44Z

Mainframe reversion

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 13 May 2021
Line 62:		Line 62:
	Can I ask the reason for reverting my note under Mainframe? I think it's very much worth noting that his appearance on the cover of FHE FFoD VHS is oddly less bizarre in retrospect as a result of the Kingdom toy.[[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 16:56, 12 May 2021 (EDT)		Can I ask the reason for reverting my note under Mainframe? I think it's very much worth noting that his appearance on the cover of FHE FFoD VHS is oddly less bizarre in retrospect as a result of the Kingdom toy.[[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 16:56, 12 May 2021 (EDT)

	In the second reversion, after I edited my original note, you state there's no evidence that the Kingdom toy is meant to retcon previous fiction. I don't intend to get into a reversion war or anything, and I want this to be an actual discussion about the merits of the note, so here's the way I see it:		:In the second reversion, after I edited my original note, you state there's no evidence that the Kingdom toy is meant to retcon previous fiction. I don't intend to get into a reversion war or anything, and I want this to be an actual discussion about the merits of the note, so here's the way I see it:

	1) The statement that there is "no evidence" that the Kingdom toy is meant to retcon previous fiction is inaccurate. The Kingdom toy is listed on both G1 Mainframe's and Teletraan I's pages and is clearly meant to represent both of those characters/computers/concepts. I.e., it is a toy of Teletraan I as it appeared in the cartoon, and the very fact that Mainframe and Teletraan I are now the same toy is evidence. I'm a lawyer by trade, and it more or less follows the test for relevance that the Federal (and most state) Rules of Evidence espouses "Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action." In other words, the fact that Mainframe and Teletraan I are ever the same makes it more probable that they are at other times the same.		:1) The statement that there is "no evidence" that the Kingdom toy is meant to retcon previous fiction is inaccurate. The Kingdom toy is listed on both G1 Mainframe's and Teletraan I's pages and is clearly meant to represent both of those characters/computers/concepts. I.e., it is a toy of Teletraan I as it appeared in the cartoon, and the very fact that Mainframe and Teletraan I are now the same toy is evidence. I'm a lawyer by trade, and it more or less follows the test for relevance that the Federal (and most state) Rules of Evidence espouses "Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action." In other words, the fact that Mainframe and Teletraan I are ever the same makes it more probable that they are at other times the same.

	2) Obviously, Mainframe and Teletraan I are not the same in every continuity, as there are times Mainframe appears in stories that follow the G1 cartoon in which he is clearly a separate individual (barring specific retcons). That said, I purposely qualified the note with "arguably" for that reason. Additionally, it's merely a note rather than an extreme measure like proposing the pages be merged or something. It's meant to point out something interesting, and it does not in anyway detract from the article, nor is it inaccurate information.		:2) Obviously, Mainframe and Teletraan I are not the same in every continuity, as there are times Mainframe appears in stories that follow the G1 cartoon in which he is clearly a separate individual (barring specific retcons). That said, I purposely qualified the note with "arguably" for that reason. Additionally, it's merely a note rather than an extreme measure like proposing the pages be merged or something. It's meant to point out something interesting, and it does not in anyway detract from the article, nor is it inaccurate information.

	3) Retcons are not always explicit, anyway, and can even be unintended consequences of introducing new information. I'm not sure lack of intent (or, rather, lack of evidence of intent) is enough to say a retcon hasn't occurred.		:3) Retcons are not always explicit, anyway, and can even be unintended consequences of introducing new information. I'm not sure lack of intent (or, rather, lack of evidence of intent) is enough to say a retcon hasn't occurred.

	Now, I feel that's a pretty well-reasoned justification for a short note. Can you explain what is wrong with my reasoning?[[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 12:07, 13 May 2021 (EDT)		:Now, I feel that's a pretty well-reasoned justification for a short note. Can you explain what is wrong with my reasoning?[[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 12:07, 13 May 2021 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 4 October 2023
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Hello! I noticed you took down my edit on the shelfwarmer article. That's totally okay; but I was curious on where that bit of trivia would belong instead, if anywhere. I personally think something being on a shelf for over a decade is notable enough to be on the wiki, so where could I put it? Thanks! [[User:Gigirassy\|Gigirassy]] ([[User talk:Gigirassy\|talk]]) 09:38, 4 October 2023 (EDT)		Hello! I noticed you took down my edit on the shelfwarmer article. That's totally okay; but I was curious on where that bit of trivia would belong instead, if anywhere. I personally think something being on a shelf for over a decade is notable enough to be on the wiki, so where could I put it? Thanks! [[User:Gigirassy\|Gigirassy]] ([[User talk:Gigirassy\|talk]]) 09:38, 4 October 2023 (EDT)
	:Minor toy markets like Rite-Aid often have product on the shelves for such long times, so I don't see it as worth noting. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 10:51, 4 October 2023 (EDT)		:Minor toy markets like Rite-Aid often have product on the shelves for such long times, so I don't see it as worth noting. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha\|talk]]) 10:51, 4 October 2023 (EDT)
			:That's fair. I appreciate you informing me, and I hope you have a nice day! [[User:Gigirassy\|Gigirassy]] ([[User talk:Gigirassy\|talk]]) 13:42, 4 October 2023 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:06, 13 May 2021
Line 72:		Line 72:
	:Now, I feel that's a pretty well-reasoned justification for a short note. Can you explain what is wrong with my reasoning?[[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 12:07, 13 May 2021 (EDT)		:Now, I feel that's a pretty well-reasoned justification for a short note. Can you explain what is wrong with my reasoning?[[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 12:07, 13 May 2021 (EDT)
	:: Just cause Mainframe is linked to Teletraan I now doesn't somehow justify a bizarre VHS cover with multiple characters who didn't appear in any of the episodes containe within. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 12:11, 13 May 2021 (EDT)		:: Just cause Mainframe is linked to Teletraan I now doesn't somehow justify a bizarre VHS cover with multiple characters who didn't appear in any of the episodes containe within. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 12:11, 13 May 2021 (EDT)

			:::It's not justifying the VHS cover, it's noting the coincidental irony of it. The note I proposed is accurate information and is of some interest. I don't see how it's contrary to any policy of the Wiki. [[User:Tjfosko\|Tjfosko]] ([[User talk:Tjfosko\|talk]]) 13:06, 13 May 2021 (EDT)