User talk:Leon35 - Revision history

Jalaguy at 21:01, 25 April 2013

2013-04-25T21:01:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 25 April 2013
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Another thing I had a question on; FoC and WfC aren't in the same continuity as the Prime tv series, but the wiki makes it seem that way. Is it??? [[User:Leon35\|Leon35]] 16:23, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		Another thing I had a question on; FoC and WfC aren't in the same continuity as the Prime tv series, but the wiki makes it seem that way. Is it??? [[User:Leon35\|Leon35]] 16:23, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
	:[[Aligned continuity family\|It is the same continuity]]. At least, that seems to be Hasbro's intent. -[[User:Ookalf\|Ookalf]] 16:29, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		:[[Aligned continuity family\|It is the same continuity]]. At least, that seems to be Hasbro's intent. -[[User:Ookalf\|Ookalf]] 16:29, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
			:Yes, they're in the same [[continuity family]]. Whether they occur in the precise, exact same, continuity is debatable, but the Prime cartoon has made it very clear through flashbacks that WFC or something very, very similar to it occurred in its past. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:01, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Ookalf at 20:29, 25 April 2013

2013-04-25T20:29:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 25 April 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Another thing I had a question on; FoC and WfC aren't in the same continuity as the Prime tv series, but the wiki makes it seem that way. Is it??? [[User:Leon35\|Leon35]] 16:23, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		Another thing I had a question on; FoC and WfC aren't in the same continuity as the Prime tv series, but the wiki makes it seem that way. Is it??? [[User:Leon35\|Leon35]] 16:23, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
			:[[Aligned continuity family\|It is the same continuity]]. At least, that seems to be Hasbro's intent. -[[User:Ookalf\|Ookalf]] 16:29, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Leon35 at 20:23, 25 April 2013

2013-04-25T20:23:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 25 April 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I think everyone appreciates the sentiment, but if you're talking about captions, they're not vandalism. They're supposed to be there. The captions are like a fun little reward regular contributors get to have for all the hard work they normally do. Not all captions on the wiki are jokes, but the ones that aren't are few and far between. This is because if all the captions were serious, most of the pictures on the wiki would have an extremely obvious caption that has no need to be there. Hope this explanation helps. -- [[User:Spydersix\|spyder]][[User Talk:Spydersix\|<sup>Use this!</sup>]] 07:03, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		:I think everyone appreciates the sentiment, but if you're talking about captions, they're not vandalism. They're supposed to be there. The captions are like a fun little reward regular contributors get to have for all the hard work they normally do. Not all captions on the wiki are jokes, but the ones that aren't are few and far between. This is because if all the captions were serious, most of the pictures on the wiki would have an extremely obvious caption that has no need to be there. Hope this explanation helps. -- [[User:Spydersix\|spyder]][[User Talk:Spydersix\|<sup>Use this!</sup>]] 07:03, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
	:Yeah, I think you are confusing our more informal tone with vandalism. Really, how deadly serious can you write about giant robots from outer space? As for "potential to be so great", we are already the leading source for TF information. We are used by the official writers and artists for reference. And we've even had our material show up in official productions. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 10:19, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		:Yeah, I think you are confusing our more informal tone with vandalism. Really, how deadly serious can you write about giant robots from outer space? As for "potential to be so great", we are already the leading source for TF information. We are used by the official writers and artists for reference. And we've even had our material show up in official productions. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 10:19, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

			It just seems...informal for a wiki, is all.

			Another thing I had a question on; FoC and WfC aren't in the same continuity as the Prime tv series, but the wiki makes it seem that way. Is it??? [[User:Leon35\|Leon35]] 16:23, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Khajidha at 14:19, 25 April 2013

2013-04-25T14:19:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:19, 25 April 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I think he means the captions. [[User:Inkblot\|Inkblot]] 06:20, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		::I think he means the captions. [[User:Inkblot\|Inkblot]] 06:20, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
	:I think everyone appreciates the sentiment, but if you're talking about captions, they're not vandalism. They're supposed to be there. The captions are like a fun little reward regular contributors get to have for all the hard work they normally do. Not all captions on the wiki are jokes, but the ones that aren't are few and far between. This is because if all the captions were serious, most of the pictures on the wiki would have an extremely obvious caption that has no need to be there. Hope this explanation helps. -- [[User:Spydersix\|spyder]][[User Talk:Spydersix\|<sup>Use this!</sup>]] 07:03, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		:I think everyone appreciates the sentiment, but if you're talking about captions, they're not vandalism. They're supposed to be there. The captions are like a fun little reward regular contributors get to have for all the hard work they normally do. Not all captions on the wiki are jokes, but the ones that aren't are few and far between. This is because if all the captions were serious, most of the pictures on the wiki would have an extremely obvious caption that has no need to be there. Hope this explanation helps. -- [[User:Spydersix\|spyder]][[User Talk:Spydersix\|<sup>Use this!</sup>]] 07:03, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
			:Yeah, I think you are confusing our more informal tone with vandalism. Really, how deadly serious can you write about giant robots from outer space? As for "potential to be so great", we are already the leading source for TF information. We are used by the official writers and artists for reference. And we've even had our material show up in official productions. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 10:19, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Spydersix at 11:03, 25 April 2013

2013-04-25T11:03:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:03, 25 April 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:What are you interpreting as vandalism here?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:34, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		:What are you interpreting as vandalism here?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:34, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
	::I think he means the captions. [[User:Inkblot\|Inkblot]] 06:20, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		::I think he means the captions. [[User:Inkblot\|Inkblot]] 06:20, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
			:I think everyone appreciates the sentiment, but if you're talking about captions, they're not vandalism. They're supposed to be there. The captions are like a fun little reward regular contributors get to have for all the hard work they normally do. Not all captions on the wiki are jokes, but the ones that aren't are few and far between. This is because if all the captions were serious, most of the pictures on the wiki would have an extremely obvious caption that has no need to be there. Hope this explanation helps. -- [[User:Spydersix\|spyder]][[User Talk:Spydersix\|<sup>Use this!</sup>]] 07:03, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Inkblot at 10:20, 25 April 2013

2013-04-25T10:20:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:20, 25 April 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What is with all the vandalism on this wiki? This site has the potential to be so great, but nealry every article is invalidated with such useless comments...[[User:Leon35\|Leon35]] 00:02, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		What is with all the vandalism on this wiki? This site has the potential to be so great, but nealry every article is invalidated with such useless comments...[[User:Leon35\|Leon35]] 00:02, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
	:What are you interpreting as vandalism here?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:34, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		:What are you interpreting as vandalism here?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:34, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
			::I think he means the captions. [[User:Inkblot\|Inkblot]] 06:20, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Rosicrucian at 05:34, 25 April 2013

2013-04-25T05:34:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:34, 25 April 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What is with all the vandalism on this wiki? This site has the potential to be so great, but nealry every article is invalidated with such useless comments...[[User:Leon35\|Leon35]] 00:02, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		What is with all the vandalism on this wiki? This site has the potential to be so great, but nealry every article is invalidated with such useless comments...[[User:Leon35\|Leon35]] 00:02, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
			:What are you interpreting as vandalism here?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:34, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

Leon35: Created page with "What is with all the vandalism on this wiki? This site has the potential to be so great, but nealry every article is invalidated with such useless comments...~~~~"

2013-04-25T04:02:46Z

Created page with "What is with all the vandalism on this wiki? This site has the potential to be so great, but nealry every article is invalidated with such useless comments...~~~~"

New page

What is with all the vandalism on this wiki? This site has the potential to be so great, but nealry every article is invalidated with such useless comments...[[User:Leon35|Leon35]] 00:02, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 25 April 2013
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Another thing I had a question on; FoC and WfC aren't in the same continuity as the Prime tv series, but the wiki makes it seem that way. Is it??? [[User:Leon35\|Leon35]] 16:23, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		Another thing I had a question on; FoC and WfC aren't in the same continuity as the Prime tv series, but the wiki makes it seem that way. Is it??? [[User:Leon35\|Leon35]] 16:23, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
	:[[Aligned continuity family\|It is the same continuity]]. At least, that seems to be Hasbro's intent. -[[User:Ookalf\|Ookalf]] 16:29, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		:[[Aligned continuity family\|It is the same continuity]]. At least, that seems to be Hasbro's intent. -[[User:Ookalf\|Ookalf]] 16:29, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
			:Yes, they're in the same [[continuity family]]. Whether they occur in the precise, exact same, continuity is debatable, but the Prime cartoon has made it very clear through flashbacks that WFC or something very, very similar to it occurred in its past. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] 17:01, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:19, 25 April 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I think he means the captions. [[User:Inkblot\|Inkblot]] 06:20, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		::I think he means the captions. [[User:Inkblot\|Inkblot]] 06:20, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
	:I think everyone appreciates the sentiment, but if you're talking about captions, they're not vandalism. They're supposed to be there. The captions are like a fun little reward regular contributors get to have for all the hard work they normally do. Not all captions on the wiki are jokes, but the ones that aren't are few and far between. This is because if all the captions were serious, most of the pictures on the wiki would have an extremely obvious caption that has no need to be there. Hope this explanation helps. -- [[User:Spydersix\|spyder]][[User Talk:Spydersix\|<sup>Use this!</sup>]] 07:03, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		:I think everyone appreciates the sentiment, but if you're talking about captions, they're not vandalism. They're supposed to be there. The captions are like a fun little reward regular contributors get to have for all the hard work they normally do. Not all captions on the wiki are jokes, but the ones that aren't are few and far between. This is because if all the captions were serious, most of the pictures on the wiki would have an extremely obvious caption that has no need to be there. Hope this explanation helps. -- [[User:Spydersix\|spyder]][[User Talk:Spydersix\|<sup>Use this!</sup>]] 07:03, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
			:Yeah, I think you are confusing our more informal tone with vandalism. Really, how deadly serious can you write about giant robots from outer space? As for "potential to be so great", we are already the leading source for TF information. We are used by the official writers and artists for reference. And we've even had our material show up in official productions. --[[User:Khajidha\|Khajidha]] 10:19, 25 April 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:03, 25 April 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:What are you interpreting as vandalism here?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:34, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		:What are you interpreting as vandalism here?--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 01:34, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
	::I think he means the captions. [[User:Inkblot\|Inkblot]] 06:20, 25 April 2013 (EDT)		::I think he means the captions. [[User:Inkblot\|Inkblot]] 06:20, 25 April 2013 (EDT)
			:I think everyone appreciates the sentiment, but if you're talking about captions, they're not vandalism. They're supposed to be there. The captions are like a fun little reward regular contributors get to have for all the hard work they normally do. Not all captions on the wiki are jokes, but the ones that aren't are few and far between. This is because if all the captions were serious, most of the pictures on the wiki would have an extremely obvious caption that has no need to be there. Hope this explanation helps. -- [[User:Spydersix\|spyder]][[User Talk:Spydersix\|<sup>Use this!</sup>]] 07:03, 25 April 2013 (EDT)