User talk:Mazenoise - Revision history

FFN: /* Video game sections */

2009-10-27T14:50:32Z

Video game sections

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 27 October 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:I agree, and at least in my opinion the stuff I put on the Combaticon Scout and Sniper pages, for example, is "in-universe" enough, although admittedly it probably needs some tweaking.		:I agree, and at least in my opinion the stuff I put on the Combaticon Scout and Sniper pages, for example, is "in-universe" enough, although admittedly it probably needs some tweaking.
	:Also, I haven't added the "Status" sections to any of the pages. I've noticed the "Status" stuff has mostly been put in by anons, and I have no clue where those numbers are actually <i>from</i>. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 10:43, 27 October 2009 (EDT)		:Also, I haven't added the "Status" sections to any of the pages. I've noticed the "Status" stuff has mostly been put in by anons, and I have no clue where those numbers are actually <i>from</i>. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 10:43, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
			::Same, I just rolled with them. I gotta reinstall the bloody game again just to update these 50 billion game sections that have popped up. Argh. Yeah, I don't have a modern console :( --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 10:50, 27 October 2009 (EDT)

Mazenoise: /* Video game sections */

2009-10-27T14:43:34Z

Video game sections

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:43, 27 October 2009
Line 29:		Line 29:
	I recently decided, based upon the significant contributions of somebody who unfortunately no longer edits here (apparently), that we should treat game character appearances as "in-universe" fiction, so we should try to avoid talking about say, the Combaticon scout like "this guy attacks you on X stage", and instead be more like "The Combaticons scouts were deployed in X region to support the Grindor." What do you think? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:40, 27 October 2009 (EDT)		I recently decided, based upon the significant contributions of somebody who unfortunately no longer edits here (apparently), that we should treat game character appearances as "in-universe" fiction, so we should try to avoid talking about say, the Combaticon scout like "this guy attacks you on X stage", and instead be more like "The Combaticons scouts were deployed in X region to support the Grindor." What do you think? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:40, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
	:Also, I think you mean "stats" when you make heading for sections that are called "Status". Since "status" doesn't really make any sense. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:42, 27 October 2009 (EDT)		:Also, I think you mean "stats" when you make heading for sections that are called "Status". Since "status" doesn't really make any sense. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:42, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
			:I agree, and at least in my opinion the stuff I put on the Combaticon Scout and Sniper pages, for example, is "in-universe" enough, although admittedly it probably needs some tweaking.
			:Also, I haven't added the "Status" sections to any of the pages. I've noticed the "Status" stuff has mostly been put in by anons, and I have no clue where those numbers are actually <i>from</i>. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 10:43, 27 October 2009 (EDT)

FFN: /* Video game sections */

2009-10-27T12:42:37Z

Video game sections

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:42, 27 October 2009
Line 28:		Line 28:

	I recently decided, based upon the significant contributions of somebody who unfortunately no longer edits here (apparently), that we should treat game character appearances as "in-universe" fiction, so we should try to avoid talking about say, the Combaticon scout like "this guy attacks you on X stage", and instead be more like "The Combaticons scouts were deployed in X region to support the Grindor." What do you think? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:40, 27 October 2009 (EDT)		I recently decided, based upon the significant contributions of somebody who unfortunately no longer edits here (apparently), that we should treat game character appearances as "in-universe" fiction, so we should try to avoid talking about say, the Combaticon scout like "this guy attacks you on X stage", and instead be more like "The Combaticons scouts were deployed in X region to support the Grindor." What do you think? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:40, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
			:Also, I think you mean "stats" when you make heading for sections that are called "Status". Since "status" doesn't really make any sense. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:42, 27 October 2009 (EDT)

FFN: /* Video game sections */ new section

2009-10-27T12:40:21Z

Video game sections: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 27 October 2009
Line 24:		Line 24:
	:Ahh crap. My apologies. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:33, 14 October 2009 (EDT)		:Ahh crap. My apologies. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:33, 14 October 2009 (EDT)
	::I was actually being stupid when I made the article: I shouldn't have called him a video game concept artist, but I just skimmed through the blog and didn't notice those entries about him working on the actual movie. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 14:54, 17 October 2009 (EDT)		::I was actually being stupid when I made the article: I shouldn't have called him a video game concept artist, but I just skimmed through the blog and didn't notice those entries about him working on the actual movie. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 14:54, 17 October 2009 (EDT)

			== Video game sections ==

			I recently decided, based upon the significant contributions of somebody who unfortunately no longer edits here (apparently), that we should treat game character appearances as "in-universe" fiction, so we should try to avoid talking about say, the Combaticon scout like "this guy attacks you on X stage", and instead be more like "The Combaticons scouts were deployed in X region to support the Grindor." What do you think? --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 08:40, 27 October 2009 (EDT)

Mazenoise: /* Please explain */

2009-10-17T18:54:00Z

Please explain

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:54, 17 October 2009
Line 23:		Line 23:
	[http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Talk:Ken_Christiansen this] --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:29, 14 October 2009 (EDT)		[http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Talk:Ken_Christiansen this] --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:29, 14 October 2009 (EDT)
	:Ahh crap. My apologies. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:33, 14 October 2009 (EDT)		:Ahh crap. My apologies. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:33, 14 October 2009 (EDT)
			::I was actually being stupid when I made the article: I shouldn't have called him a video game concept artist, but I just skimmed through the blog and didn't notice those entries about him working on the actual movie. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 14:54, 17 October 2009 (EDT)

FFN: /* Please explain */

2009-10-14T05:33:01Z

Please explain

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:33, 14 October 2009
Line 22:		Line 22:

	[http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Talk:Ken_Christiansen this] --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:29, 14 October 2009 (EDT)		[http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Talk:Ken_Christiansen this] --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:29, 14 October 2009 (EDT)
			:Ahh crap. My apologies. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:33, 14 October 2009 (EDT)

FFN: /* Please explain */ new section

2009-10-14T05:29:17Z

Please explain: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:29, 14 October 2009
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:I dunno, maybe it doesn't need its own article after all, but there are a ton of red links in articles here, and it's not that people are "unwilling" to write articles, it's just that they might not be too high on the priority scale. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 06:07, 13 September 2009 (EDT)		:I dunno, maybe it doesn't need its own article after all, but there are a ton of red links in articles here, and it's not that people are "unwilling" to write articles, it's just that they might not be too high on the priority scale. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 06:07, 13 September 2009 (EDT)
	::Oh well. Maybe I'll try, then. I hate redlinks (the kind of hate like the Hate Plague). -- [[User:Silver\|Silvery]] 06:27, 13 September 2009 (EDT)		::Oh well. Maybe I'll try, then. I hate redlinks (the kind of hate like the Hate Plague). -- [[User:Silver\|Silvery]] 06:27, 13 September 2009 (EDT)

			== Please explain ==

			[http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Talk:Ken_Christiansen this] --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:29, 14 October 2009 (EDT)

Silver: /* Cleveland */

2009-09-13T10:27:26Z

Cleveland

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:27, 13 September 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Dunno, maybe I overdid it, but still, what's the point in redlinks when apparently nobody's willing to write an article about this city? I would, but since Animated is by far the only continuity I know really good (and I guess it's not the only one with CLeveland in it), I'm not so eager to start an article. -- [[User:Silver\|Silvery]] 05:27, 13 September 2009 (EDT)		Dunno, maybe I overdid it, but still, what's the point in redlinks when apparently nobody's willing to write an article about this city? I would, but since Animated is by far the only continuity I know really good (and I guess it's not the only one with CLeveland in it), I'm not so eager to start an article. -- [[User:Silver\|Silvery]] 05:27, 13 September 2009 (EDT)
	:I dunno, maybe it doesn't need its own article after all, but there are a ton of red links in articles here, and it's not that people are "unwilling" to write articles, it's just that they might not be too high on the priority scale. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 06:07, 13 September 2009 (EDT)		:I dunno, maybe it doesn't need its own article after all, but there are a ton of red links in articles here, and it's not that people are "unwilling" to write articles, it's just that they might not be too high on the priority scale. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 06:07, 13 September 2009 (EDT)
			::Oh well. Maybe I'll try, then. I hate redlinks (the kind of hate like the Hate Plague). -- [[User:Silver\|Silvery]] 06:27, 13 September 2009 (EDT)

Mazenoise: /* Cleveland */

2009-09-13T10:07:12Z

Cleveland

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:07, 13 September 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Dunno, maybe I overdid it, but still, what's the point in redlinks when apparently nobody's willing to write an article about this city? I would, but since Animated is by far the only continuity I know really good (and I guess it's not the only one with CLeveland in it), I'm not so eager to start an article. -- [[User:Silver\|Silvery]] 05:27, 13 September 2009 (EDT)		Dunno, maybe I overdid it, but still, what's the point in redlinks when apparently nobody's willing to write an article about this city? I would, but since Animated is by far the only continuity I know really good (and I guess it's not the only one with CLeveland in it), I'm not so eager to start an article. -- [[User:Silver\|Silvery]] 05:27, 13 September 2009 (EDT)
			:I dunno, maybe it doesn't need its own article after all, but there are a ton of red links in articles here, and it's not that people are "unwilling" to write articles, it's just that they might not be too high on the priority scale. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 06:07, 13 September 2009 (EDT)

Silver: /* Cleveland */ new section

2009-09-13T09:27:30Z

Cleveland: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:27, 13 September 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	I was chatting with Andy Schmidt before the book came out and asked if Goldbug would be in the book. With a gleam in his eyes, he said 'yup, but he's not Bumblebee.' It was a deliberate choice, like separating Galvatron from Megatron was. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 15:43, 10 August 2009 (EDT)		I was chatting with Andy Schmidt before the book came out and asked if Goldbug would be in the book. With a gleam in his eyes, he said 'yup, but he's not Bumblebee.' It was a deliberate choice, like separating Galvatron from Megatron was. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 15:43, 10 August 2009 (EDT)
	:OK, thanks for the info! Believe it or not, this was actually relevant - if he's actually supposed to be a separate character, then all the more reason to have a separate (IDW) page for him. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 15:45, 10 August 2009 (EDT)		:OK, thanks for the info! Believe it or not, this was actually relevant - if he's actually supposed to be a separate character, then all the more reason to have a separate (IDW) page for him. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 15:45, 10 August 2009 (EDT)

			== Cleveland ==

			Dunno, maybe I overdid it, but still, what's the point in redlinks when apparently nobody's willing to write an article about this city? I would, but since Animated is by far the only continuity I know really good (and I guess it's not the only one with CLeveland in it), I'm not so eager to start an article. -- [[User:Silver\|Silvery]] 05:27, 13 September 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:54, 17 October 2009
Line 23:		Line 23:
	[http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Talk:Ken_Christiansen this] --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:29, 14 October 2009 (EDT)		[http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Talk:Ken_Christiansen this] --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:29, 14 October 2009 (EDT)
	:Ahh crap. My apologies. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:33, 14 October 2009 (EDT)		:Ahh crap. My apologies. --[[User:FFN\|FFN]] 01:33, 14 October 2009 (EDT)
			::I was actually being stupid when I made the article: I shouldn't have called him a video game concept artist, but I just skimmed through the blog and didn't notice those entries about him working on the actual movie. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 14:54, 17 October 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:27, 13 September 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Dunno, maybe I overdid it, but still, what's the point in redlinks when apparently nobody's willing to write an article about this city? I would, but since Animated is by far the only continuity I know really good (and I guess it's not the only one with CLeveland in it), I'm not so eager to start an article. -- [[User:Silver\|Silvery]] 05:27, 13 September 2009 (EDT)		Dunno, maybe I overdid it, but still, what's the point in redlinks when apparently nobody's willing to write an article about this city? I would, but since Animated is by far the only continuity I know really good (and I guess it's not the only one with CLeveland in it), I'm not so eager to start an article. -- [[User:Silver\|Silvery]] 05:27, 13 September 2009 (EDT)
	:I dunno, maybe it doesn't need its own article after all, but there are a ton of red links in articles here, and it's not that people are "unwilling" to write articles, it's just that they might not be too high on the priority scale. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 06:07, 13 September 2009 (EDT)		:I dunno, maybe it doesn't need its own article after all, but there are a ton of red links in articles here, and it's not that people are "unwilling" to write articles, it's just that they might not be too high on the priority scale. -[[User:Mazenoise\|Mazenoise]] 06:07, 13 September 2009 (EDT)
			::Oh well. Maybe I'll try, then. I hate redlinks (the kind of hate like the Hate Plague). -- [[User:Silver\|Silvery]] 06:27, 13 September 2009 (EDT)