User talk:Rosicrucian/Archive 2 - Revision history

AzimuthAcolyte: Sound and Fury -> Sound and Fury (episode) update

2025-05-14T02:45:44Z

Sound and Fury -> Sound and Fury (episode) update

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:45, 14 May 2025
Line 148:		Line 148:
	here I wish you would cut it out with soundwave! On [[Swindle (Animated)\|Swindle]]'s page they say he has a bolo tie. I have the right to put my info!<small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Zebraa\|Zebraa]] ([[User talk:Zebraa\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zebraa\|contribs]]) 15:34, 21 July 2008.</small>		here I wish you would cut it out with soundwave! On [[Swindle (Animated)\|Swindle]]'s page they say he has a bolo tie. I have the right to put my info!<small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Zebraa\|Zebraa]] ([[User talk:Zebraa\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zebraa\|contribs]]) 15:34, 21 July 2008.</small>
	:Animated Swindle's design ''does'' include a bolo-tie design on his robot mode's collar. Animated Soundwave ''does not'' include the heavily trademarked XBox 360 logo.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]]<strong class="selflink"><sup>Talk</sup></strong> 15:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)		:Animated Swindle's design ''does'' include a bolo-tie design on his robot mode's collar. Animated Soundwave ''does not'' include the heavily trademarked XBox 360 logo.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]]<strong class="selflink"><sup>Talk</sup></strong> 15:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
	::it is on his back! I saw it when he got smashed by [[Bulkhead (Animated)\|Bulkhead]] in [[Sound and Fury]]!<small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Zebraa\|Zebraa]] ([[User talk:Zebraa\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zebraa\|contribs]]) 15:40, 21 July 2008.</small>		::it is on his back! I saw it when he got smashed by [[Bulkhead (Animated)\|Bulkhead]] in [[Sound and Fury (episode)\|Sound and Fury]]!<small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Zebraa\|Zebraa]] ([[User talk:Zebraa\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zebraa\|contribs]]) 15:40, 21 July 2008.</small>
	:::Then you're seeing what you want to see.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]]<strong class="selflink"><sup>Talk</sup></strong> 15:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)		:::Then you're seeing what you want to see.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]]<strong class="selflink"><sup>Talk</sup></strong> 15:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
	::::Zebraa here! It is upside down on his back! Look for youself!<small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Zebraa\|Zebraa]] ([[User talk:Zebraa\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zebraa\|contribs]]) 15:43, 21 July 2008.</small>		::::Zebraa here! It is upside down on his back! Look for youself!<small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Zebraa\|Zebraa]] ([[User talk:Zebraa\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zebraa\|contribs]]) 15:43, 21 July 2008.</small>

Abates: Protected "User talk:Rosicrucian/Archive 2" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

2010-09-12T20:27:53Z

Protected "User talk:Rosicrucian/Archive 2" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:27, 12 September 2010
(No difference)

Detour: Undo revision 498558 by 95.168.183.233 (Talk) More spam.

2010-09-12T17:18:46Z

Undo revision 498558 by 95.168.183.233 (Talk) More spam.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:18, 12 September 2010
Line 352:		Line 352:
	:Don't get me wrong, here. Your batting record is actually quite good. It's only recently that I've noticed a (very small) handful of talkpages that legitimately go with articles nominated. I have no qualms about deleting the vast majority of the ones you've tagged. In fact, you'll notice that I already have. I only wanted to point out some of the "outdated" ones you've flagged that are genuinely still with articles and thus should probably be preserved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:02, 7 April 2009 (EDT)		:Don't get me wrong, here. Your batting record is actually quite good. It's only recently that I've noticed a (very small) handful of talkpages that legitimately go with articles nominated. I have no qualms about deleting the vast majority of the ones you've tagged. In fact, you'll notice that I already have. I only wanted to point out some of the "outdated" ones you've flagged that are genuinely still with articles and thus should probably be preserved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:02, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
	::I'm not taking any offence. I had actually planned to ask permission for nominating certain things for deletion on the community portal. But then I came across my first talk page not with its article and really was not worth moving and with the crash and server performances taking up so much I went a little too ahead on things. I'll refrain from that for now. I do not believe certain ones should stay preserved, but I also do not believe it's up to me to decide. I'll just keep to less doubtful deletion nominations for now. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:12, 7 April 2009 (EDT)		::I'm not taking any offence. I had actually planned to ask permission for nominating certain things for deletion on the community portal. But then I came across my first talk page not with its article and really was not worth moving and with the crash and server performances taking up so much I went a little too ahead on things. I'll refrain from that for now. I do not believe certain ones should stay preserved, but I also do not believe it's up to me to decide. I'll just keep to less doubtful deletion nominations for now. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:12, 7 April 2009 (EDT)

	~~== Pokerspiel ==~~

	~~I usually do not leave a comment, but you really impress me, also I have a few questions like to ask, what's your contact details?~~

	~~-Johnson~~

95.168.183.233: /* Pokerspiel */ new section

2010-09-12T16:42:26Z

Pokerspiel: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 12 September 2010
Line 352:		Line 352:
	:Don't get me wrong, here. Your batting record is actually quite good. It's only recently that I've noticed a (very small) handful of talkpages that legitimately go with articles nominated. I have no qualms about deleting the vast majority of the ones you've tagged. In fact, you'll notice that I already have. I only wanted to point out some of the "outdated" ones you've flagged that are genuinely still with articles and thus should probably be preserved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:02, 7 April 2009 (EDT)		:Don't get me wrong, here. Your batting record is actually quite good. It's only recently that I've noticed a (very small) handful of talkpages that legitimately go with articles nominated. I have no qualms about deleting the vast majority of the ones you've tagged. In fact, you'll notice that I already have. I only wanted to point out some of the "outdated" ones you've flagged that are genuinely still with articles and thus should probably be preserved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:02, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
	::I'm not taking any offence. I had actually planned to ask permission for nominating certain things for deletion on the community portal. But then I came across my first talk page not with its article and really was not worth moving and with the crash and server performances taking up so much I went a little too ahead on things. I'll refrain from that for now. I do not believe certain ones should stay preserved, but I also do not believe it's up to me to decide. I'll just keep to less doubtful deletion nominations for now. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:12, 7 April 2009 (EDT)		::I'm not taking any offence. I had actually planned to ask permission for nominating certain things for deletion on the community portal. But then I came across my first talk page not with its article and really was not worth moving and with the crash and server performances taking up so much I went a little too ahead on things. I'll refrain from that for now. I do not believe certain ones should stay preserved, but I also do not believe it's up to me to decide. I'll just keep to less doubtful deletion nominations for now. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:12, 7 April 2009 (EDT)

			== Pokerspiel ==

			I usually do not leave a comment, but you really impress me, also I have a few questions like to ask, what's your contact details?

			-Johnson

NCZ: Undo revision 492853 by 121.12.175.21 (Talk) Spam, and even if it wasn't, it's in the wrong place.

2010-08-23T19:53:24Z

Undo revision 492853 by 121.12.175.21 (Talk) Spam, and even if it wasn't, it's in the wrong place.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 23 August 2010
Line 352:		Line 352:
	:Don't get me wrong, here. Your batting record is actually quite good. It's only recently that I've noticed a (very small) handful of talkpages that legitimately go with articles nominated. I have no qualms about deleting the vast majority of the ones you've tagged. In fact, you'll notice that I already have. I only wanted to point out some of the "outdated" ones you've flagged that are genuinely still with articles and thus should probably be preserved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:02, 7 April 2009 (EDT)		:Don't get me wrong, here. Your batting record is actually quite good. It's only recently that I've noticed a (very small) handful of talkpages that legitimately go with articles nominated. I have no qualms about deleting the vast majority of the ones you've tagged. In fact, you'll notice that I already have. I only wanted to point out some of the "outdated" ones you've flagged that are genuinely still with articles and thus should probably be preserved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:02, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
	::I'm not taking any offence. I had actually planned to ask permission for nominating certain things for deletion on the community portal. But then I came across my first talk page not with its article and really was not worth moving and with the crash and server performances taking up so much I went a little too ahead on things. I'll refrain from that for now. I do not believe certain ones should stay preserved, but I also do not believe it's up to me to decide. I'll just keep to less doubtful deletion nominations for now. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:12, 7 April 2009 (EDT)		::I'm not taking any offence. I had actually planned to ask permission for nominating certain things for deletion on the community portal. But then I came across my first talk page not with its article and really was not worth moving and with the crash and server performances taking up so much I went a little too ahead on things. I'll refrain from that for now. I do not believe certain ones should stay preserved, but I also do not believe it's up to me to decide. I'll just keep to less doubtful deletion nominations for now. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:12, 7 April 2009 (EDT)

	~~== form generator ==~~

	Took me time to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! It's always nice when you can not only be informed, but also entertained!

	~~- Andre~~

121.12.175.21: /* form generator */ new section

2010-08-23T19:52:40Z

form generator: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:52, 23 August 2010
Line 352:		Line 352:
	:Don't get me wrong, here. Your batting record is actually quite good. It's only recently that I've noticed a (very small) handful of talkpages that legitimately go with articles nominated. I have no qualms about deleting the vast majority of the ones you've tagged. In fact, you'll notice that I already have. I only wanted to point out some of the "outdated" ones you've flagged that are genuinely still with articles and thus should probably be preserved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:02, 7 April 2009 (EDT)		:Don't get me wrong, here. Your batting record is actually quite good. It's only recently that I've noticed a (very small) handful of talkpages that legitimately go with articles nominated. I have no qualms about deleting the vast majority of the ones you've tagged. In fact, you'll notice that I already have. I only wanted to point out some of the "outdated" ones you've flagged that are genuinely still with articles and thus should probably be preserved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:02, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
	::I'm not taking any offence. I had actually planned to ask permission for nominating certain things for deletion on the community portal. But then I came across my first talk page not with its article and really was not worth moving and with the crash and server performances taking up so much I went a little too ahead on things. I'll refrain from that for now. I do not believe certain ones should stay preserved, but I also do not believe it's up to me to decide. I'll just keep to less doubtful deletion nominations for now. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:12, 7 April 2009 (EDT)		::I'm not taking any offence. I had actually planned to ask permission for nominating certain things for deletion on the community portal. But then I came across my first talk page not with its article and really was not worth moving and with the crash and server performances taking up so much I went a little too ahead on things. I'll refrain from that for now. I do not believe certain ones should stay preserved, but I also do not believe it's up to me to decide. I'll just keep to less doubtful deletion nominations for now. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:12, 7 April 2009 (EDT)

			== form generator ==

			Took me time to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! It's always nice when you can not only be informed, but also entertained!

			- Andre

Abates: Undo revision 461866 by 78.86.202.230 (Talk) spambot

2010-06-01T02:27:25Z

Undo revision 461866 by 78.86.202.230 (Talk) spambot

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 1 June 2010
Line 352:		Line 352:
	:Don't get me wrong, here. Your batting record is actually quite good. It's only recently that I've noticed a (very small) handful of talkpages that legitimately go with articles nominated. I have no qualms about deleting the vast majority of the ones you've tagged. In fact, you'll notice that I already have. I only wanted to point out some of the "outdated" ones you've flagged that are genuinely still with articles and thus should probably be preserved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:02, 7 April 2009 (EDT)		:Don't get me wrong, here. Your batting record is actually quite good. It's only recently that I've noticed a (very small) handful of talkpages that legitimately go with articles nominated. I have no qualms about deleting the vast majority of the ones you've tagged. In fact, you'll notice that I already have. I only wanted to point out some of the "outdated" ones you've flagged that are genuinely still with articles and thus should probably be preserved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:02, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
	::I'm not taking any offence. I had actually planned to ask permission for nominating certain things for deletion on the community portal. But then I came across my first talk page not with its article and really was not worth moving and with the crash and server performances taking up so much I went a little too ahead on things. I'll refrain from that for now. I do not believe certain ones should stay preserved, but I also do not believe it's up to me to decide. I'll just keep to less doubtful deletion nominations for now. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:12, 7 April 2009 (EDT)		::I'm not taking any offence. I had actually planned to ask permission for nominating certain things for deletion on the community portal. But then I came across my first talk page not with its article and really was not worth moving and with the crash and server performances taking up so much I went a little too ahead on things. I'll refrain from that for now. I do not believe certain ones should stay preserved, but I also do not believe it's up to me to decide. I'll just keep to less doubtful deletion nominations for now. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:12, 7 April 2009 (EDT)

	~~== Please help ==~~

	~~Hi there everyone, can anybody aid please.~~

	~~How come won't the buttons towards the top of the site webpage that submit a comment work for me?~~

	~~Thanks~~

78.86.202.230: /* Please help */ new section

2010-06-01T02:20:12Z

Please help: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:20, 1 June 2010
Line 352:		Line 352:
	:Don't get me wrong, here. Your batting record is actually quite good. It's only recently that I've noticed a (very small) handful of talkpages that legitimately go with articles nominated. I have no qualms about deleting the vast majority of the ones you've tagged. In fact, you'll notice that I already have. I only wanted to point out some of the "outdated" ones you've flagged that are genuinely still with articles and thus should probably be preserved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:02, 7 April 2009 (EDT)		:Don't get me wrong, here. Your batting record is actually quite good. It's only recently that I've noticed a (very small) handful of talkpages that legitimately go with articles nominated. I have no qualms about deleting the vast majority of the ones you've tagged. In fact, you'll notice that I already have. I only wanted to point out some of the "outdated" ones you've flagged that are genuinely still with articles and thus should probably be preserved.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:02, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
	::I'm not taking any offence. I had actually planned to ask permission for nominating certain things for deletion on the community portal. But then I came across my first talk page not with its article and really was not worth moving and with the crash and server performances taking up so much I went a little too ahead on things. I'll refrain from that for now. I do not believe certain ones should stay preserved, but I also do not believe it's up to me to decide. I'll just keep to less doubtful deletion nominations for now. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:12, 7 April 2009 (EDT)		::I'm not taking any offence. I had actually planned to ask permission for nominating certain things for deletion on the community portal. But then I came across my first talk page not with its article and really was not worth moving and with the crash and server performances taking up so much I went a little too ahead on things. I'll refrain from that for now. I do not believe certain ones should stay preserved, but I also do not believe it's up to me to decide. I'll just keep to less doubtful deletion nominations for now. [[User:Geewunling\|Geewunling]] 15:12, 7 April 2009 (EDT)

			== Please help ==

			Hi there everyone, can anybody aid please.

			How come won't the buttons towards the top of the site webpage that submit a comment work for me?

			Thanks

Bluestreak7: Don't mind me. Just killing some dead links off the wanted pages.

2010-05-21T19:52:17Z

Don't mind me. Just killing some dead links off the wanted pages.

Geewunling at 15:56, 7 January 2010

2010-01-07T15:56:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:56, 7 January 2010
Line 73:		Line 73:


	:I had the ending to Autoboot camp ruined for me-- ''despite'' avoiding any articles for Animated characters that were getting edits that day because someone posted a new section on a talk page with the Big Spoiler as the title-- and thus it shows up in the Recent Changes page for everyone to see. It's about as tactful as posting on a messageboard [[SPOILER]] VADER IS LUKE'S DAD! It doesn't '''matter''' that you marked it as a spoiler- the fact it's in the subjectline makes it impossible to not see. Just like the Arr-Tard who let everyone see "Elita-1 (Animated) had been redirected to ~~Black Arachnia~~ (Animated)".		:I had the ending to Autoboot camp ruined for me-- ''despite'' avoiding any articles for Animated characters that were getting edits that day because someone posted a new section on a talk page with the Big Spoiler as the title-- and thus it shows up in the Recent Changes page for everyone to see. It's about as tactful as posting on a messageboard '''SPOILER''' VADER IS LUKE'S DAD! It doesn't '''matter''' that you marked it as a spoiler- the fact it's in the subjectline makes it impossible to not see. Just like the Arr-Tard who let everyone see "Elita-1 (Animated) had been redirected to Blackarachnia (Animated)".

	:Some edits, '''by the very nature of doing them''' are in fact spoilers. I accept that I'm gonna see activity on the wiki that might spoil who the major characters are in a new episode-- but I also expect that other editors will exercise some basic consideration to avoid slapping their dicks in my face with major spoilers!		:Some edits, '''by the very nature of doing them''' are in fact spoilers. I accept that I'm gonna see activity on the wiki that might spoil who the major characters are in a new episode-- but I also expect that other editors will exercise some basic consideration to avoid slapping their dicks in my face with major spoilers!

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:45, 14 May 2025
Line 148:		Line 148:
	here I wish you would cut it out with soundwave! On [[Swindle (Animated)\|Swindle]]'s page they say he has a bolo tie. I have the right to put my info!<small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Zebraa\|Zebraa]] ([[User talk:Zebraa\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zebraa\|contribs]]) 15:34, 21 July 2008.</small>		here I wish you would cut it out with soundwave! On [[Swindle (Animated)\|Swindle]]'s page they say he has a bolo tie. I have the right to put my info!<small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Zebraa\|Zebraa]] ([[User talk:Zebraa\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zebraa\|contribs]]) 15:34, 21 July 2008.</small>
	:Animated Swindle's design ''does'' include a bolo-tie design on his robot mode's collar. Animated Soundwave ''does not'' include the heavily trademarked XBox 360 logo.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]]<strong class="selflink"><sup>Talk</sup></strong> 15:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)		:Animated Swindle's design ''does'' include a bolo-tie design on his robot mode's collar. Animated Soundwave ''does not'' include the heavily trademarked XBox 360 logo.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]]<strong class="selflink"><sup>Talk</sup></strong> 15:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
	::it is on his back! I saw it when he got smashed by [[Bulkhead (Animated)\|Bulkhead]] in [[Sound and Fury]]!<small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Zebraa\|Zebraa]] ([[User talk:Zebraa\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zebraa\|contribs]]) 15:40, 21 July 2008.</small>		::it is on his back! I saw it when he got smashed by [[Bulkhead (Animated)\|Bulkhead]] in [[Sound and Fury (episode)\|Sound and Fury]]!<small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Zebraa\|Zebraa]] ([[User talk:Zebraa\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zebraa\|contribs]]) 15:40, 21 July 2008.</small>
	:::Then you're seeing what you want to see.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]]<strong class="selflink"><sup>Talk</sup></strong> 15:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)		:::Then you're seeing what you want to see.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]]<strong class="selflink"><sup>Talk</sup></strong> 15:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
	::::Zebraa here! It is upside down on his back! Look for youself!<small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Zebraa\|Zebraa]] ([[User talk:Zebraa\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zebraa\|contribs]]) 15:43, 21 July 2008.</small>		::::Zebraa here! It is upside down on his back! Look for youself!<small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Zebraa\|Zebraa]] ([[User talk:Zebraa\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zebraa\|contribs]]) 15:43, 21 July 2008.</small>

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:52, 21 May 2010
Line 125:		Line 125:
	:I do think some of what has stalled both SoM and I is that we're mostly each other's echo chambers on this. It's been tricky to get the rest of the wiki to weigh in and provide too much in the way of feedback. Not that we've been promoting it or anything, just that nobody really chimes in except occasionally Derik.		:I do think some of what has stalled both SoM and I is that we're mostly each other's echo chambers on this. It's been tricky to get the rest of the wiki to weigh in and provide too much in the way of feedback. Not that we've been promoting it or anything, just that nobody really chimes in except occasionally Derik.

	:I did leave some notes for myself (or anyone so inclined [[MediaWiki talk:Sidebar~~\|here]]~~ as to how we could do something similar to the Monaco sidebar if we were so inclined (IE one that uses a more readily editable sourcefile, which is a fairly documented alteration we could do). If anyone wants to look for decentish documentation on how to fold, spindle, and mutilate a standard MediaWiki, I've found that most of that stuff has been moved from Wikipedia where it was originally hosted to the Wikimedia foundation metawiki (where the sidebar links I mentioned are hosted).		:I did leave some notes for myself (or anyone so inclined "MediaWiki talk:Sidebar") as to how we could do something similar to the Monaco sidebar if we were so inclined (IE one that uses a more readily editable sourcefile, which is a fairly documented alteration we could do). If anyone wants to look for decentish documentation on how to fold, spindle, and mutilate a standard MediaWiki, I've found that most of that stuff has been moved from Wikipedia where it was originally hosted to the Wikimedia foundation metawiki (where the sidebar links I mentioned are hosted).


Line 185:		Line 185:

	I'll take that as a yes.[[User:Imnotflorodery\|Imnotflorodery]] 21:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)		I'll take that as a yes.[[User:Imnotflorodery\|Imnotflorodery]] 21:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
	:::What's the point of an apology if you're still acting aggressively, INFD?~~[[Image:~~Koromon.png]][[User:KrytenKoro\|<span style="color:orange"><small>Not even Mr. Lister's</small></span>]] [[User talk:KrytenKoro\|<span style="color:orange"><small>Koromon survived intact.</small></span>]] 14:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)		:::What's the point of an apology if you're still acting aggressively, INFD?"Koromon.png"[[User:KrytenKoro\|<span style="color:orange"><small>Not even Mr. Lister's</small></span>]] [[User talk:KrytenKoro\|<span style="color:orange"><small>Koromon survived intact.</small></span>]] 14:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

	For once, can you stop following me in just 1 hour. [[User:Mr. Serious\|Mr. Serious]] 20:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)		For once, can you stop following me in just 1 hour. [[User:Mr. Serious\|Mr. Serious]] 20:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Line 197:		Line 197:

	I'm just about finished putting the new skin up on the new server, but I need a little bit of help: can you give me a rendering of the text for a sidebar box called "Advertisement"? It'd be much quicker for you to do it than for me to try and get it to match the others perfectly. Thanks! --[[User:Suki Brits\|Suki Brits]] 18:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC)		I'm just about finished putting the new skin up on the new server, but I need a little bit of help: can you give me a rendering of the text for a sidebar box called "Advertisement"? It'd be much quicker for you to do it than for me to try and get it to match the others perfectly. Thanks! --[[User:Suki Brits\|Suki Brits]] 18:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
	:Here you go. I've done up the normal one, and a variant for the [[User:Rosicrucian/deceptibook.css~~\|Deceptibook]]~~ color scheme.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]]<strong class="selflink"><sup>Talk</sup></strong> 18:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)		:Here you go. I've done up the normal one, and a variant for the "User:Rosicrucian/deceptibook.css" color scheme.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]]<strong class="selflink"><sup>Talk</sup></strong> 18:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
	::Thanks! --[[User:Suki Brits\|Suki Brits]] 20:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)		::Thanks! --[[User:Suki Brits\|Suki Brits]] 20:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Line 312:		Line 312:

	:If we're actually discussing possible revisions to the toy layout... I'd like if there was a standard 'spot' to stick an (external) link to this toy's tech-spec and toy gallery (if any, and makbe 'no bio' if there was none?) Especially as multiple toys becomes ''de rigur'' for characters I'm finding the External Links section inadequate to this purpose. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 21:18, 3 October 2008 (EDT)		:If we're actually discussing possible revisions to the toy layout... I'd like if there was a standard 'spot' to stick an (external) link to this toy's tech-spec and toy gallery (if any, and makbe 'no bio' if there was none?) Especially as multiple toys becomes ''de rigur'' for characters I'm finding the External Links section inadequate to this purpose. -[[User:Derik\|Derik]] 21:18, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
	::For ''that'', I'd say visit [[Template talk:Toybox]] for the discussion already in progress.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]]<strong class="selflink"><sup>Talk</sup></strong> 22:05, 3 October 2008 (EDT)		::For ''that'', I'd say visit "Template talk:Toybox" for the discussion already in progress.--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]]<strong class="selflink"><sup>Talk</sup></strong> 22:05, 3 October 2008 (EDT)

	==Snide comments==		==Snide comments==
Line 320:		Line 320:

	ROCKS HARD!!! You are my personal hero of the day. I can't wait to see this deployed. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 16:36, 18 October 2008 (EDT)		ROCKS HARD!!! You are my personal hero of the day. I can't wait to see this deployed. --[[User:Jimsorenson\|Jimsorenson]] 16:36, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
	:Just noticed this comment. Thanks! It's always nice to get something on this page that doesn't involve people berating me for reminding them of the rules. I'm rather fond of that template myself, but if you check [[Template talk:Toybox~~\|this talkpage]]~~ you'll see we haven't quite found a good place for it in the layout. The kind words are appreciated, though!--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]]<strong class="selflink"><sup>Talk</sup></strong> 19:17, 21 November 2008 (EST)		:Just noticed this comment. Thanks! It's always nice to get something on this page that doesn't involve people berating me for reminding them of the rules. I'm rather fond of that template myself, but if you check "Template talk:Toybox" you'll see we haven't quite found a good place for it in the layout. The kind words are appreciated, though!--[[User:Rosicrucian\|Rosicrucian]]<strong class="selflink"><sup>Talk</sup></strong> 19:17, 21 November 2008 (EST)

	== Would you be able to help me with something? ==		== Would you be able to help me with something? ==