User talk:SanityOrMadness - Revision history

MistaTee: /* Are you still around? */ new section

2017-10-07T12:08:45Z

Are you still around?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 7 October 2017
Line 144:		Line 144:

	Why did you change the picture on the main Ironhide G1 page with the one on the toy page? I'm not going to change it back unless you want, but I think the former picture was better, but I'd like to know to your reasoning.[[User:IronhideG1\|IronhideG1]] ([[User talk:IronhideG1\|talk]]) 19:43, 6 May 2015 (EDT)		Why did you change the picture on the main Ironhide G1 page with the one on the toy page? I'm not going to change it back unless you want, but I think the former picture was better, but I'd like to know to your reasoning.[[User:IronhideG1\|IronhideG1]] ([[User talk:IronhideG1\|talk]]) 19:43, 6 May 2015 (EDT)

			== Are you still around? ==

			No posts since 2015, so I guess not unless you changed names or are lurking. I was looking for some help with the IDWG1Comic template if you get this message. --[[User:MistaTee\|MistaTee]] ([[User talk:MistaTee\|talk]]) 08:08, 7 October 2017 (EDT)

S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47: Fixing links.

2017-02-21T12:15:37Z

Fixing links.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:15, 21 February 2017
Line 102:		Line 102:

	Actually, Casseticon Laserbeak shows up in the Soundwave operation issue. Plus, Armada Laserbeak showed up first. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 19:37, 6 May 2014 (EDT)		Actually, Casseticon Laserbeak shows up in the Soundwave operation issue. Plus, Armada Laserbeak showed up first. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 19:37, 6 May 2014 (EDT)
	:Ah. Well it will still be [[Laserbeak (Kre-O Autobot)]] and [[Laserbeak (Kre-O Decepticon)]], not "(Armada Kre-O)" and "(G1 Kre-O)".		:Ah. Well it will still be [[Laserbeak (Armada)\|Laserbeak (Kre-O Autobot)]] and [[Laserbeak (G1)\|Laserbeak (Kre-O Decepticon)]], not "(Armada Kre-O)" and "(G1 Kre-O)".
	:<nowiki></nowiki>is beginning to see Sipher's point about these background guys not meriting their own pages until they actually DO something... - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 19:40, 6 May 2014 (EDT)		:<nowiki></nowiki>is beginning to see Sipher's point about these background guys not meriting their own pages until they actually DO something... - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 19:40, 6 May 2014 (EDT)
	::Also, I think since we got Universe Soundwave at ICBM Soundwave, maybe "Bomber Starscream" would be a better name for Machine Wars Starscream? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 19:50, 6 May 2014 (EDT)		::Also, I think since we got Universe Soundwave at ICBM Soundwave, maybe "Bomber Starscream" would be a better name for Machine Wars Starscream? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 19:50, 6 May 2014 (EDT)

IronhideG1: I forgot to sign my signature

2015-05-06T23:43:44Z

I forgot to sign my signature

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:43, 6 May 2015
Line 143:		Line 143:
	== Why the picture change? ==		== Why the picture change? ==

	Why did you change the picture on the Ironhide G1 ~~pag~~ with the one on the toy page? I'm not going to change it back unless you want, but I think the former picture was better, but I'd like to know to your reasoning.		Why did you change the picture on the main Ironhide G1 page with the one on the toy page? I'm not going to change it back unless you want, but I think the former picture was better, but I'd like to know to your reasoning.[[User:IronhideG1\|IronhideG1]] ([[User talk:IronhideG1\|talk]]) 19:43, 6 May 2015 (EDT)

IronhideG1: /* Why the picture change? */ new section

2015-05-06T00:12:25Z

Why the picture change?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, 6 May 2015
Line 140:		Line 140:
	:The thing is, upright=* only works on \|thumb\| images. Which is >99% of the images on the Wiki. So, occasionally, I miss those few that ''aren't''.		:The thing is, upright=* only works on \|thumb\| images. Which is >99% of the images on the Wiki. So, occasionally, I miss those few that ''aren't''.
	:Sorry. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 21:59, 2 May 2015 (EDT)		:Sorry. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 21:59, 2 May 2015 (EDT)

			== Why the picture change? ==

			Why did you change the picture on the Ironhide G1 pag with the one on the toy page? I'm not going to change it back unless you want, but I think the former picture was better, but I'd like to know to your reasoning.

SanityOrMadness: /* Enlarging the thumbnails */

2015-05-03T01:59:13Z

Enlarging the thumbnails

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:59, 3 May 2015
Line 138:		Line 138:

	I dunno if it's a bot thing or what, but whenever you change the size code on a thumbnail from "150px" or whatever to "upright=1.05" or whatever, it makes the thumbnail HUMONGOUS. I've had to fix this a bunch of times after you've done it. Usually the Japanese logo thumbnails on the Transformers cartoon page. When you're making those across the board "upright=1.whatever" changes to image size coding, maybe exclude the Japanese logo thumbnails. This is like the fourth or fifth time, man. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 19:26, 2 May 2015 (EDT)		I dunno if it's a bot thing or what, but whenever you change the size code on a thumbnail from "150px" or whatever to "upright=1.05" or whatever, it makes the thumbnail HUMONGOUS. I've had to fix this a bunch of times after you've done it. Usually the Japanese logo thumbnails on the Transformers cartoon page. When you're making those across the board "upright=1.whatever" changes to image size coding, maybe exclude the Japanese logo thumbnails. This is like the fourth or fifth time, man. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 19:26, 2 May 2015 (EDT)
			:The thing is, upright=* only works on \|thumb\| images. Which is >99% of the images on the Wiki. So, occasionally, I miss those few that ''aren't''.
			:Sorry. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 21:59, 2 May 2015 (EDT)

DrSpengler at 23:26, 2 May 2015

2015-05-02T23:26:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 2 May 2015
Line 134:		Line 134:

	Clearly I was a little enthusiastic on the '0' key. :) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 15:37, 3 February 2015 (EST)		Clearly I was a little enthusiastic on the '0' key. :) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 15:37, 3 February 2015 (EST)

			== Enlarging the thumbnails ==

			I dunno if it's a bot thing or what, but whenever you change the size code on a thumbnail from "150px" or whatever to "upright=1.05" or whatever, it makes the thumbnail HUMONGOUS. I've had to fix this a bunch of times after you've done it. Usually the Japanese logo thumbnails on the Transformers cartoon page. When you're making those across the board "upright=1.whatever" changes to image size coding, maybe exclude the Japanese logo thumbnails. This is like the fourth or fifth time, man. --[[User:DrSpengler\|DrSpengler]] ([[User talk:DrSpengler\|talk]]) 19:26, 2 May 2015 (EDT)

Abates: /* Heh, thanks! */ new section

2015-02-03T20:37:07Z

Heh, thanks!: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 3 February 2015
Line 130:		Line 130:
	Is there a reason why you're adding NoteCR to RID sections which don't include any CR specific information? It seems to clutter things up for no real gain. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 14:55, 27 January 2015 (EST)		Is there a reason why you're adding NoteCR to RID sections which don't include any CR specific information? It seems to clutter things up for no real gain. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 14:55, 27 January 2015 (EST)
	:The "in italics" bit was an afterthought for futureproofing (now CR is subbed), if that's what you're referring to. The main point was adding the "this is in two continuity families" bit while I was disambiguating headings and categories anyway. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 15:00, 27 January 2015 (EST)		:The "in italics" bit was an afterthought for futureproofing (now CR is subbed), if that's what you're referring to. The main point was adding the "this is in two continuity families" bit while I was disambiguating headings and categories anyway. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 15:00, 27 January 2015 (EST)

			== Heh, thanks! ==

			Clearly I was a little enthusiastic on the '0' key. :) --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 15:37, 3 February 2015 (EST)

SanityOrMadness: /* NoteCR */

2015-01-27T20:04:33Z

NoteCR

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:04, 27 January 2015
Line 129:		Line 129:

	Is there a reason why you're adding NoteCR to RID sections which don't include any CR specific information? It seems to clutter things up for no real gain. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 14:55, 27 January 2015 (EST)		Is there a reason why you're adding NoteCR to RID sections which don't include any CR specific information? It seems to clutter things up for no real gain. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 14:55, 27 January 2015 (EST)
	:The "in italics" bit was an afterthought for futureproofing, if that's what you're referring to. The main point was adding the "this is in two continuity families" bit while I was disambiguating headings and categories anyway. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 15:00, 27 January 2015 (EST)		:The "in italics" bit was an afterthought for futureproofing (now CR is subbed), if that's what you're referring to. The main point was adding the "this is in two continuity families" bit while I was disambiguating headings and categories anyway. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 15:00, 27 January 2015 (EST)

SanityOrMadness: /* NoteCR */

2015-01-27T20:03:11Z

NoteCR

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:03, 27 January 2015
Line 129:		Line 129:

	Is there a reason why you're adding NoteCR to RID sections which don't include any CR specific information? It seems to clutter things up for no real gain. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 14:55, 27 January 2015 (EST)		Is there a reason why you're adding NoteCR to RID sections which don't include any CR specific information? It seems to clutter things up for no real gain. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 14:55, 27 January 2015 (EST)
	:The "in italics" bit was an afterthought, if that's what you're referring to. The main point was the "this is in two continuity families" bit. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 15:00, 27 January 2015 (EST)		:The "in italics" bit was an afterthought for futureproofing, if that's what you're referring to. The main point was adding the "this is in two continuity families" bit while I was disambiguating headings and categories anyway. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 15:00, 27 January 2015 (EST)

SanityOrMadness: /* NoteCR */

2015-01-27T20:00:01Z

NoteCR

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 27 January 2015
Line 129:		Line 129:

	Is there a reason why you're adding NoteCR to RID sections which don't include any CR specific information? It seems to clutter things up for no real gain. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 14:55, 27 January 2015 (EST)		Is there a reason why you're adding NoteCR to RID sections which don't include any CR specific information? It seems to clutter things up for no real gain. --[[User:Abates\|abates]] ([[User talk:Abates\|talk]]) 14:55, 27 January 2015 (EST)
			:The "in italics" bit was an afterthought, if that's what you're referring to. The main point was the "this is in two continuity families" bit. - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 15:00, 27 January 2015 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:15, 21 February 2017
Line 102:		Line 102:

	Actually, Casseticon Laserbeak shows up in the Soundwave operation issue. Plus, Armada Laserbeak showed up first. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 19:37, 6 May 2014 (EDT)		Actually, Casseticon Laserbeak shows up in the Soundwave operation issue. Plus, Armada Laserbeak showed up first. [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 19:37, 6 May 2014 (EDT)
	:Ah. Well it will still be [[Laserbeak (Kre-O Autobot)]] and [[Laserbeak (Kre-O Decepticon)]], not "(Armada Kre-O)" and "(G1 Kre-O)".		:Ah. Well it will still be [[Laserbeak (Armada)\|Laserbeak (Kre-O Autobot)]] and [[Laserbeak (G1)\|Laserbeak (Kre-O Decepticon)]], not "(Armada Kre-O)" and "(G1 Kre-O)".
	:<nowiki></nowiki>is beginning to see Sipher's point about these background guys not meriting their own pages until they actually DO something... - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 19:40, 6 May 2014 (EDT)		:<nowiki></nowiki>is beginning to see Sipher's point about these background guys not meriting their own pages until they actually DO something... - [[User:SanityOrMadness\|SanityOrMadness]] ([[User talk:SanityOrMadness\|talk]]) 19:40, 6 May 2014 (EDT)
	::Also, I think since we got Universe Soundwave at ICBM Soundwave, maybe "Bomber Starscream" would be a better name for Machine Wars Starscream? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 19:50, 6 May 2014 (EDT)		::Also, I think since we got Universe Soundwave at ICBM Soundwave, maybe "Bomber Starscream" would be a better name for Machine Wars Starscream? [[User:Escargon\|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon\|talk]]) 19:50, 6 May 2014 (EDT)