User talk:Tritusk - Revision history

Tritusk at 04:43, 16 January 2019

2019-01-16T04:43:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:43, 16 January 2019
Line 10:		Line 10:
	~~Well if he says it like that it's pretty much confirmed "I'm sure" is pretty definitive~~		~~Well if he says it like that it's pretty much confirmed "I'm sure" is pretty definitive~~
	:No, he really doesn't; it's a common turn of phrase not indicative of anything definitive. Besides, our primary source has always been the shows/comics/etc. themselves; authorial intent is generally a trivia section mention at best. (Four tildes. At the end. Of your post.) -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 19:20, 15 January 2019 (EST)		:No, he really doesn't; it's a common turn of phrase not indicative of anything definitive. Besides, our primary source has always been the shows/comics/etc. themselves; authorial intent is generally a trivia section mention at best. (Four tildes. At the end. Of your post.) -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 19:20, 15 January 2019 (EST)

			He did. I don't know why you just want to not see it but whatever. Just keep it your way.

Cyberlink420 at 00:20, 16 January 2019

2019-01-16T00:20:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 16 January 2019
Line 9:		Line 9:

	~~Well if he says it like that it's pretty much confirmed "I'm sure" is pretty definitive~~		~~Well if he says it like that it's pretty much confirmed "I'm sure" is pretty definitive~~
			:No, he really doesn't; it's a common turn of phrase not indicative of anything definitive. Besides, our primary source has always been the shows/comics/etc. themselves; authorial intent is generally a trivia section mention at best. (Four tildes. At the end. Of your post.) -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 19:20, 15 January 2019 (EST)

Tritusk at 00:17, 16 January 2019

2019-01-16T00:17:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:17, 16 January 2019
Line 8:		Line 8:
	: Unfortunately, that's not good enough. Adam himself says in the tweet "they'll probably get out". That's not a firm "yes", that's an assumption, and can't be taken as fact. (And I meant sign with the four tildes inside the "nowiki" tags, not the tags themselves.) -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 19:14, 15 January 2019 (EST)		: Unfortunately, that's not good enough. Adam himself says in the tweet "they'll probably get out". That's not a firm "yes", that's an assumption, and can't be taken as fact. (And I meant sign with the four tildes inside the "nowiki" tags, not the tags themselves.) -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 19:14, 15 January 2019 (EST)

	~~Well if he says it like that it's pretty much confirmed~~		~~Well if he says it like that it's pretty much confirmed "I'm sure" is pretty definitive~~

Tritusk at 00:16, 16 January 2019

2019-01-16T00:16:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:16, 16 January 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:
	<nowiki> Sure thing, Here this https://twitter.com/sonnova/status/1083403764751462400 </nowiki>		<nowiki> Sure thing, Here this https://twitter.com/sonnova/status/1083403764751462400 </nowiki>
	: Unfortunately, that's not good enough. Adam himself says in the tweet "they'll probably get out". That's not a firm "yes", that's an assumption, and can't be taken as fact. (And I meant sign with the four tildes inside the "nowiki" tags, not the tags themselves.) -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 19:14, 15 January 2019 (EST)		: Unfortunately, that's not good enough. Adam himself says in the tweet "they'll probably get out". That's not a firm "yes", that's an assumption, and can't be taken as fact. (And I meant sign with the four tildes inside the "nowiki" tags, not the tags themselves.) -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 19:14, 15 January 2019 (EST)

			~~Well if he says it like that it's pretty much confirmed~~

Cyberlink420 at 00:14, 16 January 2019

2019-01-16T00:14:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:14, 16 January 2019
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:Care to link to that tweet? Because otherwise, all I have is your word to go on, and that's not enough. (Also, remember to sign your posts on talk pages with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.) -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 19:02, 15 January 2019 (EST)		:Care to link to that tweet? Because otherwise, all I have is your word to go on, and that's not enough. (Also, remember to sign your posts on talk pages with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.) -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 19:02, 15 January 2019 (EST)
	<nowiki> Sure thing, Here this https://twitter.com/sonnova/status/1083403764751462400 </nowiki>		<nowiki> Sure thing, Here this https://twitter.com/sonnova/status/1083403764751462400 </nowiki>
			: Unfortunately, that's not good enough. Adam himself says in the tweet "they'll probably get out". That's not a firm "yes", that's an assumption, and can't be taken as fact. (And I meant sign with the four tildes inside the "nowiki" tags, not the tags themselves.) -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 19:14, 15 January 2019 (EST)

Tritusk at 00:06, 16 January 2019

2019-01-16T00:06:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:06, 16 January 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Hey! I understand! But I had actually seen it in a recent tweet from Adam Beechen that they did break out!		Hey! I understand! But I had actually seen it in a recent tweet from Adam Beechen that they did break out!
	:Care to link to that tweet? Because otherwise, all I have is your word to go on, and that's not enough. (Also, remember to sign your posts on talk pages with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.) -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 19:02, 15 January 2019 (EST)		:Care to link to that tweet? Because otherwise, all I have is your word to go on, and that's not enough. (Also, remember to sign your posts on talk pages with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.) -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 19:02, 15 January 2019 (EST)
			<nowiki> Sure thing, Here this https://twitter.com/sonnova/status/1083403764751462400 </nowiki>

Cyberlink420 at 00:02, 16 January 2019

2019-01-16T00:02:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 16 January 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Hey! I understand! But I had actually seen it in a recent tweet from Adam Beechen that they did break out!		Hey! I understand! But I had actually seen it in a recent tweet from Adam Beechen that they did break out!
			:Care to link to that tweet? Because otherwise, all I have is your word to go on, and that's not enough. (Also, remember to sign your posts on talk pages with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.) -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 19:02, 15 January 2019 (EST)

Tritusk at 23:59, 15 January 2019

2019-01-15T23:59:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 15 January 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:

	However, all of your recent edits have been reverted for being either misinformation or totally unnecessary. We don't need to clarify every time that a Decepticon is okay after a battle, nor was it ever stated that anyone broke out of prison at the end of RID. Please take more care in the future when adding new content. -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 18:46, 15 January 2019 (EST)		However, all of your recent edits have been reverted for being either misinformation or totally unnecessary. We don't need to clarify every time that a Decepticon is okay after a battle, nor was it ever stated that anyone broke out of prison at the end of RID. Please take more care in the future when adding new content. -- [[User:Cyberlink420\|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420\|talk]]) 18:46, 15 January 2019 (EST)

			Hey! I understand! But I had actually seen it in a recent tweet from Adam Beechen that they did break out!

Cyberlink420: Created page with "{{welcome}} However, all of your recent edits have been reverted for being either misinformation or totally unnecessary. We don't need to clarify every time that a Decepticon..."

2019-01-15T23:46:19Z

Created page with "{{welcome}} However, all of your recent edits have been reverted for being either misinformation or totally unnecessary. We don't need to clarify every time that a Decepticon..."

New page

{{welcome}}

However, all of your recent edits have been reverted for being either misinformation or totally unnecessary. We don't need to clarify every time that a Decepticon is okay after a battle, nor was it ever stated that anyone broke out of prison at the end of RID. Please take more care in the future when adding new content. -- [[User:Cyberlink420|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420|talk]]) 18:46, 15 January 2019 (EST)