User talk:Vanderbeet - Revision history

Vanderbeet at 20:11, 31 October 2020

2020-10-31T20:11:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 31 October 2020
Line 2:		Line 2:
	If your edits are being reverted by other users, don't start an edit war and keep reverting them back – this is not constructive. In cases like this, you should instead be starting a discussion on the article in question's talk page. Additionally, you should ''definitely'' not be coming on to the wiki and altering policy documents with your second-ever edit. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 07:49, 31 October 2020 (EDT)		If your edits are being reverted by other users, don't start an edit war and keep reverting them back – this is not constructive. In cases like this, you should instead be starting a discussion on the article in question's talk page. Additionally, you should ''definitely'' not be coming on to the wiki and altering policy documents with your second-ever edit. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 07:49, 31 October 2020 (EDT)

	* I have lurked this wiki for years lol. I originally intended to edit the captions page because JaAm was not on the list of "jokes we hate" the last time I visited, I had no idea what the explanation even meant, and on top of that it wasn't even really funny. So then I go to the JaAm page, and it still doesn't really explain what the issue is. So then I have to go to the talk page, where someone claims the original comic was ''intended'' to mock autistic people, which is just mind-blowing. Considering Grimlock's captions are explicitly designed to mock people who aren't intelligent, it is quite interesting that people have come to view JaAm of all things as anything other than (now rather annoying) RaNd0m humor. [[User:Vanderbeet\|Vanderbeet]] ([[User talk:Vanderbeet\|talk]]) 16:10, 31 October 2020 (EDT)		* I have lurked this wiki for years lol. I originally intended to edit the captions page because JaAm was not on the list of "jokes we hate" the last time I visited, I had no idea what the explanation even meant, and on top of that it wasn't even really funny. So then I go to the JaAm page, and it still doesn't really explain what the issue is. So then I have to go to the talk page, where someone claims the original comic was ''intended'' to mock autistic people, which is just mind-blowing. Considering Grimlock's captions are explicitly designed to mock/imitate people who aren't intelligent, it is quite interesting that people have come to view JaAm of all things as anything other than (now rather annoying) RaNd0m humor. [[User:Vanderbeet\|Vanderbeet]] ([[User talk:Vanderbeet\|talk]]) 16:10, 31 October 2020 (EDT)

Vanderbeet at 20:10, 31 October 2020

2020-10-31T20:10:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:10, 31 October 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Welcome}}		{{Welcome}}
	If your edits are being reverted by other users, don't start an edit war and keep reverting them back – this is not constructive. In cases like this, you should instead be starting a discussion on the article in question's talk page. Additionally, you should ''definitely'' not be coming on to the wiki and altering policy documents with your second-ever edit. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 07:49, 31 October 2020 (EDT)		If your edits are being reverted by other users, don't start an edit war and keep reverting them back – this is not constructive. In cases like this, you should instead be starting a discussion on the article in question's talk page. Additionally, you should ''definitely'' not be coming on to the wiki and altering policy documents with your second-ever edit. [[User:Jalaguy\|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy\|talk]]) 07:49, 31 October 2020 (EDT)

			* I have lurked this wiki for years lol. I originally intended to edit the captions page because JaAm was not on the list of "jokes we hate" the last time I visited, I had no idea what the explanation even meant, and on top of that it wasn't even really funny. So then I go to the JaAm page, and it still doesn't really explain what the issue is. So then I have to go to the talk page, where someone claims the original comic was ''intended'' to mock autistic people, which is just mind-blowing. Considering Grimlock's captions are explicitly designed to mock people who aren't intelligent, it is quite interesting that people have come to view JaAm of all things as anything other than (now rather annoying) RaNd0m humor. [[User:Vanderbeet\|Vanderbeet]] ([[User talk:Vanderbeet\|talk]]) 16:10, 31 October 2020 (EDT)

Jalaguy: Created page with "{{Welcome}} If your edits are being reverted by other users, don't start an edit war and keep reverting them back – this is not constructive. In cases like this, you should ..."

2020-10-31T11:49:58Z

Created page with "{{Welcome}} If your edits are being reverted by other users, don't start an edit war and keep reverting them back – this is not constructive. In cases like this, you should ..."

New page

{{Welcome}}
If your edits are being reverted by other users, don't start an edit war and keep reverting them back – this is not constructive. In cases like this, you should instead be starting a discussion on the article in question's talk page. Additionally, you should ''definitely'' not be coming on to the wiki and altering policy documents with your second-ever edit. [[User:Jalaguy|Jalaguy]] ([[User talk:Jalaguy|talk]]) 07:49, 31 October 2020 (EDT)