User talk:M Sipher/Sandbox:Fiction header experiment: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search Created page with "My problem with the lines as put around "TransTech" there is that lines are what visually break up the first-level headers. If we had more graphical headers for "Fiction" and..." |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
My problem with the lines as put around "TransTech" there is that lines are what visually break up the first-level headers. If we had more graphical headers for "Fiction" and the like, [[ | My problem with the lines as put around "TransTech" there is that lines are what visually break up the first-level headers. If we had more graphical headers for "Fiction" and the like, [[User:Suki_Brits/Nightbeat|such as this really old mockup]], that'd be okay. But as it stands, that'd mostly just confuse things. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 20:04, 12 January 2016 (EST) | ||
:Maybe getting rid of the "Fiction" header? Or is that a step too far? [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 20:20, 12 January 2016 (EST) | |||
::WAY too far. To the point where I honestly can't fathom why you'd even suggest it. I mean, that's how we separate the fiction from the toys, or the general notes. We NEED that kind of broad-concept header, fundamentally. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] ([[User talk:M Sipher|talk]]) 20:47, 12 January 2016 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:47, 13 January 2016
My problem with the lines as put around "TransTech" there is that lines are what visually break up the first-level headers. If we had more graphical headers for "Fiction" and the like, such as this really old mockup, that'd be okay. But as it stands, that'd mostly just confuse things. --M Sipher (talk) 20:04, 12 January 2016 (EST)
