Talk:Armageddon (film): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
m S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 moved page Talk:Armageddon to Talk:Armageddon (film) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::No, but it's funnier, and funnier from a 'taking very literally' approach we use on the wiki when there isn't enough information in the fiction. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 18:51, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | ::No, but it's funnier, and funnier from a 'taking very literally' approach we use on the wiki when there isn't enough information in the fiction. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 18:51, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Nope. ''Armageddon'' is italicized in the subtitles. So, it has to be a reference to literature, film, or video game. [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 18:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | :::Nope. ''Armageddon'' is italicized in the subtitles. So, it has to be a reference to literature, film, or video game. [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 18:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Now all we need is a page for Bad Boys 2 since Sam wrote all over in in ROTF. | :::Now all we need is a page for Bad Boys 2 since Sam wrote all over in in ROTF.[[User:Riddlerj|Riddlerj]] 16:12, 21 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:51, 28 January 2016
If we take it at face value, it could also be construed as the End of Days for Earth, as believed by some humans, and Ratchet crashing into a store is a hundred times cooler than that. :D --FFN 18:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- True, but do we really think that he was taking about that? -- SFH 18:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, but it's funnier, and funnier from a 'taking very literally' approach we use on the wiki when there isn't enough information in the fiction. --FFN 18:51, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Nope. Armageddon is italicized in the subtitles. So, it has to be a reference to literature, film, or video game. —Interrobang 18:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Now all we need is a page for Bad Boys 2 since Sam wrote all over in in ROTF.Riddlerj 16:12, 21 July 2009 (EDT)
- No, but it's funnier, and funnier from a 'taking very literally' approach we use on the wiki when there isn't enough information in the fiction. --FFN 18:51, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
