Talk:Heatrock: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) New page: I have this guy, but although I have a camera, I don't have any way of doing that professional white-background stuff you guys use. I think I ''might'' also be able to scan his image on th... |
m Saix moved page Talk:Heatrock (G1) to Talk:Heatrock: Moving in preparation |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have this guy, but although I have a camera, I don't have any way of doing that professional white-background stuff you guys use. I think I ''might'' also be able to scan his image on the box, if I still have it. Would either of these methods of picture be worth trying?[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] 13:10, 3 December 2012 (EST) | I have this guy, but although I have a camera, I don't have any way of doing that professional white-background stuff you guys use. I think I ''might'' also be able to scan his image on the box, if I still have it. Would either of these methods of picture be worth trying?[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] 13:10, 3 December 2012 (EST) | ||
:You could easily get a clean background with a big sheet of paper or a cloth sheet. It doesn't need to be super-perfect blemish-free bright white, just plain enough that it isn't distracting the viewer from the toy. If the box-pic is art, and not just another photo, that'd be worth having in addition to a toy photo. [[User:Jalaguy|Jalaguy]] 15:11, 3 December 2012 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:32, 12 March 2016
I have this guy, but although I have a camera, I don't have any way of doing that professional white-background stuff you guys use. I think I might also be able to scan his image on the box, if I still have it. Would either of these methods of picture be worth trying?KrytenKoro 13:10, 3 December 2012 (EST)
- You could easily get a clean background with a big sheet of paper or a cloth sheet. It doesn't need to be super-perfect blemish-free bright white, just plain enough that it isn't distracting the viewer from the toy. If the box-pic is art, and not just another photo, that'd be worth having in addition to a toy photo. Jalaguy 15:11, 3 December 2012 (EST)
