Talk:Lightning Strike Coalition: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m Talk:Lightning Strike Coalition moved to Talk:Lightning Strike Coalition (G1): That's not how we move articles. |
|||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Prime continuity?= | =Prime continuity?= | ||
==Untitled== | |||
I haven't finished it yet, but doesn't ''Exodus'' use the term Lightning Strike Coalition to refer to the pre-Autobot/Decepticon era combiners? -- [[User:G1MarvelBlaster|G1MarvelBlaster]] 10:46, 14 July 2010 (EDT) | I haven't finished it yet, but doesn't ''Exodus'' use the term Lightning Strike Coalition to refer to the pre-Autobot/Decepticon era combiners? -- [[User:G1MarvelBlaster|G1MarvelBlaster]] 10:46, 14 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
No, at least as I recall they mearly mention the name as a group of Autobots at a gathering, but don't go into any detail as to who they are. Least that's what I recall.--[[User:ZacWilliam|ZacWilliam]] 10:49, 14 July 2010 (EDT) | No, at least as I recall they mearly mention the name as a group of Autobots at a gathering, but don't go into any detail as to who they are. Least that's what I recall.--[[User:ZacWilliam|ZacWilliam]] 10:49, 14 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
As far as I'm aware, subfactions like the [[Wreckers]] don't get split up into groups by continuity family. Wouldn't that include this? --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 23:44, 24 August 2012 (EDT) | |||
:Also, they have their own faction logo and everything. Really feels like this should be more like the inter-continuity family Wreckers page. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 21:10, 25 August 2012 (EDT) | |||
::I'm not entirely sure why it was split in the first place. --[[User:Abates|abates]] 01:38, 27 August 2012 (EDT) | |||
::What ''is'' the standard on subgroups? Because Dinobots get split off by continuities, as do combiner teams, but Wreckers and Elite Guards... don't? Anywho, isn't the WFC/Aligned Lightning Strike Coalition essentially just "the Dinobots before they were Dinobots" (sorta like how Dynobots don't get a separate article from Dinobots)? The split-off article was almost verbatim the FOC Dinobot article, so I just merged it with that one. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 01:43, 27 August 2012 (EDT) | |||
:::My feelings are that if a faction symbol is the main image of an article, then we can probably put more than one continuity family on there. And your splitting and merging of this page with the Dinobot article presumes that there were never any non-Dinobot members of the Lightning Strike Coalition (Force). (In fact, due to FOC spoilers, we know of at least one.) --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 01:52, 27 August 2012 (EDT) | |||
::::I didn't split it. I just took the split article, which was almost word-for-word what the FOC Dinobot article was, and just made them one article. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 01:54, 27 August 2012 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:56, 20 January 2023
Prime continuity?
[edit]Untitled
[edit]I haven't finished it yet, but doesn't Exodus use the term Lightning Strike Coalition to refer to the pre-Autobot/Decepticon era combiners? -- G1MarvelBlaster 10:46, 14 July 2010 (EDT)
No, at least as I recall they mearly mention the name as a group of Autobots at a gathering, but don't go into any detail as to who they are. Least that's what I recall.--ZacWilliam 10:49, 14 July 2010 (EDT)
As far as I'm aware, subfactions like the Wreckers don't get split up into groups by continuity family. Wouldn't that include this? --ItsWalky 23:44, 24 August 2012 (EDT)
- Also, they have their own faction logo and everything. Really feels like this should be more like the inter-continuity family Wreckers page. --ItsWalky 21:10, 25 August 2012 (EDT)
- I'm not entirely sure why it was split in the first place. --abates 01:38, 27 August 2012 (EDT)
- What is the standard on subgroups? Because Dinobots get split off by continuities, as do combiner teams, but Wreckers and Elite Guards... don't? Anywho, isn't the WFC/Aligned Lightning Strike Coalition essentially just "the Dinobots before they were Dinobots" (sorta like how Dynobots don't get a separate article from Dinobots)? The split-off article was almost verbatim the FOC Dinobot article, so I just merged it with that one. --Detour 01:43, 27 August 2012 (EDT)
- My feelings are that if a faction symbol is the main image of an article, then we can probably put more than one continuity family on there. And your splitting and merging of this page with the Dinobot article presumes that there were never any non-Dinobot members of the Lightning Strike Coalition (Force). (In fact, due to FOC spoilers, we know of at least one.) --ItsWalky 01:52, 27 August 2012 (EDT)
- I didn't split it. I just took the split article, which was almost word-for-word what the FOC Dinobot article was, and just made them one article. --Detour 01:54, 27 August 2012 (EDT)
- My feelings are that if a faction symbol is the main image of an article, then we can probably put more than one continuity family on there. And your splitting and merging of this page with the Dinobot article presumes that there were never any non-Dinobot members of the Lightning Strike Coalition (Force). (In fact, due to FOC spoilers, we know of at least one.) --ItsWalky 01:52, 27 August 2012 (EDT)
