Ruined FOREVER: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Abates (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
Fortunately, there ''is'' hope.  The Transformers fanbase has resolved to remain ''ever vigilant'' against something that could Ruin Transformers Forever, and call out a warning if they see something that could potentially do so.
Fortunately, there ''is'' hope.  The Transformers fanbase has resolved to remain ''ever vigilant'' against something that could Ruin Transformers Forever, and call out a warning if they see something that could potentially do so.


Some Transformers conservationists suggest a more extreme approach, that Transformers should [[Mickey Mouse|abandon all attempts at re-invention]] and instead [[wikipedia:Masters of the Universe#Masters of the Universe Classics|cater exclusively to the old-school collectors]].  Though attractive, this approach may prove [[G.I. Joe (franchise)|impractical as a long-term solution]].
Some Transformers conservationists suggest a more extreme approach, that Transformers should abandon all attempts at re-invention and instead cater exclusively to the old-school collectors.  Though attractive, this approach may prove [[G.I. Joe (franchise)|impractical as a long-term solution]].


Ruined Forever remains a serious threat to Transformers now and in the foreseeable future, though it's possible a proposed initiative requiring all Transformers fans to purchase an annual [[wikipedia:Carbon offset|plastic offset]] could ensure our fragile brand's existence through the mid-21st century.
Ruined Forever remains a serious threat to Transformers now and in the foreseeable future, though it's possible a proposed initiative requiring all Transformers fans to purchase an annual {{w|Carbon offset|plastic offset}} could ensure our fragile brand's existence through the mid-21st century.


==Things that have '''Ruined Transformers Forever''' in the past==
==Things that have '''Ruined Transformers Forever''' in the past==
Line 28: Line 28:
*[[Trukk not munky]]
*[[Trukk not munky]]
*[[Chin]]
*[[Chin]]
*[[Funko Pop!#And then there's all those dreaded NFTs|Things that are ''actually'', '''''objectively''''' terrible]]


==External links==
==External links==

Latest revision as of 15:13, 21 September 2023

We believe in regular Preparedness Drills.

Fans realize something Hasbro does not: that robust 42-year-old billion-dollar franchises, while seemingly healthy, are in actuality as fragile as two bricks tied together with tissue paper. One mistake, one bad mis-step will cause the entire thing to shatter and fall apart; and Transformers would be ruined forever.

Fortunately, there is hope. The Transformers fanbase has resolved to remain ever vigilant against something that could Ruin Transformers Forever, and call out a warning if they see something that could potentially do so.

Some Transformers conservationists suggest a more extreme approach, that Transformers should abandon all attempts at re-invention and instead cater exclusively to the old-school collectors. Though attractive, this approach may prove impractical as a long-term solution.

Ruined Forever remains a serious threat to Transformers now and in the foreseeable future, though it's possible a proposed initiative requiring all Transformers fans to purchase an annual plastic offset could ensure our fragile brand's existence through the mid-21st century.

Things that have Ruined Transformers Forever in the past

See also