Talk:Beast Wars Universe: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
We are seeing an ''awful lot'' of articles of questionable canonicity being cited to what I am told is a recent translation of this book. When citing this book, we have to be especially careful to denote which things actually came from the fiction, which were unused but in the series bible, and which were just DiTillio and Forward shooting their mouths off about ideas they had. The latter two examples should be used ''very'' sparingly, usually in trivia sections if at all.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]] 03:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | We are seeing an ''awful lot'' of articles of questionable canonicity being cited to what I am told is a recent translation of this book. When citing this book, we have to be especially careful to denote which things actually came from the fiction, which were unused but in the series bible, and which were just DiTillio and Forward shooting their mouths off about ideas they had. The latter two examples should be used ''very'' sparingly, usually in trivia sections if at all.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]] 03:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Agreed. An idea that went un-realized in the actual stories does not become more "real" if the authors talk about it in an interview, not even if the interview is in a licensed publication. See also: Liege Maximo. --[[User:Thylacine 2000|Thylacine 2000]] 03:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | :Agreed. An idea that went un-realized in the actual stories does not become more "real" if the authors talk about it in an interview, not even if the interview is in a licensed publication. See also: Liege Maximo. --[[User:Thylacine 2000|Thylacine 2000]] 03:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:17, 27 March 2009
I demand scanlations --FortMax 21:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
The section about Dark Glass is two dense pages long. Would probably be worth translating someday... --Thylacine 2000 13:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Er...
[edit]We are seeing an awful lot of articles of questionable canonicity being cited to what I am told is a recent translation of this book. When citing this book, we have to be especially careful to denote which things actually came from the fiction, which were unused but in the series bible, and which were just DiTillio and Forward shooting their mouths off about ideas they had. The latter two examples should be used very sparingly, usually in trivia sections if at all.--Rosicrucian 03:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. An idea that went un-realized in the actual stories does not become more "real" if the authors talk about it in an interview, not even if the interview is in a licensed publication. See also: Liege Maximo. --Thylacine 2000 03:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
