Talk:Magnus Armor: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "Does anyone else think we should put the Magnus Armor wearers in chronological order instead of alphabetical order?"
 
Emvee (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Does anyone else think we should put the Magnus Armor wearers in chronological order instead of alphabetical order?
Does anyone else think we should put the Magnus Armor wearers in chronological order instead of alphabetical order?
:That would make sense to me. [[User:ZeroSD|ZeroSD]] ([[User talk:ZeroSD|talk]]) 21:12, 6 April 2015 (EDT)
::But we don't ''know'' the chronological order. We just know Suture was first, and Datum was at Hell's Point. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] ([[User talk:Chris McFeely|talk]]) 21:17, 6 April 2015 (EDT)
:::Hm, so basically, it's pretty hard until we get Ramp and Blockus... [[User:ZeroSD|ZeroSD]] ([[User talk:ZeroSD|talk]]) 23:32, 6 April 2015 (EDT)
::::Kinda why I went with alphabetical order in the first place :) --[[User:Emvee|Emvee]] ([[User talk:Emvee|talk]]) 13:53, 7 April 2015 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 17:53, 7 April 2015

Does anyone else think we should put the Magnus Armor wearers in chronological order instead of alphabetical order?

That would make sense to me. ZeroSD (talk) 21:12, 6 April 2015 (EDT)
But we don't know the chronological order. We just know Suture was first, and Datum was at Hell's Point. - Chris McFeely (talk) 21:17, 6 April 2015 (EDT)
Hm, so basically, it's pretty hard until we get Ramp and Blockus... ZeroSD (talk) 23:32, 6 April 2015 (EDT)
Kinda why I went with alphabetical order in the first place :) --Emvee (talk) 13:53, 7 April 2015 (EDT)