Talk:Vector Sigma Chamber: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Transfan 1992 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
:: As the creator of the article, and thus somewhat biased in a way, I would argue that Vector Sigma and the Chamber itself are two separate things and thus should be separate articles and if there are more content that could be added, it could be enough for its own article. Just my thought on it. --[[User:Darth Batrus|Darth Batrus]] 22:04, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
:: As the creator of the article, and thus somewhat biased in a way, I would argue that Vector Sigma and the Chamber itself are two separate things and thus should be separate articles and if there are more content that could be added, it could be enough for its own article. Just my thought on it. --[[User:Darth Batrus|Darth Batrus]] 22:04, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
::I... just have trouble believing there is that much to say about the chamber.  It seems quite natural to me to combine the two articles.  If it's really that fascinating of a room independently of having VS in it, then I'm okay with it having its own article.  I'd like to see it actually written, though, instead of just being a stub.  In its present state it is definitely not justifying its existence.  --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 04:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
::I... just have trouble believing there is that much to say about the chamber.  It seems quite natural to me to combine the two articles.  If it's really that fascinating of a room independently of having VS in it, then I'm okay with it having its own article.  I'd like to see it actually written, though, instead of just being a stub.  In its present state it is definitely not justifying its existence.  --[[User:Steve-o|Steve-o]] 04:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
:::It's something I can definitely write eventually, but I think, well, there's all sorts of stubs on the wiki that require attention more.  But if only this article needs more to justify its existence, I guess that makes it more important.  --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 04:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>
:::It's something I can definitely write eventually, but I think, well, there's all sorts of stubs on the wiki that require attention more.  But if only this article needs more to justify its existence, I guess that makes it more important.  --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 04:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
:If this article were to get merged, it seems more appropriate for it to be merged with [[Oracle (BM)]]. I mean, look at the Beat machines cartoon section, it even says it's called the oracle there, it seems like there the same thing.[[User:Transfan 1992|Transfan 1992]] ([[User talk:Transfan 1992|talk]]) 16:28, 7 August 2015 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 20:28, 7 August 2015

This article seems unnecessary to me. I recommend merging it -- what little of it is original content -- into Vector Sigma. --Steve-o 03:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

I think this could be a great article, once we put more information into it. Documentation of its design and function over the various series would be cool, and better served as its own entity, just as Primus and Cybertron are different articles. I disagree with the merge. --ItsWalky 03:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
As the creator of the article, and thus somewhat biased in a way, I would argue that Vector Sigma and the Chamber itself are two separate things and thus should be separate articles and if there are more content that could be added, it could be enough for its own article. Just my thought on it. --Darth Batrus 22:04, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
I... just have trouble believing there is that much to say about the chamber. It seems quite natural to me to combine the two articles. If it's really that fascinating of a room independently of having VS in it, then I'm okay with it having its own article. I'd like to see it actually written, though, instead of just being a stub. In its present state it is definitely not justifying its existence. --Steve-o 04:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
It's something I can definitely write eventually, but I think, well, there's all sorts of stubs on the wiki that require attention more. But if only this article needs more to justify its existence, I guess that makes it more important. --ItsWalky 04:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
If this article were to get merged, it seems more appropriate for it to be merged with Oracle (BM). I mean, look at the Beat machines cartoon section, it even says it's called the oracle there, it seems like there the same thing.Transfan 1992 (talk) 16:28, 7 August 2015 (EDT)