Talk:Collision Course: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "Since the subtitle may be auto generated, they should not count as errors (because there are too many to be listed)?--~~~~" |
Cyberlink420 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since the subtitle may be auto generated, they should not count as errors (because there are too many to be listed)?--[[User:Kmc|Kmc]] ([[User talk:Kmc|talk]]) 21:27, 19 June 2018 (EDT) | Since the subtitle may be auto generated, they should not count as errors (because there are too many to be listed)?--[[User:Kmc|Kmc]] ([[User talk:Kmc|talk]]) 21:27, 19 June 2018 (EDT) | ||
:I'm not sure they are auto-generated. There's several proper names like Grimlock and Megatronus that appear just fine in the captions multiple times, which I don't think an auto-caption would pick up on. Maybe they use an auto-generated caption as a base and refine it afterwards, but neglected to change several errors? -- [[User:Cyberlink420|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420|talk]]) 00:07, 20 June 2018 (EDT) | |||
::It's possible to set auto-captioning software to recognize unusual words like Grimlock and Megatron. But considering the amount of errors in even professional captions ("Chugway"), I don't think noting every single wrong thing is particularly useful here. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 00:32, 20 June 2018 (EDT) | |||
:::That's fair. I don't have a horse in this race, so I leave it to the other editors to decide whether captioning errors are worth keeping or continuing to add. -- [[User:Cyberlink420|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420|talk]]) 01:04, 20 June 2018 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:04, 20 June 2018
Since the subtitle may be auto generated, they should not count as errors (because there are too many to be listed)?--Kmc (talk) 21:27, 19 June 2018 (EDT)
- I'm not sure they are auto-generated. There's several proper names like Grimlock and Megatronus that appear just fine in the captions multiple times, which I don't think an auto-caption would pick up on. Maybe they use an auto-generated caption as a base and refine it afterwards, but neglected to change several errors? -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 00:07, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
- It's possible to set auto-captioning software to recognize unusual words like Grimlock and Megatron. But considering the amount of errors in even professional captions ("Chugway"), I don't think noting every single wrong thing is particularly useful here. Saix (talk) 00:32, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
- That's fair. I don't have a horse in this race, so I leave it to the other editors to decide whether captioning errors are worth keeping or continuing to add. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 01:04, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
- It's possible to set auto-captioning software to recognize unusual words like Grimlock and Megatron. But considering the amount of errors in even professional captions ("Chugway"), I don't think noting every single wrong thing is particularly useful here. Saix (talk) 00:32, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
