User talk:TGB: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Per the user page policy, you may not blank your talk page.
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
Please stop adding plot points you find to be illogical to the continuity error sections of episodes. They are not continuity errors nor do we need to deeply analyze the logic of a '80s cartoon for children. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 10:58, 23 November 2020 (EST)
Please stop adding plot points you find to be illogical to the continuity error sections of episodes. They are not continuity errors nor do we need to deeply analyze the logic of a '80s cartoon for children. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 10:58, 23 November 2020 (EST)
:Presumably you will be editing out all the other plot inconsistencies as well, which is pretty much all the continuity errors. Wouldn't want to be a hypocrite, amiright? {{unsigned|TGB}}
:Presumably you will be editing out all the other plot inconsistencies as well, which is pretty much all the continuity errors. Wouldn't want to be a hypocrite, amiright? {{unsigned|TGB}}
::Yes, they're bad too, but nobody has the time to go through 90+ episodes to remove bad notes from more than a decade ago. We don't need more, which is why I reverted your edits. Your overreaction is noted. [[User:Saix|Saix]] ([[User talk:Saix|talk]]) 06:23, 24 November 2020 (EST)
:::Discussions were made recently to go through and edit out a lot of continuity errors listed in the G1 cartoon episodes. The show was riddled with them from top to bottom and the list would become too extensive. IIRC we've decided the animation and colouring errors are going to be top priority for listed errors as cartoons are full of things like shattering forcefields and underwater fires which prove to be illogical in the real-world. But hey, isn't 80s sci-fi cartoon logic fun? [[User:Fanofcoolstuff27|Fanofcoolstuff27]] ([[User talk:Fanofcoolstuff27|talk]]) 06:54, 24 November 2020 (EST)

Latest revision as of 11:54, 24 November 2020

"Continuity errors"

[edit]

Please stop adding plot points you find to be illogical to the continuity error sections of episodes. They are not continuity errors nor do we need to deeply analyze the logic of a '80s cartoon for children. Saix (talk) 10:58, 23 November 2020 (EST)

Presumably you will be editing out all the other plot inconsistencies as well, which is pretty much all the continuity errors. Wouldn't want to be a hypocrite, amiright? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TGB (talkcontribs).
Yes, they're bad too, but nobody has the time to go through 90+ episodes to remove bad notes from more than a decade ago. We don't need more, which is why I reverted your edits. Your overreaction is noted. Saix (talk) 06:23, 24 November 2020 (EST)
Discussions were made recently to go through and edit out a lot of continuity errors listed in the G1 cartoon episodes. The show was riddled with them from top to bottom and the list would become too extensive. IIRC we've decided the animation and colouring errors are going to be top priority for listed errors as cartoons are full of things like shattering forcefields and underwater fires which prove to be illogical in the real-world. But hey, isn't 80s sci-fi cartoon logic fun? Fanofcoolstuff27 (talk) 06:54, 24 November 2020 (EST)