Talk:Terror-Tread: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
RolonBolon (talk | contribs) New page: Isn't it wiki policy that, when there's no fiction for a character, we just don't put in a Fiction section, instead of having an empty one? - ~~~~ |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Isn't it wiki policy that, when there's no fiction for a character, we just don't put in a Fiction section, instead of having an empty one? - [[User:RolonBolon|RolonBolon]] 02:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC) | Isn't it wiki policy that, when there's no fiction for a character, we just don't put in a Fiction section, instead of having an empty one? - [[User:RolonBolon|RolonBolon]] 02:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Correct. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 02:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
:: Wisdom received for future reference. On the other hand: | |||
:: a) Since I've never read the ''Micromasters'' miniseries, and my knowledge of the relevant era of the Marvel comic is slim, there's a difference between "None" and "None known (to the creator of this page)." | |||
:: b) Those characters which were genuinely toy-only should receive that category, but, again, I'm not qualified to make that call. | |||
:: c) I'm not entirely sure I agree with the policy, since the fact a character didn't appear in fiction is actually an ''interesting'' fact, and might deserve more than to be hinted at by absence of a header. | |||
:: That all said, if someone wants to replace the "None known"s with silence, it won't bother me none. [[User:JW|JW]] 11:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:15, 24 March 2009
Isn't it wiki policy that, when there's no fiction for a character, we just don't put in a Fiction section, instead of having an empty one? - RolonBolon 02:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Correct. --ItsWalky 02:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Wisdom received for future reference. On the other hand:
- a) Since I've never read the Micromasters miniseries, and my knowledge of the relevant era of the Marvel comic is slim, there's a difference between "None" and "None known (to the creator of this page)."
- b) Those characters which were genuinely toy-only should receive that category, but, again, I'm not qualified to make that call.
- c) I'm not entirely sure I agree with the policy, since the fact a character didn't appear in fiction is actually an interesting fact, and might deserve more than to be hinted at by absence of a header.
- That all said, if someone wants to replace the "None known"s with silence, it won't bother me none. JW 11:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
