Talk:Rack'n'Ruin (G1): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Interrobang (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m Grum moved page Talk:Rack'n'Ruin to Talk:Rack'n'Ruin (G1) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Which one is which?—[[User:TOM|TOM]] 19:26, 27 November 2010 (EST) | Which one is which?—[[User:TOM|TOM]] 19:26, 27 November 2010 (EST) | ||
:Jesus fuck can you please stop with the inane edits and talk pages. [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 19:37, 27 November 2010 (EST) | :Jesus fuck can you please stop with the inane edits and talk pages. [[User:Interrobang|—Interrobang]] 19:37, 27 November 2010 (EST) | ||
==Marvel continuity sections== | |||
Since neither section for the Marvel continuities have anything to do with each other, is there any point in lumping them together and attaching a disclaimer? [[User:Mimi|Mimi]] 17:51, 1 June 2013 (EDT) | |||
:Yes, because all the other pages have [[Marvel Comics continuity]] as the major header for both Marvel G1 (UK and/or US) and RG1 (also G2 and FP Classics), breaking convention for one page is just going to confuse and/or annoy people. - [[User:SanityOrMadness|SanityOrMadness]] 18:00, 1 June 2013 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:51, 28 October 2018
Which one is which?—TOM 19:26, 27 November 2010 (EST)
- Jesus fuck can you please stop with the inane edits and talk pages. —Interrobang 19:37, 27 November 2010 (EST)
Marvel continuity sections
[edit]Since neither section for the Marvel continuities have anything to do with each other, is there any point in lumping them together and attaching a disclaimer? Mimi 17:51, 1 June 2013 (EDT)
- Yes, because all the other pages have Marvel Comics continuity as the major header for both Marvel G1 (UK and/or US) and RG1 (also G2 and FP Classics), breaking convention for one page is just going to confuse and/or annoy people. - SanityOrMadness 18:00, 1 June 2013 (EDT)
