Talk:Jigu: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should the "Ji" be hiragana like that? Also, would it be more appropriate to romanize it as Jik/Zhik?[[Special:Contributions/192.249.47.177|192.249.47.177]] 14:12, 1 October 2012 (EDT) | Should the "Ji" be hiragana like that? Also, would it be more appropriate to romanize it as Jik/Zhik?[[Special:Contributions/192.249.47.177|192.249.47.177]] 14:12, 1 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
:O crap. That's what you get for not having native kana support, forcing a cumbersome copy-paste tactic. Fixed. And じ/ジ is almost always transliterated as "ji", as per modern preferences. And unless there's an | :O crap. That's what you get for not having native kana support, forcing a cumbersome copy-paste tactic. Fixed. And じ/ジ is almost always transliterated as "ji", as per modern preferences. And I usually prefer retaining the near-silent "u", unless there's an English word with the same Japanese spelling and the pun is intentional. [[User:JelZe GoldRabbit|JelZe GoldRabbit]] 14:26, 1 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:55, 26 November 2012
Should the "Ji" be hiragana like that? Also, would it be more appropriate to romanize it as Jik/Zhik?192.249.47.177 14:12, 1 October 2012 (EDT)
- O crap. That's what you get for not having native kana support, forcing a cumbersome copy-paste tactic. Fixed. And じ/ジ is almost always transliterated as "ji", as per modern preferences. And I usually prefer retaining the near-silent "u", unless there's an English word with the same Japanese spelling and the pun is intentional. JelZe GoldRabbit 14:26, 1 October 2012 (EDT)
