Talk:Natural Selection, Part Five: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "Based on the arrangement of the Japanese, I think the code is supposed to be writing out the years 1984 (juukyuu + hachijuushi) and 2014 (nijuu + juuyon), the latter of which wou…" |
m moved Talk:Natural Selection, Part 5 to Talk:Natural Selection, Part Five: Actual name. |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Based on the arrangement of the Japanese, I think the code is supposed to be writing out the years 1984 (juukyuu + hachijuushi) and 2014 (nijuu + juuyon), the latter of which would mark the 30th anniversary of the Transformers brand. Does this seem likely? [[User:EHeroFlareNeos|EHeroFlareNeos]] 11:27, 14 April 2013 (EDT) | Based on the arrangement of the Japanese, I think the code is supposed to be writing out the years 1984 (juukyuu + hachijuushi) and 2014 (nijuu + juuyon), the latter of which would mark the 30th anniversary of the Transformers brand. Does this seem likely? [[User:EHeroFlareNeos|EHeroFlareNeos]] 11:27, 14 April 2013 (EDT) | ||
:That sounds correct. Basically, they're pronouncing it as the Japanese equivalent of "Nineteen Eighty-four" rather than "One thousand, nine hundred eighty-four". It's kind of weird that they split up the 19 and 14, and put the x10 with the four instead of eight, though. Still, the intent is clear.[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] 13:44, 17 April 2013 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:37, 21 August 2013
Based on the arrangement of the Japanese, I think the code is supposed to be writing out the years 1984 (juukyuu + hachijuushi) and 2014 (nijuu + juuyon), the latter of which would mark the 30th anniversary of the Transformers brand. Does this seem likely? EHeroFlareNeos 11:27, 14 April 2013 (EDT)
- That sounds correct. Basically, they're pronouncing it as the Japanese equivalent of "Nineteen Eighty-four" rather than "One thousand, nine hundred eighty-four". It's kind of weird that they split up the 19 and 14, and put the x10 with the four instead of eight, though. Still, the intent is clear.KrytenKoro 13:44, 17 April 2013 (EDT)
