Talk:Galvatron (G1)/2005 IDW continuity: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Mimi (talk | contribs)
"The D-Void"
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


SanityOrMadness, can you please actually explain why you're removing the article? Especially when it's the most recent form of its name and the one used in the actual article for the [[D-Void]]? [[User:Mimi|Mimi]] 22:21, 12 May 2013 (EDT)
SanityOrMadness, can you please actually explain why you're removing the article? Especially when it's the most recent form of its name and the one used in the actual article for the [[D-Void]]? [[User:Mimi|Mimi]] 22:21, 12 May 2013 (EDT)
:And I see you've went and pointlessly changed the D-Void's page after I pointed it out. Really, now? [[User:Mimi|Mimi]] 22:26, 12 May 2013 (EDT)
::Because "Original" gets priority over "most recent". Hence [[Overhaul (Cybertron)]] not Leobreaker, the mainpics in most articles, etc. [[D-Void]] was in error, so I changed it.
::PS: Could you get more patronising? [I doubt it.] - [[User:SanityOrMadness|SanityOrMadness]] 23:31, 12 May 2013 (EDT)
:::I don't think that rule was created for variant grammatical phrasings. Seems to me that D-Void sans article was the error to start with and the wiki used the other style till you decided otherwise.
:::PS: Then don't be patronizing yourself. [[User:Mimi|Mimi]] 00:09, 13 May 2013 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 17:09, 5 April 2019

"The D-Void"

[edit]

SanityOrMadness, can you please actually explain why you're removing the article? Especially when it's the most recent form of its name and the one used in the actual article for the D-Void? Mimi 22:21, 12 May 2013 (EDT)

And I see you've went and pointlessly changed the D-Void's page after I pointed it out. Really, now? Mimi 22:26, 12 May 2013 (EDT)
Because "Original" gets priority over "most recent". Hence Overhaul (Cybertron) not Leobreaker, the mainpics in most articles, etc. D-Void was in error, so I changed it.
PS: Could you get more patronising? [I doubt it.] - SanityOrMadness 23:31, 12 May 2013 (EDT)
I don't think that rule was created for variant grammatical phrasings. Seems to me that D-Void sans article was the error to start with and the wiki used the other style till you decided otherwise.
PS: Then don't be patronizing yourself. Mimi 00:09, 13 May 2013 (EDT)